Neighbourhood reputations, moving behaviour and neighbourhood dynamics

Understanding Neighbourhood Dynamics: New Insights for Neighbourhood Effects Research

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 161-182

  Permentier, Matthieu ^a  

^a The Netherlands Institute for Social Research/SCP   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84935093405     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4854-5_8     Document Type: Chapter

References (68)

1. Aalbers, M. (2005). Who?s afraid of red, yellow and green? Redlining in Rotterdam. Geoforum, 36 (5), 562-580.
2. Aalbers, M. (2012). How do mortgage lenders in fluence neighbourhood dynamics? Redlining and predatory lending. In M. van Ham, D. Manley, N. Bailey, L. Simpson, & D. Maclennan (Eds.), Understanding neighbourhood dynamics: New insights for neighbourhood effects research (pp. xx-xx). Dordrecht: Springer.
3. AD. (2008). Hotspots. Zichtbaar verbeterde wijken, maar zien potentiële bewoners dat?-Imago zit probleembuurten nog flink dwars [Hotspots. Neighbourhoods visibly improved, but do potential residents see that? Reputation still bothers problem neighbourhoods]. AD, January 17, 2008.
4. Airey, L. (2003). ?Nae as nice as scheme as it used to be?: Lay accounts of neighbourhood incivilities and well-being. Health & Place, 9 (2), 129-137.
5. Arthurson, K. (2001). Achieving social justice in estate regeneration: The impact of physical image construction. Housing Studies, 16 (6), 807-826.
6. Bauder, H. (2001). You?re good with your hands, why don?t you become an auto mechanic?: Neighborhood context, institutions and career development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25 (3), 593-608.
7. Bauder, H. (2002). Neighbourhood effects and cultural exclusion. Urban Studies, 39 (1), 85-93.
8. Blokland, T. (2003). Urban bonds. Social relationships in an inner city neighbourhood. Cambridge: Polity Press.
9. Bolt, G., van Ham, M., & van Kempen, R. (2006). Allochtonen op de woningmarkt. ruimtelijke Segregatie en verhuisdynamiek [Immigrants on the housing market. Spatial segregation and migration dynamics]. In F. van Tubergen & I. Maas (Eds.), Allochtonen in Nederland in international perspectief [Immigrants in the Netherlands from an international perspective]. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
10. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
11. Bush, J., Moffatt, S., & Dunn, C. (2001). ?Even the birds round here cough?: Stigma, air pollution and health in Teesside. Health & Place, 7 (1), 47-56.
12. Clark, W. A. V. (1991). Residential preferences and neighborhood racial segregation: A test of the Schelling segregation model. Demography, 28 (1), 1-19.
13. Clark, W. A. V. (1992). Residential preferences and residential choices in a multiethnic context. Demography, 29 (3), 451-466.
14. Clark, W. A. V., & Ledwith, V. (2006). Mobility, housing stress, and neighborhood contexts: Evidence from Los Angeles. Environment and Planning A, 38 (6), 1077-1093.
15. Coleman, R. P., & Neugarten, B. L. (1972). Social status in the city. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16. Congalton, A. A. (1969). Status and prestige in Australia. Melbourne: Cheshire.
17. De Jong, G. F., & Fawcett, J. (1981). Motivations for migration: An assessment and value-expectancy research model. In G. F. De Jong & R. W. Gardner (Eds.), Migration decision making: Multidisciplinary approaches to microlevel studies in developed and developing countries. New York: Pergamon Press.
18. Dean, J., & Hastings, A. (2000). Challenging images. Housing estates, stigma and regeneration. Bristol: The Policy Press and Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
19. Dietz, R. (2002). The estimation of neighbourhood effects in the social sciences. An interdisciplinary approach. Social Science Research, 31 (4), 539-575.
20. Ellen, I. G., & Turner, M. A. (1997). Does neighbourhood matter? Assessing recent evidence. Housing Policy Debate, 8 (4), 833-866.
21. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7 (2), 117-140.
22. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
23. Firey, W. (1945). Sentiment and symbolism as ecological variables. American Sociological Review, 10 (2), 140-148.
24. Forrest, R., & Kearns, A. (2001). Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38 (12), 2125-2143.
25. Friedrichs, J. (1998). Do poor neighborhoods make their residents poorer? In H. Andress (Ed.), Empirical poverty research in a comparative perspective. Hants: Ashgate.
26. Galster, G. (2003). Investigating behavioural impacts of poor neighbourhoods: Towards new data and analytical strategies. Housing Studies, 18 (6), 893-914.
27. Galster, G. (2005). Neighborhood mix, social opportunities, and the policy challenges of an increasingly diverse Amsterdam. Amsterdam: AMIDSt.
28. Galster, G. (2007). Should policy makers strive for neighborhood social mix? An analysis of the Western European evidence base. Housing Studies, 22 (4), 523-545.
29. Galster, G. (2011). The mechanism(s) of neighbourhood effects. Theory, evidence, and policy implications. In M. van Ham et al. (Eds.), Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
30. Galster, G., & Godfrey, E. (2005). By words and deeds: Racial steering by real estate agents in the U.S. in 2000. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71 (3), 251-268.
31. GBA City of Utrecht. 2006). Buurtmonitor. Available at http://utrecht.buurtmonitor.nl/. Accessed February 20, 2006.
32. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Prentice Hall.
33. Harvey, R. D. (2001). Individual differences in the phenomenological impact of social stigma. Journal of Social Psychology, 141 (2), 174-189.
34. Hastings, A., & Dean, J. (2003). Challenging images: Tackling stigma through estate regeneration. Policy & Politics, 31 (2), 171-184.
35. Hortulanus, R. P. (1995). Stadsbuurten-bewoners en beheerders in buurten met uiteenlopende reputaties [Urban neighbourhoods-residents and managers in neighbourhoods with diverging reputations]. Den Haag: VUGA.
36. Kearns, A., & Parkinson, M. (2001). The signi fi cance of neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38 (12), 2103-2110.
37. Kearns, A., Hiscock, R., Ellaway, A., & Macintyre, S. (2000). ?Beyond four walls?, The psychosocial bene fi ts of home: Evidence from West Central Scotland. Housing Studies, 15 (3), 387-410.
38. Lee, B. A., Oropesa, R. S., & Kanan, J. W. (1994). Neighborhood context and residential mobility. Demography, 31 (2), 249-270.
39. Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighbourhoods they live in: The effects of neighbourhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126 (2), 309-337.
40. Lu, M. (1998). Analyzing migration decisionmaking: Relationships between residential satisfaction, mobility intentions, and moving behavior. Environment and Planning A, 30 (8), 1473-1495.
41. Mead, G. H. (1934 [1967]). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
42. Meen, G. (2012). The causes of long-Term urban and neighbourhood change. In M. van Ham, D. Manley, N. Bailey, L. Simpson, & D. Maclennan (Eds.), Understanding neighbourhood dynamics: New insights for neighbourhood effects research. Dordrecht: Springer.
43. Murie, A., Knorr-Siedow, T., & Van Kempen, R. (2003). Large estates in Europe. General developments and theoretical backgrounds. Restate report 1. Restructuring large-scale housing estates in European cities: Good practices and new visions for sustainable neighbourhoods and estates. Utrecht: URU.
44. O+S Amsterdam. (2006). Amsterdam in cijfers. Available at http://www.os.amsterdam.nl/feitenencijfers/amsterdamincijfers2006. Accessed March 30, 2006
45. Permentier, M. (2009). Reputation, neighbourhoods and behaviour. Utrecht: KNAG/Faculteit Geowetenschappen.
46. Permentier, M., van Ham, M., & Bolt, G. (2009). Neighbourhood reputation and the intention to leave the neighbourhood. Environment and Planning A, 41 (9), 2162-2180.
47. Permentier, M., Bolt, G., & Van Ham, M. (2011). Determinants of neighbourhood satisfaction and perceived neighbourhood reputation. Urban Studies, 48 (5), 977-996.
48. Ridgeway, C. L. (2006). Status construction theory. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
49. Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing ?neighborhood effects?: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28 , 443-478.
50. Schelling, T. (1969). Models of segregation. The American Economic Review, 59 (2), 488-493.
51. Schelling, T. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Society, 1 (2), 143-186.
52. Semyonov, M., & Kraus, V. (1982). The social hierarchies of communities and neighborhoods. Social Science Quarterly, 63 (4), 780-789.
53. Speare, A. (1974). Residential satisfaction as an intervening variable in residential mobility. Demography, 11 (2), 173-188.
54. Suttles, G. D. (1968). The social order of the slum. Ethnicity and territory in the inner city. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
55. Suttles, G. D. (1972). The social construction of communities. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
56. Taylor, M. (1998). Combating the social exclusion of housing estates. Housing Studies, 13 (6), 819-832.
57. Trouw. (2007). Slecht imago blijft de wijk achtervolgen [Bad reputation haunts a neighbourhood], Trouw, July 30, 2007.
58. Tsfati, Y., & Cohen, J. (2003). On the effect of the ?third-person effect?: Perceived in fluence of media coverage and residential mobility intentions. Journal of Communication, 53 (4), 711-727.
59. Van Ham, M., & Feijten, P. (2008). Who wants to leave the neighbourhood? The effects of being different from the neighbourhood population on wishes to move. Environment and Planning A, 40 (5), 1151-1170.
60. Van Ham, M., & Manley, D. (2010). The effect of neighbourhood housing tenure mix on labour market outcomes: A longitudinal investigation of neighbourhood effects. Journal of Economic Geography, 10 (2), 257-282.
61. Van Ham, M., Manley, D., Bailey, N., Simpson, L., & Maclennan, D. (Eds.). (2011). Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
62. Wacquant, L. J. D. (1993). Urban outcasts: Stigma and division in the black American ghetto and the French periphery. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 17 (3), 366-383.
63. Wake fi eld, S., & McMullan, C. (2005). Healing in places of decline: (Re)imaging everyday landscapes in Hamilton, Ontario. Health & Place, 11 (4), 299-312.
64. Warner, W. L. (1960). Social class in America: A manual of procedure for the measurement of social status. New York: Harper & Row.
65. Wellman, B. (1996). Are personal communities local? A Dumptarian reconsideration. Social Networks, 18 , 347-540.
66. White, M. (1987). American neighbourhoods and residential differentiation. New York: Sage Foundation.
67. Wilson, W. J. (1996). When work disappears. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
68. Wyly, E. K. (2002). Mortgaged metropolis: Evolving urban geographies of residential lending. Urban Geography 23 1 3-30.