Early T2 changes predict onset of radiographic knee osteoarthritis: Data from the osteoarthritis initiative

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Volumn 74, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 1353-1359

  Liebl, Hans ^a   Joseph, Gabby ^b   Nevitt, Michael C ^c   Singh, Nathan ^b   Heilmeier, Ursula ^b   Subburaj, Karupppasamy ^b   Jungmann, Pia M ^b   McCulloch, Charles E ^c   Lynch, John A ^c   Lane, Nancy E ^d   Link, Thomas M ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; AGE; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CAUCASIAN; CONTRAST; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; ENTROPY; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; FEMUR; GENDER; GREY LEVEL COOCCURENCE MATRIX TEXTURE ANALYSIS; HUMAN; KELLGREN LAWRENCE GRADE; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATELLA; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RACE DIFFERENCE; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; T2 RELAXATION TIME; VARIANCE; AGED; CARTILAGE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EVALUATION STUDY; INCIDENCE; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; TIBIA;

ADULT; AGED; CARTILAGE; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PATELLA; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHY; TIBIA;

EID: 84934913093     PISSN: 00034967     EISSN: 14682060     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204157     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Sharma L, Kapoor D, Issa S. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: an update. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2006;18:147-56.
2. Peterfy CG. Imaging of the disease process. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2002;14:590-6.
3. Amin S, LaValley MP, Guermazi A, et al. The relationship between cartilage loss on magnetic resonance imaging and radiographic progression in men and women with knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:3152-9.
4. Mosher TJ, Dardzinski BJ. Cartilage MRI T2 relaxation time mapping: overview and applications. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2004;8:355-68.
5. Nishioka H, Hirose J, Nakamura E, et al. T1rho and T2 mapping reveal the in vivo extracellular matrix of articular cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;35:147-55.
6. Li X, Cheng J, Lin K, et al. Quantitative MRI using T1rho and T2 in human osteoarthritic cartilage specimens: correlation with biochemical measurements and histology. Magn Reson Imaging 2011;29:324-34.
7. Marik W, Apprich S, Welsch GH, et al. Biochemical evaluation of articular cartilage in patients with osteochondrosis dissecans by means of quantitative T2- and T2-mapping at 3 T MRI: a feasibility study. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:923-7.
8. Stehling C, Liebl H, Krug R, et al. Patellar cartilage: T2 values and morphologic abnormalities at 3.0-T MR imaging in relation to physical activity in asymptomatic subjects from the osteoarthritis initiative. Radiology 2010;254:509-20.
9. Marik W, Apprich S, Welsch GH, et al. Biochemical evaluation of articular cartilage in patients with osteochondrosis dissecans by means of quantitative T2- and T2∗-mapping at 3 T MRI: a feasibility study. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:923-7.
10. Joseph GB, Baum T, Carballido-Gamio J, et al. Texture analysis of cartilage T2 maps: individuals with risk factors for OA have higher and more heterogeneous knee cartilage MR T2 compared to normal controls - data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Arthritis Res Ther 2011;13:R153.
11. Stahl R, Luke A, Li X, et al. T1rho, T2 and focal knee cartilage abnormalities in physically active and sedentary healthy subjects versus early OA patients - a 3.0-Tesla MRI study. Eur Radiol 2009;19:132-43.
12. Friedrich KM, Shepard T, de Oliveira VS, et al. T2 measurements of cartilage in osteoarthritis patients with meniscal tears. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:W411-15.
13. Prasad AP, Nardo L, Schooler J, et al. T(1rho) and T(2) relaxation times predict progression of knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013;21:69-76.
14. Urish KL, Keffalas MG, Durkin JR, et al. T2 texture index of cartilage can predict early symptomatic OA progression: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013;21:1550-7.
15. Peterfy CG, Schneider E, Nevitt M. The osteoarthritis initiative: report on the design rationale for the magnetic resonance imaging protocol for the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008;16:1433-41.
16. Peterfy C, Li J, Zaim S, et al. Comparison of fixed-flexion positioning with fluoroscopic semi-flexed positioning for quantifying radiographic joint-space width in the knee: test-retest reproducibility. Skeletal Radiol 2003;32:128-32.
17. Felson DT, Nevitt MC, Yang M, et al. A new approach yields high rates of radiographic progression in knee osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 2008;35:2047-54.
18. Felson DT, Niu J, Guermazi A, et al. Defining radiographic incidence and progression of knee osteoarthritis: suggested modifications of the Kellgren and Lawrence scale. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:1884-6.
19. Smith HE, Mosher TJ, Dardzinski BJ, et al. Spatial variation in cartilage T2 of the knee. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:50-5.
20. Maier CF, Tan SG, Hariharan H, et al. T2 quantitation of articular cartilage at 1.5 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;17:358-64.
21. Raya JG, Dietrich O, Horng A, et al. T2 measurement in articular cartilage: impact of the fitting method on accuracy and precision at low SNR. Magn Reson Med 2010;63:181-93.
22. Carballido-Gamio J, Blumenkrantz G, Lynch JA, et al. Longitudinal analysis of MRI T (2) knee cartilage laminar organization in a subset of patients from the osteoarthritis initiative. Magn Reson Med 2010;63:465-72.
23. Haralick R. Statistical and structured approaches to texture. Proceedings of the IEEE 1979;61:786-803.
24. Haralick R, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1973;SMC-1:610-8.
25. Carballido-Gamio J, Joseph GB, Lynch JA, et al. Longitudinal analysis of MRI T2 knee cartilage laminar organization in a subset of patients from the osteoarthritis initiative: a texture approach. Magn Reson Med 2011;65:1184-94.
26. Blumenkrantz G, Stahl R, Carballido-Gamio J, et al. The feasibility of characterizing the spatial distribution of cartilage T(2) using texture analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008;16:584-90.
27. Carballido-Gamio J, Joseph GB, Lynch JA, et al. Longitudinal analysis of MRI T(2) knee cartilage laminar organization in a subset of patients from the osteoarthritis initiative: a texture approach. Magn Reson Med 2011;65:1184-94.
28. Stehling C, Baum T, Mueller-Hoecker C, et al. A novel fast knee cartilage segmentation technique for T2 measurements at MR imaging - data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011;19:984-9.
29. Washburn RA, Smith KW, Jette AM, et al. The Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): development and evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46:153-62.
30. Jobke B, Bolbos R, Saadat E, et al. Mechanism of disease in early osteoarthritis: application of modern MR imaging techniques - a technical report. Magn Reson Imaging 2013:31:156-61.
31. Bolbos RI, Ma CB, Link TM, et al. In vivo T1rho quantitative assessment of knee cartilage after anterior cruciate ligament injury using 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 2008;43:782-8.
32. Apprich S, Welsch GH, Mamisch TC, et al. Detection of degenerative cartilage disease: comparison of high-resolution morphological MR and quantitative T2 mapping at 3.0 Tesla. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010;18:1211-17.
33. Dunn TC, Lu Y, Jin H, et al. T2 relaxation time of cartilage at MR imaging: comparison with severity of knee osteoarthritis. Radiology 2004;232:592-8.
34. Shiomi T, Nishii T, Myoui A, et al. Influence of knee positions on T2, T∗2, and dGEMRIC mapping in porcine knee cartilage. Magn Reson Med 2010;64:707-14.
35. Wei ZM, Du XK, Huo TL, et al. Quantitative T2 mapping evaluation for articular cartilage lesions in a rabbit model of anterior cruciate ligament transection osteoarthritis. Chin Med J (Engl) 2012;125:843-50.
36. Fragonas E, Mlynarik V, Jellus V, et al. Correlation between biochemical composition and magnetic resonance appearance of articular cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1998;6:24-32.
37. Reiter DA, Irrechukwu O, Lin PC, et al. Improved MR-based characterization of engineered cartilage using multiexponential T2 relaxation and multivariate analysis. NMR Biomed 2012;25:476-88.
38. Regatte RR, Akella SV, Lonner JH, et al. T1rho relaxation mapping in human osteoarthritis (OA) cartilage: comparison of T1rho with T2. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;23:547-53.
39. Stehling C, Luke A, Stahl R, et al. Meniscal T1rho and T2 measured with 3.0 T MRI increases directly after running a marathon. Skeletal Radiol 2011;40:725-35.
40. Joseph GB, Baum T, Carballido-Gamio J, et al. Texture analysis of cartilage T2 maps: individuals with risk factors for OA have higher and more heterogeneous knee cartilage MR T2 compared to normal controls - data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Arthritis Res Ther 2011;13:R153.
41. Baum T, Joseph GB, Arulanandan A, et al. Association of magnetic resonance imaging-based knee cartilage T2 measurements and focal knee lesions with knee pain: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012;64:248-55.
42. Eckstein F, Burstein D, Link TM. Quantitative MRI of cartilage and bone: degenerative changes in osteoarthritis. NMR Biomed 2006;19:822-54.
43. Kinds MB, Marijnissen AC, Bijlsma JW, et al. Quantitative radiographic features of early knee osteoarthritis: development over 5 years and relationship with symptoms in the CHECK cohort. J Rheumatol 2013;40:58-65.
44. Leyland KM, Hart DJ, Javaid MK, et al. The natural history of radiographic knee osteoarthritis: a fourteen-year population-based cohort study. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:2243-51.
45. Bining HJ, Santos R, Andrews G, et al. Can T2 relaxation values and color maps be used to detect chondral damage utilizing subchondral bone marrow edema as a marker? Skeletal Radiol 2009;38:459-65.
46. Li X, Pai A, Blumenkrantz G, et al. Spatial distribution and relationship of T1rho and T2 relaxation times in knee cartilage with osteoarthritis. Magn Reson Med 2009;61:1310-8.
47. Joseph GB, Baum T, Alizai H, et al. Baseline mean and heterogeneity of MR cartilage T(2) are associated with morphologic degeneration of cartilage, meniscus, and bone marrow over 3 years - data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2012;20:727-35.
48. Eckstein F, Le Graverand MP, Charles HC, et al. Clinical, radiographic, molecular and MRI-based predictors of cartilage loss in knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:1223-30.
49. Kumahashi N, Tadenuma T, Kuwata S, et al. A longitudinal study of the quantitative evaluation of patella cartilage after total knee replacement by delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and T2 mapping at 3.0 T: preliminary results. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013;21:126-35.
50. Hawezi ZK, Lammentausta E, Svensson J, et al. In vivo transport of Gd-DTPA(2-) in human knee cartilage assessed by depth-wise dGEMRIC analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;34:1352-8.
51. Buchbender C, Scherer A, Kropil P, et al. Cartilage quality in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of T2∗mapping, native T1 mapping, dGEMRIC, DeltaR1 and value of pre-contrast imaging. Skeletal Radiol 2012;41:685-92.
52. Crossley KM, Hinman RS. The patellofemoral joint: the forgotten joint in knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011;19:765-7.
53. Seedholm BB, Takeda T, Tsubuku M, et al. Mechanical factors and patellofemoral osteoarthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1979;38:307-16.
54. Duncan R, Peat G, Thomas E, et al. Does isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis matter? Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009;17:1151-5.
55. Duncan R, Peat G, Thomas E, et al. Incidence, progression and sequence of development of radiographic knee osteoarthritis in a symptomatic population. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:1944-8.
56. Pollard TC, Gwilym SE, Carr AJ. The assessment of early osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008;90:411-21.
57. Guilak F, Ratcliffe A, Lane N, et al. Mechanical and biochemical changes in the superficial zone of articular cartilage in canine experimental osteoarthritis. J Orthop Res 1994;12:474-84.
58. Nieminen MT, Toyras J, Rieppo J, et al. Quantitative MR microscopy of enzymatically degraded articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:676-81.
59. Xia Y, Moody JB, Burton-Wurster N, et al. Quantitative in situ correlation between microscopic MRI and polarized light microscopy studies of articular cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001;9:393-406.
60. Mosher TJ, Dardzinski BJ, Smith MB. Human articular cartilage: influence of aging and early symptomatic degeneration on the spatial variation of T2 - preliminary findings at 3 T. Radiology 2000;214:259-66.