Whole genome amplification with SurePlex results in better copy number alteration detection using sequencing data compared to the MALBAC method

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Deleye, Lieselot ^a   De Coninck, Dieter ^a   Christodoulou, Christodoulos ^b   Sante, Tom ^b   Dheedene, Annelies ^b   Heindryckx, Björn ^b   Van Den Abbeel, Etienne ^b   De Sutter, Petra ^b   Menten, Björn ^b   Deforce, Dieter ^a   Van Nieuwerburgh, Filip ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL LINE; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; DNA SEQUENCE; FEMALE; GENE DOSAGE; GENE LIBRARY; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HUMAN; HUMAN CHROMOSOME; HUMAN GENOME; NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS;

CELL LINE; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; DNA COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS; FEMALE; GENE DOSAGE; GENE LIBRARY; GENOME, HUMAN; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TECHNIQUES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84934775012     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep11711     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Fedick, A., Su, J., Jalas, C. & Treff, N. R. High-throughput real-time PCR-based genotyping without DNA purification. BMC research notes 5, 573, doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-573 (2012).
2. Fiorentino, F. et al. Development and validation of a next-generation sequencing-based protocol for 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening of embryos. Fertility and sterility 101, 1375-1382, doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.051 (2014).
3. Treff, N. R., Su, J., Tao, X., Levy, B. & Scott, R. T., Jr. Accurate single cell 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening using whole genome amplification and single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays. Fertility and sterility 94, 2017-2021, doi: 10.1016/j. fertnstert.2010.01.052 (2010).
4. Wells, D. et al. Clinical utilisation of a rapid low-pass whole genome sequencing technique for the diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos prior to implantation. Journal of medical genetics 51, 553-562, doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2014-102497 (2014).
5. Van Loo, P. & Voet, T. Single cell analysis of cancer genomes. Current opinion in genetics & development 24, 82-91, doi: 10.1016/j. gde.2013.12.004 (2014).
6. Fiegler, H. et al. DNA microarrays for comparative genomic hybridization based on DOP-PCR amplification of BAC and PAC clones. Genes, chromosomes & cancer 36, 361-374, doi: 10.1002/gcc.10155 (2003).
7. Sermon, K., Lissens, W., Joris, H., Van Steirteghem, A. & Liebaers, I. Adaptation of the primer extension preamplification (PEP) reaction for preimplantation diagnosis: single blastomere analysis using short PEP protocols. Molecular human reproduction 2, 209-212 (1996).
8. Zhang, L. et al. Whole genome amplification from a single cell: implications for genetic analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 89, 5847-5851 (1992).
9. Spits, C. & Sermon, K. PGD for monogenic disorders: aspects of molecular biology. Prenatal diagnosis 29, 50-56, doi: 10.1002/ pd.2161 (2009).
10. Ning, L. Quantitative comparison of single-cell sequencing methods using hippocampal neurons biorxiv, doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1101/004366 (2014).
11. de Bourcy, C. F. et al. A quantitative comparison of single-cell whole genome amplification methods. PloS one 9, e105585, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105585 (2014).
12. Miller, C. A., Hampton, O., Coarfa, C. & Milosavljevic, A. ReadDepth: a parallel R package for detecting copy number alterations from short sequencing reads. PloS one 6, e16327, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016327 (2011).
13. Ben-Bassat, H., Shlomai, Z., Kohn, G. & Prokocimer, M. Establishment of a human T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell line with a (16;20) chromosome translocation. Cancer genetics and cytogenetics 49, 241-248 (1990).
14. Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078-2079, doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/ btp352 (2009).
15. Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841-842, doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 (2010).
16. Duan, J., Zhang, J. G., Deng, H. W. & Wang, Y. P. Comparative studies of copy number alteration detection methods for nextgeneration sequencing technologies. PloS one 8, e59128, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059128 (2013).
17. Talseth-Palmer, B. A., Bowden, N. A., Hill, A., Meldrum, C. & Scott, R. J. Whole genome amplification and its impact on CGH array profiles. BMC research notes 1, 56, doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-1-56 (2008).
18. Leo, A. et al. A GC-wave correction algorithm that improves the analytical performance of aCGH. The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD 14, 550-559, doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2012.06.002 (2012).
19. Dimitriadou, E., Van der Aa, N., Cheng, J., Voet, T. & Vermeesch, J. R. Single cell segmental aneuploidy detection is compromised by S phase. Molecular cytogenetics 7, 46, doi: 10.1186/1755-8166-7-46 (2014).
20. Baslan, T. et al. Genome-wide copy number analysis of single cells. Nature protocols 7, 1024-1041, doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.039 (2012).
21. Scheinin, I. et al. DNA copy number analysis of fresh and formalin-fixed specimens by shallow whole-genome sequencing with identification and exclusion of problematic regions in the genome assembly. Genome research 24, 2022-2032, doi: 10.1101/ gr.175141.114 (2014).