Three-dimensional reconstruction and its precision evaluation of plant architecture based on multiple view stereo method

Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering

Volumn 31, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 209-214

  Hu, Pengcheng ^a   Guo, Yan ^a   Li, Baoguo ^a   Zhu, Jinyu ^b   Ma, Yuntao ^a  

^a CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF PLANT PROTECTION   (China)

Author keywords

Image reconstruction; Image sequence; Multiple view; Plant phenotyping; Stereo vision; Three dimensional

Indexed keywords

GEOMETRY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; ITERATIVE METHODS; LASER APPLICATIONS; PILOT PLANTS; SCANNING; STEREO VISION; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

IMAGE SEQUENCE; ITERATIVE CLOSEST POINT ALGORITHM; LASER SCANNING POINT CLOUDS; MULTIPLE VIEWS; PLANT PHENOTYPING; SURFACE RECONSTRUCTION ALGORITHMS; THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3-D) RECONSTRUCTION; THREE-DIMENSIONAL RECONSTRUCTION;

STEREO IMAGE PROCESSING;

EID: 84934768135     PISSN: 10026819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.11.030     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Falster D S, Westoby M. Leaf size and angle vary widely across species: What consequences for light interception?[J]. New Phytologist, 2003, 158(3): 509-525.
2. Sarlikioti V, de Visser P H B, Buck-Sorlin G H, et al. How plant architecture affects light absorption and photosynthesis in tomato: Towards an ideotype for plant architecture using a functional-structural plant model[J]. Annals of Botany, 2011, 108(6): 1065-1073.
3. Vos J, Evers J B, Buck-Sorlin G H, et al. Functional-structural plant modelling: A new versatile tool in crop science[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2010, 61(8): 2101-2115.
4. Yang Wengneng, Guo Zilong, Huang Chenglong, et al. Combining high-throughput phenotyping and genome-wide association studies to reveal natural genetic variation in rice[J]. Nature Communications, 2014, 11(5): 1-9.
5. Fahlgren N, Gehan M A, Baxter I. Lights, camera, action: High-throughput plant phenotyping is ready for a close-up[J]. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2015, 24(4): 93-99.
6. Lang A R G. Leaf orientation of a cotton plant[J]. Agricultural Meteorology, 1973, 11(4): 37-51.
7. Sinoquet H, Moulia B, Bonhomme R. Estimating the three-dimensional geometry of a maize crop as an input of radiation models: Comparison between three-dimensional digitizing and plant profiles[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1991, 55(3/4): 233-249.
8. Kaminuma E, Heida N, Tsumoto Y, et al. Automatic quantification of morphological traits via three-dimensional measurement of Arabidopsis[J]. The Plant Journal, 2004, 38(2): 358-365.
9. Dornbusch T, Wernecke P, Diepenbrock W. A method to extract morphological traits of plant organs from 3D point clouds as a database for an architectural plant model[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2007, 200(1/2): 119-129.
10. Omasa K, Hosoi F, Konishi A. 3D lidar imaging for detecting and understanding plant responses and canopy structure[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2007, 58(4): 881-898.
11. Paulus S, Schumann H, Kuhlmann H, et al. High-precision laser scanning system for capturing 3D plant architecture and analysing growth of cereal plants[J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2014, 121(5): 1-11.
12. Chéné Y, Rousseau D, Lucidarme P, et al. On the use of depth camera for 3D phenotyping of entire plants[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2012, 82(3): 122-127.
13. Alenya G, Dellen B, Foix S, et al. Robotized plant probing: Leaf segmentation utilizing time-of-flight data[J]. IEEE Robotics Automation Magazine, 2013, 20(3): 50-59.
14. Ivanov N, Boissard P, Chapron M, et al. Computer stereo plotting for 3-D reconstruction of a maize canopy[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1995, 75(1/2/3): 85-102.
15. Biskup B, Scharr H, Schurr U, et al. A stereo imaging system for measuring structural parameters of plant canopies[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2007, 30(10): 1299-1308.
16. Mccarthy C L, Hancock N H, Raine S R. Applied machine vision of plants: A review with implications for field deployment in automated farming operations[J]. Intelligent Service Robotics, 2010, 3(4): 209-217.
17. de Moraes Frasson R P, Krajewski W F. Three-dimensional digital model of a maize plant[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2010, 150(3): 478-488.
18. Quan Long, Tan Ping, Zeng Gang, et al. Image-based plant modeling[J]. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2006, 25(3): 599-604.
19. Pound M P, French A P, Murchie E H, et al. Automated recovery of three-dimensional models of plant shoots from multiple color images[J]. Plant Physiology, 2014, 166(4): 1688-1698.
20. Guo Yan, Shi Tongxin, Wu Jie, et al. The development of static virtual tobacco model basing on three-dimensional scanning methodology[J]. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2012, 18(5): 29-33. (in Chinese with English abstract)
21. Snavely N, Seitz S M, Szeliski R. Photo tourism: Exploring photo collections in 3D[J]. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2006, 25(3): 835-846.
22. Lowe D G. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints[J]. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2004, 60(2): 91-110.
23. Furukawa Y, Ponce J. Accurate, dense, and robust multiview stereopsis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2010, 32(8): 1362-1376.
24. Rusu R B, Marton Z C, Blodow N, et al. Towards 3D Point cloud based object maps for household environments[J]. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2008, 56(11): 927-941.
25. Rabbani T, van den Heuvel F, Vosselmann G. Segmentation of point clouds using smoothness constraint[J]. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2006, 36(5): 248-253.
26. Aspert N, Santa-Cruz D, Ebrahimi T. MESH: Measuring errors between surfaces using the Hausdorff distance[C]// Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference in Multimedia and Expo. USA: IEEE, 2002, 1: 705-708.
27. Paproki A, Sirault X, Berry S, et al. A novel mesh processing based technique for 3D plant analysis[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2012, 12(5): 1-13.
28. Ihaka R, Gentleman R. R: A language for data analysis and graphics[J]. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 1996, 5(3): 299-314.
29. Jay S, Rabatel G, Hadoux X, et al. In-field crop row phenotyping from 3D modeling performed using Structure from Motion[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2015, 110(2): 70-77.
30. Lati R N, Filin S, Eizenberg H. Plant growth parameter estimation from sparse 3D reconstruction based on highly-textured feature points[J]. Precision Agriculture, 2013, 14(6): 586-605.
31. Nielsen M, Andersen H J, Slaughter D C, et al. Ground truth evaluation of computer vision based 3D reconstruction of synthesized and real plant images[J]. Precision Agriculture, 2007, 8(1/2): 49-62.
32. Van Der Heijden G, Song Y, Horgan G, et al. SPICY: Towards automated phenotyping of large pepper plants in the greenhouse[J]. Functional Plant Biology, 2012, 39(11): 870-877.
33. Kazmi W, Foix S, Alenyà G, et al. Indoor and outdoor depth imaging of leaves with time-of-flight and stereo vision sensors: Analysis and comparison[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2014, 88(2): 128-146.
34. Wang Chuanyu, Zhao Ming, Yan Jianhe, et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction of maize leaves based on binocular stereovisionsystem[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2010, 26(4): 198-202. (in Chinese with English abstract)