High-precision laser scanning system for capturing 3D plant architecture and analysing growth ofcereal plants

Biosystems Engineering

Volumn 121, Issue , 2014, Pages 1-11

  Paulus, Stefan ^a   Schumann, Henrik ^a   Kuhlmann, Heiner ^a   Léon, Jens ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

3D plant architecture; Barley; Laser scanning; Non invasive; Phenotyping; Plant growth

Indexed keywords

BARLEY; LASER SCANNING; NON-INVASIVE; PHENOTYPING; PLANT ARCHITECTURE; PLANT GROWTH;

AGRICULTURE; ARCHITECTURE; CLIMATE CHANGE; FOOD SUPPLY; LASER APPLICATIONS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

EID: 84896892983     PISSN: 15375110     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.01.010     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ali M., Jensen C.R., Mogensen V.O., Andersen M.N., Henson I.E. Root signalling and osmotic adjustmentduring intermittent soil drying sustain grainyield of field grown wheat. Field Crops Research 1999, 62:35-52.
2. Bellasio C., Olejníčková J., Tesař R., Sebela D., Nedbal L. Computer reconstruction of plant growth and chlorophyll fluorescence emission in three spatial dimensions. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 2012, 12:1052-1071.
3. Buck-Sorlin G.H., Kniemeyer O., Kurth W. Barley morphology, genetics and hormonal regulation of internode elongation modelled by a relational growth grammar. New Phytologist 2005, 166:859-867.
4. Bylesjö M., Segura V., Soolanayakanahally R.Y., Rae A.M., Trygg J., Gustafsson P., et al. LAMINA: a tool for rapid quantification of leaf size and shape parameters. BMC Plant Biology 2008, 8:82.
5. Costes E. MAppleT: simulation of apple tree development using mixed stochastic and biomechanical models. Functional Plant Biology 2008, 35:936-950.
6. Dhondt S., Wuyts N., Inze D. Cell to whole-plant phenotyping: the best is yet to come. Trends in Plant Science 2013, 18(8):428-439.
7. Eitel J.U.H., Vierling L.A., Long D.S. Simultaneous measurements of plant structure and chlorophyll content in broadleaf saplings with a terrestrial laser scanner. Remote Sensing of Environment 2010, 114(10):2229-2237.
8. Eitel J.U.H., Vierling L.A., Long D.S., Raymond Hunt E. Early season remote sensing of wheat nitrogen status using a green scanning laser. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 2011, 151:1338-1345.
9. Eitel J.U.H., Vierling L.A., Magney T.S. A lightweight, low cost autonomously operating terrestrial laser scanner for quantifying and monitoring ecosystem structural dynamics. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 2013, 180:86-96.
10. Fiorani F., Rascher U., Jahnke S., Schurr U. Imaging plants dynamics in heterogenic environments. Current Opinion in Biotechnology April 2012, 23(2):227-235. 0958-1669, 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.12.010.
11. Frasson R.P.D., Krajewski W.F. Three-dimensional digital model of a maize plant. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 2010, 150:478-488.
12. Furbank R.T. Plant phenomics: from gene to form and function. Functional Plant Biology 2009, 36:V-VI.
13. Furbank R.T., Tester M. Phenomics - technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. Trends in Plant Science 2011, 16:635-644.
14. Gardner F.P., Pearce R.B., Mitchell R.L. The physiology of crop plants 1985, Iowa State University Press, US.
15. Gaulton R., Danson F.M., Ramirez F.A., Gunawan O. The potential of dual-wavelength laser scanning for estimating vegetation moisture content. Remote Sensing of Environment 2013, 132:32-39.
16. Golzarian M.R., Frick R.A., Rajendran K., Berger B., Roy S., Tester M., et al. Accurate inference of shoot biomassfrom high-throughput images of cereal plants. Plant Methods 2011, 7:2.
17. Hay R., Porter J. The physiology of crop yield 2006, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK. 2nd ed.
18. Hexagon Metrology Technical Data Romer Infinite 2.0 2013, http://www.hexagonmetrology.com.ar/en/romer-infinite-20_814.htm.
19. Hexagon Metrology Technical Data Perceptron ScanWorks V5 for Romer 2013, http://www.hexagonmetrology.com.ar/en/perceptron-scanworks-v5-for-romer_275.htm.
20. Holmgren J. Prediction of tree height, basal area and stem volume in forest stands using airborne laser scanning. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 2004, 19:543-553.
21. Hosoi F., Nakabayashi K., Omasa K. 3-D modeling of tomato canopies using a high-resolution portable scanning LiDAR for extracting structural information. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 2011, 11:2166-2174.
22. Houle D., Govindaraju D.R., Omholt S. Phenomics: the next challenge. Nature Reviews Genetics 2010, 11:855-866.
23. Izanloo A., Condon A.G., Langridge P., Tester M., Schnurbusch T. Different mechanisms of adaptation to cyclic water stress in two South Australian bread wheat cultivars. Journal of Experimental Botany 2008, 59:3327-3346.
24. Jansen M., Gilmer F., Biskup B., Nagel K.A., Rascher U., Fischbach A., et al. Simultaneous phenotyping of leaf growth and chlorophyll fluorescence via GROWSCREEN FLUORO allows detection of stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and other rosette plants. Functional Plant Biology 2009, 36:902-914.
25. Kaminuma E., Heida N., Tsumoto Y., Yamamoto N., Goto N., Okamoto N., et al. Automatic quantification of morphological traits via three-dimensional measurement of Arabidopsis. Plant Journal 2004, 38:358-365.
26. Keightley K.E., Bawden G.W. 3D volumetric modeling of grapevine biomass using Tripod LiDAR. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2010, 74:305-312.
27. Kilian B., Graner A. NGS technologies for analyzing germplasm diversity in genebanks. Briefings in Functional Genomics 2012, 11:38-50.
28. Kolev K., Brox T., Cremers D. Fast joint estimation of silhouettes and dense 3D geometry from multiple images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2012, 34:493-505.
29. Ku L.X., Zhao W.M., Zhang J., Wu L.C., Wang C.L., Wang P.A., et al. Quantitative trait loci mapping of leaf angle and leaf orientation value in maize (Zea mays L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 2010, 121(5):951-959.
30. Llorens J., Gil E., Llop J., Escola A. Ultrasonic and LiDAR sensors for electronic canopy characterization in vineyards: advances to improve pesticide application methods. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 2011, 11:2177-2194.
31. Magney T.S., Eusden S.A., Eitel J.U.H., Logan B.A., Jiang J., Vierling L.A. Assessing leaf photoprotective mechanism using terrestrial LiDAR: towards mapping canopy photosynthetic performance in three dimensions. New Phytologist 2014, 201:344-356.
32. Nelson R., Krabill W., Tonelli J. Estimating forest biomass and volume using airborne laser data. Remote Sensing of Environment 1988, 24:247-267.
33. Omasa K., Hosoi F., Konishi A. 3D LiDAR imaging for detecting and understanding plant responses and canopy structure. Journal of Experimental Botany 2007, 58:881-898.
34. Palacín J., Pallejà T., Tresanchez M., Sanz R., Llorens J., Ribes-Dasi M., et al. Real-time tree-foliage surface estimation using a ground laser scanner. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 2007, 56:1377-1383.
35. Paproki A., Sirault X., Berry S., Furbank R., Fripp J. A novel mesh processing based technique for 3d plant analysis. BMC Plant Biology 2012, 12:63.
36. Pastrana J.C., Rath T. Novel image processing approach for solving the overlapping problem in agriculture. Biosystems Engineering 2013, 115:106-115.
37. Paulus S., Dupuis J., Mahlein A.K., Kuhlmann H. Surface feature based classification of plant organs from 3D laser scanned point clouds for plant phenotyping. BMC Bioinformatics 2013, 14:238. 10.1186/1471-2105-14-238.
38. Pérez-Pérez J.M., Esteve-Bruna J., Micol J.L. QTL analysis of leaf architecture. Journal of Plant Research 2010, 123(1):15-23.
39. Rosell-Polo J.R., Sanz R., Llorens J., Arnó J., Escolà A., Ribes-Dasi M., et al. A tractor-mounted scanning LiDAR for the non-destructive measurement of vegetative volume and surface area of tree-row plantations: a comparison with conventional destructive measurements. Biosystems Engineering 2009, 102:128-134.
40. Praba M.L., Cairns J.E., Babu R.C., Lafitte H.R. Identification of physiological traits underlying cultivar differences in drought tolerance in rice and wheat. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 2009, 195:30-46.
41. Rajendran K., Tester M., Roy S.J. Quantifying the three main components of salinity tolerance in cereals. Plant Cell and Environment 2009, 32:237-249.
42. Sanz-Cortiella R., Llorens-Calveras J., Escola A., Arno-Satorra J., Ribes-Dasi M., Masip-Vilalta J., et al. Innovative LiDAR 3D dynamic measurement system to estimate fruit-tree leaf area. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 2011, 11:5769-5791.
43. SAS Institute The SAS system for Windows, Release 9.2 2008, SAS Inst, Cary, NC, USA.
44. Steinhage, V., Schöler, F., & Balfer, J. (29-31 August, 2012). A model-based approach to high performance phenotyping. In International conference on informatics for environmental protection (EnviroInfo) (pp. 303-310). Dessau, Germany.
45. Steinhage V., Schröder S., Lampe K.H., Cremers A.B. Automated extraction and analysis of morphological features for species identification. The Systematics Association special volume series 2007, Vol. 74:115-129. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, (Chapter 8). N. MacLeod (Ed.).
46. Tardieu F., Tuberosa R. Dissection and modelling of abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2010, 13:206-212.
47. Tester M., Langridge P. Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science 2010, 327:818-822.
48. Vos J., Evers J.B., Buck-Sorlin G.H., Andrieu B., Chelle M., de Visser P.H.B. Functional-structural plant modelling: a new versatile tool in crop science. Journal of Experimental Botany 2010, 61(8):2101-2115.
49. Wagner B., Santini S., Ingensand H., Gartner H. A tool to model 3D coarse-root development with annual resolution. Plant and Soil 2011, 346:79-96.
50. Walter A., Silk W.K., Schurr U. Environmental effects on spatial and temporal patterns of leaf and root growth. Annual Review of Plant Biology 2009, 60:279-304.
51. Xia C., Lee J.M., Li Y., Song Y.H., Chung B.K., Chon T.S. Plant leaf detection using modified active shape models. Biosystems Engineering 2013, 116:23-35.