Supersymmetry with radiatively-driven naturalness: Implications for WIMP and axion searches

Symmetry

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 788-814

  Bae, Kyu Jung ^a   Baer, Howard ^a   Barger, Vernon ^b   Savoy, Michael R ^a   Serce, Hasan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^b Wisconsin Electric Machines and Power Electronics Consortium   (United States)

Author keywords

Axions; Dark matter; Naturalness; Supersymmetry; WIMPs

Indexed keywords

EID: 84934762542     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20738994     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/sym7020788     Document Type: Article

References (148)

1. Aad, G.; Abajyan, T.; Abbott, B.; Abdallah, J.; Abdel Khalek, S.; Abdelalim, A.A.; Abdinov, O.; Aben, R.; Abi, B.; Abolins, M.; et al. Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B 2012, 716, 1-29.
2. Chatrchyan, S.; Khachatryan, V.; Sirunyan, A.; Tumasyan, A.; Adam, W.; Aguilo, E.; Bergauer, T.; Dragicevic, M.; Ero, J.; Fabjan, C.; et al. Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B 2012, 716, 30-61.
3. Gaillard, M.K.; Lee, B.W. Rare Decay Modes of the K-Mesons in Gauge Theories. Phys. Rev. D 1974, 10, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.897.
4. Susskind, L. Dynamics of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in the Weinberg-Salam Theory. Phys. Rev. D 1979, 20, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.20.2619.
5. Nilles, H.P. Supersymmetry, Supergravity and Particle Physics. Phys. Rept. 1984, 110, 1-162.
6. Martin, S.P. A Supersymmetry primer. Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 2010, 21, 1-153.
7. Chung, D.J.H.; Everett, L.L.; Kane, G.L.; King, S.F.; Lykken, J.D.; Wang, L.T. The Soft supersymmetry breaking Lagrangian: Theory and applications. Phys. Rept. 2005, 407,1-203.
8. Baer, H.; Tata, X. Weak scale supersymmetry: From superfields to scattering events. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2006; p. 537.
9. Nilles, H.P. Dynamically Broken Supergravity and the Hierarchy Problem. Phys. Lett. B 1982, 115, 193-196.
10. Chamseddine, A.; Arnowitt, R.; Nath, P. Locally Supersymmetric Grand Unification. Phys. Rev. Lett.1982, 49, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.970.
11. Barbieri, R.; Ferrara, S.; Savoy, C. Gauge Models with Spontaneously Broken Local Supersymmetry. Phys. Lett. 1982, B119, 343-347.
12. Ohta, N. Grand Unified Theories Based On Local Supersymmetry. Prog. Theor. Phys. 1983, 70, 542-549.
13. Hall, L.; Lykken, J.; Weinberg, S. Supergravity as the Messenger of Supersymmetry Breaking. Phys. Rev. D 1983, 27, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.27.2359.
14. Soni, S.K.; Weldon, H.A. Analysis of the Supersymmetry Breaking Induced by N = 1 Supergravity Theories. Phys. Lett. B 1983, 126, 215-219.
15. Kaplunovsky, V.S.; Louis, J. Model independent analysis of soft terms in effective supergravity and in string theory. Phys. Lett. B 1993, 306, 269-275.
16. Brignole, A.; Ibanez, L.E.; Munoz, C. Towards a theory of soft terms for the supersymmetric Standard Model. Nucl. Phys. B 1994, 422, 125-171. [Erratum-ibid, B. 1995, 436, 747].
17. Brignole, A.; Ibanez, L.E.; Munoz, C. Soft supersymmetry breaking terms from supergravity and superstring models. 1997, arXiv:hep-ph/9707209. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9707209 (accessed on 27 May 2015).
18. Amaldi, U.; de Boer, W.; Furstenau, H. Comparison of grand unified theories with electroweak and strong coupling constants measured at LEP. Phys. Lett. B 1991, 260, 447-455.
19. Ibañez, L.E.; Ross, G.G. SU(2)L × U(1) Symmetry Breaking as a Radiative Effect of Supersymmetry Breaking in Guts. Phys. Lett. B 1982, 110, 215-220.
20. Inoue, K.; Kakuto, A.; Komatsu, H.; Takeshita, S. Aspects of Grand Unified Models with Softly Broken Supersymmetry. Prog. Theor. Phys. 1982, 68, 927-946.
21. Nilles, H.P.; Srednicki, M.; Wyler, D. Weak Interaction Breakdown Induced by Supergravity. Phys. Lett. B 1983, 120, 346-348.
22. Ibañez, L. Locally Supersymmetric SU(5) Grand Unification. Phys. Lett. B 1982, 118, 73-78.
23. Ellis, J.; Hagelin, J.; Nanopoulos, D.; Tamvakis, M. Weak Symmetry Breaking by Radiative Corrections in Broken Supergravity. Phys. Lett. B 1983, 125, 275-281.
24. Alvarez-Gaumé, L.; Polchinski, J.; Wise, M. Minimal Low-Energy Supergravity. Nucl. Phys. B 1983, 221, 495-523.
25. Ovrut, B.A.; Raby, S. The Locally Supersymmetric Geometrical Hierarchy Model. Phys. Lett. B 1983, 130, 277-284.
26. Ibanez, L.E.; Ross, G.G. Supersymmetric Higgs and radiative electroweak breaking. Comptes Rendus Phys. 2007, 8, 1013-1028.
27. Carena, M.S.; Haber, H.E. Higgs boson theory and phenomenology. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2003, 50, 63-152.
28. Bertone, G.; Silk, J.; Moore, B.; Diemand, J.; Bullock, J.; Kaplinghat, M.; Strigari, L.; Mellier, Y.; et al., Particle Dark Matter: Observations, Models and Searches; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010; p. 738.
29. Dine, M.; Kusenko, A. The Origin of the matter-antimatter asymmetry. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2003, 76, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.76.1.
30. Shifman, M. Frontiers Beyond the Standard Model: Reflections and Impressionistic Portrait of the conferernce. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 2012, 27, doi:10.1142/S0217732312300431.
31. Barbieri, R. Electroweak theory after the first Large Hadron Collider phase. Phys. Scr. T 2013, 158, doi:10.1088/0031-8949/2013/T158/014006.
32. Giudice, G.F. Naturalness after LHC8. 2013, arXiv:1307.7879. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.7879 (accessed on 27 May 2015).
33. Altarelli, G. The Higgs: So simple yet so unnatural. Phys. Scr. 2014, doi:10.1088/0031-8949/2013/T158/014011.
34. Craig, N. The State of Supersymmetry after Run I of the LHC. 2013, arXiv:1309.0528. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/1309.0528 (accessed on 27 May 2015).
35. Murayama, H. Future Experimental Programs. Phys. Scr. 2013, 158, doi:10.1088/0031-8949/2013/T158/014025.
36. Ross, G.G. SUSY: Quo Vadis? Eur. Phys. J. C 2014, 2014, 99-119.
37. Lykken, J.; Spiropulu, M. Supersymmetry and the Crisis in Physics. Sci. Am. 2014, 310, 34-39.
38. Dine, M. Naturalness Under Stress. 2015, arXiv:1501.01035. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.01035 (accessed on 27 May 2015).
39. Witten, E. Dynamical Breaking of Supersymmetry. Nucl. Phys. B 1981, 188, 513-554.
40. Kaul, R.K. Gauge Hierarchy in a Supersymmetric Model. Phys. Lett. B 1982, 109, 19-24.
41. Barbieri, R.; Strumia, A. About the fine tuning price of LEP. Phys. Lett. B 1998, 433, 63-66.
42. Birkedal, A.; Chacko, Z.; Gaillard, M.K. Little supersymmetry and the supersymmetric little hierarchy problem. J. High Energy Phys. 2004, 0410, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/10/036.
43. Dermisek, R.; Gunion, J.F. Escaping the large fine tuning and little hierarchy problems in the next to minimal supersymmetric model and h → aa decays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95, 041801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.041801.
44. Choi, K.; Jeong, K.S.; Kobayashi, T.; Okumura, K.I. Little SUSY hierarchy in mixed modulus-anomaly mediation. Phys. Lett. B 2006, 633, 355-361.
45. Kim, S.-G.; Maekawa, N.; Matsuzaki, A.; Sakurai, K.; Sanda, A.I.; Yoshikawa, T. A Solution for little hierarchy problem and b → sγ. Phys. Rev. D 2006, 74, 115016, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.115016.
46. Choi, K.; Jeong, K.S.; Kobayashi, T.; Okumura, K.I. TeV Scale Mirage Mediation and Natural Little SUSY Hierarchy. Phys. Rev. D 2007, 75, 095012, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.095012.
47. Dutta, B.; Mimura, Y. Landscape of Little Hierarchy. Phys. Lett. B 2007, 648, 357-364.
48. Dutta, B.; Mimura, Y.; Nanopoulos, D.V. No-Scale Solution to Little Hierarchy. Phys. Lett. B 2007, 656, 199-206.
49. Babu, K.S.; Gogoladze, I.; Rehman, M.U.; Shafi, Q. Higgs Boson Mass, Sparticle Spectrum and Little Hierarchy Problem in Extended MSSM. Phys. Rev. D 2008, 78, 055017, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.055017.
50. Bellazzini, B.; Csaki, C.; Delgado, A.; Weiler, A. SUSY without the Little Hierarchy. Phys. Rev. D 2009, 79, 095003, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.095003.
51. Delgado, A.; Kolda, C.; Olson, J.P.; de la Puente, A. Solving the Little Hierarchy Problem with a Singlet and Explicit μ Terms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 091802, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.091802.
52. Gherghetta, T.; von Harling, B.; Setzer, N. A natural little hierarchy for RS from accidental SUSY. J. High Energy Phys. 2011, 7, 1-35.
53. Feldman, D.; Kane, G.; Kuflik, E.; Lu, R. A new (string motivated) approach to the little hierarchy problem. Phys. Lett. B 2011, 704, 56-61.
54. Younkin, J.E.; Martin, S.P. Non-universal gaugino masses, the supersymmetric little hierarchy problem, and dark matter. Phys. Rev. D 2012, 85, 055028, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.055028.
55. Baer, H.; Barger, V.; Mustafayev, A. Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs scalar for LHC SUSY and neutralino dark matter searches. Phys. Rev. D 2012, 85, 075010, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.075010.
56. Baer, H.; Barger, V.; Huang, P.; Mustafayev, A.; Tata, X. Radiative natural SUSY with a 125 GeV Higgs boson. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109, 161802, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.161802.
57. Baer, H.; Barger, V.; Huang, P.; Mickelson, D.; Mustafayev, A.; Tata, X. Radiative natural supersymmetry: Reconciling electroweak fine-tuning and the Higgs boson mass. Phys. Rev. D 2013, 87, 115028, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.115028.
58. Matalliotakis, D.; Nilles, H.P. Implications of nonuniversality of soft terms in supersymmetric grand unified theories. Nucl. Phys. B 1995, 435, 115-128.
59. Nath, P.; Arnowitt, R.L. Nonuniversal soft SUSY breaking and dark matter. 1998, arXiv:hep-ph/9801259. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9801259 (accessed on 27 May 2015).
60. Ellis, J.; Olive, K.; Santoso, Y. The MSSM parameter space with nonuniversal Higgs masses. Phys. Lett. B 2002, 539, 107-118.
61. Ellis, J.; Falk, T.; Olive, K.; Santoso, Y. Exploration of the MSSM with nonuniversal Higgs masses. Nucl. Phys. B 2003, 652, 259-347.
62. Baer, H.; Mustafayev, A.; Profumo, S.; Belyaev, A.; Tata, X. Direct, indirect and collider detection of neutralino dark matter in SUSY models with non-universal Higgs masses. J. High Energy Phys. 2005, 2005, 065, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/07/065.
63. Duffy, L.; Sikivie, P.; Tanner, D.B.; Asztalos, S.; Hagmann, C.; Kinion, D.; Rosenberg, L.J.; van Bibber, K.; Yu, D.; Bradley, R.F. Results of a search for cold flows of dark matter axions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95, 091304, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.091304.
64. Duffy, L.D.; Sikivie, P.; Tanner, D.B.; Asztalos, S.J.; Hagmann, C.; Kinion, D.; Rosenberg, L.J.; van Bibber, K.; Yu, D.B.; Bradley, R.F. A high resolution search for dark-matter axions. Phys. Rev. D 2006, 74, 012006, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.012006.
65. Asztalos, S.J.; Rosenberg, L.; van Bibber, K.; Sikivie, P.; Zioutas, K. Searches for astrophysical and cosmological axions. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2006, 56, 293-326.
66. Baer, H.; Barger, V.; Mickelson, D.; Padeffke-Kirkland, M. SUSY models under siege: LHC constraints and electroweak fine-tuning. Phys. Rev. D 2014, 89, 115019, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.115019.
67. - reactions. 2003, arXiv:hep-ph/0312045. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0312045 (accessed on 27 May 2015).
68. Djouadi, A.; Muhlleitner, M.M.; Spira, M. Decays of supersymmetric particles: The Program SUSY-HIT (SUspect-SdecaY-Hdecay-InTerface). 2006, arXiv:hep-ph/0609292. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0609292 (accessed on 27 May 2015).
69. Allanach, B.C. SOFTSUSY: a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2002, 143, 305-331.
70. - colliders. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2003 153, 275-315.
71. Chan, K.; Chattopadhyay, U.; Nath, P. Naturalness, weak scale supersymmetry and the prospect for the observation of supersymmetry at the Tevatron and at the CERN LHC. Phys. Rev. D 1998, 58, 096004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.58.096004.
72. Barbieri, R.; Pappadopulo, D. S-particles at their naturalness limits. J. High Energy Phys. 2009, 2009, 061, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/10/061.
73. Baer, H.; Barger, V.; Huang, P. Hidden SUSY at the LHC: the light higgsino-world scenario and the role of a lepton collider. J. High Energy Phys. 2011, 2011, 1-25.
74. Feng, J.L.; Matchev, K.T.; Moroi, T. Focus points and naturalness in supersymmetry. Phys. Rev. D 2000, 61, 075005, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.61.075005.
75. Feng, J.L.; Matchev, K.T.; Moroi, T. Naturalness reexamined: Implications for supersymmetry searches. 2000, arXiv:hep-ph/0003138. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0003138 (accessed on 27 May 2015).
76. Feng, J.L.; Sanford, D. A Natural 125 GeV Higgs Boson in the MSSM from Focus Point Supersymmetry with A-Terms. Phys. Rev. D 2012, 86, 055015, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.055015.
77. Baer, H.; Barger, V.; Huang, P.; Mickelson, D.; Mustafayev, A.; Tata, X. Post-LHC7 fine-tuning in the minimal supergravity/CMSSM model with a 125 GeV Higgs boson. Phys. Rev. D 2013, 87, 035017, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.035017.
78. - colliders. Phys. Rev. D 1995, 51, 1046-1050.
79. Baer, H.; Ferrandis, J.; Kraml, S.; Porod, W. On the treatment of threshold effects in SUSY spectrum computations. Phys. Rev. D 2006, 73, 015010, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.015010.
80. Kitano, R.; Nomura, Y. A Solution to the supersymmetric fine-tuning problem within the MSSM. Phys. Lett. B 2005, 631, 58-67.
81. Kitano, R.; Nomura, Y. Supersymmetry, naturalness, and signatures at the LHC. Phys. Rev. D 2006, 73, 095004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.095004.
82. Papucci, M.; Ruderman, J.T.; Weiler, A. Natural SUSY Endures. J. High Energy Phys. B 2012 2012, doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2012)035.
83. Brust, C.; Katz, A.; Lawrence, S.; Sundrum, R. SUSY, the Third Generation and the LHC. J. High Energy Phys. 2012, 2012, doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2012)103.
84. Evans, J.A.; Kats, Y.; Shih, D.; Strassler, M.J. Toward Full LHC Coverage of Natural Supersymmetry. J. High Energy Phys. 2014, 2014, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)101.
85. Baer, H.; Barger, V.; Mickelson, D. How conventional measures overestimate electroweak fine-tuning in supersymmetric theory. Phys. Rev. D 2013, 88, 095013, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.095013.
86. Baer, H.; Barger, V.; Savoy, M. Supergravity gauge theories strike back: There is no crisis for SUSY but a new collider may be required for discovery. Phys. Scripta 2015, 90, 068003, doi:10.1088/0031-8949/90/6/068003.
87. Ellis, J.R.; Enqvist, K.; Nanopoulos, D.V.; Zwirner, F. Observables in Low-Energy Superstring Models. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 1986, 1, 57-69.
88. Barbieri, R.; Giudice, G.F. Upper Bounds on Supersymmetric Particle Masses. Nucl. Phys. B 1988, 306, 63-76.
89. Ibanez, L.E.; Lopez, C.; Munoz, C. The Low-Energy Supersymmetric Spectrum According to N = 1 Supergravity Guts. Nucl. Phys. B 1985, 256, 218-252.
90. Lleyda, A.; Munoz, C. Nonuniversal soft scalar masses in supersymmetric theories. Phys. Lett. B 1993, 317, 82-91.
91. Weinberg, S. The U(1) Problem. Phys. Rev. D 1975, 11, 3583, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.11.3583.
92. 't Hooft, G. Symmetry Breaking Through Bell-Jackiw Anomalies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1976, 37, 8-11.
93. Peccei, R.D.; Quinn, H.R. CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1977, 38, 1440, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.38.1440.
94. Weinberg, S. A New Light Boson? Phys. Rev. Lett. 1978, 40, 223, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.223.
95. Wilczek, F. Problem of Strong p and t Invariance in the Presence of Instantons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1978, 40, 279, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.279.
96. Kim, J.E. Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1979, 43, 103, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.103.
97. Shifman, M.A.; Vainstein, A.; Zakharov, V.I. Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interactions? Nucl. Phys. B 1980, 166, 493-506.
98. Dine, M.; Fischler, W.; Srednicki, M. A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion. Phys. Lett. B 1981, 104, 199-202.
99. Zhitnitskii, A.P. On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. Sov. J. Phys. 1980, 31, 497-504.
100. Abbott, L.F.; Sikivie, P. A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion. Phys. Lett. B 1983, 120, 133-136.
101. Preskill, J.; Wise, M.; Wilczek, F. Cosmology of the Invisible Axion. Phys. Lett. B 1983, 120, 127-132.
102. Dine, M.; Fischler, W. The Not So Harmless Axion. Phys. Lett. 1983, 120, 137-141.
103. Turner, M. Cosmic and Local Mass Density of Invisible Axions. Phys. Rev. D 1986, 33, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.33.889.
104. Bae, K.J.; Huh, J.H.; Kim, J.E. Update of axion CDM energy. 2008, arXiv:0806.0497. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/0806.0497 (accessed on 27 May 2015).
105. Visinelli, L.; Gondolo, P. Dark Matter Axions Revisited. Phys. Rev. D 2009, 80, 035024, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.035024.
106. Kim, J.E.; Nilles, H.P. The μ-Problem and the Strong CP-Problem. Phys. Lett. B 1984, 138, 150-154.
107. Chun, E.J. Dark matter in the Kim-Nilles mechanism. Phys. Rev. D 2011, 84, 043509, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.043509.
108. Bae, K.J.; Chun, E.J.; Im, S.H. Cosmology of the DFSZ axino. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2012, 1203, 013, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/03/013.
109. Murayama, H.; Suzuki, H.; Yanagida, T. Radiative breaking of Peccei-Quinn symmetry at the intermediate mass scale. Phys. Lett. B 1992, 291, 418-425.
110. Gherghetta, T.; Kane, G.L. Chaotic inflation and a radiatively generated intermediate scale in the supersymmetric standard model. Phys. Lett. B 1995, 354, 300-306.
111. Choi, K.; Chun, E.J.; Kim, J.E. Cosmological implications of radiatively generated axion scale. Phys. Lett. B 1997, 403, 209-217.
112. Bae, K.J.; Baer, H.; Serce, H. Natural little hierarchy for SUSY from radiative breaking of the Peccei-Quinn symmetry. Phys. Rev. D 2015, 91, 015003, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.015003.
113. Baer, H.; Balazs, C.; Belyaev, A. Neutralino relic density in minimal supergravity with coannihilations. J. High Energy Phys. 2002, 0203, 042, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/03/042.
114. Bisset, M.A. Detection of Higgs bosons of the minimal supersymmetric standard model at hadron supercolliders. Available online: http://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/handle/10125/10084/?sequence=2 (accessed on 27 May 2015).
115. Baer, H.; Choi, K.Y.; Kim, J.E.; Roszkowski, L. Dark matter production in the early Universe: Beyond the thermal WIMP paradigm. Phys. Rept. 2014, 555, 1-60.
116. Davis, R.L. Cosmic Axions from Cosmic Strings. Phys. Lett. B 1986, 180, 225-230.
117. Harari, D.; Sikivie, P. On the Evolution of Global Strings in the Early Universe. Phys. Lett. B 1987, 195, 361-365.
118. Davis, R.L.; Shellard, E.P.S. Do Axions Need Inflation? Nucl. Phys. B 1989, 324, 167-186.
119. Hagmann, C.; Chang, S.; Sikivie, P. Axion radiation from strings. Phys. Rev. D 2001, 63, 125018:1-125018:12.
120. Sakharov, A.S.; Khlopov, M.Y. The Nonhomogeneity problem for the primordial axion field. Phys. Atom. Nucl. 1994, 57, 514-516.
121. Khlopov, M.Y.; Sakharov, A.S.; Sokoloff, D.D. The large scale modulation of the density distribution in standard axionic CDM and its cosmological and physical impact. 1998, arXiv:hep-ph/9812286. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9812286 (accessed on 27 May 2015).
122. Goto, T.; Yamaguchi, M. Is axino dark matter possible in supergravity? Phys. Lett. B 1992, 276, 103-107.
123. Chun, E.J.; Kim, J.E.; Nilles, H.P. Axino mass. 1992, arXiv:hep-ph/9205229. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9205229 (accessed on 27 May 2015).
124. Chun, E.J.; Lukas, A. Axino mass in supergravity models. Phys. Lett. B 1995, 357, 43-50.
125. Kim, J.E.; Seo, M.-S. Mixing of axino and goldstino, and axino mass. Nucl. Phys. B 2012, 864, 296-316.
126. Bae, K.J.; Choi, K.; Im, S.H. Effective Interactions of Axion Supermultiplet and Thermal Production of Axino Dark Matter. J. High Energy Phys. 2011, 2011, 1-35.
127. Choi, K.Y.; Kim, J.E.; Lee, H.M.; Seto, O. Neutralino dark matter from heavy axino decay. Phys. Rev. D 2008, 77, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.123501.
128. Baer, H.; Lessa, A.; Rajagopalan, S.; Sreethawong, W. Mixed axion/neutralino cold dark matter in supersymmetric models. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2011, 1106, 031, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2011/06/031.
129. Ade, P.A.R.; Aghanim, N.; Arnaud, M.; Ashdown, M.; Aumont, J.; Baccigalupi, C.; Banday, A.J.; Barreiro, R.B.; Bartlett1, J.G.; Bartolo, N.; et al. Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters. 2015, arXiv:1502.01589. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.01589 (accessed on 27 May 2015).
130. Bae, K.J.; Baer, H.; Chun, E.J. Mainly axion cold dark matter from natural supersymmetry. Phys. Rev. D 2014, 89, 031701, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.031701.
131. Bae, K.J.; Baer, H.; Chun, E.J. Mixed axion/neutralino dark matter in the SUSY DFSZ axion model. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2013, 1312, 028, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/12/028.
132. Bae, K.J.; Baer, H.; Lessa, A.; Serce, H. Coupled Boltzmann computation of mixed axion neutralino dark matter in the SUSY DFSZ axion model. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2014, 1410, 82, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/10/082.
133. Jedamzik, K. Big bang nucleosynthesis constraints on hadronically and electromagnetically decaying relic neutral particles. Phys. Rev. D 2006, 74, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.103509.
134. Rybka, G. New Results and New Perspectives from ADMX. In Proceedings of the New Perspectives on Dark Matter Workshop, Fermilab, IL, USA, 29 April-2 May 2014.
135. Rybka, G.; Wagner, A.; Brill, A.; Ramos, K.; Percival, R.; Patel, K. Search for dark matter axions with the Orpheus experiment. Phys. Rev. D 2015, 91, 011701, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.011701.
136. Raffelt, G.G. Axions-Motivation, limits and searches. J. Phys. A 2007, 40, 6607, doi:10.1088/1751-8113/40/25/S05.
137. Baer, H.; Barger, V.; Mickelson, D. Direct and indirect detection of higgsino-like WIMPs: Concluding the story of electroweak naturalness. Phys. Lett. B 2013, 726, 330-336.
138. Baer, H.; Barger, V.; Mickelson, D.; Tata, X. Snowmass whitepaper: Exploring natural SUSY via direct and indirect detection of higgsino-like WIMPs. 2013, arXiv:1306.4183. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.4183 (accessed on 27 May 2015).
139. Bae, K.J.; Baer, H.; Barger, V.; Mickelson, D.; Savoy, M. Implications of naturalness for the heavy Higgs bosons of supersymmetry. Phys. Rev. D 2014, 90, 075010, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.075010.
140. Baer, H.; Balazs, C.; Belyaev, A.; O'Farrill, J. Direct detection of dark matter in supersymmetric models. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2003, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2003/09/007.
141. Hisano, J.; Ishiwata, K.; Nagata, N. Direct Search of Dark Matter in High-Scale Supersymmetry. Phys. Rev. D 2013, 87, 035020, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.035020.
142. Bottino, A.; Donato, F.; Fornengo, N.; Scopel, S. Probing the supersymmetric parameter space by WIMP direct detection. Phys. Rev. D 2001, 63, 125003, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.63.125003.
143. 3I Bubble Chamber Operated in a Deep Underground Site. Phys. Rev. D 2012, 86, 052001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.052001.
144. Bottino, A.; Donato, F.; Fornengo, N.; Salati, P. Antiproton fluxes from light neutralinos. Phys. Rev. D 2005, 72, 083518, doi:0.1103/PhysRevD.72.083518.
145. Barger, V.; Gao, Y.; Keung, W.; Marfatia, D.; Shaughnessy, G. Dark matter and pulsar signals for Fermi LAT, PAMELA, ATIC, HESS and WMAP data. Phys. Lett. B 2009, 678, 283-292.
146. Profumo, S. Dissecting cosmic-ray electron-positron data with Occam's Razor: The role of known Pulsars. Central Eur. J. Phys. 2011, 10, 1-31.
147. Ackermann, M.; Ajello, M.; Albert, A.; Atwood, W.A.; Baldini, L.; Ballet, J.; Barbiellini, G.; Bastieri, D.; Bechtol, K.; Bellazzini, R.; et al. (Fermi Collaboration), Constraining Dark Matter Models from a Combined Analysis of MilkyWay Satellites with the Fermi Large Area Telescope. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107, 241302, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.241302.
148. Geringer-Sameth, A.; Koushiappas, S.M. Exclusion of canonical WIMPs by the joint analysis of Milky Way dwarfs with Fermi. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107, 241303, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.241303.