Conspicuous genetic structure belies recent dispersal in an endangered beach mouse (Peromyscus polionotus trissyllepsis)

Conservation Genetics

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 915-928

  Austin, James D ^a   Gore, Jeffery A ^b   Greene, Daniel U ^a,b   Gotteland, Cécile ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b FISH AND WILDLIFE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Connectivity; Fragmentation; Long distance dispersal; Perdido key beach mouse; Peromyscus; Re introduction

Indexed keywords

CONNECTIVITY; CONSERVATION GENETICS; DISPERSAL; ENDANGERED SPECIES; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC STRUCTURE; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; LIFE HISTORY; REINTRODUCTION; RODENT; SPECIES CONSERVATION;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; GULF OF MEXICO;

MUS; PEROMYSCUS; PEROMYSCUS POLIONOTUS TRISSYLLEPSIS;

EID: 84934438343     PISSN: 15660621     EISSN: 15729737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-015-0710-8     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Anderson EC, Thompson EA (2002) A model-based method for identifying species hybrids using multilocus genetic data. Genetics 160:1217–1229
2. Andrén H (1996) Population response to habitat fragmentation: statistical power and the random sample hypothesis. Oikos 76:235–242
3. Bowen WW (1968) Variation and evolution of Gulf Coast populations of beach mice (Peromyscus polionotus). Bull Fla State Mus Biol Sci 12:1–91
4. Brown JH, Kodric-Brown A (1977) Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology 58:445–449
5. Bryant D, Rodenburg E, Cox T, Nielsen D (1995) Coastlines and risk: An index of potential development-related threats to coastal ecosystems. World Resources Institute, Washington DC
6. Burgman MA, Lindenmayer DB, Elith J (2005) Managing landscapes for conservation under uncertainty. Ecology 86:2007–2017
7. Calabrese JM, Fagan W (2004) A comparison-shopper’s guide to connectivity metrics. Front Ecol Environ 2:529–536
8. Chirhart SE, Honeycutt RL, Greenbaum IF (2000) Microsatellite markers for the deer mouse Peromyscus maniculatus. Mol Ecol 9:1661–1686
9. Domingues VS, Poh Y-P, Peterson BK, Pennings PS, Jensen JD, Hoekstra HE (2012) Evidence of adaptation from ancestral variation in young populations of beach mice. Evolution 66:3209–3223
10. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620
11. Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 34:487–515
12. Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2007) Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:265–280
13. Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). http://www2.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.htm. Accessed 24 Oct 2012
14. Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (2002) SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol Ecol Notes 2:618–620
15. Holler NR, Mason DW, Dawson RM, Simons T, Wooten MC (1989) Reestablishment of the Perdido Key beach mouse (Peromyscus polionotus trissyllepsis) on Gulf Islands National Seashore. Conserv Biol 3:397–404
16. Holliman DC (1983) Status and habitat of Gulf Coast Alabama beach mice Peromyscus polionotus ammobates and P.p. trissyllepsis. Northeast Gulf Sci 6:121–129
17. Humphrey SR (1992) Rare and endangered biota of Florida. Vol. 1: mammals. University Press of Florida, Gainesville
18. Humphrey SR, Barbour DB (1981) Status of three subspecies of Peromyscus polionotus in Florida. J Mammal 62:840–844
19. Hunter ML, Hutchinson A (1994) The virtues and shortcomings of parochialism: conserving species that are locally rare, but globally common. Conserv Biol 8:1163–1165
20. Irwin J, Smith A, Gore JA, Greene DU, Austin JD (2012) Whole-genome amplification of microsatellites reveals limited genetic variation in a captive colony relative to the wild source population of the endangered beach mouse, Peromyscus polionotus trissyllepsis. Fla Sci 75:253–258
21. Jombart T, Devillard S, Dufour A-B, Pontier D (2008) Revealing cryptic spatial patterns in genetic variability by a new multivariate method. Heredity 101:92–103
22. Jost L (2008) GST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol Ecol 17:4015–4026
23. Knutson TR, McBride JL, Chan J, Emanuel K, Holland G, Landsea C, Held I, Kossin JP, Srivastava AK, Sugi M (2010) Tropical cyclones and climate change. Nat Geosci 3:157–163
24. Lacy RC, Alaks G, Walsh A (1996) Heirarchical analysis of inbreeding depression in Peromyscus polionotus. Evolution 50:2187–2200
25. Lande R (1999) Extinction risks from anthropogenic, ecological, and genetic factors. In: Landweber LF, Dobson AP (eds) Genetics and the extinction of species. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 1–22
26. Lynn WJ (2000) Social organization and burrow site selection of the Alabama beach mouse (Peromyscus polionotus ammobates) M.S. thesis, Auburn University, Alabama
27. Lynn WJ (2001) Perdido Key area-GINS status survey trapping and translocation summary. Final report march 7. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Panama City
28. Madsen T, Ujvari B, Olsson M (2004) Novel genes continue to enhance population growth in adders (Vipera berus). Biol Conserv 120(1):145–147
29. Manel S, Gaggiotti OE, Waples RS (2005) Assignment methods: matching biological questions with appropriate techniques. Trends Ecol Evol 20:136–142
30. McPeek MA, Holt RD (1992) The evolution of dispersal in spatially and temporally varying environments. Am Nat 140:1010–1027
31. Moritz C (2002) Strategies to protect biological diversity and the evolutionary processes that sustain it. Syst Biol 51:238–254
32. Mullen LM, Hirschmann RJ, Prince KL, Glenn TC, Dewey MJ, Hoekstra HE (2006) Sixty polymorphic microsatellite markers for the oldfield mouse developed in Peromyscus polionotus and Peromyscus maniculatus. Mol Ecol Notes 6:36–40
33. Nei M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583–590
34. Oli MK, Holler NH, Wooten MC (2001) Viability analysis of Gulf Coast beach mice (Peromyscus polionotus) populations. Biol Conserv 97:107–118
35. Paetkau D, Slade R, Burden M, Estoup A (2004) Genetic assignment methods for the direct, real-time estimation of migration rate: a simulation-based exploration of accuracy and power. Mol Ecol 13:55–65
36. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GenAlEx 6: genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295
37. Pérez I, Anadón JD, Díaz M, Nicola GG, Tella JL, Giménez A (2012) What is wrong with current translocations? A review and decision-making proposal. Front Ecol Environ 10:494–501
38. Piry S, Alapetite A, Cornuet J-M, Paetkau D, Baudouin L, Estoup A (2004) GENECLASS2: a software for genetic assignment and first-generation migrant detection. J Hered 95:536–539
39. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959
40. Provancha JA, Oddy DM (1992) A mark and release study of the southeastern beach mouse (Peromyscus polionotis niveiventris) on the Kennedy Space Center. Fla Sci 55(Supplement 1):28
41. Queller DC, Goodnight KF (1989) Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43:258–275
42. Rannala B, Mountain JL (1997) Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:9197–9201
43. Rousset F (2008) Genepop’007: a complete reimplementation of the Genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106
44. Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation. Conserv Biol 5:18–32
45. Smith MH (1968) Dispersal of the oldfield mouse, Peromyscus polionotus. Bull Ga Acad Sci 26:45–51
46. Sumner FB (1926) An analysis of geographic variation in mice of the Peromyscus polionotus group from Florida and Alabama. J Mammal 7:149–184
47. Trakhtenbrot A, Nathan R, Perry G, Richardson DM (2005) The importance of long distance dispersal in biodiversity conservation. Diver Distrib 11:173–181
48. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (1985) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; determination of endangered status and critical habitat for three beach mice; final rule. Fed Reg 50:23872–23889
49. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2006) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; Designation of critical habitat for the Perdido Key beach mouse, Choctawhatchee beach mouse, and St. Andrew beach mouse. Fed Regist 71:60238–60370
50. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (1987) Recovery plan for the Alabama beach mouse (Peromyscus polionotus ammobates) Perdido Key beach mouse (P. p. trisyllepsis) and Choctawhatchee beach mouse (P. p. allophrys). USFWS, Atlant
51. Vähä JP, Primmer CR (2006) Efficiency of model-based Bayesian methods for detecting hybrid individuals under different hybridization scenarios and with different number of loci. Mol Ecol 15:63–72
52. Weber JN, Peters MB, Tsyusko OV, Linnen CR, Hagen C, Schable NA, Tuberville TD, McKee AM, Lance SL, Jones KL, Fisher HS, Dewey MJ, Hoekstra HE, Glenn TC (2010) Five hundred microsatellite loci for Peromyscus. Conser Genet 11:1243–1246
53. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370