Multicultural Inquiry Toward Demystifying Scientific Culture and Learning Science

Science Education

Volumn 99, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 617-637

  Meyer, Xenia S ^a   Crawford, Barbara A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84934437922     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: 1098237X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sce.21162     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1-52.
2. Amaral, O., Garrison, L., & Klentschy, M. (2002). Helping English learners increase achievement through inquiry-based science instruction. Bilingual Research Journal, 26(2), 213-239.
3. Bang, M., & Medin, D. (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94(6), 1008-1026.
4. Bencze, L., & Hodson, D. (1999). Changing practice by changing practice: Toward more authentic science and science curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(5), 521-539.
5. Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6. Brown, J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
7. Capps, D. K., & Crawford, B. A. (2013). Inquiry-based instruction and teaching about nature of science: Are they happening?. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 497-526.
8. Chinn, C., Buckland, L., & Samarapungavan, A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology, Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 141-167.
9. Chinn, C., & Malhotra, B. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218.
10. Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613-642.
11. Crawford, B. A. (2014). From inquiry to scientific practices in the science classroom. In N. Lederman & S. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II), (pp. 515-544). New York: Routledge.
12. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(5), 5-12.
13. Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. C. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399-483.
14. Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
15. Hogan, K., & Corey, C. (2001). Viewing classrooms as cultural contexts for fostering scientific literacy. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 32(2), 214-243.
16. Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Lederman, N. G. (2004). Scientific inquiry and nature of science. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
19. Lederman, J. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2005). Teaching and assessing nature of science and scientific inquiry with young children. A workshop presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Science Teachers Association, Dallas, TX.
20. Lee, O., Buxton, C., Lewis, S., & LeRoy, K. (2006). Science inquiry and student diversity: Enhanced abilities and continuing difficulties after and instructional intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(7), 607-636.
21. Lipka, J., Mohatt, G., & the Ciulistet Group (1998). Transforming the culture of schools: Yup'ik Eskimo examples. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
22. Luykx, A., & Lee, O. (2007). Measuring instructional congruence in elementary science classrooms: Pedagogical and methodological components of a theoretical framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 424-447.
23. McFaddin, J., & Kahle, J. B. (2008). Evaluation of Cornell University's Fossil Finders academic year 2007-2008 Year 1 report. Oxford, OH: Miami University, Ohio's Evaluation & Assessment Center for Mathematics and Science Education.
24. Meyer, X. (2010). Instruction in nature of science and inquiry with underrepresented students: Being explicit about science. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
25. Meyer, X., Capps, D., Crawford, B. A., & Ross, R. (2012). Using inquiry and tenets of multicultural education to engage Latino ELL students in learning about geology and nature of science. Journal of Geosciences Education, 60, 212-219.
26. Meyer, X., & Crawford, B. A. (2011). Teaching science as a cultural way of knowing: Merging authentic inquiry, nature of science, and multicultural strategies. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6(3), 525-547.
27. National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
28. National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
29. National Academy of Sciences. (2013). The next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
30. Phelan, P., Davidson, A., & Cao, H. (1991). Students' multiple words: Negotiating the boundaries of family, peer, and school cultures. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 22(2), 224-250.
31. Project 2061 (American Association for the Advancement of Science). (1989). Science for all Americans: A Project 2061 report on literacy goals in science, mathematics, and technology (Vol. 1). American Association for the Advancement of Science.
32. Pugh, K. J. (2011). Transformative experience: An integrative construct in the spirit of Deweyan pragmatism. Educational Psychologist, 46(2), 107-121.
33. Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Conant, F. R. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings from language minority classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 61-94.
34. Rudolph, J. L. (2005). Inquiry, instrumentalism, and the public understanding of science. Science Education, 89(5), 803-821.
35. Saxe, G. B. (2003). Ethnic and academic identities: A cultural practice perspective on emerging tensions and their management in the lives of minority students. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 14-18.
36. Schwartz, R. S., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Authentic scientific inquiry as context for teaching nature of science: Identifying critical elements. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education (pp. 331-355). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
37. Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(4), 610-645.
38. Settlage, J., & Meadows, L. (2002). Standards-based reform and its unintended consequences: Implications for science education within America's urban schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 114-127.
39. Southerland, S., Golden, B., & Enderle, P. (2012). The bounded nature of science: An effective tool in an equitable approach to the teaching of science. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Advances in nature of science research (pp. 75-96). New York: Springer.
40. Stanley, W. B., & Brickhouse, N. W. (1994). Multiculturalism, universalism, and science education. Science Education, 78(4), 387-398.
41. Stoddart, T., Pinal, A., Latzke, M., & Canaday, D. (2000). Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(8), 664-687.
42. Stroupe, D. (2014). Examining classroom science practice communities: How teachers and students negotiate epistemic agency and learn science-as-practice. Science Education, 98(3), 487-516.
43. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44. Yin, R. K. (2011). Applications of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.