Subjectivity and objectivity in landscape evaluation: An old topic revisited

The Economic Value of Landscapes

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 53-76

  Price, Colin ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906802666     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203076378     Document Type: Chapter

References (74)

1. Abelson, P. (1979) Cost Benefit Analysis and Environmental Problems. Farnborough, Hants, UK: Saxon House.
2. Anderson, L.M. and Cordell, H.K. (1988) 'Influence of trees on residential property values in Athens, Georgia (U.S.A.): A survey based on actual sales prices', Landscape and Urban Planning, 15(1-2): 153-164.
3. Anthon, S., Thorsen, B.J. and Helles, F. (2005) 'Urban-fringe afforestation projects and taxable hedonic values', Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 3(2): 79-91.
4. Aoki, Y. (1999) 'Trends in the study of the psychological evaluation of landscape', Landscape Research, 24(1): 85-94.
5. Appleton, J. (1975) 'Landscape evaluation: the theoretical vacuum', Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 66: 120-123.
6. Bergin, J. and Price, C. (1994) 'The travel cost method and landscape quality', Landscape Research, 19(1): 21-23.
7. Bishop, R.C. and Welsh, M.P. (1993) 'Existence values in benefit-cost analysis and damage assessment'. In: W.L. Adamowicz, W. White and W.E. Phillips (eds), Forestry and the Environment: Economic Perspectives. pp. 135-154, Wallingford: CAB International.
8. Bourassa, S.C., Hoesli, M. and Sun, J. (2004) 'What's in a view?' Environment and Planning, 36(8): 1427-1450.
9. Brookshire, D.S., Ives, B.C. and Schulze, W.D. (1976) 'The valuation of aesthetic preferences', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 3(4): 325-346.
10. Brown, G. Jr and Mendelsohn, R. (1984) 'The hedonic travel cost method', Review of Economics and Statistics, 66(3): 427-33.
11. Carlson, A.A. (1977) 'On the possibility of quantifying scenic beauty', Landscape Planning, 4: 131-172.
12. Choumert, J., Travers, M., Delaître, C. and Beaujouan, V. (2009) 'Capitalization of green spaces into housing values in the city of Angers: A hedonic approach', Paper presented for the First International Conference on Landscape Economics, Vienna.
13. Clamp, P. (1976) 'Evaluating English landscapes-some recent developments', Environment and Planning A, 8(1): 79-92.
14. Clamp, P. (1981) 'The landscape evaluation controversy', Landscape Research, 6(2): 13-15.
15. Clark, J., Burgess, J. and Harrison, C.M. (2000) "'I struggled with this money business": respondents' perspectives on contingent valuation', Ecological Economics, 33(1): 45-62.
16. Cobham Resource Consultants and Price, C. (1991) The Benefits of Amenity Trees. London: Report to Department of the Environment.
17. Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers (frequent revisions) Guide for Establishing Values of Trees and Other Plants. International Society of Arboriculture, Urbana, Il.
18. Coventry-Solihull-Warwickshire (1971) A Strategy for the Sub-region, Supplementary Report 5: Countryside. Coventry-Solihull-Warwickshire Sub-regional Study Group.
19. Davis, R. (1963) 'Recreation planning as an economic problem', Natural Resources Journal, 3: 239-249.
20. Dearden, P. (1981) 'Landscape evaluation: the case for a multidimensional approach', Journal of Environmental Management, 13: 95-105.
21. Fines, K.D. (1968) 'Landscape evaluation: a research project in East Sussex', Regional Studies, 2(1): 41-55.
22. Fleischer, A. and Tsur, Y. (2009) 'The amenity value of agricultural landscape and ruralurban land allocation', Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60(1): 132-153.
23. Garrod, G. (2002) Social and Environmental Benefits of Forestry Phase 2: Landscape Benefits. Edinburgh: Report to Forestry Commission. http://www.forestry.gov.uk/website/pdf.nsf/pdf/fclscaperep.pdf/$FILE/fclscaperep.pdf (accessed 11 May 2012).
24. Garrod, G.D. and Willis, K.G. (1992) 'Valuing goods' characteristics: an application of the hedonic pricing method to environmental attributes', Journal of Environmental Management, 34: 59-76.
25. Gilg, A.W. (1975) 'The objectivity of Linton type methods of assessing scenery as a natural resource', Regional Studies, 9(2): 181-191.
26. Gupta, V., Mythili, G. and Hegde, D.S. (2009) 'Deriving implicit prices for urban environmental amenities from Mumbai housing prices: a revealed preference approach', Paper presented for the First International Conference on Landscape Economics, Vienna.
27. Hanley, N., MacMillan, D., Wright, R.E., Bullock, C., Simpson, I., Parsisson, D. and Crabtree, B. (1998) 'Contingent valuation versus choice experiments: estimating the benefits of Environmentally Sensitive Areas in Scotland', Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49(1): 1-15.
28. Hanley, N.D. and Ruffell, R. (1993) 'The contingent valuation of forest characteristics', Journal of Agricultural Economics, 44(2): 218-229.
29. Helliwell, D.R. (1967) 'The amenity value of trees and woodlands', Arboricultural Journal, 1: 128-131.
30. Henry, M.S. (1994) 'The contribution of landscaping to the price of single family houses: a study of home sales in Greenville, South Carolina', Journal of Environmental Horticulture, 12(2): 65-70.
31. Henry, M.S. (1999) 'Landscape quality and the price of single family houses: Further evidence from home sales in Greenville, South Carolina', Journal of Environmental Horticulture, 17(1): 25-30.
32. Hoinville, G. (1971) 'Evaluating community preferences', Environment and Planning A, 3(1): 33-50.
33. Jacques, D.L. (1980) 'Landscape appraisal: the case for a subjective theory', Journal of Environmental Management, 10: 107-113.
34. Kim, Y-F. and Johnson, J.L. (2002) 'The impact of forests and forest management on neighboring property values', Society and Natural Resources, 15(10): 887-901.
35. Lancaster, K.J. (1966) 'Change and innovation in the technology of consumption', American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 56(1/2): 14-23.
36. Lange, E. and Schaeffer, P.V. (2001) 'A comment on the market value of a room with a view', Landscape and Urban Planning, 55(2): 113-120.
37. Linton, D.L. (1968) 'The assessment of scenery as a natural resource', Scottish Geographical Magazine, 84(3): 218-238.
38. Luttik, J. (2000) 'The value of trees, water and open space as reflected by house prices in the Netherlands', Landscape and Urban Planning, 48(3-4): 161-167.
39. MacMillan, D.C. and Duff, E.I. (1998) 'Estimating the non-market costs and benefits of native woodland restoration using the Contingent Valuation Method', Forestry, 71(3): 247-259.
40. Mitchell, R.C. and Carson, R.T. (1989) Using Surveys to Value Goods: the Contingent Valuation Method. Washington: Resources for the Future.
41. Morales, D.J., Boyce, B.N. and Favretti, R.J. (1976) 'The contribution of trees to residential property value: Manchester, Connecticut', Valuation, 23(2): 26-43.
42. Navrud, S., Ready, R., Magnussen, K. and Bergland, O. (2008) 'Valuing the social benefits of avoiding landscape destruction from overhead power tranmission lines - do cables pass the benefit-cost test?', Landscape Research, 33(3): 1-16.
43. Nielsen, A.B., Olsen, S.B. and Lundhede, T. (2007) 'An economic valuation of the recreational benefits associated with nature-based forest management practices', Landscape and Urban Planning, 80(1-2): 63-71.
44. Payne, B.R. and Strom, S. (1973) 'The contribution of trees to the appraised value of unimproved residential land', Valuation, 22(2): 36-45.
45. Penning-Rowsell, E.C. and Hardy, D.I. (1973) 'Landscape evaluation and planning policy: A comparative study in the Wye Valley Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty', Regional Studies, 7(2): 152-160.
46. Price, C. (1970) Social Benefit from Forestry in the UK. Oxford University: Department of Forestry.
47. Price, C. (1975) Increasing the Electricity Supply to Skye. Report to the Public Enquiry held in Broadford, Highland Region.
48. Price, C. (1976) 'Subjectivity and objectivity in landscape evaluation', Environment and Planning A, 8(7): 829-838.
49. Price, C. (1978) Landscape Economics. London: Macmillan.
50. Price, C. (1991) Landscape Valuation and Public Decision Making. Cheltenham: Report to the Countryside Commission.
51. Price, C. (1993) 'Applied landscape economics: a personal journey of discovery', Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 36(1): 51-63.
52. Price, C. (1994) 'Literature review [of landscape valuation]', Landscape Research, 19(1): 38-55.
53. Price, C. (1995) 'The pros and cons of alternative valuation methods'. In: K.G. Willis and J.T. Corkindale (eds), Environmental Valuation: New Perspectives. pp. 160-177, Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
54. Price, C. (1999) 'Contingent valuation and retrograde information bias'. In: A. Park and C. Stewart Roper (eds), The Living Forest. pp. 37-44, London, HMSO: Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Non-market Benefits of Forestry, Edinburgh, June 1996.
55. Price, C. (2000) 'Valuation of unpriced products: contingent valuation, cost-benefit analysis and participatory democracy', Land Use Policy, 17(3): 187-196.
56. Price, C. (2001) 'Exact values and vague products? Contingent valuation and passive use value'. In: T. Sievanen, C.C. Konijnendijk, L. Langner. and K. Nilsson K. (eds),Forest and Social Services - the Role of Research. pp. 205-217, Vantaa, Finland: Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Paper 815.
57. Price, C. (2003) 'Quantifying the aesthetic benefits of urban forestry', Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 1(3): 123-133.
58. Price, C. (2004) 'Forest aesthetics, forest economics and ecological sustainability'. In: R. Döring and M. Rühs (eds), Ökonomische Rationalität und praktische Vernunft. pp. 111-128, Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
59. Price, C. (2007a) 'The landscape of sustainable economics'. In: J.F. Benson and M. Roe (eds), Landscape and Sustainability (2nd ed.). pp. 37-57, Cheltenham: E & F Spon.
60. Price, C. (2007b) 'Putting a value on trees: an economist's perspective', Arboricultural Journal, 30(1): 7-19.
61. Price, C. (2008) 'Landscape economics at dawn: an eye-witness account', Landscape Research, 33(3): 263-280.
62. Price, C. and Thomas, A.Ll. (2001) 'Evaluating the impact of farm woodland on the landscape: a case of blending perspectives'. In: T. Sievanen, C.C. Konijnendijk, L. Langner and K. Nilsson (eds), Forest and Social Services - the Role of Research. pp. 191-203, Vantaa, Finland: Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Paper 815.
63. Price, U. (1810) Essays on the Picturesque, as compared with the Sublime and the Beautiful; and, on the Use of Studying Pictures, for the purpose of Improving Real Landscape. London: Mawman.
64. Randall, A., Grunewald, O., Johnson, S., Ausness, R. and Pagoulatos, A. (1978) 'Reclaiming coal surface mines in central Appalachia: a case study of the benefits and costs', Land Economics, 54(4): 472-489.
65. Sagoff, M. (1988) The Economy of the Earth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66. Schroeder, H.W. (1986) 'Estimating park tree densities to maximize landscape esthetics', Journal of Environmental Management, 23: 325-333.
67. Shafer, E.L. Jr and Metz, J. (1970) It Seems Possible to Quantify Scenic Beauty in Photographs. USDA Forest Service Paper NE-162.
68. Sheppard, S.R.J. and Harshaw, H.W. (eds) (2001) Forests and Landscapes: Linking Ecology, Sustainability and Aesthetics. Wallingford, Berks: CABI Publishing.
69. Sievänen, T., Pouta, E. and Ovaskainen, V. (1992) 'Problems of measuring recreational value', Scandinavian Forest Economics, 33: 231-243.
70. Tyrväinen, L. (1997) 'The amenity value of the urban forest: an application of the hedonic pricing method', Landscape and Urban Planning, 37(3-4): 211-222.
71. Tyrväinen, L. and Miettinen, A. (2000) 'Property prices and urban forest amenities', Journal ofEnvironmental Economics and Management, 39(2): 205-223.
72. Tyrväinen, L. and Väänänen, H. (1998) 'The economic value of urban forest amenities: An application of the contingent valuation method', Landscape and Urban Planning, 43(1-3): 105-118.
73. Whiteman, A. (1995) The Supply and Demand for Timber, Recreation and Community Forest Outputs from Forests in Great Britain. Edinburgh University: PhD thesis.
74. Willis, K.G. and Garrod, G.D. (1993) 'Valuing landscape: a contingent value approach', Journal of Environmental Management, 37(1): 1-22.