Evaluation and selection of emergency treatment technology based on dynamic fuzzy GRA method for chemical contingency spills

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 299, Issue , 2015, Pages 306-315

  Liu, Jie ^a   Guo, Liang ^a   Jiang, Jiping ^a   Hao, Linlin ^a   Liu, Rentao ^a   Wang, Peng ^a  

^a HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Dynamic analysis; Emergency treatment technology; GRA method; Interval valued triangular fuzzy numbers; Multi criteria decision making

Indexed keywords

EID: 84934272498     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: 18733336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.06.048     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Xue P., Zeng W. Policy issues on the control of environmental accident hazards in China and their implementation. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2010, 2:440-445.
2. Shi S.G., Cao J.C., Li F., Liang W.Y., Zhang L.Q. Construction of a technique plan repository and evaluation system based on AHP group decision-making for emergency treatment and treatment in chemical pollution accidents. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 276:200-206.
3. The Central People's Government of the People's Republic of China. The National Program for Long- and Medium-Term Scientific and Technological Development (2006-2020), 2006.. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2006-02/26/content_211553.htm.
4. Tseng M.L. A causal and effect decision making model of service quality expectation using grey-fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36:7738-7748.
5. Lee S.K., Mogi G., Li Z., Hui K.S., Lee S.K., Hui K.N., Park S.Y., Ha Y.J., Kim J.W. Measuring the relative efficiency of hydrogen energy technologies for implementing the hydrogen economy: an integrated fuzzy AHP/DEA approach. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36:12655-12663.
6. Naghadehi M.Z., Mikaeil R., Ataei M. The application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to selection of optimum underground mining method for Jajarm Bauxite Mine Iran. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36:8218-8226.
7. Aragonés-Beltrán P., Mendoza-Roca J.A., Bes-Pia A., García-Melónb M., Parra-Ruiz E. Application of multicriteria decision analysis to jar-test results for chemicals selection in the physical-chemical treatment of textile wastewater. J. Hazard. Mat. 2009, 164:288-295.
8. Naghadehi M.Z., Mikaeil R., Ataei M. The application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to selection of optimum underground mining method for Jajarm Bauxite Mine, Iran. Expert Systems Appl. 2009, 36:8218-8226.
9. Shi L., Shuai J., Xu K. Fuzzy fault tree assessment based on improved AHP for fire and explosion accidents for steel oil storage tanks. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 278:529-538.
10. Ren J., Sovacool B.K. Prioritizing low-carbon energy sources to enhance China's energy security. Energy Convers. Manage. 2015, 92:129-136.
11. Zeng G., Jiang R., Huang G. Optimization of wastewater treatment alternative selection by hierarchy grey relational analysis. J. Environ. Manage. 2007, 82:250-259.
12. Lin C.T., Chang C.W., Chen C.B. The worst ill-conditioned silicon wafer slicing machine detected by using grey relational analysis. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2006, 31:388-395.
13. Chan J.W.K. Application of grey relational analysis for ranking material options. Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol. 2006, 26:210-217.
14. Chan J.W.K., Tong T.K.L. Multi-criteria material selections and end-of-life product strategy: grey relational analysis approach. Mater. Design 2007, 28:1539-1546.
15. Manzardo A., Ren J.Z., Mazzi A., Scipioni A. A grey-based group decision-making methodology for the selection of hydrogen technologies in life cycle sustainability perspective. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37:17663-17670.
16. Nian Q.F., Shi S.L., Li R.Q. Research and application of safety assessment method of gas explosion accident in coal mine based on GRA-ANP-FCE. Procedia Eng. 2012, 45:106-111.
17. Zhou J.G., Wang Y.X., Li B. Study on optimization of denitration technology based on gray-fuzzy combined comprehensive evaluation model. Syst. Eng. Procedia 2012, 4:210-218.
18. Moran J., Granada E., Míguez J.L., Porteiro J. Use of grey relational analysis to assess and optimize small biomass boilers. Fuel Process. Technol. 2006, 87:123-127.
19. Kuo Y., Yang T., Huang G.W. The use of grey relational analysis in solving multiple attribute decision-making problems. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2008, 55:80-93.
20. Ip W.C., Hu B.Q., Wong H., Xia J. Applications of grey relational method to river environment quality evaluation in China. J. Hydrol. 2009, 379:284-290.
21. Lin S.J., Lu I.J., Lewis C. Grey relation performance correlations among economics, energy use and carbon dioxide emission in Taiwan. Energy Policy 2007, 35:1948-1955.
22. Wu H.H. A comparative study of using grey relational analysis in multiple attribute decision making problems. Quality Eng. 2002, 15:209-217.
23. Xu Z. On multi-period multi-attribute decision making. Knowl.-Based Syst. 2008, 21:164-171.
24. Lin Y.H., Lee P.C., Ting H.I. Dynamic multi-attribute decision making model with grey number evaluations. Expert Syst. Appl. 2008, 35:1638-1644.
25. Xu Z., Yager R.R. Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 2008, 48:246-262.
26. Rong M., Mahapatra N.K., Maiti M. A multi-objective wholesaler-retailers inventory-distribution model with controllable lead-time based on probabilistic fuzzy set and triangular fuzzy number. Appl. Math. Modell. 2008, 32:2670-2685.
27. Wu Q., Law R. The complex fuzzy system forecasting model based on fuzzy SVM with triangular fuzzy number input and output. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38:12085-12093.
28. BagherzadehValami H. Cost efficiency with triangular fuzzy number input prices: An application of DEA. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 2009, 42:1631-1637.
29. Wu Q. Fuzzy robust ν-support vector machine with penalizing hybrid noises on symmetric triangular fuzzy number space. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38:39-46.
30. Ashtiani B., Haghighirad F., Makui A. Extension of fuzzy TOPSIS method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Appl. Soft Comput. 2009, 9:457-461.
31. Mokhtari K., Ren J., Roberts C., Wang J. Application of a generic bow-tie based risk analysis framework on risk management of sea ports and offshore terminals. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 192:465-475.
32. Zhang S.F. Several Methods for Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision-making with Application 2012, Xidian University.
33. Lee W.S., Lin Y.C. Evaluating and ranking energy performance of office buildings using Grey relational analysis. Energy 2011, 36:2551-2556.
34. Kuo Y., Yang T., Huang G.W. The use of grey relational analysis in solving multiple attribute decision-making problems. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2008, 55:80-93.
35. Wei G.W. GRA method for multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information in intuitionistic fuzzy settings. Knowl.-Based Syst. 2010, 23:243-247.
36. Wang P., Meng P., Zhai J.Y., Zhu Z.Q. A hybrid method using experiment design and grey relational analysis for multiple criteria decision making problems. Knowl.-Based Syst. 2013, 53:100-107.
37. Wei G.W. GRA method for multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information in intuitionistic fuzzy setting. Knowl.-Based Syst. 2010, 23:243-247.
38. Zhang S.F., Liu S.Y., Zhai R.H. An extended GRA method for MCDM with interval-valued triangular fuzzy assessments and unknown weights. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2011, 61:1336-1341.
39. Li D.F., Wang Y.C., Liu S., Shan F. Fractional programming methodology for multi-attribute group decision-making using IFS. Appl. Soft Comput. 2009, 9:219-225.
40. Singhirunnusorn W., Stenstrom M.K. Appropriate wastewater treatment systems for developing countries: criteria and indictor assessment in Thailand. Water Sci. Technol. 2009, 59:1873-1884.
41. Balkema A.J., Preisig H.A., Otterpohl R., Lambert F.J.D. Indicators for the sustainability assessment of wastewater treatment systems. Urban Water 2002, 4:153-161.
42. Dambies L., Vincent T., Guibal E. Treatment of arsenic-containing solutions using chitosan derivatives: uptake mechanism and sorption performances. Water Res. 2002, 36:3699-3710.
43. Mohan D., Pittman C.U. Activated carbons and low cost adsorbents for remediation of tri-and hexavalent chromium from water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 137:762-811.
44. Lin T.F., Wu J.K. Adsorption of arsenite and arsenate within activated alumina grains: equilibrium and kinetics. Water Res. 2001, 35:2049-2057.
45. Pena M.E., Korfiatis G.P., Patel M.P., Lippincott L., Meng X.G. Adsorption of As (V) and As (III) by nanocrystalline titanium dioxide. Water Res. 2005, 39:2327-2337.
46. Manning B.A., Fendorf S.E., Bostick B., Suarez D.L. Arsenic (III) oxidation and arsenic (V) adsorption reactions on synthetic birnessite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36:976-981.
47. Roberts L.C., Hug S.J., Ruettimann T., Billah M.M., Khan A.W., Rahman M.T. Arsenic removal with iron (II) and iron (III) in waters with high silicate and phosphate concentrations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38:307-315.
48. Altundoğan H.S., Altundoğan S., Tümen F., Boldik M. Arsenic adsorption from aqueous solutions by activated red mud. Waste Manage. 2002, 22:357-363.
49. Manna B.R., Bhat S.C., Dasgupta M. Studies on removal of arsenic from water using hydrated zirconium oxide, Chem. Environ. Res. 1999, 8:51-56.
50. Verma A.K., Dash R.R., Bhunia P. A review on chemical coagulation/flocculation technologies for removal of colour from textile wastewaters. J. Environ. Manage. 2012, 93:154-168.
51. Bilici M.B., Pala A. A statistical experiment design approach for arsenic removal by coagulation process using aluminum sulfate. Desalination 2010, 254:42-48.
52. Ashtiani B., Haghighirad F., Makui A. Extension of fuzzy TOPSIS method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Appl. Soft Comput. 2009, 9:457-461.