Construction of a technique plan repository and evaluation system based on AHP group decision-making for emergency treatment and disposal in chemical pollution accidents

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 276, Issue , 2014, Pages 200-206

  Shi, Shenggang ^a,b   Cao, Jingcan ^a   Feng, Li ^a   Liang, Wenyan ^a   Zhang, Liqiu ^a  

^a BEIJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b BAOTOU TEACHERS COLLEGE   (China)

Author keywords

Chemical pollution accident; Emergency treatment and disposal; Evaluation system; Group decision improved AHP; Technique plan repository

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENTS; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; INDICATORS (CHEMICAL); POLLUTION CONTROL; WASTE DISPOSAL;

CHEMICAL POLLUTION; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; EVALUATION SYSTEM; GROUP DECISION-IMPROVED AHP; TECHNIQUE PLAN REPOSITORY;

RIVER POLLUTION;

ANILINE; DRINKING WATER; RIVER WATER;

ACCIDENT; CHEMICAL POLLUTANT; DECISION MAKING; POLLUTION CONTROL; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; POLLUTION POLICY;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ACCIDENT; CHEMICAL POLLUTION ACCIDENT; CHEMICAL SAFETY; CHINA; COST; DECISION MAKING; EMERGENCY DISPOSAL TECHNIQUE PLAN REPOSITORY; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MATURITY; PHYSICAL PHENOMENA; POLLUTION; POLLUTION CONTROL; PROCESS DESIGN; RIVER BASIN; SOCIETY; TECHNIQUE EVALUATION INDEX SYSTEM; TIME; TIME SENSITIVENESS; TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT; WASTE DISPOSAL; WATER SUPPLY; AIR POLLUTION; EMERGENCY; GROUP PROCESS; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;

AIR POLLUTION; DECISION MAKING; EMERGENCIES; GROUP PROCESSES; PLANNING TECHNIQUES;

EID: 84901487369     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: 18733336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.05.034     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Wei L.D., Guo H.C., Qing Y., Qing G.C. The situation of hazardous chemical accidents in China between 2000 and 2006. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186:1489-1494.
2. Zhang H.D., Zheng X.P. Characteristics of hazardous chemical accidents in China: a statistical investigation. J. Loss Prev. Proc. Ind. 2012, 25:686-693.
3. Xue P.L., Zeng W.H. Policy issues on the control of environmental accident hazards in China and their implementation. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2010, 2:440-445.
4. Saw L., Shumway J., Ruckart P. Surveillance data on pesticide and agricultural chemical releases and associated public health consequences in selected US states 2003-2007. J. Med. Toxicol. 2011, 7(2):164-171.
5. Schap A., Desel H., Wyke S., Orford R., Griffiths M.R., Edwards N., Kupferschmid H., Mathieu M., Pelclova D., Duarte-Davidson R. Countering health threats by chemicals with a potential terrorist background-creating a rapid alert system for Europe. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2012, 23(2):63-66.
6. Kirby M.F., Law R.J. Accidental spills at sea - risk, impact, mitigation and the need for co-ordinated post-incident monitoring. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2010, 60(6):797-803.
7. Tseng J.M., Kuo C.Y., Liu M.Y., Shu C.M. Emergency response plan for boiler explosion with toxic chemical releases at Nan-Kung industrial park in central Taiwan. Proc. Saf. Environ. Prot. 2008, 86(B6):415-420.
8. Bhardwaj J.R., Chawla R., Sharma R.K. Chemical disaster management: current status and perspectives. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 2007, 66(2):110-119.
9. Crisci C., Ghattas B., Perera G. A review of supervised machine learning algorithms and their applications to ecological data. Ecol. Model. 2012, 240:113-122.
10. Ferdous R., Khan F., Sadiq R., Amyotte P., Veitch B. Handling data uncertainties in event tree analysis. Proc. Saf. Environ. Prot. 2009, 87:283-292.
11. Sun O. Main pillars of legislation of hazardous chemicals in China. Chim. Oggi - Chem. Today 2013, 31(3):33-36.
12. Saaty T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation 1980, McGraw-Hill International Book Co., New York/London.
13. Macharis C., Springael J., De Brucker K., Verbeke A. PROMETHEE and AHR: the design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2004, 53:307-317.
14. Kablan M.M. Decision support for energy conservation promotion: an analytic hierarchy process approach. Energy Policy 2004, 32:1151-1158.
15. Zejli K., Azmani A., Khaliissa S. Applying fuzzy analytic hierarchy Process (FAHP) to evaluate factors locating emergency logistics platforms. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 2012, 57(21):17-23.
16. Shi L., Zhang R.F., Xie Q.Y., Fu L.H. Improving analytic hierarchy process applied to fire risk analysis of public building. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2009, 54(8):1442-1450.
17. Yang I.T., Wang W.C., Yang T.I. Automatic repair of inconsistent pair wise weighting matrices in analytic hierarchy process. Automat. Constr. 2012, 22:290-297.
18. Wang Y.M., Luo Y. A note on "A new approach for weight derivation using data envelopment analysis in the analytic hierarchy process". Math. Comput. Model. 2012, 56:49-55.
19. Xitlali D.G., Rafael P.G., Joaquín I., Jesús M.R. An analytic hierarchy process for assessing externalities in water leakage management. Math. Comput. Model. 2010, 52:1194-1202.
20. Nassi C.D., Costa F.C.C. Use of the analytic hierarchy process to evaluate transit fare system. Res. Transp. Econ. 2012, 36:50-62.
21. Bolloju N. Aggregation of analytic hierarchy process models based on similarities in decision makers' preferences. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2001, 128:499-508.
22. Grošelj P., Stirn L.Z. Acceptable consistency of aggregated comparison matrices in analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2012, 223:417-420.
23. Heo E., Kim J., Cho S. Selecting hydrogen production methods using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with opportunities costs and risks. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37:17655-17662.
24. Tsita K.G., Pilavachi P.A. Evaluation of alternative fuels for the Greek road transport sector using the analytic hierarchy process. Energy Policy 2012, 48:677-686.
25. Cay T., Uyan M. Evaluation of reallocation criteria in land consolidation studies using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Land Use Policy 2013, 30:541-548.
26. Kordi M., Brandt S.A. Effects of increasing fuzziness on analytic hierarchy process for spatial multicriteria decision analysis. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2012, 36:43-53.
27. Bernasconi M., Choirat C., Seri R. Empirical properties of group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: theory and evidence. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2014, 232(3):584-592.
28. Bohanec M., Messean A., Scatasta S., Angevin F., Griffiths B., Krogh P.H., Znidarsic M., Dzeroski S. A qualitative multi-attribute model for economic and ecological assessment of genetically modified crops. Ecol. Model. 2008, 215:247-261.
29. Kalbar P.P., Karmakar S., Asolekar S.R. The influence of expert opinions on the selection of wastewater treatment alternatives: a group decision-making approach. J. Environ. Manage. 2013, 128:844-851.
30. Qin X.Z., Wang X.H., Yang D.L. Credit degree method of group decision making in AHP (I). Syst. Eng.: Theory Pract. 1999, 7:89-93.
31. Qin X.Z., Wang X.H., Yang D.L. Credit degree method of group decision making in AHP (II). Syst. Eng.: Theory Pract. 2000, 5:77-79.
32. Figueira J., Greco S., Ehrgott M. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. State of the Art Surveys 2005, Springer-Verlag, Boston.