Multi-label classification models for sustainable flood retention basins

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 32, Issue , 2012, Pages 27-36

  Yang, Qinli ^a   Shao, Junming ^b   Scholz, Miklas ^a,c   Boehm, Christian ^b   Plant, Claudia ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

^d FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Back propagation for multi label learning; Baden; Classification framework; Flood control; Landscape management; Multi label K nearest neighbor; Multi label support vector machine; Multiple function; Scotland; Water resources

Indexed keywords

BADEN; CLASSIFICATION FRAMEWORK; LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT; MULTI-LABEL; MULTIPLE FUNCTION; SCOTLAND;

COASTAL ZONES; FLOOD CONTROL; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; WATER RESOURCES;

BACKPROPAGATION;

COASTAL ZONE; DATA SET; FLOOD CONTROL; FLOODPLAIN; IMPOUNDMENT; LANDSCAPE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RIVER BASIN; SUSTAINABILITY; WATER RESOURCE;

BADEN-BADEN; BADEN-WURTTEMBERG; GERMANY; SCOTLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84857365593     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Boutell M.R., Luo J., Shen X., Brown C.M. Learning multi-label scene classification. Pattern Recog. 2004, 37(9):1757-1771.
2. Chen Y.W., Lin C.J. Combining SVMs with various feature selection strategies. Feature Extraction, Foundations and Applications 2006, 315-323. Springer, London, UK. I. Guyon, S. Gunn, M. Nikravesh, L. Zadeh (Eds.).
3. Clare A., King R.D. Knowledge discovery in multi-label phenotype data. Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery (PKDD 2001) 2001, 42-53. Springer, London, UK. L. De Raedt, A. Siebes (Eds.).
4. Defra Flood and Water Management Act 2010, Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), The Stationary Office, London, UK, (last accessed 01.12.11.). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/29/pdfs/ukpga_20100029_en.pdf.
5. Defra The Natural Choice: Securing the Value for Nature. Natural Environment White Paper 2011, Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), The Stationary Office, London, UK, (last accessed 01.12.11.). http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm80/8082/8082.pdf.
6. Elisseeff A., Weston J. A kernel method for multi-labelled classification. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2002, vol. 14:681-687. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. European Union Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks. Off. J. European Union (Eur Lex) Ref L 2007, 288:27-34.
8. Gibert K., Sànchez-Marrè M. Application of machine learning methods to spatial interpolation of environmental variables. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2011, 26(7):983-985.
9. Godbole S., Sarawagi S. Discriminative methods for multi-labeled classification. Proceedings of the 8th Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD 2004) 2004, 22-30. Sydney, Australia.
10. Hedmark Å., Zhang L., Scholz M., Aronsson P., Elowson T. Self-organizing map analysis of planted soil infiltration systems for treatment of log yard runoff. For. Sci. 2009, 55(2):183-188.
11. Joachims T. Text categorization with support vector machines: learning with many relevant features. Proceedings of European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML) 1998, vol. 1398 (7):137-142. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
12. Kohonen T. An introduction to neural computing. Neural Networks 1988, 1(1):3-16.
13. Li T., Ogihara M. Toward intelligent music information retrieval. IEEE T. Multimedia 2006, 8(3):564-574.
14. Li Y., Shawe-Taylor J. The SVM with uneven margins and Chinese document categorization. Proceedings of the 17th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (PACLIC17) 2003, 216-227. Singapore.
15. Li J., Heap A.D., Potter A., Daniell J.J. A new library to combine artificial neural networks and support vector machines with statistics and a database engine for application in environmental modelling. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2011, 26(12):1647-1659.
16. McCallum A.K. Multi-label text classification with a mixture model trained by EM. Proceedings of the AAAI' 99 Workshop on Text Learning 1999, 1-7. Orlando, Florida, USA.
17. McMinn W.R., Yang Q., Scholz M. Classification and assessment of water bodies as adaptive structural for flood risk management planning. J. Environ. Manage. 2010, 91(9):1855-1863.
18. Qi G.J., Hua X.S., Rui Y., Tang J., Mei T., Zhang H.J. Correlative multi-label video annotation. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Multimedia 2007, 17-26. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA.
19. Rifkin R., Klautau A. In defence of one-versus-all classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2004, 5:101-141.
20. Rumelhart D.E., Hinton G.E., Williams R.J. Learning internal representations by error propagation. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition 1986, vol. 1:318-362. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
21. Salton G. Developments in automatic text retrieval. Science 1991, 253(5023):974-980.
22. Schapire R.E., Singer Y. Boostexter: a boosting-based system for text categorization. Mach. Learn. 2000, 39(2/3):135-168.
23. Scholz M., Sadowski A.J. Conceptual classification model for sustainable flood retention basins. J. Environ. Manage. 2009, 90(1):624-633.
24. Scholz M., Yang Q. Guidance on variables characterizing water bodies including sustainable flood retention basins. Landscape Urban Plan. 2010, 98(3-4):190-199.
25. Scholz M. Classification methodology for sustainable flood retention basins. Landscape Urban Plan. 2007, 81(3):246-256.
26. Scholz M. Ecological effects of water retention in the River Rhine Valley: a review assisting future retention basin classification. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 2007, 64(2):171-187.
27. Sebastiani F. Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Comput. Surv. 2002, 34(1):1-47.
28. Snoek C.G.M., Worring M., van Gemert J.C., Geusebroek J.M., Smeulders A.W.M. The challenge problem for automated detection of 101 semantic concepts in multimedia. Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia 2006, 421-430. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA.
29. Sudhakaran J.K., Vasantha R. Mixed method approach for efficient component retrieval from a component repository. J. Software Eng. Appl. 2011, 4:442-445.
30. Sudheep E.M., Sumam M.I., Joseph A. Design and performance analysis of data mining techniques based on decision trees and Naive Bayes classifier for employment chance prediction. J. Conver. Info. Tech. 2011, 6(5):89-98.
31. Trohidis K., Tsoumakas G., Kalliris G., Vlahavas I. Multilabel classification of music into emotions. Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR 2008) 2008, 325-330. Philadelphia, PA, USA.
32. Tsoumakas G., Katakis I. Multi-label classification: an overview. Int. J. Data Warehous. Min. 2007, 3(3):1-13.
33. Tsoumakas G., Katakis I., Vlahavas I. Mining multi-label data. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook 2010, 667-685. Springer. second ed. O. Maimon, L. Rokach (Eds.).
34. Yang Q., Shao J., Scholz M., Plant C. Feature selection methods for characterizing and classifying adaptive sustainable flood retention basins. Water Res. 2011, 45(3):993-1004.
35. Zhang M.L., Zhou Z.H. Multi-label neural networks with applications to functional genomics and text categorization. IEEE T. Knowl. Data Eng 2006, 18(10):1338-1351.
36. Zhang M.L., Zhou Z.H. ML-KNN: a lazy learning approach to multi-label learning. Pattern Recog. 2007, 40(7):2038-2048.
37. Zhang Y., Burer S., Street W.N. Ensemble pruning via semi-definite programming. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2006, 7:1315-1338.
38. Zhu L., Yang J., Shen H.B. Multi label learning for prediction of human protein subcellular localizations. Protein J. 2009, 28(9-10):384-390.