Camera model identification based on DCT coefficient statistics

Digital Signal Processing: A Review Journal

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 88-100

  Thai, Thanh Hai ^a   Retraint, Florent ^a   Cogranne, Rémi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE TROYES   (France)

Author keywords

Camera model identification; Digital forensics; Discrete cosine transform; Hypothesis testing; Natural image model

Indexed keywords

CAMERAS; DIGITAL FORENSICS; IMAGE PROCESSING; STATISTICAL TESTS;

CAMERA MODEL IDENTIFICATIONS; DISCRETE COSINE TRANSFORM(DCT); EXTRACTING INFORMATION; FALSE ALARM PROBABILITY; GENERALIZED LIKELIHOOD RATIO TEST; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; LIKELIHOOD RATIO TESTS; NATURAL IMAGES; DIGITAL FORENSIC;

DISCRETE COSINE TRANSFORMS;

EID: 84933677366     PISSN: 10512004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsp.2015.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. M.C. Stamm, M. Wu, K.J.R. Liu, Information forensics: an overview of the first decade, IEEE Access 1 (2013) 167-200.
2. C.I. Podilchuk, E.J. Delp, Digital watermarking: algorithms and applications, IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 18 (4) (2001) 33-46.
3. G.L. Friedman, The trustworthy digital camera: restoring credibility to the photographic image, IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 39 (4) (1993) 905-910.
4. J. Lukas, J. Fridrich, M. Goljan, Digital camera identification from sensor pattern noise, IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 1 (2) (2006) 205-214.
5. K. Kurosawa, K. Kuroki, N. Saitoh, CCD fingerprint method-identification of a video camera from videotaped images, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Process, vol. 3, 1999, pp. 537-540.
6. M. Chen, J. Fridrich, M. Goljan, J. Lukas, Determining image origin and integrity using sensor noise, IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 3 (1) (2008) 74-90.
7. J. Fridrich, Digital image forensics, IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 26 (2) (2009) 26-37.
8. C.-T. Li, Y. Li, Color-decoupled photo response non-uniformity for digital image forensics, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 22 (2) (2012) 260-271.
9. T. Filler, J. Fridrich, M. Goljan, Using sensor pattern noise for camera model identification, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Process, 2008, pp. 1296-1299.
10. K.S. Choi, E.Y. Lam, K. Wong, Source camera identification using footprints from lens aberration, in: Proc. SPIE Digit. Photography, vol. 6069, 2006, pp. 172-179.
11. A. Swaminathan, M. Wu, K.J.R. Liu, Nonintrusive component forensics of visual sensors using output images, IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2 (1) (2007) 91-106.
12. H. Cao, A.C. Kot, Accurate detection of demosaicing regularity for digital image forensics, IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 4 (4) (2009) 899-910.
13. S. Gao, G. Xu, R. Hu, Camera model identification based on the characteristic of CFA and interpolation, in: Proc. Int. Workshop Digital Forensics Watermarking, vol. 7128, 2012, pp. 268-280.
14. Y. Hu, C.-T. Li, X. Lin, B.-B. Liu, Camera model identification based on the characteristic of CFA and interpolation, in: Proc. Int. Conf. Intelligent Inf. Hiding Multimedia Signal Process, 2012, pp. 325-330.
15. K.S. Choi, E.Y. Lam, K.K.Y. Wong, Source camera identification by JPEG compression statistics for image forensics, in: IEEE Region Conf. TENCON, 2006, pp. 1-4.
16. M.-J. Tsai, C.-S. Wang, J. Liu, A hybrid model for digital camera source identification, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Process, 2009, pp. 2901-2904.
17. M. Liu, N. Yu, W. Li, Camera model identification for JPEG images via tensor analysis, in: Proc. Int. Conf. Intelligent Inf. Hiding Multimedia Signal Process, 2010, pp. 462-465.
18. M.-J. Tsai, C.-S. Wang, J. Liu, J.-S. Yin, Using decision fusion of feature selection in digital forensics for camera source model identification, Comput. Stand. Interfaces 34 (2012) 292-304.
19. T. Mitchell, Machine Learning, McGraw Hill, 1997.
20. E.L. Lehmann, J.P. Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses, 3rd edition, Springer, New York, 2005.
21. V.N. Vapnik, The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, 2nd edition, Springer Verlag, 2000.
22. C. Scott, Performance measures for Neyman-Pearson classification, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 53 (8) (2007) 2852-2863.
23. T.H. Thai, R. Cogranne, F. Retraint, Camera model identification based on the heteroscedastic noise model, IEEE Trans. Image Process. 23 (1) (2014) 250-263.
24. T.H. Thai, F. Retraint, R. Cogranne, Camera model identification based on the generalized noise model in natural images, Signal Process., submitted for publication.
25. T.H. Thai, F. Retraint, R. Cogranne, Generalized signal-dependent noise model and parameter estimation for natural images, Signal Process., submitted for publication.
26. T.H. Thai, R. Cogranne, F. Retraint, Optimal detector for camera model identification based on an accurate model of DCT coefficients, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Workshop Multimedia Signal Process, 2014.
27. T.H. Thai, R. Cogranne, F. Retraint, Statistical model of natural images, in: Proc. IEEE. Int. Conf. Image Process, 2012, pp. 2525-2528.
28. T.H. Thai, R. Cogranne, F. Retraint, Steganalysis of jsteg algorithm based on a novel statistical model of quantized DCT coefficients, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Process, 2013, pp. 4427-4431.
29. T.H. Thai, R. Cogranne, F. Retraint, Statistical model of quantized DCT coefficients: application in the steganalysis of Jsteg algorithm, IEEE Trans. Image Process. 23 (5) (2014) 1980-1993.
30. R. Ramanath, W.E. Snyder, Y. Yoo, M.S. Drew, Color image processing pipeline, IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 22 (1) (2005) 34-43.
31. G.E. Healey, R. Kondepudy, Radiometric CCD camera calibration and noise estimation, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 16 (3) (1994) 267-276.
32. I.M. Ryzhik, I.S. Gradshteyn, Tables of Integrals, Series, and Products, Elsevier, United Kingdom, 2007.
33. C.R. Rao, H. Toutenburg, Linear Models: Least Squares and Alternatives, 2nd edition, Springer, New York, 1999.
34. P.J. Rousseeuw, C. Croux, Alternatives to the median absolute deviation, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 88 (424) (1993) 1273-1283.
35. M.A. Robertson, R.L. Stevenson, DCT quantization noise in compressed images, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 15 (1) (2005) 27-38.
36. L. Tierney, J.B. Kadane, Accurate approximations for posterior moments and marginal densities, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 81 (393) (1986) 82-86.
37. R. Butler, A. Wood, Laplace approximations for hypergeometric functions with matrix argument, Ann. Stat. 30 (4) (2002) 1155-1177.
38. M.K. Mihçak, I. Kozintsev, K. Ramchandran, Spatially adaptive statistical modeling of wavelet image coefficients and its application to denoising, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process, vol. 6, 1999, pp. 3253-3256.
39. T. Gloe, R. Bohme, The Dresden image database for benchmarking digital image forensics, in: Proc. ACM Symposium Applied Comput., vol. 2, 2010, pp. 1585-1591.
40. T. Gloe, K. Borowka, A. Winkler, Feature-based camera model identification works in practice, in: Proc. Int. Workshop Inf. Hiding, vol. 5806, 2009, pp. 262-276.
41. E.Y. Lam, J.W. Goodman, A mathematical analysis of the DCT coefficient distributions for images, IEEE Trans. Image Process. 9 (10) (2000) 1661-1666.
42. J.-H. Chang, J.-W. Shin, N.S. Kim, S.K. Mitra, Image probability distribution based on generalized gamma function, IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 12 (4) (2005) 325-328.
43. N.L. Johnson, S. Kotz, N. Balakrishnan, Continuous Univariate Distributions, 2nd edition, Wiley, New York, 1994.