Can eye of origin serve as a deviant? Visual mismatch negativity from binocular rivalry

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue MAY, 2013, Pages

  van Rhijn, Manja ^a   Roeber, Urte ^a,b,c   O'Shea, Robert P ^a  

^a SOUTHERN CROSS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Attention; Binocular rivalry; Event related potentials (ERP); Eye of origin; Utrocular processing; Visual mismatch negativity (vMMN)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; RETINA RIVALRY; VISUAL MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

EID: 84933673476     PISSN: 16625161     EISSN: 16625161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00190     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Alais, D., Cass, J., O'Shea, R. P., and Blake, R. (2010). Visual sensitivity underlying changes in visual consciousness. Curr. Biol. 20, 1362-1367.
2. Astikainen, P., Lillstrang, E., and Ruusuvirta, T. (2008). Visual mismatch negativity for changes in orientation: a sensory memory- dependent response. Eur. J. Neurosci. 28, 2319-2324.
3. Bach, M. (2007). The Freiburg Visual Acuity Test: variability unchanged by post-hoc re-analysis. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 245, 965-971.
4. Blake, R., and Cormack, R. H. (1979). On utrocular discrimination. Percept. Psychophys. 26, 53-68.
5. Blake, R., and O'Shea, R. P. (2009). "Binocular rivalry," in Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, Vol. 2, ed L. R. Squire (Oxford: Academic Press), 179-187.
6. Blake, R., Westendorf, D. H., and Overton, R. (1980). What is suppressed during binocular rivalry? Perception 9, 223-231.
7. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spat. Vis. 10, 433-436.
8. Cogan, R. (1973). Distribution of durations of perception in the binocular rivalry of contours. J. Gen. Psychol. 89, 297-304.
9. Czigler, I. (2007). Visual mismatch negativity: violation of nonattended environmental regularities. J. Psychophysiol. 2, 224-230.
10. Czigler, I., and Csibra, G. (1990). Event-related potentials in a visual discrimination task: negative waves related to detection and attention. Psychophysiology 27, 669-676.
11. Fox, R., and Check, R. (1966). Forced- choice form recognition during binocular rivalry. Psychon. Sci. 6, 471-472.
12. Fox, R., and Herrmann, J. (1967). Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations. Percept. Psychophys. 2, 432-436.
13. Fries, P., Roelfsema, P. R., Engel, A. K., Konig, P., and Singer, W. (1997). Synchronization of oscillatory responses in visual cortex correlates with perception in interocular rivalry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 12699-12704.
14. Gaillard, R., Dehaene, S., Adam C., Clemenceau, S., Hasboun, D., Baulac, M., et al. (2009). Converging intracranial markers of conscious access. PLoS Biol. 7:e61. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000061
15. Garrido, M. I., Kilner, J. M., Stephan, K. E., and Friston, K. J. (2009). The mismatch negativity: a review of underlying mechanisms. Clin. Neurophysiol. 120, 453-463.
16. Jack, B. N., Roeber, U., and O'Shea, R. P. (2012). Early neural correlates of familiarity during binocular rivalry [Abstract]. Perception 41, 248. (ECVP Abstract Supplement).
17. Kimura, M. (2012). Visual mismatch negativity and unintentional temporal-context-based prediction in vision. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 83, 144-155.
18. Kimura, M., Katayama, J. I., Ohira H., and Schroger, E. (2009). Visual mismatch negativity: new evidence from the equiprobable paradigm. Psychophysiology 46, 402-409.
19. Kimura, M., Schroger, E., and Czigler, I. (2011). Visual mismatch negativity and its importance in visual cognitive sciences. Neuroreport 22, 669-673.
20. Kimura, M., Schroger, E., Czigler, I. and Ohira, H. (2010). Human visual system automatically encodes sequential regularities of discrete events. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 22, 1124-1139.
21. Klink, P. C., van Ee, R., Nijs, M. M., Brouwer, G. J., Noest, A. J., and van Wezel, R. J. A. (2008). Early interactions between neuronal adaptation and voluntary control determine perceptual choices in bistable vision. J. Vis. 8, 16.1-16.18.
22. Lamme, V. A. F. (2010). How neuroscience will change our view on consciousness. Cogn. Neurosci. 1, 204-220.
23. Levelt, W. J. M. (1967). Note on the distribution of dominance times in binocular rivalry. Br. J. Psychol. 58, 143-145.
24. Logothetis, N. K., Leopold, D. A., and Sheinberg, D. L. (1996). What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? Nature 380, 621-624.
25. Noest, A. J., van Ee, R., Nijs, M. M., and van Wezel, R. J. (2007). Percept- choice sequences driven by interrupted ambiguous stimuli: a low- level neural model. J. Vis. 7:10. doi: 10.1167/7.8.10
26. O'Shea, R. P., and Crassini, B. (1984). Binocular rivalry occurs without simultaneous presentation of rival stimuli. Percept. Psychophys. 36, 266-276.
27. O'Shea, R. P., Roeber, U., and Bach, M. (2010). "Evoked potentials: vision," in Encyclopedia ofPerception, Vol. 1, ed E. B. Goldstein (Los Angeles, CA: Sage), 399-400, xli.
28. Odom, J. V., Bach, M., Brigell, M., Holder, G. E., McCulloch, D. L., Tormene, A. P., et al. (2010). ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials (2009 update). Doc. Ophthalmol. 120, 111-119.
29. Pazo-Alvarez, P., Cadaveira, F., and Amenedo, E. (2003). MMN in the visual modality: a review. Biol. Psychol. 63, 199-236.
30. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The videotoolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat. Vis. 10, 437-442.
31. Roeber, U., and Schroger, E. (2004). Binocular rivalry is partly resolved at early processing stages with steady and with flickering presentation: a human event-related brain potential study. Neurosci. Lett. 371, 51-55.
32. Roeber, U., Veser, S., Schrolger, E., and O'Shea, R. P. (2011). On the role of attention in binocular rivalry: electrophysiological evidence. PLoS ONE 6:e22612. doi: 10.1371/jour- nal.pone.0022612
33. Roeber, U., Widmann, A., Trujillo-Barreto, N. J., Herrmann, C. S., O'Shea, R. P., and Schroger, E. (2008). Early correlates of visual awareness in the human brain: time and place from event- related brain potentials. J. Vis. 8, 1-12.
34. Sadia, G., Ritter, W., and Sussman, E. (2013). Category effects: is top-down control alone sufficient to elicit the mismatch negativity (MMN) component? Biol. Psychol. 92, 191-198.
35. Sussman, E. S. (2007). A new view on the MMN and attention debate: the role of context in processing auditory events. J. Psychophysiol. 21, 164-175.
36. Tales, A., Porter, G., and Butler, S. (2009). Automatic change detection during the performance of a continuous visual task. Neuroreport 20, 1638-1642.
37. Veser, S., O'Shea, R. P., Schroger, E., Trujillo-Barreto, N. J., and Roeber, U. (2008). Early correlates of visual awareness following orientation and colour rivalry. Vis. Res. 48, 2359-2369.
38. Wheatstone, C. (1838). Contributions to the physiology of vision. Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 128, 371-394.
39. Winkler, I., and Czigler, I. (2012). Evidence from auditory and visual event-related potential (ERP) studies of deviance detection (MMN and vMMN) linking predictive coding theories and perceptual object representations. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 83, 132-143.
40. Winkler, I., Czigler, I., Sussman, E., Horvath, J., and Balazs, L. (2005). Preattentive binding of auditory and visual stimulus features. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17,320-339.
41. Wolfe, J. M. (1983). Influence of spatial frequency, luminance and duration on binocular rivalryand abnormal fusion of briefly presented dichoptic stimuli. Perception 12, 447-456.
42. Wolfe, J. M., and Franzel, S. L. (1988). Binocularity and visual search. Percept. Psychophys. 44, 81-93.
43. Zhou, Y. H., Gao, J. B., White, K.D., Merk, I., and Yao, K. (2004). Perceptual dominance time distributions in multistable visual perception. Biol. Cybern. 90, 256-263.