Parametric fate and transport profiling for selective groundwater monitoring at closed landfills: A case study

Waste Management

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 263-270

  Sizirici, Banu ^a   Tansel, Berrin ^b  

^a KHALIFA UNIVERSITY   (United Arab Emirates)

^b Florida International University   (United States)

Author keywords

Closed municipal solid waste landfill; Groundwater monitoring; Metals; Mobility; Monitoring cost; Volatile organic carbons

Indexed keywords

CARRIER MOBILITY; CONTAMINATION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DATA HANDLING; GROUNDWATER; GROUNDWATER FLOW; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; IMPURITIES; ION EXCHANGE; LAND FILL; LEACHATE TREATMENT; METALS; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; SOIL POLLUTION; SOILS; SOLID WASTES; WELLS;

CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONS; GROUNDWATER MONITORING; GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS; MOBILITY CHARACTERISTICS; MONITORING COSTS; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS; TRANSPORT CHARACTERISTICS; VOLATILE ORGANIC CARBONS;

MONITORING;

1,4 DICHLOROBENZENE; AMMONIA; CADMIUM; CHLOROBENZENE; CHROMIUM; GROUND WATER; IRON; SODIUM; VINYL CHLORIDE; XYLENE; ZINC; WATER POLLUTANT;

ENVIRONMENTAL FATE; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; LANDFILL; METAL; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; ORGANIC CARBON; POLLUTANT TRANSPORT; POLLUTION MONITORING; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND;

ADSORPTION KINETICS; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; DEGRADATION KINETICS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ION EXCHANGE; LANDFILL LEACHATE; PH; POLLUTION TRANSPORT; PRECIPITATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOIL DEPTH; WATER CONTAMINATION; WATER FLOW; ANALYSIS; PROCEDURES; SOLUBILITY; THEORETICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES; WASTE DISPOSAL; WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITY; WATER POLLUTANT;

FLORIDA [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FLORIDA; GROUNDWATER; MODELS, THEORETICAL; REFUSE DISPOSAL; SOLUBILITY; WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 84933672519     PISSN: 0956053X     EISSN: 18792456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.12.020     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Allison J.D., Allison T.L. Partition Coefficients for Metals in Surface Water, Soil, and Waste 2005, HydroGeoLogic INC, Herndon, VA.
2. Aziz H.A., Adlan M.N., Ariffin K.S. Heavy metals (Cd, Pb, Zn, Ni, Cu and Cr(III)) removal from water in Malaysia: post treatment by high quality limestone. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:1578-1583.
3. Aziz H.A., Smith P.G. Removal of manganese from water using crushed dolomite filtration technique. Water Res. 1996, 30:489-492.
4. Christensen T.H., Kjeldsen P., Bjerg P.L., Jensen D.L., Christensen J.B., Baun A., Albrechtsen H.-J., Heron G. Biogeochemistry of landfill leachate plumes. Appl. Geochem. 2001, 16:659-718.
5. Eganhouse R.P., Cozzarelli I.M., Scholl M.A., Matthews L.L. Natural attenuation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the leachate plume of a municipal landfill: using alkylbenzenes as process probes. Ground Water 2001, 39:192-202.
6. EPA 2012, APPENDIX K Soil Organic Carbon (Koc)/Water (Kow) Partition Coefficients <> (accessed November 2012). http://www.epa.gov/superfund/health/conmedia/soil/pdfs/appd_k.pdf.
7. Kjeldsen P., Barlaz M.A., Rooker A.P., Baun A., Ledin A., Christensen T.H. Present and long-term composition of MSW landfill leachate: a review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 32:297-336.
8. Lawrence J. Updating your landfill's groundwater monitoring system: small changes can add up to big cost saving. J. Munic. Solid Waste Manage. Prof. 2008, 18-24.
9. Liu D.H., Lipták B.G. Groundwater and surface water pollution 2000, CRC Press.
10. McLean, J.E., Bledsoe, B.E., 1992. Ground Water Issue: Behavior of Metals in Soil. No. EPA/540/S 92/018) U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
11. Reyes-López J.A., Ramírez-Hernández J., Lázaro-Mancilla O., Carreón-Diazconti C., Garrido M.M.-L. Assessment of groundwater contamination by landfill leachate: a case in México. Waste Manage. 2008, 28(Suppl. 1):S33-S39.
12. Schnoor J.L. Environmental Modeling: Fate and Transport of Pollutants in Water, Air, and Soil 1996, John Wiley & Sons.
13. Singh U., Kumar M., Chauhan R., Jha P., Ramanathan A.L., Subramanian V. Assessment of the impact of landfill on groundwater quality: a case study of the Pirana site in western India. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2008, 141:309-321.
14. Sizirici B., Tansel B. Health risks assessment due to exposure to vinyl chloride in groundwater from a closed landfill: a case study as a contaminant of concern and effect of subsurface characteristics. J. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2010, 4:41-50.
15. Sizirici B., Tansel B. Projection of landfill stabilization period by time series analysis of leachate quality and transformation trends of VOCs. Waste Manage. 2010, 30:82-91.
16. Sizirici B., Tansel B., Kumar V. Knowledge based ranking algorithm for comparative assessment of post-closure care needs of closed landfills. Waste Manage. 2011, 31:1232-1238.
17. Sizirici Yildiz, B., 2009. Risk based post closure care analysis for Florida landfills. FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 112.
18. Tansel, B., Sizirici, B., Reinhart, D.R., Kulkarni, A., 2008. Performance based decision system for determining post-closure care (PCC) period in Florida landfills final report. Hinkley Center for Solid and Hazardous Waste Management.
19. Tuppan, E., Haynes, C., 1998. Cost-Effective Landfill Monitoring, 1998 Environmental Conference. TAPPI.
20. US Corps of Engineers, 2000. Superfund Five-year Review Report Davie Landfill Site, USEPA Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia.
21. US Corps of Engineers, 2005. Five-year Review Report for Davie Landfill Site, Davie, Broward County, Florida, USEPA Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia.
22. Walton W.C. Principles of Groundwater Engineering Lewis Publishers 1991, Michihan, USA.
23. Watten B.J., Sibrell P.L., Schwartz M.F. Acid neutralization within limestone sand reactors receiving coal mine drainage. Environ. Pollut. 2005, 137:295-304.
24. Yusoff M.K., Al-Hawas I.A. Effect of landfill leachate on groundwater quality. IUP J. Environ. Sci. 2008, 2:32-43.