The influence of prism adaptation on perceptual and motor components of neglect: A reply to Saevarsson and Kristjansson

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue MAY, 2013, Pages

  Striemer, Christopher L ^a   Danckert, James ^b  

^a MACEWAN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BASAL GANGLION; EYE MOVEMENT; FRONTAL LOBE; GAZE; HUMAN; NEGLECT; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PREMOTOR CORTEX; PRISM; PRISM ADAPTATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; SPATIAL MEMORY; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION; WORKING MEMORY;

EID: 84933672299     PISSN: 16625161     EISSN: 16625161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00255     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Aimola, L., Rogers, G., Kerkhoff, G., Smith, D. T., & Schenk, T. (2012). Visuomotor adaptation is impaired in patients with unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia, 50(6), 1158-1163.
2. Clower, D. M., Hoffman, J. M., Votaw, J. R., Faber, T. L., Woods, R. P., & Alexander, G. E. (1996). Role of posterior parietal cortex in the recalibration of visually guided reaching. Nature, 353(6601), 618-621.
3. Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci, 3(3), 201-215.
4. Coulthard, E., Parton, A., & Husain, M. (2006). Action control in visual neglect. Neuropsychologia, 44(13), 2717-2733.
5. Danckert, J., Ferber, S., & Goodale, M. A. (2008). Direct effects of prismatic lenses on visuomotor control: an event-related functional MRI study. Eur J Neurosci, 28(8), 1696-1704.
6. Dijkerman, H. C., McIntosh, R. D., Milner, A. D., Rossetti, Y., Tilikete, C., & Roberts, R. C. (2003). Ocular scanning and perceptual size distortion in hemispatial neglect: effects of prism adaptation and sequential stimulus presentation. Exp Brain Res, 153(2), 220-230.
7. Ferber, S., Danckert, J., Joanisse, M., Goltz, H. C., & Goodale, M. A. (2003). Eye movements tell only half the story. Neurology, 60(11), 1826-1829.
8. Himmelbach, M., Karnath, H. O., & Perenin, M. T. (2007). Action control is not affected by spatial neglect: A comment on Coulthard et al. Neuropsychologia, 45(8), 19791981; discussion 1982-1984.
9. Luaute, J., Schwartz, S., Rossetti, Y., Spiridon, M., Rode, G., Boisson, D., et al. (2009). Dynamic changes in brain activity during prism adaptation. J Neurosci, 29(1), 169-178.
10. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (2006). The visual brain in action (Second ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Newport, R., & Schenk, T. (2012). Prisms and neglect: what have we learned? Neuropsychologia, 50(6), 1080-1091.
12. Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I., & Umilta, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia, 25(1A), 31-40.
13. Rossit, S., Malhotra, P., Muir, K., Reeves, I., Duncan, G., Birschel, P., et al. (2009). The neural basis of visuomotor deficits in hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychologia, 47(10), 2149-2153.
14. Rossit, S., Malhotra, P., Muir, K., Reeves, I., Duncan, G., Livingstone, K., et al. (2009). No neglect-specific deficits in reaching tasks. Cereb Cortex, 19(11), 2616-2624.
15. Saevarsson, S., & Kristjansson, A. (2013). A note on Striemer and Danckert's theory of prism adaptation in unilateral neglect. Front Hum Neurosci, 7, 44.
16. Saj, A., Cojan, Y., Vocat, R., Luaute, J., & Vuilleumier, P. (2013). Prism adaptation enhances activity of intact fronto-parietal areas in both hemispheres in neglect patients. Cortex, 49(1), 107-119.
17. Sapir, A., Kaplan, J. B., He, B. J., & Corbetta, M. (2007). Anatomical correlates of directional hypokinesia in patients with hemispatial neglect. J Neurosci, 27(15), 4045-4051.
18. Sarri, M., Greenwood, R., Kalra, L., & Driver, J. (2010). Prism adaptation does not change the rightward spatial preference bias found with ambiguous stimuli in unilateral neglect. Cortex, 47(3), 353-366.
19. Sarri, M., Kalra, L., Greenwood, R., & Driver, J. (2006). Prism adaptation changes perceptual awareness for chimeric visual objects but not for chimeric faces in spatial neglect after right-hemisphere stroke. Neurocase, 12(3), 127-135.
20. Serino, A., Angeli, V., Frassinetti, F., & Ladavas, E. (2006). Mechanisms underlying neglect recovery after prism adaptation. Neuropsychologia, 44(7), 1068-1078.
21. Shiraishi, H., Yamakawa, Y., Itou, A., Muraki, T., & Asada, T. (2008). Long-term effects of prism adaptation on chronic neglect after stroke. NeuroRehabilitation, 23(2), 137-151.
22. Striemer, C., & Danckert, J. (2010a). Dissociating perceptual and motor effects of prism adaptation in spatial neglect. Neuroreport, 21(6), 436-441.
23. Striemer, C., & Danckert, J. (2010b). Through a prism darkly: re-evaluating prisms and neglect. Trends in Cognitive Science, 14(7), 308-316.
24. Vossel, S., Eschenbeck, P., Weiss, P. H., & Fink, G. R. (2010). The neural basis of perceptual bias and response bias in the Landmark task. Neuropsychologia, 45(13), 3949-3954.