Teaching grammar again after twenty years: Corpus-based help for teaching grammar

ReCALL

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 8-16

  McEnery, Tony ^a   Wilson, Andrew ^a   Barker, Paul ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84933483018     PISSN: 09583440     EISSN: 14740109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0958344000004730     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Aarts J. (1991) ‘Intuition-based and observation-based grammars’. In K. Aijmer and B. Altenberg (eds), English Corpus Linguistics, Longman: London, 44-62.
2. Alderson J. C., Clapham C. M. and Steel D. A. (1996) Metalinguistic Knowledge, Language Aptitude and Language Proficiency. CRILE Working Paper 26, Department of Linguistics and Modern English Language, Lancaster University
3. DES (1988) Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Teaching of English Language, London: HMSO.
4. DES/Welsh Office (1989) English for ages 5 to 16, London: DES/Welsh Office.
5. DES/Welsh Office (1990) Modem foreign languages for ages 11 to 16, London: DES/Welsh Office.
6. Greenbaum S. (1988) Good English and The Grammarian, London: Longman.
7. Kennedy G. (1992) ‘Preferred ways of putting things’. In J. Svartvik (ed), Directions in Corpus Linguistics, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 335-373.
8. Leech G. N. & Svartvik J. (1994) A Communicative Grammar of English, London: Longman.
9. McEnery A. M. & Wilson A. (1993) ‘The role of corpora in computer-assisted language learning’. Computer Assisted Language Learning 6 (3), 233-248.
10. McEnery A. M. & Wilson A. (1997) ‘Teaching and language corpora (TALC)’, ReCALL 9 (1), 5-14.
11. McEnery A. M., Baker J. P. & Wilson A. (1995) ‘A statistical analysis of corpus based computer vs traditional human teaching methods of part of speech analysis’, Computer Assisted Language Learning 8 (2-3), 259-274.
12. McEnery A. M., Baker J. P. & Hutchinson J. (1997) ‘A Corpus Based Grammar Tutor’. In R. G. Garside, G. N. Leech and A. M. McEnery (eds), Corpus Annotation, London: Longman.
13. Metcalfe P. (1992) ‘CALL, the foreign-language undergraduate and the teaching of grammar: a linguistic and political battlefield’. ReCALL 1 (3-5).
14. Mindt D. (1987) Sprache - Grammatik - Unterrichtsgrammatik: futurischer Zeitbezug im Englischen 1, Frankfurt/Main: Diesterweg.
15. Mindt D. (1992) Zeitbezug im Englischen: eine didaktische Grammatik des englischen Futurs, Tübingen: Narr.
16. Mindt D. (1995) An Empirical Grammar of the English Verb: Modal Verbs, Berlin: Cornelsen.
17. Mindt D. (1996) ‘English corpus linguistics and the foreign language teaching syllabus’. In J. A. Thomas and M. H. Short (eds), Using Corpora for Language Research: Studies in the Honour of Geoffrey Leech, London: Longman, 232-247.
18. Quirk R., Greenbaum S., Leech G. N. & Svartvik J. (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, London: Longman.
19. Smith B. (1995) ‘Annotated computer corpora and the learning of German grammar: implications for foreign language teaching’. Unpublished MA Dissertation, Lancaster University.
20. Stubbs M. (1996) Text and Corpus Analysis, Oxford: Blackwell.
21. Wichmann A., Fligelstone S., McEnery A. & Knowles, G. (eds). (1997) Teaching and Language Corpora, London: Longman.