Multi(national)literacies and Globalising Discourses

Discourse

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 453-467

  Prain, Vaughan ^a  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84933482477     PISSN: 01596306     EISSN: 14693739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0159630970180309     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Beck, U., 1994. “ The reinvention of politics: towards a theory of reflexive modernization ”. In Reflexive Modernisation: politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order, Edited by: Beck, U., GIDDEXS, A., and Lash, S., Stanford: Stanford University Press.
2. Buckingham, D., 1993. Going critical: the limits of media literacy. Australian Journal of Education, 37(2): 143–152.
3. Christie, F., 1991. Teaching English literacy: a project of national significance on the preservice preparation of teachers for teaching English literacy, Volumes 1 & 2, Canberra: Department of Employment, Education and Training. papers
4. Connell, I., and HURD, G., Higher education, training and the cultural industries: a working partnership. paper presented to the Third International Television Studies Conference. London.
5. Cunningham, S., A policy calculus for media studies. paper presented to the Fourth International Television Studies Conference. London.
6. Donald, J., 1990. Review of R.C. Allen Channels of Discourse and J. Fiske Television culture. Screen, 31(1): 113–118.
7. Eiser, J., 1994. Attitudes, Chaos and the Connectionist Mind, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
8. Ellsworth, E., 1989. Why doesn't this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(3): 297–324.
9. Fairclough, N., 1989. Language and Power, London: Longman.
10. Fairclough, N., 1992a. Critical Language Awareness, London: Longman.
11. Fairclough, N., 1992b. “ The appropriacy of ‘appropriateness’ ”. In Critical Language Awareness, Edited by: Fairclough, N., London/New York: Longman.
12. Fraser, N., 1995. “ False antitheses ”. In Feminist Contentions: a philosophical exchange, Edited by: Benhabib, S., Butler, J., Cornell, D., and Fraser, N., 59–64. London: Routledge.
13. Freedman, A., 1993. Show and tell? The role of explicit teaching in the learning of new genres. Research in the Teaching of English, 27(3): 222–251.
14. Freedman, A., School and workplace discourse. paper presented at the symposium, Discursive Practices in Workplace, School and Academic Settings: Recent Research Directions in Writing. July. Melbourne: Monash University.
15. Gee, J., 1992. The Social Mind: language, ideology and social practice, New York: Bergin & Garvey.
16. Gee, J., Genre in relation to a sociocultural view of mind, reading and writing. paper presented at the symposium, Discursive Practices in Workplace, School and Academic Settings: Recent Research Directions in Writing. July. Melbourne: Monash University.
17. Gee, J., 1994b. New Alignments and Old Literacies: critical literacy, post-modernism, and fast capitalism, Worcester, MA: Hiatt Centre.
18. Gee, J., and Lankshear, C., 1995. The new work order: critical language awareness and ‘fast capitalism’ texts. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 16(1): 5–19.
19. Giddens, A., 1994. Beyond Left and Right: the future of radical politics, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
20. Gore, J., 1993. The Struggle for Pedagogies: critical and feminist discourses in regimes of truth, New York: Routledge.
21. Grossberg, L., 1987. “ Critical theory and the politics of empirical research ”. In Mass Communication Review Yearbook 6, Edited by: Gurevitch, M., and Levy, M., 86–106. Beverly Hills: Sage.
22. Halliday, M., 1985. Lntroduclion to Functional Grammar, London: Edward Arnold.
23. Harre, R., and Gillett, G., 1994. The Discursive Mind, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Holsti, K., 1985. The Dividing Discipline: hegemony and diversity in international theory, Boston: Allen & Unwin.
25. Hunter, I., 1991. From discourse to disposilif. Foucault and the study of literature. Meridian, 10(2)
26. Kalantzis, M., and Cope, B., 1993. “ Histories of pedagogy, cultures of schooling ”. In The Powers of Literacy, Edited by: Cope, B., and KaiaNTZIS, M., London: Falmer Press.
27. Kress, G., 1989. Linguistic Processes in Sociocultural Practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Kress, G., 1994. Learning to Write, (2nd edn), London: Routledge.
29. Kress, G., 1995. Writing the Future: English and the making of a culture of innovation, Sheffield: National Association of Teachers of English Papers in Education.
30. Lather, P., 1991. Getting Smart: feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern, New York: Routledge.
31. Luke, A., 1988. Literacy, Textbooks and Ideology, London: Falmer Press.
32. Maclachlan, G., and Reid, I., 1994. Framing and Interpretation, Carlton, Victoria: Melbourne University Press.
33. NEW LONDON Group. 1996. A pedagogy of multiliteracies: designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66: 60–92.
34. Pennycook, A., 1996. TESOL and critical literacies: modern, post or neo?. TESOL Quarterly, 30(1): 163–171.
35. Phillipson, R., 1992. Linguistic Imperialism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. Prain, V., 1993. Opposition or surrender: English for the 1990s. Habitus, 3: 50–57.
37. Prain, V., 1995. Becoming more critical: the future of English teaching in Australia. Curriculum Perspectives, 15(1): 41–56.
38. Reid, I., 1992. Narrative Exchanges, London: Routledge.
39. Richardson, P., 1993. Language as personal resource and as social construct: competing views of literacy pedagogy in Australia. Educational Review, 43(2): 171–190.
40. Rosen, H., The whole story, keynote paper. National Association of Teachers of English Conference. York.
41. Saywer, W., and Watson, K., 1987. “ Questions of genre ”. In 77k Place of Genre in Learning: Current Debates, Edited by: Reid, I., Geelong: Deakin University Press.
42. Threadgold, T., 1992. Legislators and interpreters: linguists, feminists and critical fictions. Meridian, 11(1): 76–91t:\tnf60113\cdis1803\cdis180309.
43. Tureadgoi, D. T., Grammatics, genre, habitus: old arguments and new metaphors. paper presented at the symposium, Discursive Practices in Workplace, School and Academic Settings: Recent Research Directions in Writing. July. Melbourne: Monash University.
44. Threadgold, T., 1994b. Grammar, genre, and the ownership of literacy. Idiom, 2: 20–168.
45. Turnbull, S., 1993. The media: moral lessons and moral careers. Australian Journal of Education, 72(3): 153–87.
46. Williamson, J., 1981. How does girl number twenty understand ideology?. Screen Education, 40: 80–92.