The four-principle formulation of common morality is at the core of bioethics mediation method

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 371-377

  Ahmadi Nasab Emran, Shahram ^a  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioethics; Bioethics mediation; Clinical ethics; Clinical ethics consultation; Common morality; Conflict resolution; Neutrality; Normativity

Indexed keywords

BIOETHICS; ETHICS; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MORALITY; PROCEDURES;

BIOETHICS; HUMANS; MORALS; NEGOTIATING; PRINCIPLE-BASED ETHICS;

EID: 84933181101     PISSN: 13867423     EISSN: 15728633     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11019-014-9612-7     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2009. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Dubler, N.N. 2011. A “principled resolution”: The fulcrum for bioethics mediation. Law and Contemporary Problems 74: 177–200.
3. Dubler, N.N., and C.B. Liebman. 2011. Bioethics mediation: A guide to shaping shared solutions. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
4. Engelhardt, H.T. 1991. Bioethics and secular humanism: The search for a common morality. Philadelphia: Trinity Press International.
5. Engelhardt, H.T. 1996. The foundations of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Jonsen, A.R., and S.E. Toulmin. 1998. The abuse of casuistry: A history of moral reasoning. Berkley: University of California Press.
7. Rasmussen, L.M. 2012. Patient advocacy in clinical ethics consultation. The American Journal of Bioethics 12(8): 1–9.
8. Rawls, J. 1987. The idea of an overlapping consensus. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 7(1): 1–25.