Monitoring the Long-Term Degradation Behavior of Biomimetic Bioadhesive Using Wireless Magnetoelastic Sensor

IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 62, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 1838-1842

  Lin, Meng Hsien ^b   Anderson, Jonathan ^b   Pinnaratip, Rattapol ^b   Meng, Hao ^b   Konst, Shari ^b   DeRouin, Andrew J ^b   Rajachar, Rupak ^b   Ong, Keat Ghee ^a   Lee, Bruce P ^a  

^a Michigan Technological University   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biodegradation; magnetoelastic sensor; mussel adhesive protein; tissue adhesive

Indexed keywords

BIODEGRADATION; BIOMIMETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS;

DEGRADATION BEHAVIOR; INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE; MAGNETOELASTIC SENSOR; MUSSEL ADHESIVE PROTEINS; PHYSIOLOGICAL CONDITION; RESONANT AMPLITUDE; SENSING TECHNOLOGY; TISSUE ADHESIVES;

TISSUE;

DOPAMINE; GLUTARIC ACID; MACROGOL; MUSSEL ADHESIVE PROTEIN; TISSUE ADHESIVE; ADHESIVE AGENT; ADHESIVE PROTEIN, MUSSEL; BIOMATERIAL; BIOMIMETIC MATERIAL; PROTEIN;

ADHESION; ARTICLE; BIODEGRADATION; BIOLOGICAL MONITORING; BIOSENSOR; BODY TEMPERATURE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CROSS LINKING; DEGRADATION KINETICS; ELASTICITY; HYDROLYSIS; MATERIAL COATING; PH; PHYSIOLOGICAL PROCESS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; WIRELESS MAGNETOELASTIC SENSOR; CHEMISTRY; MATERIALS TESTING; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; PROCEDURES; WIRELESS COMMUNICATION;

ADHESIVES; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOMIMETIC MATERIALS; MATERIALS TESTING; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PROTEINS; WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84933056882     PISSN: 00189294     EISSN: 15582531     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2405251     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Y. Ikada, "Tissue adhesives," in Wound Closure Biomaterials and Devices. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 1997, pp. 317-346.
2. W. D. Spotnitz, "History of tissue adhesive," in Surgical Adhesives and Sealants: Current Technology and Applications. Lancaster, PA, USA: Technomic Publishing, 1996, pp. 3-11.
3. M. Mehdizadeh and J. Yang, "Design strategies and applications of tissue bioadhesives," Macromolecular Biosci., vol. 13, pp. 271-288, Mar. 2013.
4. A. Waugh and A. Grant, "The blood," in Anatomy and Physiology in Health and Illness. New York, NY, USA: Elsevier, 2010.
5. B. R. Soller and S. Zhang, "Optical measurement of tissue pH for surgical and critical care monitoring," Proc. SPIE, vol. 3259, pp. 122-129, 1998.
6. H. Ohman and A. Vahlquist, "In vivo studies concerning a pH gradient in human stratum corneum and upper epidermis," Acta Dermato-Venereologica, vol. 74, pp. 375-379, 1994.
7. B. R. Soller et al., "Feasibility of non-invasive measurement of tissue pH using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy," J. Clinical Monitoring, vol. 12, pp. 387-395, 1996.
8. I. F. Tannock and D. Rotin, "Acid Ph in tumors and its potential for therapeutic exploitation," Cancer Res., vol. 49, pp. 4373-4384, 1989.
9. C. Sims et al., "Skeletal muscle acidosis correlates with the severity of blood volume loss during shock and resuscitation," J. Trauma-Injury Infection Critical Care, vol. 51, pp. 1137-1145, Dec. 2001.
10. B. R. Soller et al., "Investigation of muscle pH as an indicator of liver pH and injury from hemorrhagic shock," J. Surgical Res., vol. 114, pp. 195-201, Oct. 2003.
11. Y. Liu et al., "Marine adhesive containing nanocomposite hydrogel with enhanced materials and bioadhesive properties," MRS Proc., vol. 1569, pp. 33-38, 2013.
12. J. L. Murphy et al., "Adhesive performance of biomimetic adhesive-coated biologic scaffolds," Biomacromolecules, vol. 11, pp. 2976-2984, 2010.
13. J. Anderson et al., "Wireless magnetoelastic sensors for tracking degradation profiles of nitrodopamine-modified poly(ethylene glycol)," Science-Jet, vol. 4, art. no. 80, 2015.
14. A. Hernando et al., "Metallic glasses and sensing applications," J. Phys. E: Scientific Instrum., vol. 21, pp. 1129-1139, 1988.
15. C. Modzelewski et al., "Magnetomechanical coupling and permeability in transversely annealed Metglas 2605 alloys," IEEE Trans. Magnet., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 2837-2839, Dec. 1981.
16. R. C. O'handley, "Modern magnetic materials: Principles and applications,"in Modern Magnetic Materials: Principles and Applications.New York, NY, USA: Wiley, 1999.
17. C. A. Grimes et al., "Wireless magnetoelastic resonance sensors: A critical review," Sensors, vol. 2, pp. 294-313, 2002.
18. M. Zourob et al., "A wireless biosensor for the direct detection of organophosphorous pesticides," Analyst, vol. 132, pp. 338-343, 2007.
19. K. G. Ong et al., "Quantification of multiple bioagents with wireless, remote-query magnetoelastic micro-sensors," IEEE Sensors J., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 514-523, Jun. 2006.
20. S. C. Roy et al., "Quantification of blood clotting kinetics II: Thromboelastograph analysis and measurement of erythrocyte sedimentation rate using magnetoelastic sensors," Sensor Lett., vol. 5, pp. 432-440, Jun. 2007.
21. K. G. Ong et al., "A rapid highly-sensitive endotoxin detection system,"Biosensors Bioelectron., vol. 21, pp. 2270-2274, 2006.
22. H. R. Holmes et al., "Fabrication of biocompatible, vibrational magnetoelastic materials for controlling cellular adhesion," Biosensors, vol. 2, pp. 57-69, 2012.
23. E. Vlaisavljevich et al., "Magnetoelastic vibrational biomaterials for realtime monitoring and modulation of the host response," J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med., vol. 24, pp. 1093-1104, 2013.
24. J. H. Waite, "Nature's underwater adhesive specialist," Int. J. Adhesion Adhesives, vol. 7, pp. 9-14, 1987.
25. J. H. Waite, "Reverse engineering of bioadhesion in marine mussels,"Annals New York Acad. Sci., vol. 875, pp. 301-309, 1999.
26. B. P. Lee et al., "Mussel-inspired adhesives and coatings," Annu. Rev. Mater. Res., vol. 41, pp. 99-132, 2011.
27. B. P. Lee et al., "Biomimetic adhesive polymers based on mussel adhesive proteins," in Biological Adhesives. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2006, pp. 257-278.
28. G. Bilic et al., "Injectable candidate sealants for fetal membrane repair: Bonding and toxicity in vitro," Am. J. Obstetrics Gynecology, vol. 202, pp. 85.e1-9, 2010.
29. C. M. Haller et al., "Mussel-mimetic tissue adhesive for fetal membrane repair: An ex vivo evaluation," Acta Biomaterialia, vol.8, pp.4365-4370, Dec. 2012.
30. M. Brodie et al., "Biomechanical properties of achilles tendon repair augmented with bioadhesive-coated scaffold," Biomed. Mater., vol. 6, art. no. 015014, 2011.
31. M. Mehdizadeh et al., "Injectable citrate-based mussel-inspired tissue bioadhesives with high wet strength for sutureless wound closure," Biomaterials, vol. 33, pp. 7972-7983, Nov. 2012.
32. C. E. Brubaker et al., "Biological performance of mussel-inspired adhesive in extrahepatic islet transplantation," Biomaterials, vol. 31, pp. 420-427, 2010.
33. S. Hong et al., "Hyaluronic acid catechol: A biopolymer exhibiting a pH-dependent adhesive or cohesive property for human neural stem cell engineering," Adv. Functional Mater., vol. 23, pp. 1774-1780, 2013.
34. C. J. Kastrup et al., "Painting blood vessels and atherosclerotic plaques with an adhesive drug depot," Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 109, pp. 21444-21449, 2012.
35. J. L. Dalsin et al., "Mussel adhesive protein mimetic polymers for the preparation of nonfouling surfaces," J. Am. Chemical Soc., vol. 125, pp. 4253-4258, 2003.
36. A. Pechey et al., "Anti-adhesive coating and clearance of device associated uropathogenic escherichia coli cystitis," J. Urology, vol. 182, pp. 1628-1636, 2009.
37. R. Ko et al., "Novel uropathogen-resistant coatings inspired by marine mussels," J. Endourology, vol. 22, pp. 1153-1160, 2008.
38. Y. Liu et al., "Injectable dopamine-modified poly(ethylene glycol) nanocomposite hydrogel with enhanced adhesive property and bioactivity,"ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, vol. 6, pp. 16982-16992, 2014.
39. J. L. Dalsin et al., "Multi-armed catechol compound blends," U.S. Patent 8 119 742, 2012.
40. J. A. Schwarz et al., "Biomedical implants from nanostructured materials,"in Dekker Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology.New York, NY, USA: Marcel Dekker, 2004, pp. 263-265.
41. E. Vlaisavljevich et al., "Bioactive magnetoelastic materials as coatings for implantable biomaterials," J. Med. Devices, vol. 3, art. no. 027528, 2009.
42. Z. Shafiq et al., "Bioinspired underwater bonding and debonding on demand," Angewandte Chemie, vol. 124, pp. 4408-4411, 2012.
43. B.P. Lee et al., "Synthesis and gelation of DOPA-modified poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogels," Biomacromolecules, vol. 3, pp. 1038-1047, 2002.
44. M. M. Cencer et al., "Effect of pH on the rate of curing and bioadhesive properties of dopamine functionalized poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogels,"Biomacromolecules, vol. 15, pp. 2861-2869, 2014.
45. G. T. Chao et al., "Synthesis, characterization, and hydrolytic degradation behavior of a novel biodegradable pH-sensitive hydrogel based on polycaprolactone, methacrylic acid, and poly (ethylene glycol)," J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A, vol. 85A, pp. 36-46, 2008.
46. W. N. E. van Dijk-Wolthuis et al., "Degradation kinetics of methacrylated dextrans in aqueous solution," J. Pharmaceutical Sci., vol. 86, pp. 413-417, 1997.