Treatment of infantile hemangioma in regional hospitals with ehealth support: Evaluation of feasibility and acceptance by parents and doctors

JMIR Research Protocols

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2014, Pages

  De Graaf, Marlies ^a,b   Totté, Joan E E ^c   van Os Medendorp, Harmieke ^b   van Renselaar, Wilco ^d   Breugem, Corstiaan C ^a   Pasmans, Suzanne G M A ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d Patient 1 BV   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Acceptance, usability; Child; E consulation, tertiary teledermatology; eHealth; Infantile hemangioma; Internet; Personal health record

Indexed keywords

EID: 84932133323     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19290748     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/resprot.3418     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Kilcline C, Frieden IJ. Infantile hemangiomas: How common are they? A systematic review of the medical literature. Pediatr Dermatol 2008; 25(2):168-173. [doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2008.00626.x] [Medline: 18429772]
2. Hoornweg MJ, Smeulders MJ, Ubbink DT, van der Horst CM. The prevalence and risk factors of infantile haemangiomas: A case-control study in the Dutch population. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2012 Mar; 26(2):156-162. [doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2011.01214.x] [Medline: 22324502]
3. Haggstrom AN, Drolet BA, Baselga E, Chamlin SL, Garzon MC, Horii KA, et al. Prospective study of infantile hemangiomas: Clinical characteristics predicting complications and treatment. Pediatrics 2006 Sep; 118(3):882-887 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0413] [Medline: 16950977]
4. Léauté-Labrèze C, Dumas de la Roque E, Hubiche T, Boralevi F, Thambo JB, Taïeb A. Propranolol for severe hemangiomas of infancy. N Engl J Med 2008 Jun 12; 358(24):2649-2651. [doi: 10.1056/NEJMc0708819] [Medline: 18550886]
5. Drolet BA, Frommelt PC, Chamlin SL, Haggstrom A, Bauman NM, Chiu YE, et al. Initiation and use of propranolol for infantile hemangioma: Report of a consensus conference. Pediatrics 2013 Jan; 131(1):128-140 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1691] [Medline: 23266923]
6. de Graaf M, Raphael MF, Breugem CC, Knol MJ, Bruijnzeel-Koomen CA, Kon M, et al. Treatment of infantile haemangiomas with atenolol: Comparison with a historical propranolol group. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013 Dec; 66(12):1732-1740. [doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.07.035] [Medline: 24011909]
7. Léauté-Labrèze C, Prey S, Ezzedine K. Infantile haemangioma: Part II. Risks, complications and treatment. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2011 Nov; 25(11):1254-1260. [doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04105.x] [Medline: 21569113]
8. Pagliari C, Sloan D, Gregor P, Sullivan F, Detmer D, Kahan JP, et al. What is eHealth (4): A scoping exercise to map the field. J Med Internet Res 2005; 7(1):e9 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e9] [Medline: 15829481]
9. de Graaf M, Totte J, Breugem C, van Os-Medendorp H, Pasmans S. Evaluation of the Compliance, Acceptance, and Usability of a Web-Based eHealth Intervention for Parents of Children With Infantile Hemangiomas: Usability Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2013; 2(2):e54 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/resprot.2897] [Medline: 24345450]
10. Davis FD. MIS Quarterly. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technologyURL: http://iris.nyit.edu/-kkhoo/Spring2008/Topics/TAM/PercieveUsefulness_MIS.pdf [accessed 2014-09-10] [WebCite Cache ID 6SUYPtTOF]
11. Kim J, Park HA. Development of a health information technology acceptance model using consumers' health behavior intention. J Med Internet Res 2012; 14(5):e133 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.2143] [Medline: 23026508]
12. de Graaf M, Raphael MF, Breugem CC, Knol MJ, Bruijnzeel-Koomen CA, Kon M, et al. Treatment of infantile haemangiomas with atenolol: Comparison with a historical propranolol group. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013 Dec; 66(12):1732-1740. [doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.07.035] [Medline: 24011909]
13. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci 2000 Feb; 46(2):186-204 [FREE Full text]
14. Gattiker UE. Managing computer-based office information technology: A process model for management. In: Hendrick HW, Brown OG, editors. Human factors in organizational design. The Netherlands: Elsevier Science; 1984:395-403
15. Hu PJ, Chau P, Liu O, Yan TK. Journal of Management Information Systems. 1999. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studiesURL: http://www.academia.edu/3000650/Examining_the_technology_acceptance_model_using_physician_acceptance_of_telemedicine_technology [accessed 2014-09-10] [WebCite Cache ID 6SUZZFnBQ]
16. Yarbrough AK, Smith TB. Technology acceptance among physicians: A new take on TAM. Med Care Res Rev 2007 Dec; 64(6):650-672. [doi: 10.1177/1077558707305942] [Medline: 17717378]
17. Chau PY, Hu PJ. Investigating healthcare professionals' decisions to accept telemedicine technology: An empirical test of competing theories. Information & Management 2002 Jan; 39(4):297-311 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00098-2]
18. Wickramasinghe NS, Fadlalla AM, Geisler E, Schaffer JL. A framework for assessing e-health preparedness. Int J Electron Healthc 2005; 1(3):316-334. [Medline: 18048213]
19. Li J, Talaei-Khoei A, Seale H, Ray P, Macintyre CR. Health Care Provider Adoption of eHealth: Systematic Literature Review. Interact J Med Res 2013; 2(1):e7 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/ijmr.2468] [Medline: 23608679]
20. Keely E, Liddy C, Afkham A. Utilization, benefits, and impact of an e-consultation service across diverse specialties and primary care providers. Telemed J E Health 2013 Oct; 19(10):733-738 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0007] [Medline: 23980939]
21. Stoves J, Connolly J, Cheung CK, Grange A, Rhodes P, O'Donoghue D, et al. Electronic consultation as an alternative to hospital referral for patients with chronic kidney disease: A novel application for networked electronic health records to improve the accessibility and efficiency of healthcare. Qual Saf Health Care 2010 Oct; 19(5):e54. [doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.038984] [Medline: 20554576]
22. Caffery LJ, Smith AC. A literature review of email-based telemedicine. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010; 161:20-34. [Medline: 21191155]
23. Bergmo TS, Wangberg SC, Schopf TR, Solvoll T. Web-based consultations for parents of children with atopic dermatitis: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Acta Paediatr 2009 Feb; 98(2):316-320. [doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.01033.x] [Medline: 18795905]
24. van Os-Medendorp H, Koffijberg H, Eland-de Kok PC, van der Zalm A, de Bruin-Weller MS, Pasmans SG, et al. E-health in caring for patients with atopic dermatitis: A randomized controlled cost-effectiveness study of internet-guided monitoring and online self-management training. Br J Dermatol 2012 May; 166(5):1060-1068. [doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10829.x] [Medline: 22268960]
25. Liddy C, Rowan MS, Afkham A, Maranger J, Keely E. Building access to specialist care through e-consultation. Open Med 2013; 7(1):e1-e8 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 23687533]
26. Palen TE, Ross C, Powers JD, Xu S. Association of online patient access to clinicians and medical records with use of clinical services. JAMA 2012 Nov 21; 308(19):2012-2019. [doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.14126] [Medline: 23168824]
27. Bates DW, Wells S. Personal health records and health care utilization. JAMA 2012 Nov 21; 308(19):2034-2036. [doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.68169] [Medline: 23168828]
28. Koppel R, Soumerai SB. Personal health records and medical care use. JAMA 2013 Feb 27; 309(8):767. [doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.378] [Medline: 23443432]
29. Nijkrake MJ, Keus SH, Overeem S, Oostendorp RA, Vlieland TP, Mulleners W, et al. The ParkinsonNet concept: Development, implementation and initial experience. Mov Disord 2010 May 15; 25(7):823-829. [doi: 10.1002/mds.22813] [Medline: 20461798]
30. van der Eijk M, Faber MJ, Aarts JW, Kremer JA, Munneke M, Bloem BR. Using online health communities to deliver patient-centered care to people with chronic conditions. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15(6):e115 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.2476] [Medline: 23803284]
31. Cocosila M, Archer N. Perceptions of chronically ill and healthy consumers about electronic personal health records: A comparative empirical investigation. BMJ Open 2014; 4(7):e005304 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005304] [Medline: 25056975]
32. Eland-de Kok P, van Os-Medendorp H, Vergouwe-Meijer A, Bruijnzeel-Koomen C, Ros W. A systematic review of the effects of e-health on chronically ill patients. J Clin Nurs 2011 Nov; 20(21-22):2997-3010. [doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03743.x] [Medline: 21707807]
33. Eland-de Kok P, Van Os-Medendorp H, Bruin-Weller MD, Bruijnzeel-Koomen CAFM. Digitaal huidcontact [Digital Skin Contact]. Medisch Contact 2007; 62.
34. van Os-Medendorp H, van Veelen C, Hover M, Eland-de Kok P, Bruijnzeel-Koomen C, Sonnevelt GJ, et al. The digital eczema centre utrecht. J Telemed Telecare 2010; 16(1):12-14. [doi: 10.1258/jtt.2009.001005] [Medline: 20086261]
35. Kittler AF, Carlson GL, Harris C, Lippincott M, Pizziferri L, Volk LA, et al. Primary care physician attitudes towards using a secure web-based portal designed to facilitate electronic communication with patients. Inform Prim Care 2004; 12(3):129-138. [Medline: 15606985]
36. Ross SE, Todd J, Moore LA, Beaty BL, Wittevrongel L, Lin CT. Expectations of patients and physicians regarding patient-accessible medical records. J Med Internet Res 2005; 7(2):e13 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.2.e13] [Medline: 15914460]
37. Hassol A, Walker JM, Kidder D, Rokita K, Young D, Pierdon S, et al. Patient experiences and attitudes about access to a patient electronic health care record and linked web messaging. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11(6):505-513 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1593] [Medline: 15299001]
38. White CB, Moyer CA, Stern DT, Katz SJ. A content analysis of e-mail communication between patients and their providers: Patients get the message. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11(4):260-267 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1445] [Medline: 15064295]
39. Mair FS, May C, O'Donnell C, Finch T, Sullivan F, Murray E. Factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of e-health systems: An explanatory systematic review. Bull World Health Organ 2012 May 1; 90(5):357-364 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.099424] [Medline: 22589569]
40. Elbert NJ, van Os-Medendorp H, van Renselaar W, Ekeland AG, Hakkaart-van Roijen L, Raat H, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ehealth interventions in somatic diseases: A systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16(4):e110 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.2790] [Medline: 24739471]