Diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer using a statistical model based on the gamma distribution

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 56-62

  Shinmoto, Hiroshi ^a   Oshio, Koichi ^b   Tamura, Chiharu ^a   Soga, Shigeyoshi ^a   Okamura, Teppei ^a   Yamada, Kentaro ^a   Kaji, Tastumi ^a   Mulkern, Robert V ^c  

^a NATIONAL DEFENSE MEDICAL COLLEGE   (Japan)

^b KEIO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

diffusion weighted imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; non Gaussian diffusion; prostate neoplasms; statistical model

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CURVE FITTING; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; GAMMA DISTRIBUTION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE HYPERTROPHY; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; STATISTICAL MODEL; VERY ELDERLY; ALGORITHM; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSTATE TUMOR; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTIONS;

EID: 84931955283     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24761     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D,. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61: 69-90.
2. Haider MA, van der Kwast TH, Tanguay J, et al., Combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for localization of prostate cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189: 323-328.
3. Tanimoto A, Nakashima J, Kohno H, Shinmoto H, Kuribayashi S,. Prostate cancer screening: the clinical value of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging in combination with T2-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 146-152.
4. Oto A, Kayhan A, Jiang Y, et al., Prostate cancer: differentiation of central gland cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia by using diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2010; 257: 715-723.
5. Issa B,. In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and malignant prostate tissues using echo-planar imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 16: 196-200.
6. Sato C, Naganawa S, Nakamura T, et al., Differentiation of noncancerous tissue and cancer lesions by apparent diffusion coefficient values in transition and peripheral zones of the prostate. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 21: 258-262.
7. Tamada T, Sone T, Jo Y, et al., Apparent diffusion coefficient values in peripheral and transition zones of the prostate: comparison between normal and malignant prostatic tissues and correlation with histologic grade. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 720-726.
8. Mulkern RV, Barnes AS, Haker SJ, et al., Biexponential characterization of prostate tissue water diffusion decay curves over an extended b-factor range. Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 563-568.
9. Shinmoto H, Oshio K, Tanimoto A, et al, Biexponential apparent diffusion coefficients in prostate cancer, Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 27: 355-359.
10. Döpfert J, Lemke A, Weidner A, et al., Investigation of prostate cancer using diffusion-weighted intravoxel incoherent motion imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 29: 1053-1058.
11. Shinmoto H, Tamura C, Soga S, et al., An intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging study of prostate cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199: W496-500.
12. Rosenkrantz AB, Sigmund EE, Johnson G, et al., Prostate cancer: feasibility and preliminary experience of a diffusional kurtosis model for detection and assessment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer. Radiology 2012; 264: 126-135.
13. Tamura C, Shinmoto H, Soga S, et al., Diffusion kurtosis imaging study of prostate cancer: preliminary findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014; 40: 723-729.
14. Yablonskiy DA, Bretthorst GL, Ackerman JJH,. Statistical model for diffusion attenuated MR signal. Magn Reson Med 2003; 50: 664-559.
15. Yablonskiy DA, Sukstanskii AL,. Theoretical models of the diffusion weighted MR signal. NMR Biomed 2010; 23: 661-681.
16. Oshio K, Shinmoto H, Mulkern RV,. Interpretation of diffusion MRI data using a gamma distribution model. Magn Reson Med Sci 2014 [Epub ahead of print].
17. Oshio K, Shinmoto H, Mulkern RV,. Interpretation of diffusion MRI data using a gamma distribution model. In: Proceedings of the Joint Annual Meeting of ISMRM-ESMRMB, Milan; 2014 (abstract 2612).
18. Mulkern RV, Haker SJ, Maier SE,. On high b diffusion imaging in the human brain: ruminations and experimental insights. Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 27: 1151-1162.
19. Oshio K,. Reliability of bi-exponential parameter estimation. In: Proc 20th Annual Meeting ISMRM, Melbourne; 2012 (abstract 3583).
20. Bourne RM, Panagiotaki E, Bongers A, Sved P, Watson G, Alexander DC,. Information theoretic ranking of four models of diffusion attenuation in fresh and fixed prostate tissue ex vivo. Magn Reson Med 2013 [Epub ahead of print].
21. Jensen JH, Helpern JA,. MRI quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by kurtosis analysis. NMR Biomed 2010; 23: 698-710.