An intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging study of prostate cancer

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 199, Issue 4, 2012, Pages

  Shinmoto, Hiroshi ^a   Tamura, Chiharu ^a   Soga, Shigeyoshi ^a   Shiomi, Eisuke ^a   Yoshihara, Nobuyuki ^a   Kaji, Tatsumi ^a   Mulkern, Robert V ^b,c  

^a NATIONAL DEFENSE MEDICAL COLLEGE   (Japan)

^b BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Biexponential fitting; Diffusion; Intravoxel incoherent motion; MRI; Prostate cancer

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTRAVOXEL INCOHERENT MOTION; MALE; PERFUSION; PERIPHERAL ZONE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE HYPERTROPHY; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STUDENT T TEST; TISSUE STRUCTURE;

AGED; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84866865468     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.8347     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Jemal A, Center MM, DeSantis C, Ward EM. Global patterns of cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010; 19:1893-1907
2. Hodge KK, Mcneal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 1989; 142:71-74
3. Eskicorapci SY, Baydar DE, Akbal C, et al. An extended 10-core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy protocol improves the detection of prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2004; 45:444-448 (Pubitemid 38376201)
4. Gibbs P, Tozer DJ, Liney GP, Turnbull LW. Comparison of quantitative T2 mapping and diffusion-weighted imaging in the normal and pathologic prostate. Magn Reson Med 2001; 46:1054-1058 (Pubitemid 33104291)
5. Issa B. In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and malignant prostate tissues using echo-planar imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 16:196-200 (Pubitemid 34810058)
6. Chan I, Wells W 3rd, Mulkern RV, et al. Detection of prostate cancer by integration of line-scan diffusion, T2-mapping and T2-weighted MR imaging; a multi-channel statistical classifier. Med Phys 2003; 30:2390-2398 (Pubitemid 37129745)
7. Sato C, Naganawa S, Nakamura T, et al. Differentiation of noncancerous tissue and cancer lesions by apparent diffusion coefficient values in transition and peripheral zones of the prostate. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 21:258-262 (Pubitemid 40280120)
8. Tanimoto A, Nakashima J, Kohno H, Shinmoto H, Kuribayashi S. Prostate cancer screening: the clinical value of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging in combination with T2-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25:146-152 (Pubitemid 46095209)
9. Hosseinzadeh K, Schwarz SD. Endorectal diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer to differentiate malignant from benign peripheral zone tissue. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 20:654-661 (Pubitemid 39313742)
10. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 1988; 168:497-505
11. Mulkern RV, Barnes AS, Haker SJ, et al. Biexponential characterization of prostate tissue water diffusion decay curves over an extended b-factor range. Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24:563-568 (Pubitemid 43776563)
12. Clark PR, Chua-anusorn W, St Pierre TG. Bi-exponential transverse relaxation rate (R2) image analysis using RF field intensity-weighted spin density projection: potential for R2 measurement of iron-loaded liver. Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 21:519-530 (Pubitemid 36899085)
13. Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL, et al. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 16:172-178 (Pubitemid 34810055)
14. Koh DM, Collins DJ. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. AJR 2007; 188:1622-1635 (Pubitemid 46866868)
15. Luciani A, Vignaud A, Cavet M, et al. Liver cirrhosis: intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging-pilot study. Radiology 2008; 249:891-899
16. Döpfert J, Lemke A, Weidner A, Schad LR. Investigation of prostate cancer using diffusion-weighted intravoxel incoherent motion imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 29:1053-1058
17. Lemke A, Laun FB, Klauss M, et al. Differentiation of pancreas carcinoma from healthy pancreatic tissue using multiple b-values: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion derived parameters. Invest Radiol 2009; 44:769-775
18. Le Bihan D, Turner R. The capillary network: a link between IVIM and classical perfusion. Magn Reson Med 1992; 27:171-178
19. Henkelman RM. Does IVIM measure classical perfusion? Magn Reson Med 1990; 16:470-475
20. Franiel T, Lüdemann L, Rudolph B, et al. Evaluation of normal prostate tissue, chronic prostatitis, and prostate cancer by quantitative perfusion analysis using a dynamic contrast-enhanced inversion-prepared dual-contrast gradient echo sequence. Invest Radiol 2008; 43:481-487
21. Shinmoto H, Oshio K, Tanimoto A, et al. Bi-exponential apparent diffusion coefficients in prostate cancer. Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 27:355-359
22. Bourne R, Kurniawan N, Cowin G, Sved P, Watson G. 16 T diffusion microimaging of fixed prostate tissue: preliminary findings. Magn Reson Med 2011; 66:244-247
23. Koh DM, Blackledge M, Collins DJ, et al. Reproducibility and changes in the apparent diffusion coefficients of solid tumours treated with combretastatin A4 phosphate and bevacizumab in a two-centre phase I clinical trial. Eur Radiol 2009; 19:2728-2738
24. Acton FS. Numerical methods that work, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America, 1990
25. Eisenberger U, Thoeny HC, Binser T, et al. Evaluation of renal allograft function early after transplantation with diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2010; 20:1374-1383