Multiple sclerosis lesion geometry in quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and phase imaging

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 224-229

  Eskreis Winkler, Sarah ^a   Deh, Kofi ^a   Gupta, Ajay ^a   Liu, Tian ^b   Wisnieff, Cynthia ^a,c   Jin, Moonsoo ^c   Gauthier, Susan A ^a   Wang, Yi ^a,c   Spincemaille, Pascal ^a  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b Medimagemetric LLC   (United States)

^c Cornell University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

iron; multiple sclerosis; phase; quantitative susceptibility mapping

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IN VIVO STUDY; MAGNETISM; MALE; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SIMULATION; ALGORITHM; BRAIN; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; WHITE MATTER;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WHITE MATTER;

EID: 84931837123     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24745     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Poloni G, Minagar A, Haacke EM, Zivadinov R,. Recent developments in imaging of multiple sclerosis. Neurologist [Internet]. 2011 Jul [cited 2014 Apr 11]; 17: 185-204. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21712664
2. Zivadinov R, Leist TP,. Clinical-magnetic resonance imaging correlations in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimaging [Internet]. 2005 Jan [cited 2014 Apr 11]; 15 (4 Suppl): 10S-21S. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16385015
3. Yablonskiy DA, Luo J, Sukstanskii AL, Iyer A, Cross AH,. Biophysical mechanisms of MRI signal frequency contrast in multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A [Internet]. 2012 Aug 28 [cited 2014 Apr 2]; 109: 14212-14217. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3435153&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
4. Wiggermann V, Hernández Torres E, Vavasour IM, et al., Magnetic resonance frequency shifts during acute MS lesion formation. Neurology [Internet]. 2013 Jul 16 [cited 2014 Apr 8]; 81: 211-218. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3770162&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
5. Mehta V, Pei W, Yang G, et al., Iron is a sensitive biomarker for inflammation in multiple sclerosis lesions. PLoS One [Internet]. 2013 Jan [cited 2013 Dec 10]; 8: e57573. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3597727&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
6. Bagnato F, Hametner S, Yao B, et al., Tracking iron in multiple sclerosis: a combined imaging and histopathological study at 7 Tesla. Brain [Internet]. 2011 Dec [cited 2013 Nov 11]; 134 (Pt 12): 3602-3615. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3235560&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
7. Hametner S, Wimmer I, Haider L, Pfeifenbring S, Brück W, Lassmann H,. Iron and neurodegeneration in the multiple sclerosis brain. Ann Neurol [Internet]. 2013 Jul 19 [cited 2013 Nov 18]; Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23868451
8. Bagnato F, Hametner S, Welch EB,. Visualizing iron in multiple sclerosis. Magn Reson Imaging [Internet]. 2013 Apr [cited 2013 Dec 2]; 31: 376-384. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23347601
9. Chen W, Gauthier SA, Gupta A, et al., Quantitative susceptibility mapping of multiple sclerosis lesions at various ages. Radiology [Internet]. 2014 Apr [cited 2014 Mar 27]; 271: 183-192. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24475808.
10. Bian W, Harter K, Hammond-Rosenbluth KE, et al., A serial in vivo 7T magnetic resonance phase imaging study of white matter lesions in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler [Internet]. 2013 Jan [cited 2013 Dec 10]; 19: 69-75. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22641301
11. Deistung A, Schäfer A, Schweser F, Biedermann U, Turner R, Reichenbach JR,. Toward in vivo histology: a comparison of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) with magnitude-, phase-, and R2-imaging at ultra-high magnetic field strength. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2013 Jan 15 [cited 2013 Nov 7];65: 299-314. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23036448
12. Haacke EM, Makki M, Ge Y, et al., Characterizing iron deposition in multiple sclerosis lesions using susceptibility weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging [Internet]. 2009 Mar [cited 2013 Dec 8]; 29: 537-544. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2650739&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
13. Hagemeier J, Heininen-Brown M, Poloni GU, et al., Iron deposition in multiple sclerosis lesions measured by susceptibility-weighted imaging filtered phase: a case control study. J Magn Reson Imaging [Internet]. 2012 Jul [cited 2013 Dec 10]; 36: 73-83. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22407571
14. Walsh AJ, Lebel RM, Eissa A, et al., Multiple sclerosis: validation of MR imaging for quantification and detection of iron. Radiology [Internet]. 2013 May [cited 2013 Dec 10]; 267: 531-542. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23297322
15. Haacke EM, Brown RW, Thompson MR, Venkatesan R,. Magnetic resonance imaging: physical principles and sequence design. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1999.
16. Jackson J,. Classical electrodynamics, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1998.
17. Liu T, Wisnieff C, Lou M, Chen W, Spincemaille P, Wang Y,. Nonlinear formulation of the magnetic field to source relationship for robust quantitative susceptibility mapping. Magn Reson Med [Internet]. 2013 Feb [cited 2013 Nov 8]; 69: 467-476. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22488774
18. Wang Y, Yu Y, Li D, et al., Artery and vein separation using susceptibility-dependent phase in contrast-enhanced MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging [Internet]. 2000 Nov [cited 2014 Apr 9]; 12: 661-670. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11050635
19. Salomir R, de Senneville BD, Moonen CT., A fast calculation method for magnetic field inhomogeneity due to an arbitrary distribution of bulk susceptibility. Concepts Magn Reson [Internet]. 2003 Oct 13 [cited 2014 May 29]; 19B: 26-34. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/cmr.b.10083.
20. Wong R, Chen X, Wang Y, Hu X, Jin MM., Visualizing and quantifying acute inflammation using ICAM-1 specific nanoparticles and MRI quantitative susceptibility mapping. Ann Biomed Eng [Internet]. 2012 Jun [cited 2013 Dec 9]; 40: 1328-1338. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22143599.
21. Liu T, Khalidov I, de Rochefort L, et al., A novel background field removal method for MRI using projection onto dipole fields (PDF). NMR Biomed [Internet]. 2011 Nov [cited 2014 Feb 22]; 24: 1129-1136. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3628923&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
22. Kressler B, de Rochefort L, Liu T, Spincemaille P, Jiang Q, Wang Y,. Nonlinear regularization for per voxel estimation of magnetic susceptibility distributions from MRI field maps. IEEE Trans Med Imaging [Internet]. 2010 Mar [cited 2014 May 30]; 29: 273-281. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2874210&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
23. De Rochefort L, Liu T, Kressler B, et al., Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction from MR phase data using Bayesian regularization: validation and application to brain imaging. Magn Reson Med [Internet]. 2010 Jan [cited 2014 May 30]; 63: 194-206. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19953507.
24. Liu J, Liu T, de Rochefort L, et al., Morphology enabled dipole inversion for quantitative susceptibility mapping using structural consistency between the magnitude image and the susceptibility map. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2012 Mar 1 [cited 2014 May 30]; 59: 2560-2568. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3254812&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
25. Lassmann H., Review: the architecture of inflammatory demyelinating lesions: implications for studies on pathogenesis. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol [Internet]. 2011 Dec [cited 2014 Apr 11]; 37: 698-710. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21696413.
26. Shen X, Nguyen TD, Gauthier SA, Raj A., Robust myelin quantitative imaging from multi-echo T2 MRI using edge preserving spatial priors. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv [Internet]. 2013 Jan [cited 2014 Apr 9]; 16 (Pt 1): 622-630. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24505719.
27. Nguyen TD, Wisnieff C, Cooper MA, et al., T2 prep three-dimensional spiral imaging with efficient whole brain coverage for myelin water quantification at 1.5 Tesla. Magn Reson Med [Internet]. 2012 Mar [cited 2014 Apr 9]; 67: 614-621. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22344579.
28. Du J, Ma G, Li S, et al., Ultrashort echo time (UTE) magnetic resonance imaging of the short T2 components in white matter of the brain using a clinical 3T scanner. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2014 Feb 15 [cited 2014 Apr 1]; 87: 32-41. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24188809.
29. Horch RA, Gore JC, Does MD,. Origins of the ultrashort-T2 1H NMR signals in myelinated nerve: a direct measure of myelin content? Magn Reson Med [Internet]. 2011 Jul [cited 2014 Apr 9]; 66: 24-31. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3120910&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
30. Wilhelm MJ, Ong HH, Wehrli SL, et al., Direct magnetic resonance detection of myelin and prospects for quantitative imaging of myelin density. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A [Internet]. 2012 Jun 12 [cited 2014 Apr 9]; 109: 9605-9610. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3386098&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract