T2 Relaxation time quantitation differs between pulse sequences in articular cartilage

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 105-113

  Matzat, Stephen J ^a   McWalter, Emily J ^a   Kogan, Feliks ^a   Chen, Weitian ^b   Gold, Garry E ^a,c  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GE HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^c Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

cartilage; magnetic resonance imaging; pulse sequence; T2 relaxation time mapping

Indexed keywords

AGAR;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIZATION PREPARED SPOILED GRADIENT ECHO SEQUENCE; MALE; MULTI ECHO SPIN ECHO SEQUENCE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PATELLA; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE DOUBLE ECHO STEADY STATE SEQUENCE; RELAXATION TIME; SINGLE ECHO SPIN ECHO SEQUENCE; STANDARD; THREE DIMENSIONAL FAST SPIN ECHO SEQUENCE; TIBIA; TWO DIMENSIONAL FAST SPIN ECHO SEQUENCE; YOUNG ADULT; ALGORITHM; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DEVICES; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGING PHANTOM; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84931833899     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24757     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Oliveria SA, Felson DT, Reed JI, Cirillo PA, Walker AM,. Incidence of symptomatic hand, hip, and knee osteoarthritis among patients in a health maintenance organization. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38: 1134-1141.
2. Buckwalter JA, Saltzman C, Brown T,. The impact of osteoarthritis: implications for research. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;(Suppl): S6-S15.
3. Murray CJL, Lopez AD,. The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. Cambridge, MA: Harvard School of Public Health on behalf of the World Health Organization and the World Bank; 1996. 1022 p.
4. Bredella MA, Tirman PF, Peterfy CG, Zarlingo M, Feller JF, Bost FW, et al., Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172: 1073-1080.
5. Buckwalter JA, Mankin HJ,. Articular cartilage: degeneration and osteoarthritis, repair, regeneration, and transplantation. Instr Course Lect 1998; 47: 487-504.
6. Blumenkrantz G, Majumdar S,. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis. Eur Cell Mater 2007; 13: 76-86.
7. Braun HJ, Gold GE,. Advanced MRI of articular cartilage. Imaging Med 2011; 3: 541-555.
8. Van Ginckel A, Verdonk P, Victor J, Witvrouw E,. Cartilage status in relation to return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41: 550-559.
9. Urish KL, Keffalas MG, Durkin JR, Miller DJ, Chu CR, Mosher TJ,. T2 texture index of cartilage can predict early symptomatic OA progression: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013; 21: 1550-1557.
10. Schooler J, Kumar D, Nardo L, McCulloch C, Li X, Link TM, et al., Longitudinal evaluation of T1rho and T2 spatial distribution in osteoarthritic and healthy medial knee cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2014; 22: 51-62.
11. Apprich S, Welsch GH, Mamisch TC, Szomolanyi P, Mayerhoefer M, Pinker K, et al., Detection of degenerative cartilage disease: comparison of high-resolution morphological MR and quantitative T2 mapping at 3.0 Tesla. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010; 18: 1211-1217.
12. Nishii T, Tanaka H, Sugano N, Sakai T, Hananouchi T, Yoshikawa H,. Evaluation of cartilage matrix disorders by T2 relaxation time in patients with hip dysplasia. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008; 16: 227-233.
13. David-Vaudey E, Ghosh S, Ries M, Majumdar S,. T2 relaxation time measurements in osteoarthritis. Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 22: 673-682.
14. Keenan KE, Besier TF, Pauly JM, Han E, Rosenberg J, Smith RL, et al., Prediction of glycosaminoglycan content in human cartilage by age, T1rho and T2 MRI. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011; 19: 171-179.
15. Schneider E, Nessaiver M,. The Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) magnetic resonance imaging quality assurance update. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013; 21: 110-116.
16. Xia Y,. Magic-angle effect in magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage: a review. Invest Radiol 2000; 35: 602-621.
17. Balamoody S, Williams TG, Wolstenholme C, Waterton JC, Bowes M, Hodgson R, et al., Magnetic resonance transverse relaxation time T2 of knee cartilage in osteoarthritis at 3-T: a cross-sectional multicentre, multivendor reproducibility study. Skeletal Radiol 2013; 42: 511-520.
18. Dardzinski BJ, Schneider E,. Radiofrequency (RF) coil impacts the value and reproducibility of cartilage spin-spin (T2) relaxation time measurements. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013; 21: 710-720.
19. Raya JG, Dietrich O, Horng A, Weber J, Reiser MF, Glaser C,. T2 measurement in articular cartilage: impact of the fitting method on accuracy and precision at low SNR. Magn Reson Med 2010; 63: 181-193.
20. Pai A, Li X, Majumdar S,. A comparative study at 3 T of sequence dependence of T2 quantitation in the knee. Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 26: 1215-1220.
21. Frahm J, Merboldt K-D, Hänicke W,. Localized proton spectroscopy using stimulated echoes. J Magn Reson (1969) 1987; 72: 502-508.
22. Li X, Han ET, Busse RF, Majumdar S,. In vivo T(1rho) mapping in cartilage using 3D magnetization-prepared angle-modulated partitioned k-space spoiled gradient echo snapshots (3D MAPSS). Magn Reson Med 2008; 59: 298-307.
23. Chen W, Takahashi A, Han E, editors. 3D Quantitative Imaging of T1rho and T2. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Montreal, Canada, 2011.
24. Staroswiecki E, Granlund KL, Alley MT, Gold GE, Hargreaves BA,. Simultaneous estimation of T(2) and apparent diffusion coefficient in human articular cartilage in vivo with a modified three-dimensional double echo steady state (DESS) sequence at 3 T. Magn Reson Med 2012; 67: 1086-1096.
25. Bieri O, Ganter C, Scheffler K,. Quantitative in vivo diffusion imaging of cartilage using double echo steady-state free precession. Magn Reson Med 2012; 68: 720-729.
26. Watanabe A, Boesch C, Obata T, Anderson SE,. Effect of multislice acquisition on T1 and T2 measurements of articular cartilage at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 26: 109-117.
27. Liney GP, Knowles AJ, Manton DJ, Turnbull LW, Blackband SJ, Horsman A,. Comparison of conventional single echo and multi-echo sequences with a fast spin-echo sequence for quantitative T2 mapping: application to the prostate. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6: 603-607.
28. Maier CF, Tan SG, Hariharan H, Potter HG,. T2 quantitation of articular cartilage at 1.5 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 17: 358-364.
29. Mendlik T, Faber SC, Weber J, Hohe J, Rauch E, Reiser M, et al., T2 quantitation of human articular cartilage in a clinical setting at 1.5 T: implementation and testing of four multiecho pulse sequence designs for validity. Invest Radiol 2004; 39: 288-299.
30. Dardzinski BJ, Mosher TJ, Li S, Van Slyke MA, Smith MB,. Spatial variation of T2 in human articular cartilage. Radiology 1997; 205: 546-550.
31. Smith HE, Mosher TJ, Dardzinski BJ, Collins BG, Collins CM, Yang QX, et al., Spatial variation in cartilage T2 of the knee. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 14: 50-55.
32. Wang N, Xia, Y,. Experimental issues in the measurement of multi-component relaxation times in articular cartilage by microscopic MRI. J Magn Reson 2013; 235: 15-25.
33. Wiener E, Pfirrmann CW, Hodler J,. Spatial variation in T1 of healthy human articular cartilage of the knee joint. Br J Radiol 2010; 83: 476-485.
34. Wu EX, Buxton RB,. Effect of diffusion on the steady-state magnetization with pulsed field gradients. J Magn Reson 1969; 90: 243-253.
35. Li X, Kuo D, Theologis A, Carballido-Gamio J, Stehling C, Link TM, et al., Cartilage in anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees: MR imaging T1{rho} and T2-initial experience with 1-year follow-up. Radiology 2011; 258: 505-514.
36. Goodwin DW, Wadghiri YZ, Zhu H, Vinton CJ, Smith ED, Dunn JF,. Macroscopic structure of articular cartilage of the tibial plateau: influence of a characteristic matrix architecture on MRI appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182: 311-318.
37. Bartlett PA, Symms MR, Free SL, Duncan JS,. T2 relaxometry of the hippocampus at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 1095-1098.
38. Duncan JS, Bartlett P, Barker GJ,. Technique for measuring hippocampal T2 relaxation time. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996; 17: 1805-1810.
39. Eckstein F, Ateshian G, Burgkart R, Burstein D, Cicuttini F, Dardzinski B, et al., Proposal for a nomenclature for magnetic resonance imaging based measures of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006; 14: 974-983.
40. Poon CS, Henkelman RM,. Practical T2 quantitation for clinical applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 1992; 2: 541-553.
41. Dardzinski BJ, Laor T, Schmithorst VJ, Klosterman L, Graham TB,. Mapping T2 relaxation time in the pediatric knee: feasibility with a clinical 1.5-T MR imaging system. Radiology 2002; 225: 233-239.
42. Nishii T, Kuroda K, Matsuoka Y, Sahara T, Yoshikawa H,. Change in knee cartilage T2 in response to mechanical loading. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 175-180.