The Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) magnetic resonance imaging quality assurance update

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 110-116

  Schneider, E ^a,b   NessAiver, M ^c  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b SciTrials LLC   (United States)

^c SimplyPhysics LLC   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical trial; Magnetic resonance; Osteoarthritis Initiative; Quality assurance (QA)

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CARTILAGE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; KNEE; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KNEE JOINT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MULTICENTER STUDIES AS TOPIC; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84871928256     PISSN: 10634584     EISSN: 15229653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.10.011     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. The OAI Images, Clinical Data and Biospecimens are Public Access Resources: and https://niams-imaging.nci.nih.gov/ncia/login.jsf.
2. Peterfy C.G., Schneider E., Nevitt M. The Osteoarthritis Initiative: protocol design considerations for magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008, 16:1433-1441.
3. Schneider E., NessAiver M., White D., Purdy D., Martin L., Fanella L., et al. The Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) magnetic resonance imaging quality assurance methods and results. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008, 16:994-1004.
4. Price R.R., Axel L., Morgan T., Newman R., Perman W., Schneiders S., et al. Quality assurance methods and phantoms for magnetic resonance imaging: report of AAPM nuclear magnetic resonance task group no. 1a. Med Phys 1990, 17:287-295.
5. Och J.G., Clarke G.D., Sobol W.T., Rosen C.W., Mun S.K. Acceptance testing of magnetic resonance imaging systems: report of AAPM nuclear magnetic resonance task group no. 6. Med Phys 1992, 19:217-229.
6. American College of Radiology (ACR) MRI Accreditation Program Requirements http://www.acr.org/accreditation/mri/mri.html.
7. American College of Radiology (ACR) Phantom Test Guidance for the ACR MRI Accreditation Program 1998, Reston, VA.
8. NEMA Determination of Two-dimensional Geometric Distortion in Diagnostic Magnetic Resonance Images. Document MS 2 1989, National Electrical Manufacturer's Association, Washington, DC.
9. Moorhead T.W., Gountouna V.-E., Job D.E., McIntosh A.M., Romaniuk L., Lymer G.K.S., et al. Prospective multi-centre voxel based morphometry study employing scanner specific segmentations: procedure development using CaliBrain structural MRI data. BMC Med Imaging 2009, 9:8-20.
10. Gunter J.L., Bernstein M.A., Borowski B.J., Ward C.P., Britson P.J., Felmlee J.P., et al. Measurement of MRI scanner performance with the ADNI phantom. Med Phys 2009, 36:2193-2205.
11. Kjos B.O., Ehman R.L., Brant-Zawadzki M. Reproducibility of T1 and T2 relaxation times calculated from routine MR imaging sequences: phantom study. Am J Roentgenology 1985, 144:1157-1163.
12. Koff M.F., Parratte S., Amrami K.K., Kaufman K.R. Examiner repeatability of patellar cartilage T2 values. Magn Reson Imaging 2009, 27:131-136.
13. Welsch G.H., Mamisch T.C., Weber M., Horger W., Bohndorf K., Trattnig S. High-resolution morphological and biochemical imaging of articular cartilage of the ankle joint at 3.0 T using a new dedicated phased array coil: in vivo reproducibility study. Skeletal Radiol 2008, 37:519-526.
14. Mosher T.J., Zhang Z., Reddy R., Boudhar S., Milestone B.N., Morrison W.B., et al. Knee articular cartilage damage in osteoarthritis: analysis of MR image biomarker reproducibility in ACRIN-PA 4001 multicenter trial. Radiology 2011, 258(3):832-842.
15. Keevil S.F., Barbiroli B., Collins D.J., Danielsen E.R., Hennig J., Henriksen O., et al. Quality assessment in in vivo NMR spectroscopy: IV. A multi-center trial of test objects and protocols for performance assessment in clinical NMR spectroscopy. Magn Reson Imaging 1995, 13(1):139-157.
16. DeWilde J., Price D., Curran J., Williams J., Kitney R. Standardization of performance evaluation in MRI: 13 years' experience of intersystem comparison. Concepts Magn Reson 2002, 15(1):111-116.
17. Hyde R.J., Ellis J.H., Gardner E.A., Zhang Y., Carson P.L. MRI scanner variability studies using a semi-automated analysis system. Magn Reson Imaging 1994, 12(7):1089-1097.
18. Wang D., Strugnell W., Cowin G., Doddrell D.M., Slaughter R. Geometric distortion in clinical MRI systems. Part I: evaluation using a 3D phantom. Magn Reson Imaging 2004, 22(9):1211-1221.
19. Wang D., Doddrell D.M. Geometric distortion in structural magnetic resonance imaging. Curr Med Imag Rev 2005, 1:49-60.
20. Mulkern R.V., Forbes P., Dewey K., Osganian S., Clark M., Wong S., et al. Establishment and results of a magnetic resonance quality assurance program for the pediatric brain tumor consortium. Acad Radiol 2008, 15:1099-1110.
21. Eckstein F., Hudelmaier M., Wirth W., Kiefer B., Jackson R., Yu J., et al. Double Echo Steady State (DESS) magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage at 3 tesla - a pilot study for the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2006, 65:433-441.
22. Hunter D.J., Niu J., Zhang Y., Totterman S., Tamez J., Dabrowski C., et al. Change in cartilage morphometry: a sample of the progression cohort of the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2009, 68:349-356.
23. Wirth W., Larroque S., Davies R.Y., Nevitt M., Gimona A., Baribaud F., et al. Comparison of 1-year vs 2-year change in regional cartilage thickness in osteoarthritis results from 346 participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011, 19:74-83.
24. Lerski R.A., McRobbie D.W., Straughan K., Walker P.M., de Certaines J.D., Bernard A.M. Multi-center trial with protocols and prototype test objects for the assessment of MRI equipment. Magn Reson Imaging 1998, 6(2):201-214.