Surgeon’s experience influences UKA survivorship: a comparative study between all-poly and metal back designs

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 2074-2080

  Zambianchi, F ^a   Digennaro, V ^a   Giorgini, A ^a   Grandi, G ^a   Fiacchi, F ^a   Mugnai, R ^a   Catani, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Alignment; All poly; Experience; Metal back; Surgeon; UKA

Indexed keywords

METAL; POLYETHYLENE DERIVATIVE;

AGED; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS; RADIOGRAPHY; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGERY; TIBIA;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; METALS; POLYETHYLENES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIBIA;

EID: 84931571189     PISSN: 09422056     EISSN: 14337347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-2958-9     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. https://aoanjrr.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/documents/10180/60142/Annual%20Report%202012?version=1.2&t=1355186837517
2. Bruni D, Akkawi I, Iacono F, Raspugli GF, Gagliardi M, Nitri M, Grassi A, Zaffagnini S, Bignozzi S, Marcacci M (2013) Minimum thickness of all-poly tibial component unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years does not increase revision rate for aseptic loosening. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(11):2462–2467
3. Cheng T, Pan X, Liu T, Zhang X (2012) Tibial component designs in primary total knee arthroplasty: should we reconsider all-polyethylene component? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(8):1438–1449
4. Clarius M, Hauck C, Seeger JB, Pritsch M, Merle C, Aldinger PR (2010) Correlation of positioning and clinical results in Oxford UKA. Int Orthop 34(8):1145–1151
5. Collier MB, Eickmann TH, Sukezaki F, McAuley JP, Engh GA (2006) Patient, implant, and alignment factors associated with revision of medial compartment unicondylar arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21(6 Suppl 2):108–115
6. Cossey AJ, Spriggins AJ (2005) The use of computer-assisted surgical navigation to prevent malalignment in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 20(1):29–34
7. Furnes O, Espehaug B, Lie SA, Vollset SE, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI (2007) Failure mechanisms after unicompartmental and tricompartmental primary knee replacement with cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(3):519–525
8. Gulati A, Chau R, Simpson DJ, Dodd CA, Gill HS, Murray DW (2009) Influence of component alignment on outcome for unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee 16(3):196–199
9. Harnett NI, Tregonning R, Rothwell A, Hobbs T (2010) The Oxford phase 3 unicompartimental knee arthroplasty—an audit of revisions. The New Zealand experience. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(SUPP I):224
10. Hernigou P, Deschamps G (2004) Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 423:161–165
11. Heyse TJ, Khefacha A, Peersman G, Cartier P (2012) Survivorship of UKA in the middle-aged. Knee 19(5):585–591
12. Marmor L (1988) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Ten- to 13-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 226:14–20
13. Newman J, Pydisetty RV, Ackroyd C (2009) Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the 15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(1):52–57
14. Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill HS, Barker K, Dodd CA, Murray DW (2011) Minimally invasive Oxfor phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(2):198–204
15. Price AJ, Svard U (2011) A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(1):174–179
16. Registro Regionale Di Implantologia Protesica Ortopedica Dati Complessivi interventi di Protesi d’anca, di ginocchio e di spalla in Emilia Romagna 2000–2009. https://ripo.cineca.it/pdf/relazione_globale_2009.pdf
17. Ridgeway SR, McAuley JP, Ammeen DJ, Engh GA (2002) The effect of alignment of the knee on the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(3):351–355
18. Sawatari T, Tsumura H, Iesaka K, Furushiro Y, Torisu T (2005) Three-dimensional finite element analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty—the influence of tibial component inclination. J Orthop Res 23(3):549–554
19. Schai PA, Suh JT, Thornhill TS, Scott RD (1998) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in middle-aged patients: a 2- to 6-year follow up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 13(4):365–372
20. Small SR, Berend ME, Ritter MA, Buckley CA, Rogge RD (2011) Metal backing significantly decreases tibial strains in a medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty model. J Arthroplasty 26(5):777–782
21. Sharma L, Song J, Dunlop D et al (2010) Varus and valgus alignment and incident and progressive knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 69(11):1940–1945
22. Simpson DJ, Gray H, D’Lima D, Murray DW, Gill HS (2008) The effect of bearing congruency, thickness and alignment on the stresses in unicompartmental knee replacements. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 23(9):1148–1157
23. Swank M, Stulberg SD, Jiganti J, Machairas S (1993) The natural history of unicompartmental arthroplasty. An eight-year follow-up study with survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:130–142
24. Tabor OB Jr, Tabor OB (1998) Unicompartmental arthroplasty: a long term follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 13(4):373–379
25. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register, Annual Report 2012. http://www.myknee.se/pdf/117_SKAR_2012_Engl_1.0.pdf