Nectar robbery by a hermit hummingbird: association to floral phenotype and its influence on flowers and network structure

Oecologia

Volumn 178, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 783-793

  Maruyama, Pietro Kiyoshi ^a,b   Vizentin Bugoni, Jeferson ^a,b   Dalsgaard, Bo ^b   Sazima, Ivan ^a,c   Sazima, Marlies ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c Projeto Dacnis   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Antagonism; Atlantic rainforest; Modularity; Mutualism; Phaethornis ruber; Plant pollinator interactions

Indexed keywords

BIRD; FLOWER; PHENOTYPE; PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTION; ROBBING; SPECIALIZATION; TROPHIC STRUCTURE;

CANNA PANICULATA; PHAETHORNIS RUBER;

NECTAR;

ANGIOSPERM; ANIMAL; BIRD; BRAZIL; ECOSYSTEM; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FLOWER; NECTAR; PHENOTYPE; POLLINATION;

ANGIOSPERMS; ANIMALS; BIRDS; BRAZIL; ECOSYSTEM; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FLOWERS; PHENOTYPE; PLANT NECTAR; POLLINATION;

EID: 84931570706     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-015-3275-9     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Almeida-Neto M, Ulrich W (2011) A straightforward computational approach for measuring nestedness using quantitative matrices. Environ Model Softw 26:173–178. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.08.003
2. Bascompte J, Jordano P, Melián CJ, Olesen JM (2003) The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100(16):9383–9387
3. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014) lme4: Linear mixed-effects model using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–6. Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
4. Blüthgen N, Menzel F, Blüthgen N (2006) Measuring specialization in species interaction networks. BMC Ecol 6:9. doi:10.1186/1472-6785-6-9
5. Borcard D, Gillet F, Legendre P (2011) Numerical ecology with R. Springer, New York
6. Bronstein JL (2001) The exploitation of mutualisms. Ecol Lett 4:277–287. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00218.x
7. Brosi BJ, Briggs H (2013) Single pollinator species losses reduce floral fidelity and plant reproductive function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:13044–13048. doi:10.1073/pnas.1307438110
8. Burkle LA, Irwin RE, Newman DA (2007) Predicting the effects of nectar robbing on plant reproduction: implications of pollen limitation and plant mating system. Am J Bot 94:1935–1943. doi:10.3732/ajb.94.12.1935
9. Buzato S, Sazima M, Sazima I (2000) Hummingbird–pollinated floras at three Atlantic forest sites. Biotropica 32:824–841. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2000.tb00621.x
10. Dalsgaard B, Martín González AM, Olesen JM, Ollerton J, Timmermann A, Andersen LH, Tossas AG (2009) Plant–hummingbird interactions in the West Indies: floral specialisation gradients associated with environment and hummingbird size. Oecologia 159:757–766. doi:10.1007/s00442-008-1255-z
11. Dormann CF, Strauss R (2014) A method for detecting modules in quantitative bipartite networks. Methods Ecol Evol 5:90–98. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12139
12. Dormann CF, Gruber B, Fründ J (2008) Introducing the bipartite package: analysing ecological networks. R News 8:8–11
13. Feinsinger P, Colwell RK (1978) Community organization among neotropical nectar-feeding birds. Am Zool 18:779–795. doi:10.1093/icb/18.4.779
14. Fontaine C, Guimarães PR Jr, Kéfi S, Loeuille N, Memmott J, van der Putten WH, van Veen FJF, Thébault E (2011) The ecological and evolutionary implications of merging different types of networks. Ecol Lett 14:1170–1181. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01688.x
15. Fründ J, Dormann CF, Holzschuh A, Tscharntke T (2013) Bee diversity effects on pollination depend on functional complementarity and niche shifts. Ecology 94:2042–2054. doi:10.1890/12-1620.1
16. Genini J, Morellato LP, Guimarães PR Jr, Olesen JM (2010) Cheaters in mutualism networks. Biol Lett 6:494–497. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.1021
17. Guimarães PR Jr, Guimarães P (2006) Improving the analyses of nestedness for large sets of matrices. Environ Model Softw 21:1512–1513. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.04.002
18. Inouye DW (1980) The terminology of floral larceny. Ecology 61:1251–1253
19. Irwin RE (2000) Hummingbird avoidance of nectar-robbed plants: spatial location or visual cues. Oikos 91:499–506. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.910311.x
20. Irwin RE, Bronstein JL, Manson JS, Richardson L (2010) Nectar robbing: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:271–292. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120330
21. Joly CA, Assis MA, Bernacci LC, Tamashiro JY, Campos MCR, Gomes JAMA, Lacerda MS, Santos FAM, Pedroni F, Pereira LS, Padgurschi MCG, Prata EMB, Ramos E, Torres RB, Rochelle A, Martins FR, Alves LF, Vieira SA, Martinelli LA, Camargo PB, Aidar MPM, Eisenlohr PV, Simões E, Villani JP and Belinello R (2012) Florística e fitossociologia em parcelas permanentes da Mata Atlântica do sudeste do Brasil ao longo de um gradiente altitudinal. Biota Neotrop 12(1):123–145. http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v12n1/en/abstract?article+bn01812012012
22. Justino D, Maruyama PK, Oliveira PE (2011) Floral resource availability and hummingbird territorial behaviour on a Neotropical savanna shrub. J Ornithol 153:189–197. doi:10.1007/s10336-011-0726-x
23. Lara C, Ornelas J (2001) Preferential nectar robbing of flowers with long corollas: experimental studies of two hummingbird species visiting three plant species. Oecologia 128:263–273. doi:10.1007/s004420100640
24. Maloof JE, Inouye DW (2000) Are nectar robbers cheaters or mutualists? Ecology 81:2651–2661. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2651:ANRCOM]2.0.CO;2
25. Marquitti FMD, Guimarães PR Jr, Pires MM, Bittencourt LF (2014) MODULAR: software for the autonomous computation of modularity in large network sets. Ecography 37:221–224. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00506.x
26. Maruyama PK, Oliveira GM, Ferreira C, Dalsgaard B, Oliveira PE (2013) Pollination syndromes ignored: importance of non-ornithophilous flowers to Neotropical savanna hummingbirds. Naturwissenschaften 100:1061–1068. doi:10.1007/s00114-013-1111-9
27. Maruyama PK, Vizentin-Bugoni J, Oliveira GM, Oliveira PE, Dalsgaard B (2014) Morphological and spatio-temporal mismatches shape a Neotropical savanna plant-hummingbird network. Biotropica 46:740–747. doi:10.1111/btp.12170
28. Maruyama PK, Vizentin-Bugoni J, Dalsgaard B, Sazima M (2015) Pollination and breeding system of Canna paniculata (Cannaceae) in a montane Atlantic rainforest: asymmetric dependence on a hermit hummingbird. Acta Bot Bras 29:157–160. doi:10.1590/0102-33062014abb3590
29. McDade LA, Kinsman S (1980) The impact of floral parasitism in two neotropical hummingbird–pollinated plant species. Evolution 34:944–958
30. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2013) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.0–10. Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
31. Olesen JM, Bascompte J, Dupont YL, Jordano P (2007) The modularity of pollination networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:19891–19896. doi:10.1073/pnas.0706375104
32. Ollerton J, Alarcón R, Waser N, Price M, Watts S, Cranmer L, Hingston A, Peter C, Rotenberry J (2009) A global test of the pollination syndrome hypothesis. Ann Bot 103:1471–1480. doi:10.1093/aob/mcp031
33. Ollerton J, Winfree R, Tarrant S (2011) How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos 120:321–326. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18644.x
34. Sauve A, Fontaine C, Thébault E (2014) Structure-stability relationships in networks combining mutualistic and antagonistic interactions. Oikos 123:378–384. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00743.x
35. Sazima I, Buzato S, Sazima M (1995) The saw-billed hermit Ramphodon naevius and its flowers in southeastern Brazil. J Ornithol 136:195–206. doi:10.1007/BF01651241
36. Schleuning M, Ingmann L, Strauß R, Fritz SA, Dalsgaard B, Dehling DM, Plein M, Saavedra F, Sandel B, Svenning J-C, Böhning-Gaese K, Dormann CF (2014) Ecological, historical and evolutionary determinants of modularity in weighted seed-dispersal networks. Ecol Lett 17:454–463. doi:10.1111/ele.12245
37. Staniczenko PP, Kopp JC, Allesina S (2013) The ghost of nestedness in ecological networks. Nat Commun 4:1391. doi:10.1038/ncomms2422
38. Thébault E, Fontaine C (2010) Stability of ecological communities and the architecture of mutualistic and trophic networks. Science 329:853–859. doi:10.1126/science.1188321
39. Vizentin-Bugoni J, Maruyama PK, Sazima M (2014) Processes entangling interactions in communities: forbidden links are more important than abundance in a hummingbird–plant network. Proc Royal Soc B 281:20132397. doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.2397
40. Wilson P, Castellanos MC, Hogue JN, Thomson JD, Armbruster WS (2004) A multivariate search for pollination syndromes among penstemons. Oikos 104:345–361. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12819.x
41. Yoshikawa T, Isagi Y (2013) Determination of temperate bird–flower interactions as entangled mutualistic and antagonistic sub-networks: characterization at the network and species levels. J Anim Ecol 83:651–660. doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12161