Exploring Opportunities for Engaging Public Health Organizations in Transportation Planning

Public Works Management and Policy

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 201-225

  Li, Jianling ^a   Casey, Colleen ^a   Brewer, Lou K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

collaborative planning; network collaboration; public health; regional transportation planning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84931317411     PISSN: 1087724X     EISSN: 15527549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1087724X14559520     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Agranoff R.Managing within networks: Adding value to public organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2007:
2. American Planning Association. (2004). Symposium on land use and health: Fostering collaboration between planners and public environmental health officials. Retrieved from https://www.planning.org/research/healthy/pdf/surveysummary.pdf
3. Austin J. E.The collaboration challenge: How nonprofits and businesses succeed through strategic alliances. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2000:
4. Blumenberg E.Planning for the transportation needs of welfare participants: Institutional challenges to collaborative planning.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2002;22:152-163
5. Booher D.,Innes J.Network power in collaborative planning.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2002;21:221-236
6. Braveman P.,Gottlieb L.The social determinants of health: It’s time to consider the causes of the causes.Public Health Reports. 2014;129:19-31
7. Bureau of Economic Analysis (2014). Table 2.4.5. Personal Consumption Expenditures by Type of Product (billions of dollars. Last Revised on: August05, 2014). Retrieved from http://bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?ReqID=9&step=1#reqid=9&step=3&isuri=1&903=70.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). Chronic disease prevention and health promotion. Atlanta, GA. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/overview/
9. City of Chicago. (2010). Safe streets for Chicago. Chicago, IL: Author. Available from http://www.smartgrowthamerica.org/documents/cs/policy/cs-il-chicago-safestreets.pdf
10. City of Kirkland. (2009). More people, more places, more often: A plan for active transportation. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.kirklandwa.gov/Assets/Public%20Works/Public%20Works%20PDFs/Transportation/ATP%20Final%20Plan.pdf
11. Cohen J. M.,Boniface S.,Watkins S.Health implications of transport planning, development and operations.Journal of Transport & Health. 2014;1:63-72
12. Corburn J.Confronting the challenges in reconnecting Urban planning.American Journal of Public Health. 2004;94:541-546
13. Corburn J.Toward the healthy city. Cambridge, UK: The MIT Press; 2009:
14. Corburn J.,Bhatia R.Health impact assessment in San Francisco: Incorporating the social determinants of health into environmental planning.Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 2007;50:323-341
15. Dempwolf S. C.,Lyles W. L.The uses of social network analysis in planning: A review of the literature.Journal of Planning Literature. 2012;27:3-21
16. Frank L.,Engelke P.,Schmid T.Health and community design: The impact of the built environment on physical activity. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2003:
17. Frank L.,Sallis J.,Conway T.,Chapman J.,Saelens B.,Bachman W.Many pathways from land use to health: Associations between neighborhood walkability and active transportation, body mass index, and air quality.Journal of the American Planning Association. 2006;72:75-87
18. Frumkin H.,Frank L.,Jackson R.Urban sprawl and public health: Designing, planning, and building for healthy communities. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2004:
19. Goldstein B. E.,Butler W. H.Expanding the scope and impact of collaborative planning: Combining multi-stakeholder collaboration and communities of practice in a learning network.Journal of the American Planning Association. 2010;76:238-249
20. Gray B.Conditions facilitating interorganizational collaboration.Human Relations. 1985;38:911-936
21. Gray B.Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1989:
22. Health and Wellness Coalition. (2010). Health and Wellness Coalition of Wichita, KA. Available from http://www.hwcwichita.org
23. Hynes H.,Lopez R.Urban health: Readings in the social, built, and physical environments of U.S. cities. Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett; 2009:
24. Innes J. E.,Booher D. E.Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1999;65:412-423
25. Innes J. E.,Booher D. E.Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. London, England: Routledge; 2010:
26. Margerum R. D.Beyond consensus: Improving collaborative planning and management. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2011:
27. North Central Texas Council of Governments. (2013). Metropolitan transportation plan: Mobility 2035-2013 update—Executive summary. Retrieved from http://www.nctcog.org/trans/mtp/2035/documents/ExecSummary.pdf
28. Roof K.,Glandon R.Tool created to assess health impacts of development decisions in Ingham County Michigan.Journal of Environmental Health. 2008;71 (1): 35-38
29. Roof K.,Maclennan C.Tri-County health department in Colorado does more than just review a development plan.Journal of Environmental Health. 2008;71 (1): 31-34
30. Roof K.,Sutherland S.Smart growth and health for the future: “Our course of action,” Delaware County, Ohio.Journal of Environmental Health. 2008;71 (1): 28-30
31. San Francisco Department of Public Health. (2010). Program on Health, Equity and Sustainability. Retrieved from http://www.sfhealthequity.org/
32. San Francisco Department of Public Health. (2011). Community resolution. Retrieved from http://www.sfhealthequity.org/elements/29-elements/transportation/still-lyell-freeway-channel-hia/135-community-solutions-to-protect-community-health
33. Scholz J.,Berardo R.,Kile B.Do networks solve collective action problems? Credibility, search, and collaboration.The Journal of Politics. 2008;70:393-406
34. SchrankD.EiseleB.LomaxT. (2012). TTI’s 2012 Urban Mobility Report powered by INRIX Traffic data, Texas A&M, Texas Transportation Institute (TTI). Retrieved from http://d2dtl5nnlpfr0r.cloudfront.net/tti.tamu.edu/documents/mobility-report-2012.pdf
35. Stein S. M.,Harper T. L.Power, trust, and planning.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2003;23:125-139
36. Tarrant County Public Health. (2012). Community Health Profile, Tarrant County, 2005-2010. Retrieved from http://tcweb.tarrantcounty.com/ehealth/lib/ehealth/Tarrant_County_Community_Health_Profile_2005-2010_w.pdf
37. Transportation Research Board. (2010a). Binghamton Metropolitan Transportation Study. Retrieved from http://www.transportationforcommunities.com/cases/pdf/Binghamton%20Metropolitan%20Transportation%20Study%20-%20Community%20Vision%20based%20on%20Scenario%20Planning.pdf
38. Transportation Research Board. (2010b). Grand Rapids Michigan: US-131 S-curve replacement, collaborative design and construction closure of central urban access. Retrieved from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_CS_C01_Michigan.pdf
39. Transportation Research Board. (2010c). I-69 Trans-Texas Corridor Study: Using GISST, TEAP, Quantm, SAM, and ProjectSolve Technologies. Retrieved from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_CS_C01_Texas.pdf
40. Transportation Research Board. (2010d). Idaho’s transportation vision. Retrieved from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_CS_C01_Idaho.pdf
41. Transportation Research Board. (2010e). Illinois Prairie Parkway Project: Developing comprehensive transportation system improvements using an in-depth screening process. Retrieved from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_CS_C01_Illinois.pdf
42. Transportation Research Board. (2010f). NJ-31 integrated land use and transportation plan. Retrieved from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_CS_C01_NJ-31.pdf
43. Transportation Research Board. (2010g). Oregon I-5cBeltline interchange: Structured decision making using community values as performance measures. Retrieved from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_CS_C01_Oregon.pdf
44. Transportation Research Board. (2010h). Puget Sound Region, Washington: Regional TIP policy framework and vision 2040-using paint the region to evaluate scenarios. Retrieved from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_CS_C01_Washington-PugetSound.pdf
45. Transportation Research Board. (2010i). Sacramento Region, California: Blueprint Project. Retrieved from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_CS_C01_Sacramento.pdf
46. Transportation Research Board. (2010j). US-24: New Haven Indiana to Defiance, Ohio; The 9-step transportation development process. Retrieved from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_CS_C01_Ohio-Indiana.pdf
47. Transportation Research Board. (2010k). Woodrow Wilson Bridge in Maryland and Virginia: FHWA leads the planning process for bridge redesign. Retrieved from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_CS_C01_WilsonBridge.pdf
48. Wier M.,Sciammas C.,Seto E.,Bhatia R.,Rivard T.Health, traffic, and environmental justice: Collaborative research and community action in San Francisco, California.American Journal of Public Health. 2009;99:S499-S504