Understanding the contribution of non-carbon dioxide gases in deep mitigation scenarios

Global Environmental Change

Volumn 33, Issue , 2015, Pages 142-153

  Gernaat, David E H J ^a,b   Calvin, Katherine ^c   Lucas, Paul L ^b   Luderer, Gunnar ^e   Otto, Sander A C ^a   Rao, Shilpa ^d   Strefler, Jessica ^e   van Vuuren, Detlef P ^a,b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b PBL NETHERLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^d INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS   (Austria)

^e POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Climate policy strategies; Deep mitigation scenarios; Fluorinated gasses (F gas); Methane (CH4< inf>); Nitrous oxide (N2< inf>O); Non CO2< inf> emissions

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; ATMOSPHERIC MODELING; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FLUORINE; GREENHOUSE GAS; INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE; METHANE; NITROUS OXIDE; NUMERICAL MODEL; RADIATIVE FORCING; DATABASE; EMISSION INVENTORY; KYOTO PROTOCOL; PANEL DATA;

EID: 84931273203     PISSN: 09593780     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.010     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Bates J. Economic Evaluation of Emission Reductions of Nitrous Oxides and Methane in Agriculture in the EU. Bottom-up Analysis 2001, European Commission.
2. Bosetti V., Carraro C., et al. A world induced technical change hybrid model. Energy J. 2006, 27:13-38.
3. Bosetti V., Tavoni M., et al. The 2008 WITCH model: new model features and baseline, Nota di lavoro//Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei: Sustainable development 2009.
4. Brink C. Modelling Cost-Effectiveness of Interrelated Emission Reduction Strategies: The Case of Agriculture in Europe 2003, Wageningen Univ.
5. Calvin K.V.E.A. GCAM wiki Documentation 2011, Wikipedia.
6. Clarke L., Jiang K., et al. Assessing transformation pathways. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2014, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/United Kingdom/New York, NY, USA. O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, J.C. Minx (Eds.).
7. Clemens J., Ahlgrimm H.-J. Greenhouse gases from animal husbandry: mitigation options. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2001, 60(1-3):287-300.
8. DeAngelo B.J., Francisco C., et al. Methane and nitrous oxide mitigation in agriculture. Energy J. 2006, (Special Issue# 3):89-108.
9. Delhotal K.C., de la Chesnaye F.C., et al. Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from waste, energy and industry. Energy J. 2006, 27:45-62.
10. Graus W., Harmelink M., et al. Marginal GHG-Abatement Curves for Agriculture 2004, Utrecht, the Netherlands, Ecofys.
11. Heijnes H. Reduction of the emissions of HFC's. PFC's and SF6 in the European Union 1999, European Commission.
12. Hendriks C., de Jager D. Economic Evaluation of Methane Emission Reductions in the Extraction. Transport and Distribution of Fossil Fuels in the EU: Bottom-up Analysis. A final report to European Commission 2001.
13. Hendriks C., De Jager D., et al. Emission Reduction Potential and Costs for Methane and Nitrous Oxide in the EU-15 1998, Ecofys, Utrecht.
14. Höglund-Isaksson L. Global anthropogenic methane emissions 2005-2030: technical mitigation potentials and costs. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2012, 12(19):9079-9096.
15. IPCC Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, IPCC, Cambridge/United Kingdom/New York, NY, USA. D.Q.S. Solomon, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, H.L. Miller (Eds.).
16. IPCC Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2014, IPCC, Cambridge/United Kingdom/New York, NY, USA. O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, J.C. Minx (Eds.).
17. Irving W.N., Branscombe M. Emissions from HCFC-22 production, Background Papers IPCC Expert Meetings on Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme 2002, 271-283. TSU, Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan.
18. JRC/PBL Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR) release 4.2, European Commission 2014, Joint Research Centre (JRC)/PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
19. Klein Goldewijk K., Olivier J.G.J., et al. Greenhouse Gas Emissions in The Netherlands 1990-2003, National Inventory Report 2005 2005, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
20. Kober T., van der Zwaan B.C., et al. Emission certificate trade and costs under regional burden-sharing regimes for a 2°C climate change control target. Clim. Change Econ 2013.
21. Kriegler E., Riahi K., et al. Making or breaking climate targets: the AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy. Technol. Forecast. Soc. 2015, 90:24-44.
22. Kriegler E., Tavoni M., Aboumahboub T., Luderer G., Demaere G., Krey V., Riahi K., Rosler H. Can we still meet 2°C with global climate action? The LIMITS study on implications of Durban Action Platform scenarios 2013, 282846. Clim. Change Econ.
23. Kriegler E., Weyant J.P., et al. The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies 2013, 1-15. Clim. Change.
24. Lucas P.L., van Vuuren D.P., et al. Long-term reduction potential of non-CO2 greenhouse gases. Environ. Sci. Policy 2007, 10(2):85-103.
25. Luderer G., Leimbach M., et al. Description of the ReMIND-R model 2011.
26. Meinshausen M., Raper S.C.B., et al. Emulating coupled atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6 - Part 1: Model description and calibration. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2011, 11(4):1417-1456.
27. MNP Integrated Modelling of Global Environmental Change. An Overview of IMAGE 2.4 2006, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP), Bilthoven, The Netherlands. A.F. Bouwman, T. Kram, K.K. Goldewijk (Eds.).
28. Mosier A., Duxbury J., et al. Assessing and mitigating N2O emissions from agricultural soils. Clim. Change 1998, 40(1):7-38.
29. OECD OECD Environmental Outlook to 2050: The Consequences of Inaction 2012, OECD.
30. Riahi K., Grübler A., et al. Scenarios of long-term socio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization. Technol. Forecast. Soc. 2007, 74(7):887-935.
31. Riahi K., Kriegler E., et al. Locked into Copenhagen pledges-implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2013.
32. Riemer P.W. The Abatement of Methane Emissions 1999, IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme.
33. Rösler H., van der Zwaan B., et al. Electricity versus hydrogen for passenger cars under stringent climate change control. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2014, 5:106-118.
34. Schaefer D.O., Godwin D., et al. Estimating future emissions and potential reductions of HFCs, PFCs, and SF6. Energy J. 2006, (Special Issue# 3):63-88.
35. Schwarz W., Leisewitz A. Emissions and reduction potentials of hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and sulphur hexafluoride in Germany. Report for the German Federal Environmental Agency 1999, UBA, Berlin, Umweltbundesamt.
36. Shindell D., Kuylenstierna J.C., et al. Simultaneously mitigating near-term climate change and improving human health and food security. Science 2012, 335(6065):183-189.
37. UNFCCC Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2005.
38. UNFCCC Report of the Conference of the Parties on its fifteenth session, held in Copenhagen from 7 to 19 December 2009 2009.
39. US-EPA Methane Emissions 1990-2020: Inventories, Projections, and Opportunities for Reductions 1999, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, USA.
40. US-EPA Global Mitigation of Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases: 2010-2030 2013, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
41. van der Zwaan B., Keppo I., et al. How to decarbonize the transport sector?. Energy Policy 2013, 61:562-573.
42. van Vuuren D.P. Energy systems and climate policy-long-term scenarios for an uncertain future 2007.
43. van Vuuren D.P., Den Elzen M.G., et al. Stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels: an assessment of reduction strategies and costs. Clim. Change 2007, 81(2):119-159.
44. van Vuuren D.P., Riahi K. The relationship between short-term emissions and long-term concentration targets. Clim. Change 2011, 104(3-4):793-801.
45. van Vuuren D.P., Weyant J., et al. Multi-gas scenarios to stabilize radiative forcing. Energy Econ. 2006, 28(1):102-120.
46. Velders G.J., Andersen S.O., et al. The importance of the Montreal protocol in protecting climate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104(12):4814-4819.
47. Wartmann S., Harnisch J. Reductions of SF6 emissions from high and medium voltage electrical equipment in Europe. Environ. Sci. 2005, 2(2-3):273-281.
48. Weyant J.P., de la Chesnaye F.C., et al. Overview of EMF-21: multigas mitigation and climate policy. Energy J. 2006, 27(1):1-32.