One True Anaphor

Linguistic Inquiry

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 91-124

  Safir, Ken ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anaphor; Binding; Locality; Logophor; Principle C; Pronoun

Indexed keywords

EID: 84931267230     PISSN: 00243892     EISSN: 15309150     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/ling_a_00149     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Adésolá, Olúsèye. 2004. Null operators and pronouns: A-bar dependencies and relations in Yoruba. Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
2. Afranaph Project. Ongoing. Ed. by Ken Safir. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, and Utrecht University. Available at http://www.africananaphora.rutgers.edu.
3. Anand, Pranav. 2006. De de se. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
4. Baker, Mark, Ken Safir, and Justine Sikuku. Forthcoming. Complex anaphora in Lubukusu. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Conference on African Linguistics.
5. Barker, Chris. 2012. Quantificational binding does not require c-command. Linguistic Inquiry 43:614-643.
6. Brasoveanu, Adrian. Forthcoming. Sentence-internal different as quantifier-internal anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy.
7. Büring, Daniel. 2005. Binding theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Cable, Seth. 2005. Binding local person pronouns without semantically empty features. Ms., MIT, Cambridge, MA.
9. Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 3, ed. by Adriana Belletti, 104-131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Clements, George N. 1975. The logopohoric pronoun in Ewe: Its role in discourse. Journal of West African Languages 10:141-177.
11. Dahl, Östen. 1972. On so-called 'sloppy identity'. In Gothenberg papers in theoretical linguistics, vol. 11. University of Göteberg, Sweden.
12. Dalrymple, Mary, Stuart Shieber, and Fernando Pereira. 1991. Linguistics and Philosophy 14:399-452.
13. Despić, Miloje. 2013. Binding and the structure of NP in Serbo-Croation. Linguistic Inquiry 44:239-270.
14. Elbourne, Paul. 2005. Situations and individuals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Evans, Gareth. 1980. Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 11:337-362.
16. Faltz, Leonard. 1977. Reflexivization: A study in universal syntax. New York: Garland.
17. Fiengo, Robert, and Robert May. 1994. Indices and identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Fox, Danny. 2000. Economy and semantic interpretation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Fox, Danny, and David Pesetsky. 2005. Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure. Theoretical Linguistics 31:1-45.
20. Gast, Völker. 2006. The grammar of identity. London: Routledge.
21. Grodzinsky, Yosef, and Tanya Reinhart. 1993. The innateness of binding and coreference. Linguistic Inquiry 24:69-102.
22. Hagège, Claude. 1974. Les pronoms logophoriques. Bulletin de la société de linguistique de Paris 69: 287-310.
23. Heim, Irene. 2005. Features on pronouns. Ms., MIT, Cambridge, MA.
24. Heinat, Fredrik. 2006. Probes, pronouns and binding in the Minimalist Program. Doctoral dissertation, Lund University.
25. Hestvik, Arild. 1995. Reflexives and ellipsis. Natural Language Semantics 2:1-27.
26. Hicks, Glyn. 2009. The derivation of anaphoric relations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
27. Higginbotham, James. 1980. Pronouns and bound variables. Linguistic Inquiry 11:679-708.
28. Hornstein, Norbert. 1995. Logical Form. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
29. Hyman, Larry, and Bernard Comrie. 1981. Coreference and logophoricity in Gokana. Journal of African Linguistics 3:19-37.
30. Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. König, Ekkehard, and Peter Siemund. 2000. Intensifiers and reflexives: A typological perspective. In Reflexives: Forms and functions, ed. by Zygmunt Frajzyngier and Traci Curl, 41-74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
32. Koopman, Hilda, and Dominique Sportiche. 1989. Pronouns, logical variables, and logophoricity in Abe. Linguistic Inquiry 20:555-588.
33. Kratzer, Angelika. 2009. Making a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 40:187-237.
34. Legate, Julie Anne. 2003. Some interface properties of the phase. Linguistic Inquiry 34:506-516.
35. May, Robert. 1985. Logical Form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Mchombo, Sam. 2004. The syntax of Chichewa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Pica, Pierre. 1986. De quelques implications théoriques de l'étude des relations à longue distance. In La grammaire modulaire, ed. by Mitsou Ronat and Daniel Couquaux, 187-209. Paris: Minuit.
38. Reinhart, Tanya. 1983. Anaphora and semantic interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39. Reinhart, Tanya. 2006. Interface strategies: Optimal and costly computations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Reinhart, Tanya, and Eric Reuland. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24:657-720.
41. Reuland, Eric. 2001. Primitives of binding. Linguistic Inquiry 32:439-492.
42. Reuland, Eric. 2011. Anaphora and language design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Reuland, Eric, and Sigrilur Sigurjónsdottir. 1997. Long distance 'binding' in Icelandic. In Atomism and binding, ed. by Hans Bennis, Pierre Pica, and Johan Rooryck, 323-340. Dordrecht: Foris.
44. Safir, Ken. 2004a. Person, context and perspective. Rivista di linguistica 16:107-153.
45. Safir, Ken. 2004b. The syntax of anaphora. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46. Safir, Ken. 2004c. The syntax of (in)dependence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Safir, Ken. 2008. Coconstrual and narrow syntax. Syntax 11:330-355.
48. Safir, Ken. 2010. Viable syntax: Rethinking Minimalist architecture. Biolinguistics 4:35-107.
49. Safir, Ken. 2011. The typology of movement as an epiphenomenon. In Universals and variation: Proceedings of GLOW in Asia 2010, ed. by Gao Mingle, 312-318. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.
50. Safir, Ken. 2013. Syntax, binding, and patterns of anaphora. In The Cambridge handbook of generative syntax, ed. by Marcel den Dikken, 515-576. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Safir, Ken, and Justine Sikuku. 2011. Lubukusu anaphora sketch. Available at http://www.africananaphora.rutgers.edu.
52. Schlenker, Philippe. 2003. A plea for monsters. Linguistics and Philosophy 26:29-120.
53. Sikuku, Justine. 2011. Syntactic patterns of anaphoric relations in Lubukusu: Representation and interpretation in a Minimalist perspective. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi.
54. Siloni, Tal. 2012. Reciprocal verbs and symmetry. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30:261-320.
55. Williams, Edwin. 1995a. Ellipsis. Ms., Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
56. Williams, Edwin. 1995b. Review of Fiengo and May, Indices and identity. Language 71:572-576.
57. Zaenen, Annie, Joan Maling, and Höskuldur Thráinsson. 1990. Case and grammatical relations: The Icelandic passive. In Modern Icelandic syntax, ed. by Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen, 95-136. Syntax and Semantics 24. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted from Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3:441-483.