Clinical psychology and disability studies: Bridging the disciplinary divide on mental health and disability

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 37, Issue 14, 2015, Pages 1299-1304

  Simpson, Jane ^a,c   Thomas, Carol ^b  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Clinical psychology; Disability studies; Disabled people; Mental health; Psycho emotional disablism

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY; DISABLED PERSON; HUMAN; MENTAL HEALTH; QUALITY OF LIFE; REHABILITATION; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

DISABLED PERSONS; HUMANS; MENTAL HEALTH; PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 84931097425     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2014.961656     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Boyle M. Making the world go away, and how psychology and psychiatry benefit. In: Rapley M, Moncrieff J, Dillon J, eds. Demedicalizing misery; psychiatry, psychology and the human condition. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011:27-43.
2. Fox D, Prilleltensky I, eds. Critical psychology: an introduction. London: Sage; 1997.
3. Olkin R, Pledger C. Can disability studies and psychology join hands? Am Psychol 2003;58:296-304.
4. Pilgrim D. The survival of psychiatric diagnosis. Social Sci Med 2007;65:536-7.
5. Rapley M. Quality of life research: a critical introduction. London: Sage; 2003.
6. Reeve D. Towards a psychology of disability: the emotional effects of living in a disabling society. In: Goodley D, Lawthom R, eds. Disability and psychology: critical introductions and reflections. Basingstoke, England: Macmillan; 2006:94-107.
7. Swain J, Griffiths C, French S. Counselling with the social model: challenging therapy's pathologies. In: Goodley D, Lawthom R, eds. Disability and psychology: critical introductions and reflections. Basingstoke, England: Macmillan; 2006:155-69.
8. Goodley D, Lawthom R. Disability and psychology: critical introductions and reflections. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2006.
9. Goodley D. Dis/entangling critical disability studies. Disabil Soc 2012;28:631-44. doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.717884.
10. Goodley D. 'Learning difficulties', the social model of disability and impairment: challenging epistemologies. Disabil Soc 2001;16: 207-31.
11. Martin-Baro I, Aron A, Corne S, eds. Writings for a liberation psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1996.
12. Lawthom R, Goodley D. Community psychology: towards an empowering vision of disability. Psychologist 2005;18:423-5.
13. Llewellyn A, Hogan K. The use and abuse of models of disability. Disabil Soc 2000;15:157-65.
14. Watermeyer B. Is it possible to create a politically engaged, contextual psychology of disability? Disabil Soc 2012;27:161-74.
15. Cheshire K, Pilgrim D. A short introduction to clinical psychology. London: Sage; 2004.
16. Newnes C. Toxic psychology. In: Rapley M, Moncrieff J, Dillon J, eds. De-medicalizing misery: psychiatry, psychology and the human condition. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011:221-5.
17. Pilgrim D, Treacher A. Clinical psychology observed. London, England: Routledge; 1992.
18. Johnstone L, Dallos R, eds. Formulation in psychology and psychotherapy: making sense of people's problems. Hove, England: Routledge; 2006.
19. Butler G. Clinical formulation. In: Bellack AS, Hersen M, eds. Comprehensive clinical psychology. Oxford, England: Pergamon; 1998:1-24.
20. Johnston M. Models of disability. Psychologist 1994;9:205-12.
21. Smith A, Weatherhead S. Systemic therapies. In: Weatherhead S, Flaherty-Jones G, eds. The pocket guide to therapy. London, England: Sage; 2012:101-22.
22. Turner RJ, McLean PD. Physical disability and psychological distress. Rehabil Psychol 1989;34:225-42.
23. Supple S. Getting our house in order. Psychologist 2005;18: 418-20.
24. Division of Clinical Psychology. Good practice guidelines on the use of psychological formulation. Leicester, England: BPS; 2011.
25. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition, text revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
26. HCPC. Practitioner psychologists: standards of proficiency. London, England: HCPC; 2012.
27. Bentall RP, Fernyhough C. Social predictors of psychotic experiences: specificity and psychological mechanisms. Schizophrenia Bull 2009;34:1012-20.
28. Bickenbach JE. Disability, non-talent, and distributive justice. In: Kristiansen K, Vehmas S, Shakespeare TW, eds. Arguing about disability: philosophical perspectives. London, England: Routledge; 2009:105-23.
29. British Psychological Society. New ways of working for applied psychologists in health and social care. Leicester, England: BPS; 2007.
30. Clegg J. Understanding intellectually disabled clients in clinical psychology. In: Goodley D, Lawthom R, eds. Disability and psychology: critical introductions and reflections. Basingstoke, England: Macmillan; 2006:123-40.
31. Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation (UPIAS). Fundamental principles of disability. London, England: UPIAS; 1976.
32. Campbell J, Oliver M. Disability politics: understanding our past, changing our future. London, England: Routledge; 2006.
33. Oliver M. Social work with disabled people. Basingstoke, England: Macmillan; 1983.
34. Oliver M. The social model in action: if I had a hammer. In: Barnes C, Mercer G, eds. Implementing the social model of disability: theory and research. Leeds, England: The Disability Press; 2004:18-31.
35. Disability Discrimination Act, 1995, 2005. London: The Stationery Office.
36. Cabinet Office. Improving the life chances of disabled people. London, England: The Prime Minister's Strategy Unit; 2004.
37. Pearson C. Independent living. In: Watson N, Roulestone A, Thomas C, eds. Routledge handbook of disability studies. London, England: Routledge; 2012:240-52.
38. Equality Act, 2010. London: The Stationery Office.
39. Equality Act, 2011. London: The Stationery Office.
40. CRPD. United Nations convention on the rights of people with disabilities. Available from http://www.un.org/disabilities/default. asp?navid=14&pid=150 2006 [last accessed 15 May 2014].
41. ICIDH. International Classification of Impairment, Disability and Handicap. Available from http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browse/2010/en 1980 [last accessed 15 May 2014].
42. ICF. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Available from http://apps.who.int/classifications/icfbrowser/2001 [last accessed 15 May 2014].
43. Bickenbach JE. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and its relationship to disability studies. In: Watson N, Roulestone A, Thomas C, eds. Routledge handbook of disability studies. London, England: Routledge; 2012:51-66.
44. Goodley D, Lawthom R. Epistemological journeys in participatory action research: alliances between community psychology and disability studies. Disabil Soc 2005;20:135-51.
45. Shakespeare T, Watson N. Defending the social model. Disabil Soc 1997;12:293-300.
46. Beresford P. Thinking about 'mental health': towards a social model. J Mental Health 2002;11:581-4.
47. Morris J, ed. Encounters with strangers: feminism and disability. London, England: The Women's Press; 1996.
48. Crow L. Including all our lives: renewing the social model of disability. In: Barnes C, Mercer G, eds. Exploring the divide: illness and disability. Leeds, England: The Disability Press; 1996:55-74.
49. Thomas C. Female forms; experiencing and understanding disability. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press; 1999.
50. Finkelstein V. Outside, inside out. Coalition 1996;April:30-6.
51. Oliver M. Understanding disability: from theory to practice. Basingstoke, England: Macmillan; 1996.
52. Thomas C. Theorising disability and chronic illness: where next for perspectives in medical sociology? Social Theory Health 2012;10: 209-27.
53. Thomas C. Sociologies of disability and illness: contested ideas in disability studies and medical sociology. Basingstoke, England: Macmillan; 2007.
54. Ferrie J. The psycho-emotional impact of impairment effects: where chronic illness meets disability studies. Paper presented at Centre for Disability Research (CeDR) Seminar; 2011 Nov; Lancaster University.
55. Mistry K, Simpson J. Exploring the transitional process from receiving a diagnosis to living with motor neurone disease. Psychol Health 2013;28:939-53.
56. Reeve D. Psycho-emotional disablism: the missing link? In: Watson N, Roulstone A, Thomas C, eds. Routledge handbook of disability studies. London, England: Routledge; 2012:78-93.
57. Callard F, Sartorius N, Arboleda-Flórez J, Bartlett P. Mental illness, discrimination and the law: fighting for social justice. London, England: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.
58. Aarsland D, Larsen JP, Geok Lim N, et al. Range of neuropsychiatric disturbances in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999;67:492-6.
59. Brown R, Jahanshahi M. Depression in Parkinson's disease: a psychosocial viewpoint. Adv Neurol 1995;65:61-84.
60. Chaudhuri KR, Schapira AHV. Non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease: dopaminergic pathophysiology and treatment. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:464-74.
61. Eccles FJ, Murray CM, Simpson J. Perceptions of cause and control in people with Parkinson's disease. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33: 1409-20.
62. Mulvany J. Disability, impairment or illness? The relevance of the social model of disability to the study of mental disorder. Sociol Health Illness 2000;22:582-601.
63. Calne SM, Lidtone SC, Kumar A. Psychosocial issues in youngonset Parkinson's disease: current research and challenges. Parkinson Rel Disord 2008;14:143-50.
64. Zesiewicz TA, Patel-Larson A, Hauser RA, Sullivan KL. Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) in Parkinson's disease. Rehabili Pract 2007;29:1934-6.
65. Banks P, Lawrence M. The Disability Discrimination Act, a necessary, but not sufficient safeguard for people with progressive conditions in the workplace? The experience of younger people with Parkinson's disease. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:13-24.
66. Martikainen KK, Luukkaala TH, Marttila RJ. Parkinson's disease and working capacity. Movement Disord 2006;21:2187-91.
67. Burgener SC, Berger B. Measuring perceived stigma in persons with progressive neurological disease: Alzheimer's dementia and Parkinson's disease. Dementia 2008;7:31-53.
68. Hurt CS, Weinman J, Lee R, Brown RG. The relationship of depression and disease stage to patient perceptions of Parkinson's disease. J Health Psychol 2012;17:1076-88. doi:10.1177/1359105311428537.
69. Schrag A, Hovris A, Morley D, et al. Young- versus older-onset Parkinson's disease: impact of disease and psychosocial consequences. Movement Disord 2003;18:1250-6.
70. McKinlay A, Grace RC, Dalrymple-Alford JC, et al. Neuropsychiatric problems in Parkinson's disease: comparisons between self and caregiver report. Aging Mental Health 2008;12: 647-53.
71. European Parkinson's Disease Association (EPDA). Perceptions of Parkinson's disease. Survey executive summary. Available from: http://www.parkinsonsawareness.eu.com/en/awareness-campaign/general-public-awareness-survey/2009 [last accessed 15 May 2014].
72. Moore S, Knowles S. Beliefs and knowledge about Parkinson's disease. E J Appl Psychol 2006;2:15-21.
73. Power M, Dalgleish T, eds. Cognition and emotion: from order to disorder. 2nd ed. Hove, England: Psychology Press; 2008.
74. Power M, Dalgleish T, eds. Cognition and emotion: from order to disorder. Hove, England: Psychology Press; 1997.