The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and its relationship to disability studies

Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 51-66

  Bickenbach, Jerome E ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85076952345     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203144114-11     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Altman, Barbara M. (2001) ‘Disability Definitions, Models, Classification Schemes, and Applications’, in G. L. Albrecht, K. D. Seelman and M. Bury, eds, Handbook of Disability Studies (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage): pp. 97-121.
2. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, 104 Stat. 328.
3. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Amendments Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-325, 122 Stat. 3553.
4. Bickenbach, J. E. (1993) Physical Disability and Social Policy (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).
5. Bickenbach, J. E. (2008) ‘Disability, Non-talent and Distributive Justice’, in Kristjana Kristiansen, Tom Shakespeare and Simo Vehmas, eds, Arguing About Disability: Philosophy Meets Disability Studies (New York: Routledge): pp. 105-23.
6. Bickenbach, J. E. (2011) Monitoring the United Nation’s Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Data and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (BMC Public Health).
7. Bickenbach, J. E., Chatterji, S., Badley, E. M. and Ustun, T. B. (1999) ‘Models of Disablement, Universalism and the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps’, Social Science and Medicine 48(9): 1173-1187.
8. Brandt, E. N. and Pope, A. M., eds (1997) Enabling America: Assessing the Role of Rehabilitation Science and Engineering (Washington, DC: National Academy Press).
9. Brown, S. C. (1993) ‘Revitalizing “Handicap” for Disability Research: Developing Tools to Assess Progress in Quality of Life for Persons with Disabilities’, Journal of Disability Policy Studies 4(2): 57-76.
10. Dijkers, Marcel P. J. M. (2008) ‘Issues in the Conceptualization and Measurement of Participation: An Overview’. Paper presented at the symposium ‘Participation: Conceptualization, Measurement and Application in Rehabilitation Research’, annual meeting of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, October 14-19, Toronto, Canada.
11. Epstein, Richard A. (1992) Forbidden Grounds: The Case Against Employment Discrimination Laws (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).
12. Field, M. J. and Jette, A. M., eds (2009) The Future of Disability in America (Washington, DC: National Academies Press).
13. Fougeyrollas, Patrick (1989) ‘Les implications de la diffusion de la classification international des handicaps sur les politiques concernant les personnes handicappees’, World Health Statistical Quarterly 42: 281-88.
14. Fougeyrollas, Patrick (1995) ‘Documenting Environmental Factors for Preventing the Handicap Creation Process: Quebec Contributions Relating to ICIDH and Social Participation of People with Functional Differences’, Disability and Rehabilitation 17(3-4): 145-60.
15. Fougeyrollas, P., Cloutier, R., Bergeron, H., Cote, J. and St Michel, G. (1998) The Quebec Classification: Disability Creation Process (Quebec: International Network on Disability Creation Process (INDCP)/ CSICIDH).
16. Heerkens, Y. F., van Ravensberg, C. D. and Brandsma, J. W. (1995) The Need for Revision of the ICIDH: An Example - Problems in Gait, Disability and Rehabilitation 17(3-4): 184-94.
17. Kayess, Rosemary and French, Phillip (2008) ‘Out of Darkness into Light? Introducing the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’, Human Rights Law Review 8(1): 1-34.
18. Krieger, L. H., ed. (2003) Backlash Against the ADA: Reinterpreting Disability Rights (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).
19. Leonardi, M., Bickenbach, J. E., Ustun, T. B., Kostanjsek, N. and Chatterji, S. (2006) ‘The Definition of Disability: What’s in a Name?’, The Lancet 368(9543): 1219-21.
20. Maslow, Abraham (1943) ‘A Theory of Human Motivation’, Psychological Review 50(4): 370-396.
21. Nagi, S. Z. (1965) ‘Some Conceptual Issues in Disability and Rehabilitation’, in M. Sussman, ed., Sociology and Rehabilitation (Washington, DC: American Sociological Association): pp. 100-13.
22. Nagi, S. Z. (1969) Disability and Rehabilitation: Legal, Clinical and Self-concepts and Measurement (Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press).
23. Nagi, S. Z. (1977) ‘The Disabled and Rehabilitation Services: A National Overview’, American Rehabilitation 2(5): 26-33.
24. Nagi, S. Z. (1991) ‘Disability Concepts Revisited: Implications for Prevention’, in A. M. Pope and A. R. Tarlov, eds, Disability in America: Toward a National Agenda for Prevention (Washington, DC: National Academic Press): pp. 309-27.
25. National Council on Disability (NCD) (2000) Promises to Keep: A Decade of Federal Enforcement of the Americans with Disabilities Act (Washington, DC: NCD).
26. Oliver, M. (1990) The Politics of Disablement (Basingstoke: Macmillan).
27. Oliver, M. (1992) ‘Changing the Social Relations of Research Production?’ Disability, Handicap and Society 7(2): 101-20.
28. Oliver, M. (1996) Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice (Basingstoke: Palgrave).
29. Pfeiffer, D. (1998) ‘The ICIDH and the Need for its Revision’, Disability & Society 13(4): 503-23.
30. Pfeiffer, David (2000) ‘The Devils are in the Details: The ICIDH2 and the Disability Movement’, Disability & Society 15(7): 1079-82.
31. Pope, A. M. and Tarlov, A. R., eds (1991) Disability in America: Toward a National Agenda for Prevention (Washington, DC: National Academy Press).
32. Raggi, A., Leonardi, M., Caello, M. and Bickenbach, J. E., eds. (2010) ‘Applications of ICF in Clinical Settings Across Europe’, Disability and Rehabilitation 32 Suppl 1: S17-22.
33. Shakespeare, T. (2006) Disability Rights and Wrongs (London: Routledge).
34. Trotter, Robert T. II, Ustun, T. B., Chatterji, S., Rehm, J., Room, R. and Bickenbach, J. (2001) ‘CrossCultural Applicability Research on Disablement: Models and Methods for the Revision of an International Classification’, Human Organization 60(1): 13-27.
35. Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation (UPIAS) (1976) Fundamental Principles of Disability (London: UPIAS).
36. United Nations (2006) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, G.A. Res. 61/106 (2007); available online at http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/rights/convtexte.htm (accessed 2 October 2011).
37. Üstün, T. B., Chatterji, S., Bickenbach, J. E., Trotter II, R. T. and Saxena, S (2000) Disability and Culture: Universalism and Diversity (Bern: Hogrefe and Huber).
38. Verbrugge, L. and Jette, A. M. (1993) ‘The Disablement Process’, Social Science and Medicine 6(1): 1-14.
39. Whiteneck, Gale (2006) ‘Conceptual Models of Disability: Past, Present, and Future’, in M. J. Field, A. M. Jette and L. Martin, eds, Workshop on Disability in America: A New Look - Summary and background papers (Washington, DC: National Academies Press) pp. 50-66.
40. Whiteneck, G., Charlifue, S., Gerhart, K., Overholser, J. and Richardson, G. (1992) ‘Quantifying Handicap: A New Measure of Long-term Rehabilitation Outcomes’, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 73(6): 519-26.
41. WHO (World Health Organization) (1980) International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps (ICIDH) (Geneva: WHO).
42. WHO (World Health Organization) (1992) International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, tenth revision (ICD-10) (Geneva: WHO).
43. WHO (World Health Organization) (1993) The International Classification of Impairments, Activities and Participation (ICIDH-2) (Geneva: WHO).
44. WHO (World Health Organization) (2001) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) (Geneva: WHO).
45. Zola, I. K. (1993) ‘Disability Statistics, What We Count and What It Tells Us: A Personal and Political Analysis’, Journal of Disability Policy Studies 4(2): 9-15.