Dynamics of the discovery process of proteinprotein interactions from low content studies

BMC Systems Biology

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Wang, Zichen ^a,b,c   Clark, Neil R ^a,b,c   Ma'ayan, Avi ^a,b,c  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b BD2K LINCS Data Coordination and Integration Center   (United States)

^c Knowledge Management Center for the Illuminating the Druggable Genome project   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BIOLOGY; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MOUSE; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ANIMALS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HUMANS; MICE; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84931052054     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17520509     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12918-015-0173-z     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Cordeddu V, Di Schiavi E, Pennacchio LA, Ma'ayan A, Sarkozy A, Fodale V, et al. Mutation of SHOC2 promotes aberrant protein N-myristoylation and causes Noonan-like syndrome with loose anagen hair. Nat Genet. 2009;41(9):1022-6.
2. Lim J, Hao T, Shaw C, Patel AJ, Szabó G, Rual J-F, et al. A protein-protein interaction network for human inherited ataxias and disorders of Purkinje cell degeneration. Cell. 2006;125(4):801-14.
3. Vidal M, Cusick Michael E, Barabási A-L. Interactome networks and human disease. Cell. 2011;144(6):986-98.
4. Barabasi A-L, Gulbahce N, Loscalzo J. Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(1):56-68.
5. Oti M, Snel B, Huynen MA, Brunner HG. Predicting disease genes using protein-protein interactions. J Med Genet. 2006;43(8):691-8.
6. Vazquez A, Flammini A, Maritan A, Vespignani A. Global protein function prediction from protein-protein interaction networks. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21(6):697-700.
7. Sharan R, Ulitsky I, Shamir R. Network-based prediction of protein function. Mol Syst Biol. 2007;3(1):88.
8. Yu H, Paccanaro A, Trifonov V, Gerstein M. Predicting interactions in protein networks by completing defective cliques. Bioinformatics. 2006;22(7):823-9.
9. Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(1):1-13.
10. Berger SI, Posner JM, Ma'ayan A. Genes2Networks: connecting lists of gene symbols using mammalian protein interactions databases. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007;8(1):372.
11. Antonov AV, Dietmann S, Rodchenkov I, Mewes HW. PPI spider: a tool for the interpretation of proteomics data in the context of protein-protein interaction networks. Proteomics. 2009;9(10):2740-9.
12. Neale BM, Kou Y, Liu L, Ma'Ayan A, Samocha KE, Sabo A, et al. Patterns and rates of exonic de novo mutations in autism spectrum disorders. Nature. 2012;485(7397):242-5.
13. Jia P, Zheng S, Long J, Zheng W, Zhao Z. dmGWAS: dense module searching for genome-wide association studies in protein-protein interaction networks. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(1):95-102.
14. Califano A, Butte AJ, Friend S, Ideker T, Schadt E. Leveraging models of cell regulation and GWAS data in integrative network-based association studies. Nat Genet. 2012;44(8):841-7.
15. Edwards AM, Isserlin R, Bader GD, Frye SV, Willson TM, Yu FH. Too many roads not taken. Nature. 2011;470(7333):163-5.
16. Tria F, Loreto V, Servedio VDP, Strogatz SH. The dynamics of correlated novelties. arXiv preprint arXiv:13101953. 2013.
17. Kauffman SA. Investigations: the nature of autonomous agents and the worlds they mutually create. In: Santa Fe Institute. 1996.
18. Johnson S. Where good ideas come from: the natural history of innovation. UK: Penguin; 2010.
19. Wagner A, Rosen W. Spaces of the possible: universal Darwinism and the wall between technological and biological innovation. J R Soc Interface. 2014;11(97):20131190.
20. Johnson NL, Kotz S. Urn models and their application: an approach to modern discrete probability theory. New York: Wiley; 1977.
21. Mahmoud H. Pólya urn models: CRC press. 2008.
22. Pólya G. Sur quelques points de la théorie des probabilités. In: Annales de l'institut Henri Poincaré: 1930. Presses universitaires de France: 117-161.
23. Turner B, Razick S, Turinsky AL, Vlasblom J, Crowdy EK, Cho E, et al. iRefWeb: interactive analysis of consolidated protein interaction data and their supporting evidence. Database. 2010;2010:baq023.
24. Stumpf MP, Thorne T, de Silva E, Stewart R, An HJ, Lappe M, et al. Estimating the size of the human interactome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(19):6959-64.
25. Barabási A-L, Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science. 1999;286(5439):509-12.
26. Holme P, Kim BJ. Growing scale-free networks with tunable clustering. Phys Rev E. 2002;65(2):026107.
27. Ispolatov I, Krapivsky PL, Yuryev A. Duplication-divergence model of protein interaction network. Phys Rev E. 2005;71(6):061911.
28. Batagelj V, Brandes U. Efficient generation of large random networks. Phys Rev E. 2005;71(3):036113.
29. Vincent DB, Jean-Loup G, Renaud L, Etienne L. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech: Theory Exp. 2008;2008(10):10008.
30. Newman MEJ. Analysis of weighted networks. Phys Rev E. 2004;70(5):056131.
31. Schnoes AM, Ream DC, Thorman AW, Babbitt PC, Friedberg I. Biases in the experimental annotations of protein function and their effect on our understanding of protein function space. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(5):e1003063.
32. Barabasi A-L, Oltvai ZN. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5(2):101-13.
33. Han J-DJ, Dupuy D, Bertin N, Cusick ME, Vidal M. Effect of sampling on topology predictions of protein-protein interaction networks. Nat Biotech. 2005;23(7):839-44.
34. Yu H, Tardivo L, Tam S, Weiner E, Gebreab F, Fan C, et al. Next-generation sequencing to generate interactome datasets. Nat Meth. 2011;8(6):478-80.