Organizational culture in a wider field: Is there a post post-culture?

The Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 323-340

  Linstead, Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84931031133     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781483307961.n18     Document Type: Chapter

References (123)

1. Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20, 441-464. doi:10.1177/0891243206289499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891243206289499
2. Ackroyd, S., & Fleetwood, S. (2000). Realist perspectives on organization and management. London: Routledge.
3. Alvesson, M., & Melin, L. (1987). Major discrepancies and contradictions in organizational culture. Paper presented at the Standing Conference on Organizational Symbolism and Corporate Culture, Universita Cattolica, Milan, Italy.
4. Archer, M. S. (1988). Culture and agency: The place of culture in social theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Archer, M. S. (2007). Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511618932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618932
6. Augé, M. (1995). Non-places: Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity. London: Verso.
7. Banerjee, S. B., & Linstead, S. A. (2001). Globalization, multiculturalism and other fictions: The new colonization for the new millennium. Organization, 8 (4), 711-750. doi:10.1177/135050840184006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/135050840184006
8. Bakhtin, M. M. (1968). Rabelais and his world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Barley, S., Meyer, G., & Gash, D. (1988). Cultures of culture: Academics, practitioners and the pragmatics of normative control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33 (1), 24-60. doi:10.2307/2392854 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2392854
10. Bate, S. P. (1997). Whatever happened to organizational ethnography? Human Relations, 50 (9), 1147-1175. doi:10.1177/001872679705000905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679705000905
11. Belova, O., King, I., & Sliwa, M. (2008). Polyphony and organization studies: Mikhail Bakhtin and beyond. Organization Studies, 29 (4), 493-500. doi:10.1177/0170840608088696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840608088696
12. Böhm, S. (2005). Fetish failures: Interrupting the subject and the other. In A. Pullen & S. Linstead (Eds.), Organization and identity (pp. 127-161). London: Routledge.
13. Böhm, S., & de Cock, C. (2005). Everything you wanted to know about organization theory, but were afraid to ask Slavoj Žižek. The Sociological Review, 53, 279-291.
14. Boje, D. M. (1991). Stories of the storytelling organization: A postmodern analysis of Disney as "Tamara Land." Academy of Management Review, 38, 997-1035.
15. Boje, D. M. (2001). Narrative methods for organizational and communication research Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511812507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507
17. Bourdieu, P. (1992). Language & symbolic power. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
18. Bourdieu, P. (1999). The weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
19. Brewis, J., & Jack, G. (2009). Culture: Broadening the critical repertoire. In M. Alvesson, H. Willmott, & T. Woodbridge (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of critical management studies (pp. 232-250). New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199237715.003.0011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199237715.003.0011
20. Brown, S., & Wood, M. (Producers). (2009). Lines of flight: Everyday resistance along England’s backbone [film]. Sheffield: Brown Bear Productions.
21. Bruining, T. (2006). Learning behind the frontline of public service. Utrecht, Netherlands: KPC Groep/UvH.
22. Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London, UK: Heinemann.
23. Calás. M., & Smircich, L. (1987). Organizational culture: A critical assessment. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 228-264). London: Sage.
24. Calás. M., & Smircich, L. (1997). Post-culture: Is the organizational culture literature dominant but dead? Comportamento Organizacioanl e Gestao, 3 (1), 29-56.
25. Calás, M., & Smircich, L. (1999). Past postmodernism? Reflections and tentative directions. Academy of Management Review, 24, 649-671.
26. Chan, A. (2000). Critically constituting organization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
27. Chan, A. (2003). Instantiative vs. entitative culture: The case for culture as process. In R. Westwood & S. Clegg (Eds.), Debating organization: Point-counterpoint in organization studies (pp. 311-320). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Press.
28. Chan, A., & Clegg, S. (2002). History, culture and organization studies. Culture and Organization, 8, 259-273. doi:10.1080/14759550215613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14759550215613
29. Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
30. Collinson, D. (1988). Engineering humor: Masculinity, joking and conflict in shop floor relations. Organization Studies, 9, 181-199. doi:10.1177/017084068800900203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/017084068800900203
31. Colville, I., Waterman, R., & Weick, K. (1999). Organizing and the search for excellence: Making sense of the times in theory and practice. Organization, 6, 129-148. doi:10.1177/135050849961006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/135050849961006
32. Cooper, R., & Burrell, G. (1988). Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis: An introduction. Organization Studies, 9 (1), 91-112. doi:10.1177/017084068800900112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/017084068800900112
33. Corbett J. M. (2003). Sound organization: A brief history of psychosonic management. Ephemera: Critical Dialogues on Organization, 3, 261-272.
34. Corbett, J. M. (2006). Scents of identity: Organization studies and the cultural conundrum of the nose. Culture and Organization, 12, 221-232. doi:10.1080/14759550600871469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14759550600871469
35. Czarniawska, B. (1998). Narrative approaches in organization studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Daily Mail. (2010, January 25). Plane crazy? Meet the academic who will spend the next year living in an airport. Retrieved March 4, 2010, from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1245780/Plane-crazy-Meet-academic-spend-year-living-airport.html
37. Deal, T., & Kennedy, A. (1982). Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
38. de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
39. de Cock, C., & Böhm, S. (2007). Liberalist fantasies: Žažek and the impossibility of the open society. Organization, 14, 815-836. doi:10.1177/1350508407082264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1350508407082264
40. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of qualitative inquiry (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
41. Deetz, S., Newton, T., & Reed, M. (Eds.), (in press). Special issue on responses to social constructionism and critical realism in organization studies. Organization Studies [Special issue].
42. Fischer, M. J. (2007). Culture and cultural analysis as experimental systems. Cultural Anthropology, 22, 1-65. doi:10.1525/can.2007.22.1.1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/can.2007.22.1.1
43. Gabriel, Y. (2000). Storytelling in organizations: Facts, fictions, and fantasies. London: Sage.
44. Gagliardi, P. (Ed.). (1990). Symbols and artifacts: Views of the corporate landscape Berlin: De Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110874143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110874143
45. Gherardi, S. (1995). Gender and organizational culture. London: Sage.
46. Gherardi, S., & Poggio, B. (2007). Gendertelling in organizations: Narratives from male-dominated environments. Malmö, Sweden: Liber and Copenhagen Business School Press.
47. Gordon, C. (1991). Governmental rationality: An introduction. In G. Burchell et al. (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmental rationality (pp. 1-51). Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226028811.001.0001 http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226028811.001.0001
48. Guillet de Monthoux, P., Sjöstrand, S.-E., & Gustafsson, C. (2007). Aesthetic leadership: Managing fields of flow in art and business. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
49. Hallett, T. (2003). Symbolic power and organizational culture. Sociological Theory, 21, 128-149. doi:10.1111/1467-9558.00181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9558.00181
50. Hancock, P., & Tyler, M. (2001). Work postmodernism and organization: A critical introduction. London: Sage.
51. Hassard, J., & Holliday, R. (1998). Body and organization. London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446218303 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446218303
52. Hazen, M. A. (1993). Towards polyphonic organization. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 6 (5), 15-26. doi:10.1108/09534819310072747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09534819310072747
53. Hjorth, D. (2004). Creating space for play/invention: Concepts of space and organizational entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 16, 413-432. doi:10.1080/0898562042000197144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0898562042000197144
54. Hjorth, D. (2005). Organizational entrepreneurship: With de Certeau on creating heterotopias (or spaces for play). Journal of Management Inquiry, 14, 386-398. doi:10.1177/1056492605280225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1056492605280225
55. Ho, K. (2009) Liquidated: An ethnography of Wall Street. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
56. Holmes, D., & Marcus, G. E. (2005). Cultures of expertise and the management of globalization: Toward the refunctioning of ethnography. In A. Ong & S. J. Collier (Eds.), Global assemblages: Technology, politics and ethics as anthropological problems (pp. 235-252). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Press.
57. Holmes, D., & Marcus, G. E. (2006). Fast capitalism: Para-ethnography and the rise of the symbolic analyst. In M. Fisher & G. Downey (Eds.), Frontiers of capital: Ethnographic reflections on the new economy (chap. 1). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
58. Islam, G., Zyphur, M. J., & Boje, D. (2008). Carnival and spectacle in Krewe de Vieux and the Mystic Krewe of Spermes: The mingling of organization and celebration. Organization Studies, 29, 1565-1589. doi:10.1177/0170840608098772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840608098772
59. Jeffcutt, P. (1994). From interpretation to representation in organizational analysis: postmodernism, ethnography and organizational symbolism. Organization Studies, 15, 241-274. doi:10.1177/017084069401500204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/017084069401500204
60. Jones, C. (2005). Theory after the postmodern condition. Organization, 10, 503-525. doi:10.1177/13505084030103009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13505084030103009
61. Kaulingfreks, R., & Ten Bos, R. (2006). In praise of blowjobs. In J. Brewis, S. Linstead, D. Boje, & T. O’Shea (Eds.), The passion of organizing (pp. 39-50). Malmö, Sweden: Liber and Copenhagen Business School Press.
62. Kuiper, C. (2007). The eventmaker: The hybrid art of performing professionals, work-setting rehabilitation. Den Haag, Netherlands: Boom uitgevers Den Haag.
63. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
64. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
65. Letiche, H. (2004a). Jean-Francois Lyotard. In S. A. Linstead (Ed.), Organization theory and postmodern thought (pp. 64-87). London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446217313 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446217313
66. Letiche, H. (2004b). Jean Baudrillard. In S. A. Linstead (Ed.), Organization theory and postmodern thought (pp. 137-160). London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446217313 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446217313
67. Letiche, H. (2004c). Talk & Hermès. Culture & Organization 10, 143-161. doi:10.1080/1475955042000253422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1475955042000253422
68. Linstead, S. A. (1985). Jokers wild: The importance of humor in the maintenance of organizational culture. Sociological Review, 33, 741-767. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1985.tb02447.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1985.tb02447.x
69. Linstead, S. A. (1993). From postmodern anthropology to deconstructive ethnography. Human Relations, 46, 97-120. doi:10.1177/001872679304600107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600107
70. Linstead, S. A. (1994). Objectivity, reflexivity and fiction: Humanity, inhumanity and the science of the social. Human Relations, 47(11), 1321-1346. doi:10.1177/001872679404701102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679404701102
71. Linstead, S. A. (2002a). Organizational kitsch. Organization, 9, 657-684. doi:10.1177/135050840294008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/135050840294008
72. Linstead, S. A. (2002b). Organization as reply: Henri Bergson and casual organization theory. Organization, 9, 95-111. doi:10.1177/1350508402009001350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1350508402009001350
73. Linstead, S. A. (2004). Organization theory and postmodern thought. London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446217313 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446217313
74. Linstead, S. A. (2007). Exploring culture and collective identity through the radio-ballads. In A. Pullen, D. Sims, & N. Beech (Eds.), Exploring identity: Concepts and methods (pp. 251-273). London: Palgrave.
75. Linstead, S. A. (2009a). Poststructuralism. In A. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Weibe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 703-710). London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412957397 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412957397
76. Linstead, S. A. (2009b). Postmodernism. In A. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Weibe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 694-700). London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412957397 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412957397
77. Linstead, S. A., & Grafton-Small, R. (1992). On reading organizational culture. Organization Studies, 13, 331-355. doi:10.1177/017084069201300302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/017084069201300302
78. Linstead, S. A., & Höpfl, H. J. (Eds.). (2000). The aesthetics of organization. London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446217351 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446217351
79. Linstead, S. A., & Thanem, T. (2007). Multiplicity, virtuality and organization: The contribution of Gilles Deleuze. Organization Studies, 28, 1483-1501. doi:10.1177/0170840607075675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840607075675
80. Linstead, S. A., Grafton-Small, R., & Jeffcutt, P. S. (Eds.). (1996). Understanding management. London: Sage.
81. Marcus, G. E. (1994). What comes (just) after the post? In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative inquiry (pp. 897-922). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
82. Marcus G. E. (Ed.). (1998). Corporate futures: The diffusion of the culturally sensitive corporate form. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
83. Marcus, G. E. (2007). Ethnography two decades after writing culture: From the experimental to the baroque. Anthropological Quarterly, 80, 1127-1145. doi:10.1353/anq.2007.0059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/anq.2007.0059
84. Marcus, G. E. (2008). The end(s) of ethnography: Social/cultural anthropology’s signature form of producing knowledge in transition. Cultural Anthropology, 23 (1), 14. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1360.2008.00001.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2008.00001.x
85. Marcus G. E., & Fischer, M. (1986). Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental movement in the human sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
86. Martin, J. (2002). Organizational culture: Mapping the terrain. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
87. McCabe, J. (2009). Talk, tales and testimony: An inquiry into the discursive circulation of knowledge within and around organizations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of York, UK.
88. Meek, V. L. (1988). Organizational culture: Origins and weaknesses. Organization Studies, 9, 453-473. doi:10.1177/017084068800900401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/017084068800900401
89. Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
90. Newfield, C. (1998). Corporate culture wars. In G. Marcus (Ed.), Corporate futures: The diffusion of the culturally sensitive corporate form (pp. 23-62). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
91. Ong, A., & Collier, S. J. (Eds.). (2005). Global assemblages: Technology, politics and ethics as anthropological problems. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Press.
92. Pacanowski, M. E., & O’Donnell-Trujillo, N. (1983). Organizational communication and cultural performance. Communication Monographs, 50, 126-147. doi:10.1080/03637758309390158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637758309390158
93. Parker. M. (2000). Organizational culture and identity: Unity and division at work. London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446217214 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446217214
94. Peters, T., & Waterman, R. (1982). In search of excellence. New York: Harper & Row.
95. Rancière, J. (2006). The politics of aesthetics. London: Continuum.
96. Ray, C. A. (1986). Corporate culture: The last frontier of control? Journal of Management Studies, 23, 287-297. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1986.tb00955.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1986.tb00955.x
97. Redhead, S. (2004). Paul Virilio: Theorist for an accelerated culture. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
98. Rhodes, C. (2001). D’Oh: The Simpsons, popular culture, and the organizational carnival. Journal of Management Inquiry, 10, 374-383. doi:10.1177/1056492601104010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1056492601104010
99. Rhodes, C. (2002). Coffee and the business of pleasure: The case of Harbucks vs. Mr. Tweek. Culture and Organization, 8, 293-306. doi:10.1080/14759550215611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14759550215611
100. Rhodes, C., & Westwood, R. (2008). Critical representations of work and organization in popular culture. London: Routledge.
101. Rippin, A. (2006). Stitching up the leader: Empirically based reflections on leadership and gender. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20, 209-226. doi:10.1108/09534810710724766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09534810710724766
102. Ritzer, G. (Ed.). (1990). Frontiers of social theory: The new synthesis. New York: Columbia University Press.
103. Ritzer, G. (2000). The McDonaldization of society (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
104. Ritzer, G. (2005). Enchanting a disenchanted world: Revolutionizing the means of consumption (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
105. Rose, N. (1993). Government, authority and expertise in advanced liberalism. Economy and Society, 22, 283-299. doi:10.1080/03085149300000019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03085149300000019
106. Rosen, M. (2000). Turning words, spinning worlds. London: Harwood.
107. Schein, E. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
108. Schwartz, H. S. (1990). Narcissistic process and corporate decay: The theory of the organizational ideal. New York: NYU Press.
109. Serres. M. (2007). The parasite. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
110. Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28 (3), 339-358. doi:10.2307/2392246 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2392246
111. Strati, A. (1999). Organization and aesthetics. London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446217191 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446217191
112. Strati, A. (2000). The aesthetic approach in organization studies. In S. A. Linstead & H.J. Höpfl (Eds.), The aesthetics of organisation (pp. 13-34). London: Sage.
113. Trice, H., & Beyer, J. (1993). The culture of work organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
114. Tsing, A. (2004). Friction: Ethnography of global connections. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
115. Turner, B. A. (1990). The rise of organizational symbolism. In J. Hassard & D. Pym (Eds.), The theory and philosophy of organizations (pp. 83-86). London: Routledge.
116. Tyler, S. (1987). The unspeakable: Discourse, dialogue, and rhetoric in the postmodern world. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
117. Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field. London: Sage.
118. Wacquant, L. (2004). Body and soul: Ethnographic notebooks of an apprentice-boxer. New York: Oxford University Press.
119. Warren, S. (2008). Empirical challenges in organizational aesthetics research: Towards a sensual methodology. Organization Studies, 19, 559-580. doi:10.1177/0170840607083104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840607083104
120. Westwood, R., & Rhodes, C. (2006). Humour, work and organization. London: Routledge.
121. Willmott, H. (1993). Strength is ignorance; slavery is freedom: Managing culture in modern organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 30, 515-552. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1993.tb00315.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1993.tb00315.x
122. Wood, M., & Brown S. (in press). Lines of flight: Everyday resistance along England’s backbone. Organization.
123. Young, E. (1989). On the naming of the rose: Interests and multiple meanings as elements of organizational culture. Organization Studies, 10 (2), 187-206. doi:10.1177/017084068901000204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/017084068901000204