Cognitive aging and hearing acuity: Modeling spoken language comprehension

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 6, Issue MAY, 2015, Pages

  Wingfield, Arthur ^a   Amichetti, Nicole M ^a   Lash, Amanda ^a  

^a BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

ELU model; Inhibition; Sentence comprehension; Speech recognition; Working memory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930933622     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00684     Document Type: Article

References (148)

1. Akeroyd, M.A. (2008). Are individual differences in speech perception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing impaired adults. International Journal of Audiology, 47, S53-S71.
2. Amichetti, N.M., Stanley, R.S., White, A.G., & Wingfield, A. (2013). Monitoring the capacity of working memory: Executive control and effects of listening effort. Memory and Cognition, 41, 839-849.
3. Arlinger S., Lunner T., Lyxell B., & Pichora-Fuller M.K. (2009). The emergence of cognitive hearing science. Scandanavian Journal of Psychology, 50, 371-384.
4. Baddeley, A.D. (1996). The concept of working memory. In S. Gathercole (Ed.), Models of short-term memory (pp. 1-28). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
5. Baldwin, C. L. (2007). Cognitive implications of facilitating echoic persistence. Memory and Cognition, 35, 774-780.
6. Baldwin, C. L., & Ash, I. K. (2011). Impact of sensory acuity on auditory working memory span in young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 26, 85-91.
7. Barrouillet, P., Bernardin, S., & Camos, V. (2004). Time constraints and resource sharing in adults' working memory spans. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 133, 83-100.
8. Barrouillet, P., De Paepe, A., & Langerock, N. (2012). Time causes forgetting from working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19, 87-92.
9. Benichov, J., Cox, L.C., Tun, P.A., & Wingfield, A. (2012). Word recognition within a linguistic context: Effects of age, hearing acuity, verbal ability and cognitive function. Ear and Hearing, 33, 250-256.
10. Birnboim, S. (2003). The automatic and controlled information-processing dissociation: Is it still relevant? Neuropsychology Review, 13, 19-31.
11. Black, J. W. (1952). Accompaniments of word intelligibility. J Speech Dis, 17, 409-418.
12. Bopp, K. L., & Verhaeghen, P. (2005). Aging and verbal memory span: A meta-analysis. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 60B, P223-P233.
13. Bruce, D. J. (1958). The effects of listeners' anticipation on the intelligibility of heard speech. Lang Speech, 1, 79-97.
14. Bruner, J.S., & Potter, M.C. (1964). Interference in visual recognition. Science, 144, 424-425.
15. Caplan, D., & Waters, G.S. (1999). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 77-126.
16. Carpenter, P. A., Miyake, A., & Just, M. A. (1994). Working memory constraints in comprehension: Evidence from individual differences, aphasia, and aging. In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 1075-1122). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17. Christianson, K., Williams, C.C., Zacks, R.T., & Ferreira, S. (2006). Younger and older adults' "good enough" interpretations of garden path sentences. Discourse Processes, 42, 205-238.
18. Chun, M.M., Golomb, J.D., & Turk-Browne, N.B. (2011). A Taxonomy of External and Internal Attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 73-101.
19. Cohen, G., & Faulkner, D. (1983). Word recognition: Age differences in contextual facilitation effects. Br J Psychol, 74, 239-251.
20. Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded-process model of working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 62-101). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Cowan, N. (2005). Working memory capacity limits in a theoretical context. In Human learning and memory: Advances in theory and application: The 4th Tsukuba International Conference on Memory (pp. 155-175).
22. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P.A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
23. Daneman, M., & Merikle, P.M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 422-433.
24. de Fockert, W., de, Rees, G., Frith, C.D., & Lavie, N. (2001). The role of working memory in visual selective attention. Science, 291, 1803-1806.
25. Dickinson CVM, Rabbitt PMA. Simulated visual impairment: Effects on text comprehension and reading speed. Clin Vis Sci. 1991;6:301-308.
26. Eisler, F. G. (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. Academic Press.
27. Engle, R. (2002). Working memory as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences, 11, 19-23.
28. Engle, R. W., & Kane, M. J. (2004). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. The psychology of learning and motivation, 44, 145-199.
29. Engle, R.W., Tuholski, S.W., Laughlin, J.E., & Conway, R.A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309-331.
30. Fabry D. (2011). Jim Jerger by the letters. Audiology Today (Jan/Feb), pp. 19-29.
31. Fallon, M., Peelle, J.E. & Wingfield, A. (2006). Spoken sentence processing in young and older adults modulated by task demands: Evidence from self-paced listening. Journal of Genrontology: Psychological Sciences, 61B, P310-P17.
32. Feld, J., & Sommers, M.S. (2009). Lipreading, processing speed, and working memory in younger and older adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 1555-1565.
33. Fillenbaum, S. (1974). Pragmatic normalization: Further results for some conjunctive and disjunctive sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 574-578.
34. Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 164-203.
35. Ferreira, F., Bailey, K. G. D., & Ferraro, V. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 11-15.
36. Ferreira, F., & Patson, N. (2007). The 'good enough' approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 71-83.
37. Fisk, J. E., & Sharp, C. A. (2004). Age-related impairment in executive functioning: Updating, inhibition, shifting, and access. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 26, 874-890.
38. Flores d'Arcais, G.B. (1987). Automatic processes in language comprehension. In G. Denes, C. Semenza, P. Bisiacchi, & E. Andreewsky (Eds.) Perspectives in cognitive neuropsychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Fodor, J.A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Forster, K.J. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In R.J. Wales, & E. Walker (Eds.), New approaches to language mechanisms, Amsterdam, Netherlands: North- Holland.
41. Forster, K.J. (1981). Priming and the effects of sentence and lexical contexts on naming time: Evidence for autonomous lexical processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33, 465-495.
42. Füllgrabe, C., Moore, B.C.J., & Stone, M.A. (2015). Age-group differences in speech identification despite matched audiometrically normal hearing: contributions from auditory temporal processing and cognition. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience.
43. Gordon-Salant, S., & Fitzgibbons, P.J. (1997). Selected cognitive factors and speech recognition performance among young and elderly listeners. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 423-431.
44. Green, D.M., & Swets, J.A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York, NY: Wiley.
45. Grosjean, F. (1980). Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics, 28, 267-283.
46. Grosjean, F. (1985). The recognition of words after their acoustic offset: Evidence and implications. Perception and Psychophysics, 38, 299-310.
47. Grosjean, F. (1996). Gating. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 597-604.
48. Hasher, L., Stoltzfus, E.R., Zacks, R.T., & Rypma, B.R. (1991). Age and inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 163-169.
49. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R.T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory. Vol. 22. San Diego: Academic Press.
50. Heald, S.L.M., & Nusbaum, H.C. (2014). Speech perception as an active cognitive process. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnsys. 2014.00035/full.
51. Holcomb, P.J., & Neville, H.J. (1990). Auditory and visual semantic priming in lexical decision: A comparison using event-related brain potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5, 281-312.
52. Howes, D. (1957). On the relation between the intelligibility and frequency of occurrence of English words. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 296-305.
53. Humes, L.E. (1996). Speech understanding in the elderly. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 7, 161-167.
54. Hunnicutt, S. (1985). Intelligibility versus redundancy - conditions of dependency. Language and Speech, 28, 47-56.
55. Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
56. Kahneman D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
57. Kantowitz, B.H., & Knight, J.L. (1976). On experimenter limited processes. Psychological Review, 83, 502-507.
58. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S.J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
59. Lahar, C. J., Tun, P. A., & Wingfield, A. (2004). Sentence-Final Word Completion Norms for Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 59(1), P7-P10.
60. Lash, A., Rogers, C.S., Zoller, A., & Wingfield, A. (2013). Expectation and entropy in spoken word recognition: Effects of age and hearing acuity. Experimental Aging Research, 39, 235-253.
61. Lash, A., & Wingfield, A. (2014). A Bruner-Potter effect in audition? Spoken word recognition in adult aging. Psychology and Aging, 29, 907-912.
62. Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J.W., & Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 339-354
63. Lethbridge-Ceijku, M., Schiller, J.S., & Brernadel, L. (2004). Summary health statistics for U.S, adults: National Health Interview Survey, Vital Health Statistics, 10, 1-151.
64. Lieberman, P. (1963). Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech. Language and Speech, 6(3), 172-187.
65. Liberman, A.M., Cooper, F.S., Shankweiler, D.P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431-461.
66. Lindblom, B., Brownlee, S., Davis, B., & Moon, S. J. (1992). Speech transforms. Speech Communication, 11, 357-368.
67. Lindfield, K.C., Wingfield, A., & Goodglass, H. (1999). The contribution of prosody to spoken word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 395-405.
68. Logie, R.H. (2011). The functional organization and capacity of working memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 240-245.
69. Logie, R.H., Della Sala, S., Laiacona, M., Chalmers, P., & Wynn, V. (1996). Group aggregates and individual reliability: The case of verbal short-term memory. Memory and Cognition, 24, 305-321.
70. Luo, C. R., & Snodgrass, J. G. (1994). Competitive activation model of perceptual interference in picture and word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 50.
71. Luce, P.A. & Pisoni, D.B.(1998). Recognizing spoken words: The Neighborhood Activation Model. Ear and Hearing, 19, 1-36.
72. Madden, D. J. (1988). Adult age differences in the effects of sentence context and stimulus degradation during visual word recognition. Psychol Aging, 3, 167-172.
73. Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25, 71-102.
74. Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Zwitserlood, P. (1989). Accessing spoken words: The importance of word onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 576-585.
75. McCabe, D.P., Roediger, H.L., McDaniel, M.A., Balota, D.A., & Hambrick, D.Z. (2010). The relationship between working memory capacity and executive functioning: Evidence for a common executive attention construct. Neuropsychology, 24, 222-243.
76. McClelland, J.L., & Elman, J.L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
77. Miller, P., & Wingfield, A. (2010). Distinct effects of perceptual quality on auditory word recognition, memory formation and recall in a neural model of sequential memory. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 4, 14. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2010.00014
78. Mishra, S., Lunnrer, T., Stenfelt, S., Rönnberg, J., & Rudner, M. (2013). Seeing the talker's face supports executive processing of speech in steady state noise. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7:96. http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnsys.2013.00096/full.
79. Morton, J. (1964a). A preliminary functional model for language behavior. International Audiology, 3, 1-9.
80. Morton, J. (1964b). A model for continuous language behavior. Language and Speech, 7, 450-70.
81. Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178.
82. Morton, J. (1979). Facilitation in word recognition: Experiments causing change in the logogen model. In P.A. Kolers, M.E. Wrolstad, & H. Bouma, (Eds.), Processing visual language. New York: Plenum Press.
83. Mullennix, J.W., Pisoni, D.B., & Martin, C.S. (1989). Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 365-378.
84. Murphy, D.R., Craik, F.I.M., Li, K.Z.H., & Schneider, B.A. (2000). Comparing the effects of aging and background noise on short-term memory performance. Psychology and Aging, 15, 323-334.
85. Newby, H.A. (1958). Audiology: Principles and practice. New York, NY: Appleton- Century-Crofts.
86. Norman, D.A., & Bobrow, D.G. (1995). On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 44-64.
87. Norman, D.A., & Bobrow, D.G. (1976). On the analysis of performance operating characteristics. Psychological Review, 83, 508-510.
88. Nusbaum, H., & Magnuson, J. (1997). Talker Normalization: Phonetic Constancy as a Cognitive Process. In K.A. Johnson & J.W. Mullennix (Eds.), Talker variability and speech processing. (pp. 109-132). New York, NY: Academic Press.
89. Pashler, H., Johnston, J.C., & Ruthruff, E. (2001). Attention and performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 629-651.
90. Pichora-Fuller, M.K. (2003). Cognitive aging and auditory information processing. International Journal of Audiology, 42, 2S26-2S32.
91. Pichora-Fuller, M.K., Schneider, B.A., & Daneman, M. (1995) How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 593-607.
92. Piquado, T., Benichov, J.I., Brownell, H., & Wingfied, A. (2012). The hidden effect of hearing acuity on speech recall, and compensatory effects of self-paced listening. International Journal of Audiology, 51, 576-583.
93. Piquado, T., Cousins, K. A. Q., Wingfield, A., & Miller, P. (2010). Effects of degraded sensory input on memory for speech: Behavioral data and a test of biologically constrained computational models. Brain Research, 1365, 48-65. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2010.09.070
94. Pollack, I., & Pickett, J.M. (1963). The intelligibility of excerpts from conversation. Language and Speech, 6, 165-171.
95. Posner, M.I., & Snyder, C.R.R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
96. Potter, M.C. (1993). Very short-term conceptual memory. Memory and Cognition, 21, 156-161.
97. Potter, M. C., & Lombardi, L. (1990). Regeneration in the short-term recall of sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 633-654.
98. Rabbitt, P. (1968). Channel capacity, intelligibility, and immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 241-248.
99. Rabbitt, P. (1991). Mild hearing loss can cause apparent memory failures which increase with age and reduce with IQ. Acta Otolaryngologia, 476, 167-176.
100. Rogers, C.S., Jacoby, L.L., & Sommers, M.S. (2012). Frequent false hearing by older adults: the role of age differences in metacognition. Psychology and Aging 27, 33-45.
101. Rönnberg J., Lyxell B., Arlinger S., Kinnefors C. (1989). Visual evoked potentials: relation to adult speechreading and cognitive function. Journal of Speech, Hearing, and Language Research, 32, 725-735.
102. Ronnberg, J. (2003). Cognition in the hearing impaired and deaf as a bridge between signal and dialogue: A framework and a model. International Journal of Audiology, 42, S68-S76.
103. Rönnberg, J., Rudner, M., Foo, C., & Lunner, T. (2008). Cognition counts: A working memory system for ease of language understanding (ELU). International Journal of Audiology, 47, S171-S177.
104. Rönnberg, J., Lunner, T., Zekveld, A., Sörqvist, P., Danielsson, H., Lyxell, B., Dahlström, O., Signoret, C., Stenfelt, S., Pichora-Fuller, M.K., Rudner, M. (2013). The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: Theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 7 doi:10.3389/fnsys.2013. 00031.
105. Rudner, M., & Lunner, T. (2013). Cognitive spare capacity as a window on hearing aid benefit. Seminars in Hearing, 34, 298-307.
106. Salthouse, T.A. (1994). The aging of working memory. Neuropsychology, 8, 535-543.
107. Salthouse TA. (1996) The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review,103, 403-428.
108. Salthouse, T. A., Atkinson, T. M., & Berish, D. E. (2003). Executive functioning as a potential mediator of age-related cognitive decline in normal adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 566-594.
109. Samuels, A.G. (2001). Knowing a word affects the fundamental perception of the sounds within it. Psychological Science, 12, 348-351.
110. Sanford, A. J., & Sturt, P. (2002). Depth of processing in language comprehension: Not noticing the evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 382-386.
111. Schacter, D.L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 501-518
112. Schneider, B.A., & Pichora-Fuller, M.K. (2000). Implications of perceptual deterioration for cognitive aging research. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), Handbook of aging and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 155-219). Mahwah, N. J.: Erlbaum.
113. Schneider, W., & Chen, J.M. (2003). Controlled and automatic processing: Behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms. Cognitive Science, 27, 525-559.
114. Schoof, T., & Rosen, S. (2014). The role of auditory and cognitive factors in understanding speech in noise by normal-hearing older listeners. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00307.
115. Seidenberg, M.S., Tannenhaus, M.K., Leiman, J.M., & Bienkowski, M. (1982). Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 489-537.
116. Seidenberg, M.S., Waters, G.S., Sanders, M., & Langer, P. (1984). Pre- and post-lexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 12, 315-328.
117. Shiffrin, R.M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 155-171.
118. Snodgrass, J. G., & Hirshman, E. (1991). Theoretical explorations of the Bruner-Potter 1964 interference effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 273-293.
119. Sommers, M. S., & Danielson, S. M. (1999). Inhibitory processes and spoken word recognition in young and older adults: The interaction of lexical competition and semantic context. Psychology and Aging, 14, 458-472.
120. Sommers, M.S., Spehar, B., & Tye-Murray, N. (2005). Auditory visual speech perception and visual enhancement in normal-hearing younger and older adults. Ear and Hearing, 26, 263-275.
121. Sörqvist, P., Stenfelt, S., & Rönnberg, J. (2012). Working memory capacity and visual- verbal cognitive load modulate auditory-sensory gating in the brainstem: toward a unified view of attention. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 24(11), 2147-2154.
122. Squire, L.R. (1994). Declarative and nondeclarative memory: Multiple brain systems supporting learning and memory. In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.) Memory systems (pp. 203-232). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
123. Stanovich, K.E., & West, R.F. (1983). On priming by sentence context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 1-36.
124. Stewart, R., & Wingfield, A. (2009). Hearing loss and cognitive effort in older adults' report accuracy for verbal materials. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 20, 147-154.
125. Stine, E.A.L., Wingfield, A., & Myers, S.D. (1990). Age differences in processing information from television news: The effects of bisensory augmentation. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 45, 1-8.
126. Stromswold, K., Caplan, D., Alpert, N., & Rauch, S. (1996). Localization of syntactic comprehension by positron emission tomography. Brain and language, 52, 452-473.
127. Sumby, W., & Pollack, I. (1954). Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 212-215.
128. Surprenant, A. M. (1999). The effect of noise on memory for spoken syllables. International Journal of Psychology, 34, 328-333.
129. Surprenant, A. M. (2007). Effects of noise on identification and serial recall of nonsense syllables in older and younger adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 14, 126-143.
130. Swinney, D.A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645-659.
131. Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of memory (pp. 381-403). New York: Academic Press.
132. Tyler, L.K. (1984). The structure of the initial cohort: Evidence from gating. Perception and Psychophysics, 36, 417-427.
133. van Rooij, J.C.G.M., & Plomp, R. (1992). Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners: III. Additional data and final discussion. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 1028-1033.
134. Wagenmakers, E-J., Ratcliff, R., Gomez, P., & McKoon, G. (2008). A diffusion model account of criterion shifts in the lexical decision task. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 140-159.
135. Waters, G., & Caplan, D. (1996). The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 51-79.
136. Wayland, S.C., Wingfield, A., & Goodglass, H. (1989). Recognition of isolated words: The dynamics of cohort reduction. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 475-487.
137. Wingfield, A., Aberdeen, J.S., & Stine, E.A.L. (1991). Word onset gating and linguistic context in spoken word recognition by young and elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 46, P127-P129.
138. Wingfield, A., Alexander, A.H., & Cavigelli, S. (1994). Does memory constrain utilization of top-down information in spoken word recognition? Evidence from normal aging. Language and Speech, 37, 221-235.
139. Wingfield, A., Goodglass, H., & Lindfield, K.C.(1997). Word recognition from acoustic onsets and acoustic offsets: Effects of cohort size and syllabic stress. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 85-100.
140. Wingfield, A., Goodglass, H., & Smith, K.L. (1990). Effects of word-onset cuing on picture naming in aphasia: A reconsideration. Brain and Language, 39, 373-390.
141. Wingfield, A., & Lindfield, K.C. (1995). Multiple memory systems in the processing of speech: Evidence from aging. Experimental Aging Research, 21, 101-121.
142. Wingfield, A., McCoy, S.L., Peelle, J.E., Tun, P.A., & Cox, L.C. (2006). Effects of adult aging and hearing loss on comprehension of rapid speech varying in syntactic complexity. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 17, 487-497.
143. Wingfield, A., Stine, E.L., Lahar, C.J., & Aberdeen, J.S. (1988). Does the capacity of working memory change with age? Experimental Aging Research, 14, 103-107.
144. Wingfield, A., & Stine-Morrow, E.A.L. (2000). Language and speech. In F.I.M. Craik, & T.A. Salthouse (Eds.). Handbook of aging and cognition (2nd Ed.; pp. 359-416). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
145. Wingfield, A., & Tun, P.A. (2001). Spoken language comprehension in older adults: Interactions between sensory and cognitive change in normal aging. Seminars in Hearing, 22, 287-301.
146. Wingfield, A., Tun, P. A., Koh, C. K., & Rosen, M. J. (1999). Regaining lost time: Adult aging and the effect of time restoration on recall of time-compressed speech. Psychology and Aging, 14, 380-389.
147. Wingfield, A., Tun, P.A., & McCoy, S.L. (2005). Hearing loss in older adulthood: What it is and how it interacts with cognitive performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 144-148.
148. Wingfield, A., Waters, G.S., & Tun, P.A. (1998). Does working memory work in language comprehension?: Evidence from behavioral neuroscience In N. Raz (Ed.). The other side of the error term: Aging and development as model systems in cognitive neuroscience (pp. 319-393). Amsterdam: Elsevier.