The contribution of prosody to spoken word recognition

Applied Psycholinguistics

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 395-405

  Lindfield, Kimberly C ^a   Wingfield, Arthur ^b   Goodglass, Harold ^b  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033249363     PISSN: 01427164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0142716499003045     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Connine, C. M., Blasko, D. G., & Hall, M. (1991). Effects of subsequent sentence context in auditory word recognition: Temporal and linguistic constraints. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 234-250.
2. Connine, C. M., Blasko, D. G., & Titone, D. (1993). Do the beginnings of spoken words have a special status in auditory word recognition? Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 193-210.
3. Connine, C. M., Titone, D., & Wang, J. (1993). Auditory word recognition: Extrinsic and intrinsic effects of word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 81-94.
4. Francis, W. N., & Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
5. Goldinger, S., Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1989). Priming lexical neighbors of spoken words: Effects of competition and inhibition. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 501-518.
6. Goodglass, H., Wingfield, A., Hyde, M. R., Gleason, J. B., Bowles, N. L., & Gallagher, R. E. (1997). The importance of word-initial phonology: Error patterns in prolonged naming efforts by aphasic patients. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 3, 128-138.
7. Grosjean, F. (1980). Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics, 28, 267-283. (1985). The recognition of words after their acoustic offset: Evidence and implications. Perception and Psychophysics, 38, 299-310. (1996). Gating. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 597-604.
8. Grosjean, F. (1980). Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics, 28, 267-283. (1985). The recognition of words after their acoustic offset: Evidence and implications. Perception and Psychophysics, 38, 299-310. (1996). Gating. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 597-604.
9. Grosjean, F. (1980). Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics, 28, 267-283. (1985). The recognition of words after their acoustic offset: Evidence and implications. Perception and Psychophysics, 38, 299-310. (1996). Gating. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 597-604.
10. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (1992). Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representation. Cognition, 42, 1-22.
11. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (1992). Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representation. Cognition, 42, 1-22.
12. Luce, P. A. (1986). A computational analysis of uniqueness points in auditory word recognition. Perception and Psychophysics, 39, 155-158.
13. Luce, P. A., Pisoni, D. B., & Goldinger, S. D. (1990). Similarity neighborhoods of spoken words. In G. T. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 122-147). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1984). Function and process in spoken word recognition: A tutorial review In H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 125-148). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25, 71-102. (1990). Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing (pp. 148-172). Cambridge: MIT Press.
15. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1984). Function and process in spoken word recognition: A tutorial review In H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 125-148). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25, 71-102. (1990). Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing (pp. 148-172). Cambridge: MIT Press.
16. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1984). Function and process in spoken word recognition: A tutorial review In H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 125-148). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25, 71-102. (1990). Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing (pp. 148-172). Cambridge: MIT Press.
17. McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (1992). Words within words: Lexical statistics and lexical access. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (Vol. 1, pp. 221-224). Banff: University of Alberta.
18. McQueen, J. M., Norris, D., & Cutler, A. (1994). Competition in spoken word recognition: Spotting words in other words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 621-638.
19. Nooteboom, S. G., & Doodeman, G. J. N. (1984). Speech quality and the gating paradigm. In M. P. R. van den Broeke & A. Cohen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 481-485). Dordrect: Foris.
20. Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (1995). Competition and segmentation in spoken-word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 1209-1228.
21. Perry, A. R., & Wingfield, A. (1994). Contextual encoding by young and elderly adults as revealed by cued and free recall. Aging and Cognition, 1, 120-139.
22. Tyler, L. (1984). The structure of the initial cohort: Evidence from gating. Perception and Psychophysics, 36, 417-427.
23. Tyler, L., & Wessels, J. (1983). Quantifying contextual contributions to word-recognition processes. Perception and Psychophysics, 34, 409-420.
24. Vroomen, J., Tuomainen, J., & de Gelder, B. (1998). The roles of word stress and vowel harmony in speech segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 133-149.
25. Wayland, S. C., Wingfield, A., & Goodglass, H. (1989). Recognition of isolated words: The dynamics of cohort reduction. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 475-487.
26. Wingfield, A., Aberdeen, J. S., & Stine, E. A. L. (1991). Word onset gating and linguistic context in spoken word recognition by young and elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 46, P127-P129.
27. Wingfield, A., Alexander, A. H., & Cavigelli, S. (1994). Does memory constrain utilization of top-down information in spoken word recognition? Evidence from normal aging. Language and Speech, 37, 221-235.
28. Wingfield. A., Goodglass, H., & Lindfield, K. C. (1997). Word recognition from acoustic onsets and acoustic offsets: Effects of cohort size and syllabic stress. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 85-100.