Predictors and outcomes of transfers from peritoneal dialysis to hemodialysis

Peritoneal Dialysis International

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 306-315

  Lan, Patrick G ^a   Clayton, Philip A ^a,b,c   Saunders, John ^a   Polkinghorne, Kevan R ^d,e   Snelling, Paul L ^a  

^a ROYAL PRINCE ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^d MONASH MEDICAL CENTRE   (Australia)

^e MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Epidemiology; Hemodialysis; Peritoneal dialysis; Vascular access

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; COMORBIDITY ASSESSMENT; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA PROCESSING; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURVIVAL; TREATMENT PLANNING; VASCULAR ACCESS; AUSTRALIA; CLINICAL TRIAL; EPIDEMIOLOGY; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEW ZEALAND; PROCEDURES; REGISTER; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; RISK FACTOR; SURVIVAL RATE; TIME FACTOR; TREATMENT FAILURE; TRENDS;

ADULT; AUSTRALIA; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW ZEALAND; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; REGISTRIES; RENAL DIALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SURVIVAL RATE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 84930923313     PISSN: 08968608     EISSN: 17184304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2013.00030     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. McDonald SP, Marshall MR, Johnson DW, Polkinghorne KR. Relationship between dialysis modality and mortality. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 20:155-63.
2. Grace B, Hurst K, S McDonald. 34th Annual ANZDATA Report. Adelaide, South Australia: Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplantation (ANZDATA) Registry; 2011.
3. Chiarelli G, Beaulieu M, Cozzolino M, Singh S, Kiaii M, Taylor P, et al. Vascular access planning in peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int 2008; 28:585-90.
4. Guo A, Mujais S. Patient and technique survival on peritoneal dialysis in the United States: evaluation in large incident cohorts. Kidney Int Suppl 2003; 88:S3-12.
5. Descoeudres B, Koller MT, Garzoni D, Wolff T, Steiger J, Schaub S, et al. Contribution of early failure to outcome on peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 2008; 28:259-67.
6. Mujais S, Story K. Peritoneal dialysis in the US: evaluation of outcomes in contemporary cohorts. Kidney Int Suppl 2006; 103:S21-6.
7. Jager KJ, Merkus MP, Dekker FW, Boeschoten EW, Tijssen JG, Stevens P, et al. Mortality and technique failure in patients starting chronic peritoneal dialysis: results of The Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis. NECOSAD Study Group. Kidney Int 1999; 55:1476-85.
8. Beddhu S, Zeidel ML, Saul M, Seddon P, Samore MH, Stoddard GJ, et al. The effects of comorbid conditions on the outcomes of patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. Am J Med 2002; 112:696-701.
9. Jansen MA, Termorshuizen F, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW, Boeschoten E, Krediet RT. Predictors of survival in anuric peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney Int 2005; 68:1199-205.
10. Maiorca R, Cancarini GC, Zubani R, Camerini C, Manili L, Brunori G, et al. CAPD viability: a long-term comparison with hemodialysis. Perit Dial Int 1996; 16:276-87.
11. Huisman RM, Nieuwenhuizen MG, Th de Charro F. Patient-related and centre-related factors influencing technique survival of peritoneal dialysis in The Netherlands. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17:1655-60.
12. Rumpsfeld M, McDonald SP, Johnson DW. Higher peritoneal transport status is associated with higher mortality and technique failure in the Australian and New Zealand peritoneal dialysis patient populations. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 17:271-8.
13. Cueto-Manzano AM, Quintana-Pina E, Correa-Rotter R. Long-term CAPD survival and analysis of mortality risk factors: 12-year experience of a single Mexican center. Perit Dial Int 2001; 21:148-53.
14. Snyder JJ, Foley RN, Gilbertson DT, Vonesh EF, Collins AJ. Body size and outcomes on peritoneal dialysis in the United States. Kidney Int 2003; 64:1838-44.
15. Chidambaram M, Bargman JM, Quinn RR, Austin PC, Hux JE, Laupacis A. Patient and physician predictors of peritoneal dialysis technique failure: a population based, retrospective cohort study. Perit Dial Int 2011; 31:565-73.
16. Polkinghorne KR, McDonald SP, Atkins RC, Kerr PG. Vascular access and all-cause mortality: a propensity score analysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004; 15:477-86.
17. Dhingra RK, Young EW, Hulbert-Shearon TE, Leavey SF, Port FK. Type of vascular access and mortality in U.S. hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 2001; 60:1443-51.
18. Pastan S, Soucie JM, McClellan WM. Vascular access and increased risk of death among hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 2002; 62:620-6.
19. Kalbfleisch J, Prentice R. The statistical analysis of failure time data. New York, United States: Wiley; 1980.
20. Fine J, Gray R. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Amer Statist Assoc 1999; 94:496-509.
21. Li PK, Szeto CC. Success of the peritoneal dialysis programme in Hong Kong. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23:1475-78.
22. Boudville N, Kemp A, Clayton P, Lim W, Badve SV, Hawley CM, et al. Recent peritonitis associates with mortality among patients treated with peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2012; 23:1398-405.
23. Beckingham IJ, O’Rourke JS, Bishop MC, Blamey RW. Are backup arteriovenous fistulae necessary for patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis? Lancet 1993; 341:1384-6.
24. Chui AK, Chiu EY, White EA, Yumiba T. An investigation into the practice of concurrent chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion and arteriovenous fistula formation in patients needing dialysis. Hong Kong Med J 2000; 6:312-5.