Fetal growth cessation in late pregnancy: Its impact on predicted size parameters used to classify small for gestational age neonates

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Volumn 28, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 755-765

  Deter, Russell L ^a   Lee, Wesley ^a,b,c,d   Sangi Haghpeykar, Haleh ^a   Tarca, Adi L ^c   Yeo, Lami ^c,d   Romero, Roberto ^c,e,f  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b OAKLAND UNIVERSITY WILLIAM BEAUMONT SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

^d HUTZEL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^f MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Birth characteristic predictions; SGA subgroups; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL CIRCUMFERENCE; ANTHROPOMETRIC PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVELOPMENTAL, AGE AND GROWTH PARAMETERS; ECHOGRAPHY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; FETUS GROWTH; FETUS GROWTH CESSATION; GROWTH CESSATION AGES; GROWTH POTENTIAL REALIZATION INDEX; HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MID ARM CIRCUMFERENCE; MID THIGH CIRCUMFERENCE; NEWBORN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SMALL FOR DATE INFANT; THIRD TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; ADULT; BIOMETRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FETUS DEVELOPMENT; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; GESTATIONAL AGE; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; REFERENCE VALUE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; BIOMETRY; FEMALE; FETAL DEVELOPMENT; FETAL GROWTH RETARDATION; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, SMALL FOR GESTATIONAL AGE; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, THIRD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFERENCE VALUES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 84930916400     PISSN: 14767058     EISSN: 14764954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2014.934219     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Iraola A, Gonzalez I, Eixarch E, et al. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome at term in small-for-gestational age fetuses: comparison of growth velocity vs. customized assessment. J Perinat Med 2008;36:531-5.
2. De Jong CL, Francis A, Van Geijn HP, Gardosi J. Customized fetal weight limits for antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;15:36-40.
3. McCowan LM, Roberts CT, Dekker GA, et al. Risk factors for small-for-gestational-age infants by customised birthweight centiles: data from an international prospective cohort study. BJOG 2010;117:1599-607.
4. Soothill PW, Nicolaides KH, Campbell S. Prenatal asphyxia, hyperlacticaemia, hypoglycaemia, and erythroblastosis in growth retarded fetuses. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987;294:1051-3.
5. de Jong CL, Francis A, van Geijn HP, Gardosi J. Fetal growth rate and adverse perinatal events. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;13: 86-9.
6. McIntire DD, Bloom SL, Casey BM, Leveno KJ. Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1234-8.
7. Clausson B, Gardosi J, Francis A, Cnattingius S. Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customised versus population-based birthweight standards. BJOG 2001;108:830-4.
8. Figueras F, Eixarch E, Gratacos E, Gardosi J. Predictiveness of antenatal umbilical artery Doppler for adverse pregnancy outcome in small-for-gestational-age babies according to customised birthweight centiles: population-based study. BJOG 2008;115:590-4.
9. Miller J, Turan S, Baschat AA. Fetal growth restriction. Semin Perinatol 2008;32:274-80.
10. Figueras F, Gardosi J. Intrauterine growth restriction: new concepts in antenatal surveillance, diagnosis, and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204:288-300.
11. Boers KE, van der Post JA, Mol BW, et al. Labour and neonatal outcome in small for gestational age babies delivered beyond 36+0 weeks: A retrospective cohort study. J Pregnancy 2011;2011: 293516.
12. Fratelli N, Valcamonico A, Prefumo F, et al. Effects of antenatal recognition and follow-up on perinatal outcomes in small-forgestational age infants delivered after 36 weeks. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013;92:223-9.
13. Parra-Saavedra M, Crovetto F, Triunfo S, et al. Added value of umbilical vein flow as a predictor of perinatal outcome in term small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42:189-95.
14. von Beckerath AK, Kollmann M, Rotky-Fast C, et al. Perinatal complications and long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of infants with intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208:130 e1-6.
15. Savchev S, Figueras F, Cruz-Martinez R, et al. Estimated weight centile as a predictor of perinatal outcome in small-for-gestationalage pregnancies with normal fetal and maternal Doppler indices. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;39:299-303.
16. Verlijsdonk JW, Winkens B, Boers K, et al. Suspected versus nonsuspected small-for-gestational age fetuses at term: perinatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25:938-43.
17. Figueras F, Figueras J, Meler E, et al. Customised birthweight standards accurately predict perinatal morbidity. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2007;92:F277-80.
18. Gardosi J. Customised assessment of fetal growth potential: implications for perinatal care. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012;97:F314-17.
19. Barker ED, McAuliffe FM, Alderdice F, et al. The role of growth trajectories in classifying fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:248-54.
20. Baschat AA, Cosmi E, Bilardo CM, et al. Predictors of neonatal outcome in early-onset placental dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:253-61.
21. Neerhof MG, Thaete LG. The fetal response to chronic placental insufficiency. Semin Perinatol 2008;32:201-5.
22. Simon NV, Deter RL, Kofinas AD, et al. Small-for-menstrual-age infants: different subgroups detected using individualized fetal growth assessment. J Clin Ultrasound 1994;22:3-10.
23. Hata T, Kuno A, Akiyama M, et al. Detection of small-forgestational-age infants with poor perinatal outcomes using individualized growth assessment. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1999; 47:162-5.
24. Campbell S, Thoms A. Ultrasound measurement of the fetal head to abdomen circumference ratio in the assessment of growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1977;84:165-74.
25. Wladimiroff JW, Bloemsma CA, Wallenburg HC. Ultrasonic assessment of fetal growth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1977;56: 37-42.
26. Chaiworapongsa T, Espinoza J, Gotsch F, et al. The maternal plasma soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 concentration is elevated in SGA and the magnitude of the increase relates to Doppler abnormalities in the maternal and fetal circulation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2008;21:25-40.
27. Dicke JM, Huettner P, Yan S, et al. Umbilical artery Doppler indices in small for gestational age fetuses: correlation with adverse outcomes and placental abnormalities. J Ultrasound Med 2009;28: 1603-10.
28. Illa M, Coloma JL, Eixarch E, et al. Growth deficit in term smallfor-gestational fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler is associated with adverse outcome. J Perinat Med 2009;37:48-52.
29. Oros D, Figueras F, Cruz-Martinez R, et al. Middle versus anterior cerebral artery Doppler for the prediction of perinatal outcome and neonatal neurobehavior in term small-for-gestational-age fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;35:456-61.
30. Oros D, Figueras F, Cruz-Martinez R, et al. Longitudinal changes in uterine, umbilical and fetal cerebral Doppler indices in late-onset small-for-gestational age fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37:191-5.
31. Mayer C, Joseph KS. Fetal growth: A review of terms, concepts and issues relevant to obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41: 136-45.
32. Di Lorenzo G, Monasta L, Ceccarello M, et al. Third trimester abdominal circumference, estimated fetal weight and uterine artery doppler for the identification of newborns small and large for gestational age. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013;166:133-8.
33. Unterscheider J, Daly S, Geary MP, et al. Predictable progressive Doppler deterioration in IUGR: does it really exist? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;209:539 e1-7.
34. Unterscheider J, Daly S, Geary MP, et al. Optimizing the definition of intrauterine growth restriction: The multicenter prospective PORTO Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208:290 e1-6.
35. Deter RL, Harrist RB. Assessment of normal fetal growth. In: Chervenak FA, Isaacson GC, Campbell S, eds. Ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology. Boston (MA): Litle, Brown and Company; 1993:361-86.
36. Deter RL. Individualized growth assessment: evaluation of growth using each fetus as its own control. Semin Perinatol 2004; 28:23-32.
37. Deter RL, Spence LR. Identification of macrosomic, normal and intrauterine growth retarded neonates using the modified Neonatal Growth Assessment Score. Fetal Diagn Ther 2004;19:58-67.
38. Deter RL, Hill RM, Tennyson LM. Predicting the birth characteristics of normal fetuses 14 weeks before delivery. J Clin Ultrasound 1989;17:89-93.
39. Bernstein IM, Blake K, Wall B, Badger GJ. Evidence that normal fetal growth can be noncontinuous. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1996;51: 213-14.
40. Lampl M, Johnson ML. A case study of daily growth during adolescence: A single spurt or changes in the dynamics of saltatory growth? Ann Hum Biol 1993;20:595-603.
41. Lampl M, Thompson AL. Growth chart curves do not describe individual growth biology. Am J Hum Biol 2007;19:643-53.
42. Deter RL, Lee W, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, et al. Individualized fetal growth assessment: critical evaluation of key concepts in the specification of third trimester size trajectories. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014;27:537-42.
43. Milner LL, Deter RL, Hill RM, et al. Prediction of neonatal crownheel length in normal singletons, twins, and triplets using individualized growth assessment. J Clin Ultrasound 1994;22: 253-6.
44. Lee W, Deter RL, McNie B, et al. The fetal arm: individualized growth assessment in normal pregnancies. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24:817-28.
45. Lee W, Deter RL, Sameera S, et al. Individualized growth assessment of fetal thigh circumference using three-dimensional ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31:520-8.
46. Deter RL, Rossavik IK, Harrist RB, Hadlock FP. Mathematic modeling of fetal growth: development of individual growth curve standards. Obstet Gynecol 1986;68:156-61.
47. Lee W, Balasubramaniam M, Deter RL, et al. New fetal weight estimation models using fractional limb volume. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;34:556-65.
48. Oken E, Kleinman KP, Rich-Edwards J, Gillman MW. A nearly continuous measure of birth weight for gestational age using a United States national reference. BMC Pediatr 2003;3:6-15.
49. Deter RL, Nazar R, Milner LL. Modified neonatal growth assessment score: A multivariate approach to the detection of intrauterine growth retardation in the neonate. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;6:400-10.
50. Lee W, Riggs T, Koo W, et al. The relationship of newborn adiposity to fetal growth outcome based on birth weight or the modified neonatal growth assessment score. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25:1933-40.
51. Kurniawan YS, Deter RL, Visser GH, et al. Prediction of the neonatal crown-heel length from femur diaphysis length measurements. J Clin Ultrasound 1994;22:245-52.
52. Kurniawan YS, Deter RL, Visser GH. Predicting head circumference at birth: A study in a Dutch population using the Rossavik growth model. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;5:123-8.
53. Kurniawan YS, Deter RL, Visser GH, Torringa JL. Prediction of birth weight using the Rossavik growth model: A study in a Dutch population. J Clin Ultrasound 1997;25:235-42.
54. Lee W, Deter RL, McNie B, et al. Individualized growth assessment of fetal soft tissue using fractional thigh volume. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;24:766-74.
55. Hata T, Deter RL, Hill RM. Individual growth curve standards in triplets: prediction of third-trimester growth and birth characteristics. Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:379-84.
56. Rossavik IK, Deter RL, Wasserstrum N. Mathematical modeling of fetal growth: V. Fetal weight changes at term. J Clin Ultrasound 1988;16:9-15.
57. Fowden AL, Forhead AJ. Endocrine regulation of feto-placental growth. Horm Res 2009;72:257-65.
58. Simon NV, Deter RL, Grow DR, Kofinas AD. Detection of macrosomia by the individual fetal growth curve assessment method. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:793-7.
59. Noble KG, Fifer WP, Rauh VA, et al. Academic achievement varies with gestational age among children born at term. Pediatrics 2012; 130:e257-64.
60. Dong Y, Chen SJ, Yu JL. A systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term development of early term infants. Neonatology 2012; 102:212-21.
61. Spinnato JA, Allen RD, Mendenhall HW. Birth weight prediction from remote ultrasound examination. Obstet Gynecol 1988;71: 893-8.
62. Spinnato JA, Allen RD, Mendenhall HW. Birth weight prediction from remote ultrasonographic examination. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:742-7.
63. Santonja-Lucas JJ, Armero C, Martinez-Gonzalez L. Long-term prediction of birth weight. J Ultrasound Med 1993;12:431-6.
64. Hedriana HL, Moore TR. A comparison of single versus multiple growth ultrasonographic examinations in predicting birth weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:1600-4; discussion 1604-6.
65. Mongelli M, Gardosi J. Gestation-adjusted projection of estimated fetal weight. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996;75:28-31.
66. Pressman EK, Bienstock JL, Blakemore KJ, et al. Prediction of birth weight by ultrasound in the third trimester. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:502-6.