Corrigendum to: Individualized fetal growth assessment: critical evaluation of key concepts in the specification of third trimester size trajectories (The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, (2014), 27, 6, (543-551), 10.3109/14767058.2013.833904);Individualized fetal growth assessment: Critical evaluation of key concepts in the specification of third trimester size trajectories

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 543-551

  Deter, Russell L ^a   Lee, Wesley ^a,b,c,d   Sangi Haghpeykar, Haleh ^a   Tarca, Adi L ^c,d   Yeo, Lami ^c,d   Romero, Roberto ^c  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b OAKLAND UNIVERSITY WILLIAM BEAUMONT SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

^d WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Fetal growth; Rossavik size models; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

AGE DETERMINATION; ANTHROPOMETRIC PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FETUS; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; FETUS GROWTH; GROWTH POTENTIAL REALIZATION INDEX; GROWTH RATE; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALIZED GROWTH ASSESSMENT; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MODIFIED NEONATAL GROWTH ASSESSMENT SCORE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOM ERROR; ROSSAVIK SIZE MODEL; SCORING SYSTEM; SECOND TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; THIRD TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; ADULT; BODY SIZE; FETUS DEVELOPMENT; GESTATIONAL AGE; GROWTH CURVE; INDIVIDUALITY; MORPHOMETRICS; NEWBORN; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; BODY SIZE; BODY WEIGHTS AND MEASURES; FEMALE; FETAL DEVELOPMENT; GESTATIONAL AGE; GROWTH CHARTS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INDIVIDUALITY; INFANT, NEWBORN; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, THIRD; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 84896796353     PISSN: 14767058     EISSN: 14764954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1237279     Document Type: Erratum

References (39)

1. Nyberg DA, Abuhamad A, Ville Y. Ultrasound assessment of abnormal fetal growth. Sem Perinatol 2004;28:3-22.
2. Deter RL. Individualized growth assessment: evaluation of growth using each fetus as its own control. Sem Perinatol 2004;28:23-32.
3. Kurniawan YS, Deter RL, Visser GH, Torringa JL. Prediction of birth weight using the Rossavik growth model: a study in a Dutch population. J Clin Ultrasound 1997;25:235-42.
4. Ariyuki Y, Hata T, Kitao M. Evaluation of perinatal outcome using individualized growth assessment: comparison with conventional methods. Pediatrics 1995;96:36-42.
5. Baigotti R, Brizzi L, Cariati E, et al. Utilizzaione del modello matematico di Rossavik nella determinazione delle curve individuali di crecita intrauterina. Minerva Ginecologica 1994;46:81-4.
6. Deter RL, Rossavik, IK, Harrist RB, Hadlock FP. Mathematical modeling of fetal growth: development of individual growth curve standards. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68:156-61.
7. Deter RL, Rossavik IK. A simplified method for determining individual growth curve standards. Obstet Gynecol 1987;70:801-5.
8. Deter RL, Spence LR. Identification of macrosomic, normal and intrauterine growth retarded neonates using the modified Neonatal Growth Assessment Score. Fetal Diagn Ther 2004;19: 58-67.
9. Lee W, Deter RL, Sameera S, et al. Individualized growth assessment of fetal thigh circumference using three-dimensional ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31:520-8.
10. Lee W, Deter RL, McNie B, et al. The fetal arm: individualized growth assessment in normal pregnancies. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24:817-28.
11. Lee W, Deter RL, McNie B, et al. Individualized growth assessment of fetal sof tissue using fractional thigh volume. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;24:766-74.
12. Hadlock FP, Shah YP, Kanon OJ, et al. Fetal crown-rump length: reevaluation of relation to menstrual age [5-18 weeks] with highresolution real-time US. Radiology 1992;182:501-5.
13. Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, Park SK. Fetal biparietal diameter: a critical re-evaluation of the relation to menstrual age by means of real-time ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med 1982;1: 97-104.
14. Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, Park SK. Fetal head circumference: Relation to menstrual age. Am J Roentgenol 1982;138: 649-53.
15. Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, Park SK. Fetal abdominal circumference as a predictor of menstrual age. Am J Roentgenol 1982;139:367-70.
16. Warda A, Deter RL, Rossavik IK, et al. Fetal femur length: a critical re-evaluation of the relationship to menstrual age. Obstet Gynecol 1985;66:69-75.
17. Deter RL. Fetal age determination and growth assessment: their roles in prenatal diagnosis. In: Evans MI, Johnson MP, Yaron Y, Drugan A, eds. Prenatal diagnosis. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2006:387-405.
18. Deter RL, Harrist RB. Assessment of normal fetal growth. In: Chervenak FA, Isaacson GC, Campbell S, eds. Ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology. Vol. 1. Boston (MA): Little, Brown and Company; 1993:361-86.
19. Lee W, Balasubramaniam M, Deter RL, et al. New fetal weight estimation models using fractional limb volume. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;34:556-65.
20. Deter RL, Hill RM, Tennyson LM. Predicting the birth characteristics of normal fetuses 14 weeks before delivery. J Clin Ultrasound 1989;17:89-93.
21. Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Ware JH. Applied longitudinal analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2004.
22. Blechschmidt E. The beginnings of human life. New York: Springer Verlag; 1977.
23. O'Rahilly RO, Gardner E. The timing and sequence of events in the development of the limbs in the human embryo. Anat Embryol 1975;148:1-23.
24. Deter RL, Rossavik IK, Hill RM, et al. Longitudinal studies of femur growth in normal fetuses. J Clin Ultrasound 1987;15: 299-305.
25. Hata T, Deter RL, Hill RM. Individual growth curve standards in triplets: prediction of third-trimester growth and birth characteristics. Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:379-84.
26. Royston, P. Calculation of unconditional and conditional reference intervals for foetal size and growth from longitudinal measurements. Stat Med 1995;14:1417-36.
27. Bukowksi R, Uchida T, Smith GCS, et al. Individualized norms of optimal fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:1065-76.
28. Rossavik IK, Deter RL, Hadlock FP. Mathematical modeling of fetal growth: III. Evaluation of head growth using the head profile area. J Clin Ultrasound 1987;15:23-30.
29. Manzavi R. IGFs and IGFBPs: role in health and disease. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002;16:433-47.
30. Gluckman PD, Pinal CS. Regulation of fetal growth by the somatotrophic axis. J Nutr 2003;133:1741S-6S.
31. Murphy VE, Smith R, Giles WB, Clifton VL. Endocrine regulation of human fetal growth: the role of the mother, placenta, and fetus. Endocr Rev 2006;27:141-69.
32. Fowden AL, Forhead AJ. Endocrine regulation of feto-placental growth. Horm Res 2009;72:257-65.
33. Deter RL, Rossavik IK, Harist RB. Development of individual growth curve standards for estimated fetal weight. I. Weight estimation procedure. J Clin Ultrasound 1988;16:215-26.
34. Deter RL, Nazar R, Milner LL. Modified neonatal growth assessment score: a multivariate approach ro the detection of intrauterine growth retardation in the neonate. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;6:400-10.
35. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM. Mixed-effects models in S and S-Plus. New York: Springer Verlag; 2000. ISBN 0-387-98957-0.
36. Smith GCS, Smith MFS, MacNay MB, Fleming JEE. First trimester growth and the risk for low birth weight. N Engl J Med 1995;339: 1817-22.
37. Thorsell M, Kaijser M, Almstro H, Andolf E. Large fetal size in early pregnancy associated with macrosomia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;35:390-4.
38. Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW. Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1992.
39. Goldstein H. Multilevel statistical models. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.; 1995.