The multiple facets of peto’s paradox: A life-history model for the evolution of cancer suppression

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 370, Issue 1673, 2015, Pages

  Brown, Joel S ^a,b   Cunningham, Jessica J ^b   Gatenby, Robert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer; Cancer suppression adaptation; Life history evolution; Life history trade off; Peto s paradox; Wildlife cancer

Indexed keywords

BODY SIZE; CANCER; FECUNDITY; GENE EXPRESSION; HEALTH RISK; LIFE HISTORY THEORY; LONGEVITY; MUTATION; OBSERVATIONAL METHOD; POPULATION MODELING; RODENT; SEXUAL MATURITY; SURVIVORSHIP; TRADE-OFF; TUMOR;

ALLIGATORINAE; ANIMALIA; HETEROCEPHALUS GLABER; MURIDAE;

ANIMAL; ARVICOLINAE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FERTILITY; HUMAN; LONGEVITY; MALE; MOLE RAT; NEOPLASMS; PROBABILITY; RISK FACTOR;

ANIMALS; ARVICOLINAE; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FERTILITY; HUMANS; LONGEVITY; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOLE RATS; NEOPLASMS; PROBABILITY; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84930902991     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0221     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Gatenby RA, Gillies RJ, Brown JS. 2010 The evolutionary dynamics of cancer prevention. Nat. Rev. Cancer 10, 526–527. (doi:10.1038/nrc2892).
2. Tomasetti C, Vogelstein B. 2015 Variations in cancer risk among tissue can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions. Science 347, 78–81. (doi:10.1126/science.1260825).
3. Noble R, Oliver K, Hochberg M. 2015 Statistical interpretations and new findings on variation in cancer risk among tissues. (http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.01061).
4. Peto R, Roe FJ, Lee PN, Levy L, Clack J. 1975 Cancer and ageing in mice and men. Br. J. Cancer 32, 411–426. (doi:10.1038/bjc.1975.242).
5. Caulin AF, Maley CC. 2011 Peto’s paradox: evolution’s prescription for cancer prevention. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 175–182. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.01.002).
6. Domazet-Losˇo T, Tautz D. 2010 Phylostratigraphic tracking of cancer genes suggests a link to the emergence of multicellularity in metazoa. BMC Biol. 8, 66. (doi:10.1186/1741-7007-8-66).
7. Gewin V. 2013 Massive animals may hold secrets of cancer suppression. Nat. News. (doi:10.1038/nature.2013.12258).
8. Hochberg ME, Michalakis Y, De Meeus T. 1992 Parasitism as a constraint on the rate of life-history evolution. J. Evol. Biol. 5, 491–504. (doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.1992.5030491x).
9. Allee WC, Bowen ES. 1932 Studies in animal aggregations: mass protection against colloidal silver among goldfishes. J. Exp. Zool. 61, 185–207. (doi:10.1002/jez.1400610202).
10. Lotka AJ. 1956 Elements of mathematical biology. New York, NY: Dover Publications.
11. Birch LC. 1948 The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population. J. Anim. Ecol. 17, 15–26. (doi:10.2307/1605).
12. Mertz DB. 1971 Life history phenomena in increasing and decreasing populations. In Statistical ecology, vol. 2, pp. 361–399. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
13. Preston S, Heuveline P, Guillot M. 2000 Demography: measuring and modelling population processes. New York, NY: Wiley.
14. Caswell H. 2001 Matrix population models: construction, analysis, and interpretation. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
15. Morrison WB. 2002 Cancer in dogs and cats: medical and surgical management. Jackson, WY: Teton NewMedia.
16. Saul JM. 1994 Cancer and autoimmune disease: a Cambrian couple? Geology. 22, 5.
17. Domazet-Losˇo T, Klimovich A, Anokhin B, Anton-Erxleben F, Hamm MJ, Lange C, Bosch TC. 2014 Naturally occurring tumours in the basal metazoan Hydra. Nat. Commun. 5, 5222. (doi:10.1038/ncomms5222).
18. Crespi B, Summers K. 2005 Evolutionary biology of cancer. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 545–552. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.07.007).
19. Weinstein BS, Ciszek D. 2002 The reserve-capacity hypothesis: evolutionary origins and modern implications of the trade-off between tumorsuppression and tissue-repair. Exp. Gerontol. 37, 615–627. (doi:10.1016/S0531-5565(02) 00012-8).
20. Ukraintseva SV, Arbeev KG, Akushevich I, Kulminski A, Arbeeva L, Culminskaya I, Akushevich L, Yashin AI. 2010 Trade-offs between cancer and other diseases: do they exist and influence longevity? Rejuvenation Res. 13, 387–396. (doi:10.1089/rej.2009.0941).
21. Payne NF. 1984 Population dynamics of beaver in North America. Acta Zool. Fenn. 172, 263–266.
22. Stearns SC. 1989 Trade-offs in life-history evolution. Funct. Ecol. 3, 259–268. (doi:10.2307/2389364).
23. Aktipis AC, Nesse RM. 2013 Evolutionary foundations for cancer biology. Evol. Appl. 6, 144–159. (doi:10.1111/eva.12034).
24. Buffenstein R. 2008 Negligible senescence in the longest living rodent, the naked mole-rat: insights from a successfully aging species. J. Comp. Physiol. B 178, 439–445. (doi:10.1007/s00360-007-0237-5).
25. Seluanov A, Hine C, Azpurua J, Feigenson M, Bozzella M, Mao Z, Catania KC, Gorbunova V. 2009 Hypersensitivity to contact inhibition provides a clue to cancer resistance of naked mole-rat. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 19 352–19 357. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0905252106).
26. Azpurua J, Seluanov A. 2013 Long-lived cancerresistant rodents as new model species for cancer research. Front. Genet. 3, 319. (doi:10.3389/fgene.2012.00319).
27. Buffenstein R, Jarvis JU. 2002 The naked mole rat: a new record for the oldest living rodent. Sci. Aging Knowl. Environ. 21, 7. (doi:10.1126/sageke.2002.21.pe7).
28. Hawkes K. 2010 Colloquium paper: how grandmother effects plus individual variation in frailty shape fertility and mortality: guidance from human-chimpanzee comparisons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107(Suppl. 2), 8977–8984. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0914627107).
29. Zumpe J, Dormon O, Jefferies J. 2012 Childbearing among UK born and non-UK born women living in the UK. London, UK: Office for National Statistics.
30. Nagy JD, Victor EM, Cropper JH. 2007 Why don’t all whales have cancer? A novel hypothesis resolving Peto’s paradox. Integr. Comp. Biol. 47, 317–328. (doi:10.1093/icb/icm062).
31. Nunney L. 1999 Lineage selection and the evolution of multistage carcinogenesis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 493–498. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0664).
32. Vittecoq M et al. 2013 Cancer: a missing link in ecosystem functioning? Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 628–635. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2013.07.005).
33. Roche B, Sprouffske K, Hbid H, Misse´ D, Thomas F. 2013 Peto’s paradox revisited: theoretical evolutionary dynamics of cancer in wild populations. Evol. Appl. 6, 109–116. (doi:10.1111/eva.12025).
34. Maciak S, Michalak P. 2014 Cell size and cancer: a new solution to Peto’s paradox? Evol. Appl. 8, 2–8. (doi:10.1111/eva.12228).
35. Leroi AM, Koufopanou V, Burt A. 2003 Cancer selection. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3, 226–231. (doi:10.1038/nrc1016).
36. Brown JS, Aktipis A. 2015 Inclusive fitness effects can select for cancer suppression into old age. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 370, 20150160. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0160).
37. Junttila MR, Evan GI. 2009 p53: a Jack of all trades but master of none. Nat. Rev. Cancer 9, 821–829. (doi:10.1038/nrc2728).