Resting-state networks in healthy adult subjects: A comparison between a 32-element and an 8-element phased array head coil at 3.0 Tesla

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 56, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 605-613

  Paolini, Marco ^a   Keeser, Daniel ^a   Ingrisch, Michael ^a   Werner, Natalie ^b   Kindermann, Nicole ^b   Reiser, Maximilian ^a   Blautzik, Janusch ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

CNS; equipment; functional connectivity; magnetic resonance functional imaging; phantom study; signal to noise ratio

Indexed keywords

EQUIPMENT; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SIGNAL DETECTION;

CNS; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; FUNCTIONAL IMAGING; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS(ICA); NON PARAMETRIC INFERENCES; PHANTOM STUDIES; RESTING STATE FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITIES; RESTING STATE FUNCTIONAL MRIS;

SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSULA; MEDIAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; MIDDLE TEMPORAL GYRUS; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PHANTOM; POSTERIOR CINGULATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESTING STATE NETWORK; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; THALAMUS; ADOLESCENT; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; FEMALE; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; PROCEDURES; REFERENCE VALUE; REST; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REFERENCE VALUES; REST; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84930892697     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0284185114567703     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Biswal BB, Mennes M, Zuo XN, et al. Toward discovery science of human brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010; 107: 4734-4739.
2. Damoiseaux JS, Rombouts SA, Barkhof F, et al. Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103: 13848-13853.
3. Zuo XN, Kelly C, Adelstein JS, et al. Reliable intrinsic connectivity networks: test-retest evaluation using ICA and dual regression approach. Neuroimage 2010; 49: 2163-2177.
4. Laird AR, Fox PM, Eickhoff SB, et al. Behavioral interpretations of intrinsic connectivity networks. Cogn Neurosci 2011; 23: 4022-4037.
5. Greicius MD, Srivastava G, Reiss AL, et al. Default-mode network activity distinguishes Alzheimer's disease from healthy aging: evidence from functional MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101: 4637-4642.
6. Rocca MA, Valsasina P, Absinta M, et al. Default-mode network dysfunction and cognitive impairment in progressive MS. Neurology 2010; 74: 1252-1259.
7. Stigler KA, McDonald BC, Anand A, et al. Structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging of autism spectrum disorders. Brain Res 2011; 1380: 146-161.
8. Arnold S, Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Shannon S, et al. Improved detection of functional connectivity MRI with 32-channel phased array head coil. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2011; 19: 1637-1637.
9. Hale JR, Brookes MJ, Hall EL, et al. Comparison of functional connectivity in default mode and sensorimotor networks at 3 and 7T. MAGMA 2010; 23: 339-349.
10. Roemer PB, Edelstein WA, Hayes CE, et al. The NMR phased array. Magn Reson Med 1990; 16: 192-225.
11. de Zwart JA, Ledden PJ, van Gelderen P, et al. Signal-to-noise ratio and parallel imaging performance of a 16-channel receive-only brain coil array at 3.0 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2004; 51: 22-26.
12. Wiggins GC, Triantafyllou C, Potthast A, et al. 32-channel 3 Tesla receive-only phased-array head coil with soccer-ball element geometry. Magn Reson Med 2006; 56: 216-223.
13. de Zwart JA, van Gelderen P, Kellman P, et al. Application of sensitivity-encoded echo-planar imaging for blood oxygen level-dependent functional brain imaging. Magn Reson Med 2002; 48: 1011-1020.
14. Golay X, de Zwart JA, Ho YC, et al. Parallel imaging techniques in functional MRI. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 15: 255-265.
15. Meindl T, Born C, Britsch S, et al. Functional BOLD MRI: comparison of different field strengths in a motor task. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 1102-1113.
16. Albrecht J, Burke M, Haegler K, et al. Potential impact of a 32-channel receiving head coil technology on the results of a functional MRI paradigm. Clin Neuroradiol 2010; 20: 223-229.
17. Fellner C, Doenitz C, Finkenzeller T, et al. Improving the spatial accuracy in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) based on the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) effect: benefits from parallel imaging and a 32-channel head array coil at 1.5 Tesla. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2009; 43: 71-82.
18. Kruger G, Glover GH,. Physiological noise in oxygenation-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2001; 46: 631-637.
19. Triantafyllou C, Hoge RD, Krueger G, et al. Comparison of physiological noise at 1.5 T, 3 T and 7 T and optimization of fMRI acquisition parameters. Neuroimage 2005; 26: 243-250.
20. Triantafyllou C, Polimeni JR, Wald LL,. Physiological noise and signal-to-noise ratio in fMRI with multi-channel array coils. Neuroimage 2011; 55: 597-606.
21. Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, et al. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 2002; 17: 825-841.
22. Kiviniemi V, Starck T, Remes J, et al. Functional segmentation of the brain cortex using high model order group PICA. Hum Brain Mapp 2009; 30: 3865-3886.
23. Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, et al. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102: 9673-9678.
24. Vincent JL, Patel GH, Fox MD, et al. Intrinsic functional architecture in the anaesthetized monkey brain. Nature 2007; 447: 83-86.
25. Boly M, Phillips C, Balteau E, et al. Consciousness and cerebral baseline activity fluctuations. Hum Brain Mapp 2008; 29: 868-874.
26. Smith SM, Nichols TE,. Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference. Neuroimage 2009; 44: 83-98.
27. Raichle ME, MacLeod AM, Snyder AZ, et al. A default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98: 676-682.
28. Biswal B, Yetkin FZ, Haughton VM, et al. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Reson Med 1995; 34: 537-541.
29. Meindl T, Teipel S, Elmouden R, et al. Test-retest reproducibility of the default-mode network in healthy individuals. Hum Brain Mapp 2010; 31: 237-246.
30. Franco AR, Pritchard A, Calhoun VD, et al. Interrater and intermethod reliability of default mode network selection. Hum Brain Mapp 2009; 30: 2293-2303.
31. Kaza E, Klose U, Lotze M,. Comparison of a 32-channel with a 12-channel head coil: are there relevant improvements for functional imaging? J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 34: 173-183.
32. Birn RM, Murphy K, Bandettini PA,. The effect of respiration variations on independent component analysis results of resting state functional connectivity. Hum Brain Mapp 2008; 29: 740-750.
33. Starck T, Remes J, Nikkinen J, et al. Correction of low-frequency physiological noise from the resting state BOLD fMRI-Effect on ICA default mode analysis at 1.5 T. J Neurosci Methods 2010; 186: 179-185.
34. Desmond JE, Glover GH,. Estimating sample size in functional MRI (fMRI) neuroimaging studies: statistical power analyses. J Neurosci Methods 2002; 118: 115-128.