Quantifying the consistency of scientific databases

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2015, Pages

  Šubelj, Lovro ^a   Bajec, Marko ^a   Boshkoska, Biljana Mileva ^b   Kastrin, Andrej ^b   Levnajić, Zoran ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

^b FACULTY OF INFORMATION STUDIES   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY; ARTICLE; ARXIV; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CORA; DATA ANALYSIS; DBLP; MEDLINE; PUBLICATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; WEB OF SCIENCE; HUMAN; INTERNET; SCIENCE;

ALGORITHMS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; HUMANS; INTERNET; SCIENCE;

EID: 84930666773     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127390     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Ding Y, Rousseau R, Wolfram D. Measuring Scholarly Impact: Methods and Practice. Berlin: Springer; 2014.
2. Guimera R, Uzzi B, Spiro J, Amaral LN. Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance. Science. 2005; 308:697-702. doi: 10.1126/science.1106340 PMID: 15860629
3. Pan RK, Fortunato S. Author Impact Factor: Tracking the dynamics of individual scientific impact. Scientific Reports. 2014; 4:4880. doi: 10.1038/srep04880 PMID: 24814674
4. Uzzi B, Mukherjee S, Stringer M, Jones B. Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact. Science. 2013; 342:468-472. doi: 10.1126/science.1240474 PMID: 24159044
5. Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B. The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge. Science. 2007; 316:1036-1039. doi: 10.1126/science.1136099 PMID: 17431139
6. Milojević S. Principles of scientific researchand evolution team formation. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014; 111:3984-3989. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1309723111
7. Petersen AM, Fortunato S, Pan RK, Kaski K, Penner O, Rungi A, et al. Reputation and impact in academic careers. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014; 111:15316-15321. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323111111
8. Yao L, Wei T, Zeng A, Fan Y, Di Z. Ranking scientific publications: The effect of nonlinearity. Scientific Reports. 2014; 4:6663. doi: 10.1038/srep06663 PMID: 25322852
9. Shena HW, Barabasi AL. Collective credit allocation in science. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014; 111:12325-12330. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1401992111
10. Science of science policy, http://www.scienceofsciencepolicy.net/. Date of access: 11/01/2015;.
11. Newman MEJ. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001; 98(2):404-409. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.2.404
12. Šubelj L, Bajec M. Model of complex networks based on citation dynamics. In: Proceedings of the WWW Workshop on Large Scale Network Analysis. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; 2013. p. 527-530.
13. Kim H, Yoon JW, Crowcroft J. Network analysis of temporal trends in scholarly research productivity. J Infometrics. 2012; 6(1):97-110. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2011.05.006
14. Wang D, Song C, Barabási AL. Quantifying long-term scientific impact. Science. 2013; 342(6154):127-132. doi: 10.1126/science.1237825 PMID: 24092745
15. Sayama H, Akaishi J. Characterizing interdisciplinarity of researchers and research topics using web search engines. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7:e38747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038747 PMID: 22719935
16. Barrat A, Barthélemy M, Vespignani A. Dynamical Processes on Complex Networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
17. Newman M. Networks: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
18. Easley D, Kleinberg J. Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning About a Highly Connected World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
19. Šubelj L, Furlan Š, Bajec M. An expert system for detecting automobile insurance fraud using social network analysis. Expert Syst Appl. 2011; 38(1):1039-1052. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.143
20. Perc M. Growth and structure of Slovenia's scientific collaboration network. J Infometrics. 2010; 4(4):475-482. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.04.003
21. Levnajić Z, Lužar B, Povh J, Perc M. Community Structure and the Evolution of Interdisciplinarity in Slovenia's Scientific Collaboration Network. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9:e94429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094429 PMID: 24728345
22. Krumov L, Fretter C, Müller-Hannemann M, Weihe K, Hütt MT. Motifs in co-authorship networks and their relation to the impact of scientific publications. Eur Phys J B. 2011; 84:535-540. doi: 10.1140/epjb/e2011-10746-5
23. Evans TS, Lambiotte R, Panzarasa P. Communities and patterns of scientific collaboration. Scientometrics. 2011; 89(1):381-396. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0439-1
24. Pan RK, Saramäki J. The strength of strong ties in scientific collaboration networks. Europhys Lett. 2012; 97(1):18007. doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/97/18007
25. Eom YH, Fortunato S. Characterizing and modeling citation dynamics. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6(9):e24926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024926 PMID: 21966387
26. Abbasi A, Hossain L, Leydesdorff L. Betweenness centrality as a driver of preferential attachment in the evolution of research collaboration networks. J Infometrics. 2012; 6(3):403-412. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2012.01.002
27. Šubelj L, Fiala D, Bajec M. Network-based statistical comparison of citation topology of bibliographic databases. Scientific Reports. 2014; 4:6496. doi: 10.1038/srep06496 PMID: 25263231
28. Leskovec J, Faloutsos C. Sampling from Large Graphs. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York, NY, USA; 2006. p. 631-636.
29. Ahmed N, Neville J, Kompella R. Network Sampling via Edge-based Node Selection with Graph Induction. Purdue University; 2011. Technical Report 11-016.
30. Cox TF, Cox MAA. Multidimensional Scaling. Florida: CRC Press; 2010.
31. Martinez WL, Martinez AR. Exploratory Data Analysis with MATLAB. Abingdon: Chapman and Hall; 2004.
32. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature. 1998; 393(6684):440-442. doi: 10.1038/30918 PMID: 9623998
33. Soffer SN, Vázquez A. Network clustering coefficient without degree-correlation biases. Phys Rev E. 2005; 71(5):057101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.057101
34. Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008; 22(2):338-342. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF PMID: 17884971
35. Fiala D. Mining citation information from CiteSeer data. Scientometrics. 2011; 86(3):553-562. doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0326-1
36. Kastrin A, Rindflesch TC, Hristovski D. Large-Scale Structure of a Network of Co-Occurring MeSH Terms: Statistical Analysis of Macroscopic Properties. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9:e102188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102188 PMID: 25006672
37. Yaveroglu ON, Malod-Dognin N, Davis D, Levnajic Z, Janjic V, Karapandza R, et al. Revealing the Hidden Language of Complex Networks. Scientific Reports. 2014; 4:4547. doi: 10.1038/srep04547 PMID: 24686408
38. Ziliak ST, McCloskey DN. The Cult of Statistical Significance: How the Standard Error Costs Us Jobs, Justice, and Lives. The University of Michigan Press; 2008.
39. Garfield E. Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science. 1955; 122(3159):108-111. doi: 10.1126/science.122.3159.108 PMID: 14385826
40. de Solla Price DJ. Networks of scientific papers. Science. 1965; 149:510-515. doi: 10.1126/science.149.3683.510 PMID: 14325149
41. Ley M. The DBLP computer science bibliography: Evolution, research issues, perspectives. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on String Processing and Information Retrieval. London, UK; 2002. p. 1-10.
42. McCallum AK, Nigam K, Rennie J, Seymore K. Automating the construction of Internet portals with machine learning. Inform Retrieval. 2000; 3(2):127-163. doi: 10.1023/A:1009953814988
43. Ginsparg P. ArXiv at 20. Nature. 2011; 476(7359):145-147. doi: 10.1038/476145a PMID: 21833066
44. Blagus N, Šubelj L, Bajec M. Improving the accuracy of network sampling with subgraph induction. submitted to Physica A. 2014;p. 17.
45. Pastor-Satorras R, Vázquez A, Vespignani A. Dynamical and correlation properties of the Internet. Phys Rev Lett. 2001; 87(25):258701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.258701 PMID: 11736611
46. Foster JG, Foster DV, Grassberger P, Paczuski M. Edge direction and the structure of networks. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010; 107(24):10815-10820. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912671107
47. Newman MEJ. Mixing patterns in networks. Phys Rev E. 2003; 67(2):026126. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.026126
48. Ravasz E, Somera AL, Mongru DA, Oltvai ZN, Barabási AL. Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science. 2002; 297(5586):1551-1555. doi: 10.1126/science.1073374 PMID: 12202830
49. de Nooy W, Mrvar A, Batagelj V. Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
50. Leskovec J, Kleinberg J, Faloutsos C. Graph evolution: Densification and shrinking diameters. ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data. 2007; 1(1):1-41. doi: 10.1145/1217299.1217301
51. Palmer CR, Gibbons PB, Faloutsos C. ANF: A fast and scalable tool for data mining in massive graphs. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York, NY, USA; 2002. p. 81-90.
52. Cook RD, Weisberg S. Residuals and Influence in Regression. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1982.
53. Fisher RA. Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples from an indefinitely large population. Biometrika. 1915; 10(4):507. doi: 10.2307/2331838
54. Friedman M. The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. J Am Stat Assoc. 1937; 32(200):675-701. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1937.10503522
55. Demšar J. Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. J Mach Learn Res. 2006; 7:1-30.
56. Friedman M. A comparison of alternative tests of significance for the problem of m rankings. Ann Math Stat. 1940; 11(1):86-92. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177731944
57. Nemenyi PB. Distribution-free Multiple Comparisons [PhD thesis]. Princeton University; 1963.