Integrated probabilistic risk assessment for nanoparticles: the case of nanosilica in food

Journal of Nanoparticle Research

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2015, Pages

  Jacobs, Rianne ^a   van der Voet, Hilko ^a   ter Braak, Cajo J F ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Dose metric; E551; Governance; Margin of exposure; Nanotechnology; Uncertainty; Variability

Indexed keywords

NANOPARTICLES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

DOSE METRIC; E551; GOVERNANCE; MARGIN OF EXPOSURE; UNCERTAINTY; VARIABILITY;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

ASCORBIC ACID; MULTIVITAMIN; SILICA NANOPARTICLE; SILICON DIOXIDE;

ARTICLE; FOOD COMPOSITION; FOOD SAFETY; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; NANOTECHNOLOGY; POWDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 84930645904     PISSN: 13880764     EISSN: 1572896X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-015-2911-y     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Atchison J, Shen SM (1980) Logistic-normal distributions: some properties and uses. Biometrika 67(2):261–272
2. Barlow S, Chesson A, Collins JD, Flynn A, Hardy A, Jany K, Knaap A, Kuiper H, Larsen J, Lovell D (2009) Guidance of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA on the use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment. EFSA Journal 1150:1–72
3. Batke M, Escher S, Hoffmann-Doerr S, Melber C, Messinger H, Mangelsdorf I (2011) Evaluation of time extrapolation factors based on the database RepDose. Toxicol Lett 205(2):122–129
4. Bokkers BGH, Slob W (2005) A comparison of ratio distributions based on the NOAEL and the benchmark approach for subchronic-to-chronic extrapolation. Toxicol Sci 85(2):1033–1040
5. Bosgra S, van der Voet H, Boon PE, Slob W (2009) An integrated probabilistic framework for cumulative risk assessment of common mechanism chemicals in food: an example with organophosphorus pesticides. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 54(2):124–133
6. Bouwmeester H, Dekkers S, Noordam MY, Hagens WI, Bulder AS, de Heer C, ten Voorde SECG, Wijnhoven SWP, Marvin HJP, Sips AJAM (2009) Review of health safety aspects of nanotechnologies in food production. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 53:52–62
7. Cockburn A, Bradford R, Buck N, Constable A, Edwards G, Haber B, Hepburn P, Howlett J, Kampers F, Klein C, Radomski M, Stamm H, Wijnhoven S, Wildemann T (2012) Approaches to the safety assessment of engineered nanomaterials (ENM) in food. Food Chem Toxicol 50:2224–2242
8. Dekkers S, Krystek P, Peters RJ, Lankveld DP, Bokkers BG, van Hoeven-Arentzen PH, Bouwmeester H, Oomen AG (2011) Presence and risks of nanosilica in food products. Nanotoxicology 5(3):393–405
9. Dekkers S, Bouwmeester H, Bos PMJ, Peters RJB, Rietveld AG, Oomen AG (2013) Knowledge gaps in risk assessment of nanosilica in food: evaluation of the dissolution and toxicity of different forms of silica. Nanotoxicology 7(4):367–377
10. ECETOC (1995) Assessment factors in human health risk assessment. Technical report, ECETOC European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals, Brussels
11. ECHA (2012) Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment Chapter R. 19: Uncertainty analysis. Technical Report November, European Chemicals Agency
12. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1994) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York
13. ELC (2011) ELC’s updated position on the basis of the recent EU regulatory developments on the definition and labelling of nano-ingredients. Technical Report ii, Federation of European Specialty Ingredient Industries, Brussels
14. FAO/WHO (1995) Application of risk analysis to food standards issues. Report of the Joint FAO/WHO expert consultation Geneva, Switzerland 13–17 March 1995. WHO, Geneva
15. Flari V, Chaudhry Q, Neslo R, Cooke R (2011) Expert judgment based multi-criteria decision model to address uncertainties in risk assessment of nanotechnology-enabled food products. J Nanopart Res 13(5):1813–1831
16. Grieger KD, Hansen SF, Baun A (2009) The known unknowns of nanomaterials: describing and characterizing uncertainty within environmental, health and safety risks. Nanotoxicology 3(3):222–233
17. Grieger KD, Linkov I, Hansen SF, Baun A (2012) Environmental risk analysis for nanomaterials: review and evaluation of frameworks. Nanotoxicology 6(2):196–212
18. Jager T, Vermeire T, Rikken MGJ, van der Poel P (2001) Opportunities for a probabilistic risk assessment of chemicals in the European Union. Chemosphere 43(2):257–264
19. Lehman A, Fitzhugh O (1954) 100-Fold margin of safety. Assoc Food Drug Q Bull 18:33–35
20. Linkov I, Satterstrom FK, Monica JC Jr, Hansen SF, Davis TA (2009) Nano risk governance: current developments and future perspectives. Nanotechnol: Law Bus 6:203–220
21. Maynard AD, Kuempel ED (2005) Airborne nanostructured particles and occupational health. J Nanopart Res 7(6):587–614
22. MCRA (2013) MCRA 8.0 Reference Manual. Report Dec 2013. WUR/Biometris, FERA and RIVM. Available at https://mcra.rivm.nl
23. Moerbeek M, Piersma AH, Slob W (2004) A comparison of three methods for calculating confidence intervals for the benchmark dose. Risk Anal 24(1):31–40
24. Morgan K (2005) Development of a preliminary framework for informing the risk analysis and risk management of nanoparticles. Risk Anal 25(6):1621–1635
25. Morgan MG, Henrion M (1990) Uncertainty: a guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
26. OECD (2004) SIDS Dossier on Synthetic Amorphous Silica and Silicates. UNEP; 1-254. http://www.chem.unep.ch/irptc/sids/oecdsids/Silicates.pdf
27. Pasupuleti S, Alapati S, Ganapathy S, Anumolu G, Pully NR, Prakhya BM (2012) Toxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles through oral route. Toxicol Ind Health 28(8):675–686
28. Peters S (2011) Feasibility and challenges of human health risk assessment for nanomaterials. Human health risk assessment for nanomaterials. http://www.safenano.org/media/69877/SN%20Feature%20Article_Peters2011-Human%20health%20risk%20assessment%20for%20nano.pdf
29. Peters R, Kramer E, Oomen AG, Herrera Rivera ZE, Oegema G, Tromp PC, Fokkink R, Rietveld A, Marvin HJP, Weigel S, Peijnenburg ACM, Bouwmeester H (2012) Presence of nano-sized silica during in vitro digestion of foods containing silica as a food additive. ACS Nano 6(3):2441–2451
30. Pronk MEJ, Wijnhoven SW, Bleeker E, Heugens EH, Peijnenburg WJGM, Luttik R, Hakkert BC (2009) Nanomaterials under REACH. Nanosilver as a case study. RIVM Report, 601780003
31. Rasmussen K, Mech A, Mast J, de Temmerman PJ, Waegeneers N, van Steen F et al (2013) Synthetic Amorphous Silicon Dioxide (NM-200, NM-201, NM-202, NM-203, NM-204). Characterisation and Physico-Chemical Properties. Publications Office of the European Union, pp 1–203. doi:10.2788/57989
32. Schneider K, Oltmanns J, Hassauer M (2004) Allometric principles for interspecies extrapolation in toxicological risk assessment—empirical investigations. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 39(3):334–347
33. Slob W (2002) Dose-response modeling of continuous endpoints. Toxicol Sci 66(2):298–312
34. Slob W, Cotton R (2013) proast38.9: benchmark dose modelling. R package version 38.9. http://www.rivm.nl/en/Documents_and_publications/Scientific/Models/PROAST
35. Slob W, Bokkers BGH, van der Heijden GWAM, van der Voet H (2011) Integrated probabilistic risk assessment (IPRA) for carcinogens a first exploration. RIVM Report 320121002/2011. http://www.rivm.nl/dsresource?objectid=rivmp:55729
36. Slob W, Bakker MI, Biesebeek JD, Bokkers BG (2014) Exploring the uncertainties in cancer risk assessment using the integrated probabilistic risk assessment (IPRA) approach. Risk Anal 34(8):1401–1422
37. Slob W, Pieters M (1998) A probabilistic approach for deriving acceptable human intake limits and human health risks from toxicological studies: general framework. Risk Anal 18(6):787–798
38. So SJ, Jang IS, Han CS (2008) Effect of micro/nano silica particle feeding for mice. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 8(10):5367–5371
39. Tooze JA, Midthune D, Dodd KW, Freedman LS, Krebs-Smith SM, Subar AF, Guenther PM, Carroll RJ, Kipnis V (2006) A new statistical method for estimating the usual intake of episodically consumed foods with application to their distribution. J Am Diet Assoc 106(10):1575–1587
40. van der Voet H, Slob W (2007) Integration of probabilistic exposure assessment and probabilistic hazard characterization. Risk Anal 27(2):351–371
41. van der Voet H, van der Heijden GW, Bos PM, Bosgra S, Boon PE, Muri SD, Brüschweiler BJ (2009) A model for probabilistic health impact assessment of exposure to food chemicals. Food Chem Toxicol 47(12):2926–2940
42. van der Zande M, van de Briel RJ, Groot MJ, Kramer E, Herrera Rivera ZE, Rasmussen K, Ossenkoppele JS, Tromp P, Gremmer ER, Peters RJB, Hendriksen PJ, Marvin HJP, Hoogenboom RLP, Peijnenburg ACM, Bouwmeester H (2014) Sub-chronic toxicity study in rats orally exposed to nanostructured silica. Part Fibre Toxicol. doi:10.1186/1743-8977-11-8
43. van Rossum CT, Fransen HP, Verkaik-Kloosterman J, Buurma-Rethans EJ, Ocké MC (2011) National Food Consumption Survey 2007-2010. Technical Report, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment
44. van Straalen N (2002). Theory of ecological risk assessment based on species sensitivity distributions. In: Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology, environmental and ecological risk assessment. CRC Press, Boca Raton
45. Vermeire T, Stevenson H, Pieters MN, Rennen M, Slob W, Hakkert BC (1999) Assessment factors for human health risk assessment: a discussion paper. CRC Crit Rev Toxicol 29(5):439–490
46. Voss S, Charrondiere UR, Slimani N, Kroke A, Riboli E, Wahrendorf J, Boeing H (1998) EPIC-SOFT ein europäisches Computerprogramm für 24-Stunden-Erinnerungsprotokolle. Zeitschrift für Ernährungswissenschaft 37(3):227–233