Ecotoxicological assessment of residues from different biogas production plants used as fertilizer for soil

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 298, Issue , 2015, Pages 195-202

  Stefaniuk, Magdalena ^a   Bartmiński, Piotr ^a   Rózyło, Krzysztof ^b   Debicki, Ryszard ^a   Oleszczuk, Patryk ^a  

^a MARIA CURIE SK ODOWSKA UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES IN LUBLIN   (Poland)

Author keywords

Ecotoxicity; Fertilizer; Heavy metals; Liquid phase; Non separated; Residues from biogas production; Solid phase

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; BIOGAS; BIOLOGY; CADMIUM; CANDIDA; COPPER; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FERTILIZERS; GROWTH (MATERIALS); HEAVY METALS; LEAD; LIQUIDS; SEPARATION; SOIL TESTING; SOILS; TOXICITY; YEAST;

BIOGAS PRODUCTION; ECOTOXICITY; LIQUID PHASE; NON-SEPARATED; SOLID-PHASE;

PHASE SEPARATION;

BIOGAS; CADMIUM; CHROMIUM; COPPER; FERTILIZER; HEAVY METAL; LEAD; NICKEL; SULFANILAMIDE; ZINC; BIOFUEL; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; SOIL;

BACTERIUM; BIOFERTILIZER; BIOGAS; DECIDUOUS TREE; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GAS PRODUCTION; GROWTH RATE; HEAVY METAL; HERB; INHIBITION; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTY; PHYTOTOXICITY; PLANT RESIDUE; REPRODUCTION; SEPARATION; SOIL FERTILITY; SOIL IMPROVEMENT; TOXICITY TEST;

AGRICULTURE; ALIIVIBRIO FISCHERI; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; COLLEMBOLA; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FOLSOMIA CANDIDA; GROWTH INHIBITION; LEPIDIUM SATIVUM; LIQUID; LUMINESCENCE; NONHUMAN; PHASE TRANSITION; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PLANT; PLANT GROWTH; PLANT REPRODUCTION; RESIDUES FROM BIOGAS PRODUCTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROOT GROWTH; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; SINAPIS ALBA; SOIL FERTILIZATION; SOIL PROPERTY; SOLID; WASTE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; ARTHROPOD; BACTERIUM; DRUG EFFECTS; GERMINATION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; MICROBIOLOGY; PLANT ROOT; SOIL;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); FOLSOMIA CANDIDA; LEPIDIUM SATIVUM; SINAPIS ALBA; VIBRIO FISCHERI;

ALIIVIBRIO FISCHERI; ANIMALS; ARTHROPODS; BACTERIA; BIOFUELS; ECOTOXICOLOGY; FERTILIZERS; GERMINATION; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; METALS, HEAVY; PLANT ROOTS; PLANTS; SOIL; SOIL MICROBIOLOGY;

EID: 84930644583     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: 18733336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.05.026     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Hartmann H., Ahring B.K. Strategies for the anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: an overview. Water Sci. Technol. J. Int. Assoc. Water Pollut. Res. 2006, 53:7-22.
2. Möller K., Müller T. Effects of anaerobic digestion on digestate nutrient availability and crop growth: a review. Eng. Life Sci. 2012, 12:242-257.
3. Serrano A., Siles J.A., Chica A.F., Martín M.Á. Agri-food waste valorization through anaerobic co-digestion: fish and strawberry residues. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 54:125-132.
4. Serrano A., Ángel Siles López J., Chica A.F., Martin M., Karouach F., Mesfioui A., et al. Mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and orange peel waste. Environ. Technol. 2014, 35:898-906.
5. Johansen A., Nielsen H.B., Hansen C.M., Andreasen C., Carlsgart J., Hauggard-Nielsen H., et al. Survival of weed seeds and animal parasites as affected by anaerobic digestion at meso- and thermophilic conditions. Waste Manage. 2013, 33:807-812.
6. Igliński B., Buczkowski R., Iglińska A., Cichosz M., Piechota G., Kujawski W. Agricultural biogas plants in Poland: investment process, economical and environmental aspects, biogas potential. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16:4890-4900.
7. Alburquerque J.A., de la Fuente C., Ferrer-Costa A., Carrasco L., Cegarra J., Abad M., et al. Assessment of the fertiliser potential of digestates from farm and agroindustrial residues. Biomass Bioenergy. 2012, 40:181-189.
8. Weiland P. Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 85:849-860.
9. Brändli R.C., Bucheli T.D., Kupper T., Mayer J., Stadelmann F.X., Tarradellas J. Fate of PCBs, PAHs and their source characteristic ratios during composting and digestion of source-separated organic waste in full-scale plants. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 148:520-528.
10. Govasmark E., Stäb J., Holen B., Hoornstra D., Nesbakk T., Salkinoja-Salonen M. Chemical and microbiological hazards associated with recycling of anaerobic digested residue intended for agricultural use. Waste Manag. 2011, 31:2577-2583.
11. Van Reeuwijk L.P. Procedures for Soil Analysis 1992, International Soil Reference and Information Centre, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
12. Phytotoxkit Seed germination and early growth microbiotest with higher plants. Standard Operation Procedure 2004, 1-24. MicroBioTests Inc., Nazareth.
13. ISO Soil Quality - Inhibition of Reproduction of Collembola (folsomia Candida) by Soil Pollutants 1999, 11267. ISO, Geneve, Switzerland.
14. EN 12457-2 protocol, Council Decision of 19 December 2002 establishing criteria, procedures for the acceptance of waste at landfills pursuant to Article 16 of and Annex II to Directive 1999/31/EC II, 2003/33/EC OJ L11 2002; 27.
15. SDI (1992) Microtox manual. Microbics Corporation, Carlsbad, CA.
16. Wadhia K., Dando T., Clive Thompson K. Intra-laboratory evaluation of microbial assay for risk assessment (MARA) for potential application in the implementation of the water framework directive (WFD). J. Environ. Monit. 2007, 9:953-958.
17. Andruschkewitsch M., Wachendorf C., Wachendorf M. Effects of digestates from different biogas production systems on above and belowground grass growth and the nitrogen status of the plant-soil-system. Grassl. Sci. 2013, 59:183-195.
18. Tambone F., Genevini P., D'Imporzano G., Adani F. Assessing amendment properties of digestate by studying the organic matter composition and the degree of biological stability during the anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of MSW. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:3140-3142.
19. Hjorth M., Christensen K.V., Christensen M.L., Sommer S.G. Solid-liquid separation of animal slurry in theory and practice. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2010, 30:153-180.
20. Popovic O., Hjorth M., Jensen L.S. Phosphorus, copper and zinc in solid and liquid fractions from full-scale and laboratory-separated pig slurry. Environ. Technol. 2012, 33:2119-2131.
21. Dz.U. 2010 nr 137 poz. 924.
22. Demirel B., Göl N.P., Onay T.T. Evaluation of heavy metal content in digestate from batch anaerobic co-digestion of sunflower hulls and poultry manure. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2013, 15:242-246.
23. Ishler V., Wolfgang D., Griswold D. Prevention and Control of Foot Problems in Dairy Cows 1999, The Pennsylvania State University, USA.
24. Gell K., van Groenigen J., Cayuela M.L. Residues of bioenergy production chains as soil amendments: immediate and temporal phytotoxicity. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186:2017-2025.
25. Salminen E., Rintala J., Härkönen J., Kuitunen M., Högmander H., Oikari A. Anaerobically digested poultry slaughterhouse wastes as fertiliser in agriculture. Bioresour. Technol. 2001, 78:81-88.
26. Agarwal N., Sharma S. Appraisal of garden cress (Lepidium sativum L.) and product development as an all pervasive and nutrition worthy food stuff. Ann. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 14:77.
27. Washington State University, Sinapis alba tolerance pH soil, (2003) . http://pubs.wsu.edu.
28. Muhammad Z., Hussain F. Vegetative growth performance of five medicinal plants under NaCl salt stress. Pak. J. Bot. 2010, 42:303-316.
29. Drennan M.F., DiStefano T.D. Characterization of the curing process from high-solids anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:537-544.
30. Salminen E., Rintala J. Anaerobic digestion of organic solid poultry slaughterhouse waste - a review. Bioresour. Technol. 2002, 83:13-26.
31. Greenslade P., Vaughan G.T. A comparison of collembola species for toxicity testing of Australian soils. Pedobiologia 2003, 47:171-179.
32. Jänsch S., Amorim M.J., Römbke J. Identification of the ecological requirements of important terrestrial ecotoxicological test species. Environ. Rev. 2005, 13:51-83.
33. Domene X., Colón J., Uras M.V., Izquierdo R., Àvila A., Alcañiz J.M. Role of soil properties in sewage sludge toxicity to soil collembolans. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2010, 42:1982-1990.
34. Owojori A.J., Voua-Otomo P., Reinecke S.A. Comparative study of the effects of salinity on life-cycle parameters of four soil-dwelling species (Folsomia candida, Enchytraeus doerjesi, Eisenia fetida and Aporrectodea caliginosa). Pedobiologia 2009, 52:351-360.
35. Ventura S.P.M., e Silva F.A., Gonçalves A.M.M., Pereira J.L., Gonçalves F., Coutinho J.A.P. Ecotoxicity analysis of cholinium-based ionic liquids to vibrio fischeri marine bacteria. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2014, 102:48-54.
36. Vasseur P., Bois F., Ferard J.F., Rast C. Influence of physicochemical parameters on the microtox test response. Toxic. Assess. 1986, 1:283-300.
37. Jośko I., Oleszczuk P. The influence of ZnO and TiO2 nanoparticles on the toxicity of sewage sludges. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts. 2012, 15:296-306.
38. Sieroslawska A. Evaluation of usefulness of microbial assay for risk assessment (MARA) in the cyanobacterial toxicity estimation. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2014.
39. Oleszczuk P., Jośko I., Kuśmierz M., Futa B., Wielgosz E., Ligeza S., et al. Microbiological, biochemical and ecotoxicological evaluation of soils in the area of biochar production in relation to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon content. Geoderma 2014, 213:502-511.
40. Nałecz-Jawecki G. Application of microbial assay for risk assessment biotest in evaluation of toxicity of human and veterinary antibiotics. Environ. Toxicol. 2010, 25:487-494.