Eosin Y-sensitized nanosheet-stacked hollow-sphere TiO2 for efficient photocatalytic H2 production under visible-light irradiation

Journal of Nanoparticle Research

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2015, Pages

  Shi, Jinwen ^a   Guan, Xiangjiu ^a   Zhou, Zhaohui ^a   Liu, Haipei ^a,b   Guo, Liejin ^a  

^a XI'AN JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b XI AN THERMAL POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE CO   (China)

Author keywords

Eosin Y; Hydrogen; Photocatalysis; Sensitization; Titania; Visible light

Indexed keywords

CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; HYDROGEN; HYDROGEN PRODUCTION; IRRADIATION; LIGHT ABSORPTION; NANOSHEETS; PHOTOCATALYSIS; PHOTOCATALYTIC ACTIVITY; SPHERES; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

EOSIN Y; PHOTOCATALYTIC PERFORMANCE; SENSITIZATION; SOLVOTHERMAL REACTIONS; TITANIA; VISIBLE LIGHT; VISIBLE LIGHT ABSORPTION; VISIBLE-LIGHT IRRADIATION;

LIGHT;

EOSIN; EOSIN Y; HYDROGEN; NANOMATERIAL; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; IRRADIATION; LIGHT; MORPHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PHOTOCATALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIZATION; SYNTHESIS; TEMPERATURE; ULTRAVIOLET SPECTROSCOPY; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 84930640570     PISSN: 13880764     EISSN: 1572896X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-015-3057-7     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. 2 photocatalyst using a silane-coupling reagent under visible light irradiation. J Photochem Photobiol A 137(1):63–69. doi:10.1016/S1010-6030(00)00351-8
2. Chen XB, Mao SS (2007) Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: synthesis, properties, modifications, and applications. Chem Rev 107(7):2891–2959. doi:10.1021/cr0500535
3. Chen XB, Shen SH, Guo LJ, Mao SS (2010) Semiconductor-based photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Chem Rev 110(11):6503–6570. doi:10.1021/cr1001645
4. Chen XB, Liu L, Yu PY, Mao SS (2011) Increasing solar absorption for photocatalysis with black hydrogenated titanium dioxide nanocrystals. Science 331(6018):746–750. doi:10.1126/science.1200448
5. Dhanalakshmi KB, Latha S, Anandan S, Maruthamuthu P (2001) Dye sensitized hydrogen evolution from water. Int J Hydrogen Energy 26(7):669–674. doi:10.1016/S0360-3199(00)00134-8
6. 2 particles used in polymer encapsulation. Langmuir 17(9):2664–2669. doi:10.1021/la0015213
7. Fujishima A, Honda K (1972) Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 238(5358):37–38. doi:10.1038/238037a0
8. 4 to engineer morphology, oxygen vacancy concentration, and photocatalytic activity. J Am Chem Soc 134(15):6751–6761. doi:10.1021/ja300823a
9. Grätzel M (2003) Dye-sensitized solar cells. J Photochem Photobiol C 4(2):145–153. doi:10.1016/S1389-5567(03)00026-1
10. Hisatomi T, Kubota J, Domen K (2014) Recent advances in semiconductors for photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical water splitting. Chem Soc Rev 43(22):7520–7535. doi:10.1039/C3cs60378d
11. x catalyst decorated on graphene for highly efficient reduction of water to hydrogen under visible light irradiation. ACS Catal 4(8):2763–2769. doi:10.1021/cs5006844
12. Kudo A, Miseki Y (2009) Heterogeneous photocatalyst materials for water splitting. Chem Soc Rev 38(1):253–278. doi:10.1039/b800489g
13. 2. J Mol Catal A 266(1–2):75–79
14. Li QY, Lu GX (2008) Controlled synthesis and photocatalytic investigation of different-shaped one-dimensional titanic acid nanomaterials. J Power Sour 185(1):577–583. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.06.043
15. Li HX, Bian ZF, Zhu J, Zhang DQ, Li GS, Huo YN, Li H, Lu YF (2007) Mesoporous titania spheres with tunable chamber structure and enhanced photocatalytic activity. J Am Chem Soc 129(27):8406–8407. doi:10.1021/Ja072191c
16. Li JX, Xu JH, Dai WL, Li HX, Fan KN (2009a) Direct hydro-alcohol thermal synthesis of special core–shell structured Fe-doped titania microspheres with extended visible light response and enhanced photoactivity. Appl Catal B 85(3–4):162–170. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.07.008
17. 3+ coupling for efficient visible-light photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34(14):5629–5636. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.05.100
18. Liu SW, Li C, Yu JG, Xiang QJ (2011) Improved visible-light photocatalytic activity of porous carbon self-doped ZnO nanosheet-assembled flowers. CrysEngComm 13(7):2533–2541. doi:10.1039/c0ce00295j
19. 2 production. J Nanopart Res 15(11):2057
20. Liu J, Liu Y, Liu NY, Han YZ, Zhang X, Huang H, Lifshitz Y, Lee ST, Zhong J, Kang ZH (2015) Metal-free efficient photocatalyst for stable visible water splitting via a two-electron pathway. Science 347(6225):970–974. doi:10.1126/science.aaa3145
21. Ma Y, Wang XL, Jia YS, Chen XB, Han HX, Li C (2014) Titanium dioxide-based nanomaterials for photocatalytic fuel generations. Chem Rev 114(19):9987–10043. doi:10.1021/Cr500008u
22. Maeda K, Teramura K, Lu DL, Takata T, Saito N, Inoue Y, Domen K (2006) Photocatalyst releasing hydrogen from water. Nature 440(7082):295. doi:10.1038/440295a
23. Maeda K, Eguchi M, Lee SHA, Youngblood WJ, Hata H, Mallouk TE (2009) Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from hexaniobate nanoscrolls and calcium niobate nanosheets sensitized by ruthenium (II) bipyridyl complexes. J Phys Chem C 113(18):7962–7969. doi:10.1021/jp900842e
24. Medzihradszky KF, Guan S, Maltby DA, Burlingame AL (2007) Sulfopeptide fragmentation in electron-capture and electron-transfer dissociation. J Am Soc Mass Spectr 18(9):1617–1624. doi:10.1016/j.jasms.2007.06.002
25. Pei DH, Luan JF (2012) Development of visible light-responsive sensitized photocatalysts. Int J Photoenergy 2012:262831. doi:10.1155/2012/262831
26. 3-based photocatalysts for water splitting. Prog Nat Sci Mater Int 22(6):592–615. doi:10.1016/j.pnsc.2012.12.002
27. 3 tubular structure. Opt Express 20(6):A351–A359. doi:10.1364/OE.20.00A351
28. 3 with exposed 001 facets: topotactic synthesis and enhanced photocatalytic activity. Chem Eur J 18(11):3157–3162. doi:10.1002/chem.201102214
29. Sing KSW, Everett DH, Haul RAW, Moscou L, Pierotti RA, Rouquerol J, Siemieniewska T (1985) Reporting physisorption data for gas solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface-area and porosity (Recommendations 1984). Pure Appl Chem 57(4):603–619. doi:10.1351/pac198557040603
30. Swierk JR, Méndez-Hernández DD, McCool NS, Liddell P, Terazono Y, Pahk I, Tomlin JJ, Oster NV, Moore TA, Moore AL, Gust D, Mallouk TE (2015) Metal-free organic sensitizers for use in water-splitting dye-sensitized photoelectrochemical cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112(6):1681–1686. doi:10.1073/pnas.1414901112
31. 2 photoreduction. ACS Appl Mater Inter 5(4):1348–1354. doi:10.1021/am302631b
32. 2-based photocatalysis. J Mater Chem A 2(32):12642–12661. doi:10.1039/C4ta00941j
33. 2(B) nanofibers with a shell of anatase nanocrystals. J Am Chem Soc 131(49):17885–17893. doi:10.1021/ja906774k
34. 2. RSC Adv 5(3):1852–1858. doi:10.1039/c4ra10767e
35. Youngblood WJ, Lee SHA, Maeda K, Mallouk TE (2009) Visible light water splitting using dye-sensitized oxide semiconductors. Acc Chem Res 42(12):1966–1973. doi:10.1021/Ar9002398
36. 3 for efficient hydrogen production. J Mater Chem 21(30):11347–11351. doi:10.1039/c1jm11385b
37. Yu Z, Li F, Sun LC (2014) Recent advances in dye-sensitized photoelectrochemical cells for solar hydrogen production based on molecular components. Energy Environ Sci 8(3):760–775. doi:10.1039/c4ee03565h
38. xS photocatalysts prepared by a novel thermal sulfuration method. Inter J Hydrogen Energy 32(12):4685–4691. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.08.022
39. 2 films for improved photovoltaic performances. J Phys Chem C 117(28):14659–14666. doi:10.1021/jp404439p
40. Zhu HY, Zhao XS, Lu GQ, Do DD (1996) Improved comparison plot method for pore structure characterization of MCM-41. Langmuir 12(26):6513–6517. doi:10.1021/La960541v
41. Zou ZG, Ye JH, Sayama K, Arakawa H (2001) Direct splitting of water under visible light irradiation with an oxide semiconductor photocatalyst. Nature 414(6864):625–627. doi:10.1038/414625a