Towards consistent Electroweak Precision Data constraints in the SMEFT

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2015, Issue 5, 2015, Pages

  Berthier, Laure ^a   Trott, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Effective field theories

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930625771     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP05(2015)024     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. B. Grinstein and M.B. Wise, Operator analysis for precision electroweak physics, Phys. Lett.B 265 (1991) 326 [INSPIRE].
2. Z. Han and W. Skiba, Effective theory analysis of precision electroweak data, Phys. Rev.D 71 (2005) 075009 [hep-ph/0412166] [INSPIRE].
3. M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, S. Mishima and L. Silvestrini, Electroweak Precision Observables, New Physics and the Nature of a 126 GeV Higgs Boson, JHEP08 (2013) 106 [arXiv:1306.4644] [INSPIRE].
4. C.-Y. Chen, S. Dawson and C. Zhang, Electroweak Effective Operators and Higgs Physics, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 015016 [arXiv:1311.3107] [INSPIRE].
5. M. Ciuchini et al., Update of the electroweak precision fit, interplay with Higgs-boson signal strengths and model-independent constraints on new physics, arXiv:1410.6940 [INSPIRE].
6. Gfitter Group collaboration, M. Baak et al., The global electroweak fit at NNLO and prospects for the LHC and ILC, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 3046 [arXiv:1407.3792] [INSPIRE].
7. G. Durieux, F. Maltoni and C. Zhang, A global approach to top-quark flavor-changing interactions, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 074017 [arXiv:1412.7166] [INSPIRE].
8. A.A. Petrov, S. Pokorski, J.D. Wells and Z. Zhang, Role of low-energy observables in precision Higgs boson analyses, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 073001 [arXiv:1501.02803] [INSPIRE].
9. J.D. Wells and Z. Zhang, Precision Electroweak Analysis after the Higgs Boson Discovery, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 033006 [arXiv:1406.6070] [INSPIRE].
10. J. Ellis, V. Sanz and T. You, Complete Higgs Sector Constraints on Dimension-6 Operators, JHEP07 (2014) 036 [arXiv:1404.3667] [INSPIRE].
11. M. Trott, On the consistent use of Constructed Observables, JHEP02 (2015) 046 [arXiv:1409.7605] [INSPIRE].
12. B. Henning, X. Lu and H. Murayama, How to use the Standard Model effective field theory, arXiv:1412.1837 [INSPIRE].
13. A. Pomarol and F. Riva, Towards the Ultimate SM Fit to Close in on Higgs Physics, JHEP01 (2014) 151 [arXiv:1308.2803] [INSPIRE].
14. A. Falkowski and F. Riva, Model-independent precision constraints on dimension-6 operators, JHEP02 (2015) 039 [arXiv:1411.0669] [INSPIRE].
15. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].
16. R. Alonso, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators III: Gauge Coupling Dependence and Phenomenology, JHEP04 (2014) 159 [arXiv:1312.2014] [INSPIRE].
17. W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation, Nucl. Phys.B 268 (1986) 621 [INSPIRE].
18. L. Lehman, Extending the Standard Model Effective Field Theory with the Complete Set of Dimension-7 Operators, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 125023 [arXiv:1410.4193] [INSPIRE].
19. ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD collaborations, the LEP Electroweak Working Group, the SLD Electroweak Group, the SLD Heavy Flavour Group, S. Schael et al., Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance, Phys. Rept.427 (2006) 257 [hep-ex/0509008] [INSPIRE].
20. R.S. Chivukula and H. Georgi, Composite Technicolor Standard Model, Phys. Lett.B 188 (1987) 99 [INSPIRE].
21. L.J. Hall and L. Randall, Weak scale effective supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.65 (1990) 2939 [INSPIRE].
22. G. D’Ambrosio, G.F. Giudice, G. Isidori and A. Strumia, Minimal flavor violation: An effective field theory approach, Nucl. Phys.B 645 (2002) 155 [hep-ph/0207036] [INSPIRE].
23. A.J. Buras, P. Gambino, M. Gorbahn, S. Jager and L. Silvestrini, Universal unitarity triangle and physics beyond the standard model, Phys. Lett.B 500 (2001) 161 [hep-ph/0007085] [INSPIRE].
24. A. Manohar and H. Georgi, Chiral Quarks and the Nonrelativistic Quark Model, Nucl. Phys.B 234 (1984) 189 [INSPIRE].
25. E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Naive Dimensional Analysis Counting of Gauge Theory Amplitudes and Anomalous Dimensions, Phys. Lett.B 726 (2013) 697 [arXiv:1309.0819] [INSPIRE].
26. G. Buchalla, O. Catà and C. Krause, On the Power Counting in Effective Field Theories, Phys. Lett.B 731 (2014) 80 [arXiv:1312.5624] [INSPIRE].
27. C. Arzt, M.B. Einhorn and J. Wudka, Patterns of deviation from the standard model, Nucl. Phys.B 433 (1995) 41 [hep-ph/9405214] [INSPIRE].
28. LHC Higgs Cross section Working Group collaboration, S. Heinemeyer et al., Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross sections: 3. Higgs Properties, arXiv:1307.1347 [INSPIRE].
29. G. Buchalla, O. Catà and C. Krause, A Systematic Approach to the SILH Lagrangian, Nucl. Phys.B 894 (2015) 602 [arXiv:1412.6356] [INSPIRE].
30. E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, On Gauge Invariance and Minimal Coupling, JHEP09 (2013) 063 [arXiv:1305.0017] [INSPIRE].
31. J.D. Wells, TASI lecture notes: Introduction to precision electroweak analysis, hep-ph/0512342 [INSPIRE].
32. Particle Data Group collaboration, K. Olive et al., Review of Particle Physics, Chin. Phys.C38 (2014) 090001.
33. P.J. Mohr, B.N. Taylor and D.B. Newell, CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants: 2010, Rev. Mod. Phys.84 (2012) 1527 [arXiv:1203.5425] [INSPIRE].
34. D.Y. Bardin and G. Passarino, The standard model in the making: precision study of the electroweak interactions, Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K. (1999).
35. E. Eichten, K.D. Lane and M.E. Peskin, New Tests for Quark and Lepton Substructure, Phys. Rev. Lett.50 (1983) 811 [INSPIRE].
36. G. Breit and E. Wigner, Capture of Slow Neutrons, Phys. Rev.49 (1936) 519 [INSPIRE].
37. G. Altarelli, R. Kleiss, and C. Verzegnassi, Z physics at LEP-1. Vol. 1: standard physics, CERN-89-08-V-1 [INSPIRE].
38. A. Sirlin, Theoretical considerations concerning the Z0 mass, Phys. Rev. Lett.67 (1991) 2127 [INSPIRE].
39. G. Isidori, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Probing the nature of the Higgs-like Boson via h → Vℱ decays, Phys. Lett.B 728 (2014) 131 [arXiv:1305.0663] [INSPIRE].
40. G. Isidori and M. Trott, Higgs form factors in Associated Production, JHEP02 (2014) 082 [arXiv:1307.4051] [INSPIRE].
41. M. Gonzalez-Alonso, A. Greljo, G. Isidori and D. Marzocca, Pseudo-observables in Higgs decays, Eur. Phys. J.C 75 (2015) 128 [arXiv:1412.6038] [INSPIRE].
42. L3 collaboration, O. Adriani et al., Results from the L3 experiment at LEP, Phys. Rept.236 (1993) 1 [INSPIRE].
43. −annihilation, Phys. Lett.B 347 (1995) 171 [INSPIRE].
44. −annihilation at (Formula presented.), Phys. Lett.B 447 (1999) 167 [INSPIRE].
45. S. Kirsch and T. Riemann, SMATASY: A program for the model independent description of the Z resonance, Comput. Phys. Commun.88 (1995) 89 [hep-ph/9408365] [INSPIRE].
46. A. Leike, T. Riemann and J. Rose, S matrix approach to the Z line shape, Phys. Lett.B 273 (1991) 513 [hep-ph/9508390] [INSPIRE].
47. G. Isidori, The interference parameter in the model independent approach to Z line shape, Phys. Lett.B 314 (1993) 139 [INSPIRE].
48. A. Freitas, Higher-order electroweak corrections to the partial widths and branching ratios of the Z boson, JHEP04 (2014) 070 [arXiv:1401.2447] [INSPIRE].
49. CDF, D0 collaborations, the Tevatron Electroweak Working Group, 2012 Update of the Combination of CDF and D0 Results for the Mass of the W Boson, arXiv:1204.0042 [INSPIRE].
50. M. Awramik, M. Czakon, A. Freitas and G. Weiglein, Precise prediction for the W boson mass in the standard model, Phys. Rev.D 69 (2004) 053006 [hep-ph/0311148] [INSPIRE].
51. E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators I: Formalism and lambda Dependence, JHEP10 (2013) 087 [arXiv:1308.2627] [INSPIRE].
52. E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators II: Yukawa Dependence, JHEP01 (2014) 035 [arXiv:1310.4838] [INSPIRE].
53. R. Alonso, H.-M. Chang, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and B. Shotwell, Renormalization group evolution of dimension-six baryon number violating operators, Phys. Lett.B 734 (2014) 302 [arXiv:1405.0486] [INSPIRE].
54. I. Brivio et al., Disentangling a dynamical Higgs, JHEP03 (2014) 024 [arXiv:1311.1823] [INSPIRE].
55. M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, A. Gusso and S.F. Novaes, Constraints on four fermion contact interactions from precise electroweak measurements, J. Phys.G 24 (1998) 2213 [hep-ph/9802254] [INSPIRE].