Adaptation and validation of the Spanish self-report version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III)

Spinal Cord

Volumn 53, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 451-454

  Aguilar Rodriguez M ^a,b   Pena Paches L ^c   Grao Castellote, C ^b   Torralba Collados, F ^b   Hervas Marin D ^b   Giner Pascual, M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO LA FE   (Spain)

^c HOSPITAL GENERAL DE CASTELLÓN   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; BREATHING; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE ASSESSMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CARE; SELF REPORT; SPAIN; SPHINCTER; SPINAL CORD INDEPENDENCE MEASURE; SPINAL CORD INJURY; VALIDATION STUDY; ANAL CANAL; CHRONIC DISEASE; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; LANGUAGE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; URETHRA;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; ANAL CANAL; CHRONIC DISEASE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; CULTURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; RESPIRATION; SELF CARE; SELF REPORT; SPAIN; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; URETHRA;

EID: 84930572869     PISSN: 13624393     EISSN: 14765624     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sc.2014.225     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Zarco-Perpiñán MJ, Barrera-Chacón MJ, García Obrero I, Méndez Ferrer JB, Alarcón LE, Echevarría-Ruiz de Vargas C. Development of the Spanish version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III: cross-cultural adaptation and reliability and validity study. Disabil Rehabil 2014; 36: 1644-1651.
2. Catz A, Itzkovich MA. Spinal Cord Independence Measure: comprehensive ability rating scale for the spinal cord lesion patient. J Rehabil Res Dev 2007; 44: 65-68.
3. Itzkovich M, Tamir A, Philo O, Steinberg F, Ronen J, Spasser R et al. Reliability of the Catz-Itzkovich spinal cord independence measure assessment by interview and comparison with observation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 82: 267-272.
4. Anderson K, Aito S, Atkins M, Biering-Sørensen F, Charlifue S, Curt A et al. Functional recovery measures for spinal cord injury: an evidence-based review for clinical practice and research report of the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Spinal Cord Injury Measures Meeting. J Spinal Cord Med 2008; 31: 133-144.
5. Anderson KD, Acuff ME, Arp BG, Backus D, Chun S, Fisher K et al. United States (US) multi-center study to assess the validity and reliability of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III). Spinal Cord 2011; 49: 880-885.
6. Bluvshtein V, Front L, Itzkovich M, Aidinoff E, Gelernter I, Hart I. SCIM III J is reliable and valid in a separate analysis for traumatic spinal cord lesions. Spinal Cord 2011; 49: 292-296.
7. Scivoletto G, Tamburella F, Laurenza L, Molinari M. The spinal cord independence measure: how much change is clinically significant for spinal cord injury subjects. Disabil Rehabil 2013; 35: 1808-1813.
8. Catz A, Itzkovich M, Steinberg F, Philo O, Ring H, Ronen J et al. Disability assessment by a single rater or a team: a comparative study with the Catz-Itzkovich spinal cord independence measure. J Rehabil Med 2002; 34: 226-230.
9. Fekete C, Eriks-Hoogland I, Baumberger M, Catz M, Itzkovich M, Lüthi H et al. Development and validation of a self-report version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III). Spinal Cord 2013; 51: 40-47.
10. Meneghini R, Packer AL. Is there science beyond English? Initiatives to increase the quality and visibility of non-English publications might help to break down language barriers in scientific communication. EMBO Rep 2007; 8: 112-116.
11. Sperber AD. Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: S124-S128.
12. Lin L. A note on the concordance correlation coefficient. Biometrics 2000; 56: 324-325.
13. Bland J, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 327: 307-310.
14. McBride GB. A proposal for strength-of-agreement criteria for Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient. NIWA Client Report: HAM2005062, 2005.