Translation and Validation of Study Instruments for Cross-Cultural Research

Gastroenterology

Volumn 126, Issue 1, 2004, Pages

  Sperber, Ami D ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; CULTURAL FACTOR; ENTERITIS; FECES INCONTINENCE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; IRRITABLE COLON; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; URINE INCONTINENCE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0346101530     PISSN: 00165085     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.016     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Reilly WT, Talley NJ, Pemberton JH, Zinsmeister AR. Validation of a questionnaire to assess fecal incontinence and associated risk factors: Fecal Incontinence Questionnaire. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:146-154.
2. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG, Wexner SD, Bliss D, Lowry AC. Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:1525-1532.
3. Blaivas JG, Appell RA, Fantl JA, Leach G, McGuire EJ, Resnick NM, Raz S, Wein AJ. Standards of efficacy for evaluation of treatment outcomes in urinary incontinence: recommendations of the Urodynamic Society. Neurourol Urodyn 1997;16:145-147.
4. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG, Wexner SD, Bliss D, Lowry AC. Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:9-17.
5. Lee PS, Reid DW, Saltmarche A, Linton L. Measuring the psychosocial impact of urinary incontinence. The York Incontinence Perception Scale (YIPS). J Am Geriatr Soc 1995;43:1275-1278.
6. Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS, McClish D, Fantl JA. Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program (CPW) in Women (CPW) Research Group. Qual Life Res 1994;3:291-306.
7. Visnes AG, Haltbakk J, Hunksaar S. A Norwegian version of the Incontinence Stress Questionnaire-Staff Reaction: translation and validation for cross-cultural use. J Nurs Manag 2000;8:71-86.
8. Patrick DL, Martin ML, Bushnell DM, Marquis P, Andrejasich CM, Buesching DP. Cultural adaptation of a quality-of-life measure for urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 1999;36:427-435.
9. Badia Llach X, Castro Diaz D, Conejero Sugranes J. Validity of the King's Health questionnaire in the assessment of quality of life of patients with urinary incontinence. The King's Group (in Spanish). Med Clin (Barc) 2000;114:647-652.
10. Brislin R, Lonner W, Thorndike R. Questionnaire wording and translation. Cross-cultural research methods. New York: Wiley, 1973:32-58.
11. Jones PS, Lee JW, Phillips LR, Zhang XE, Jaceldo KB. An adaptation of Brislin's translation model for cross-cultural research. Nurs Res 2001;50:300-304.
12. Diaz-Loving R. Contributions of Mexican ethnopsychology to the resolution of the etic-emic dilemma in personality. J Cross-Cult Psychol 1998;29:104-118.
13. Levenstein S, Li Z, Almer S, Barbosa A, Marquis P, Moser G, Sperber AD, Toner B, Drossman D. Cross-cultural variation in disease-related concerns among patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:1822-1830.
14. Bontempo R. Translation fidelity of psychological scales: an item response theory analysis of an individualism-collectivism scale. J Cross-Cult Psychol 1993;24:149-166.
15. Sperber AD, DeVellis RF, Boehlecke B. Cross-cultural translation: methodology and validation. J Cross-Cult Psychol 1994;25:501-524.