Pitfalls in using electrophysiological studies to diagnose neuromuscular disorders

Journal of Clinical Neurology (Korea)

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-14

  Koo, Yong Seo ^a,b   Cho, Charles S ^c   Kim, Byung Jo ^a  

^a Korea University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Jeju Medical Center of Jeju Special Self Governing Province   (South Korea)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Electrodiagnostic study; Electromyography; Nerve conduction study; Neuromuscular disorders; Pitfalls

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930483882     PISSN: 17386586     EISSN: 20055013     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3988/jcn.2012.8.1.1     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. Dumitru D, Zwartz MJ. Electrodiagnostic medicine pitfalls. In: Dumitru D, Amato AA, Zwarts M. Electrodiagnostic Medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus, 2001;541-577.
2. Goldfarb AR, Saadeh PB, Sander HW. Effect of amplifier gain setting on distal motor latency in normal subjects and CTS patients. Clin Neurophysiol 2005;116:1581-1584.
3. Dumitru D, Zwartz MJ. Instrumentation. In: Dumitru D, Amato AA, Zwarts M. Electrodiagnostic Medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus, 2001;69-97.
4. Dumitru D, Walsh NE. Practical instrumentation and common sources of error. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1988;67:55-65.
5. Oh SJ. Basic components of electromyography instruments. In: Oh SJ. Clinical Electromyography: Nerve Conduction Studies. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002;25-36.
6. van Dijk JG, Tjon-a-Tsien A, van der Kamp W. CMAP variability as a function of electrode site and size. Muscle Nerve 1995;18:68-73.
7. Lee EJ, Baek DH, Baek JY, Kim BJ, Choi J, Pak JJ, et al. PDMS-and silver-ball-based flexible multichannel surface electrode: fabrication and application in nerve conduction study on patients with diabetic polyneuropathy. IEEE Sens J 2009;9:625-632.
8. Ven AA, Van Hees JG, Stappaerts KH. Effect of size and pressure of surface recording electrodes on amplitude of sensory nerve action potentials. Muscle Nerve 2004;30:234-238.
9. Drenthen J, Blok JH, van Heel EB, Visser GH. Limb temperature and nerve conduction velocity during warming with hot water blankets. J Clin Neurophysiol 2008;25:104-110.
10. Dumitru D, Amato AA, Zwartz MJ. Nerve conduction studies. In: Dumitru D, Amato AA, Zwarts M. Electrodiagnostic Medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus, 2001;159-223.
11. Eduardo E, Burke D. The optimal recording electrode configuration for compound sensory action potentials. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1988;51:684-687.
12. Lee HJ, DeLisa JA, Bach JR. Physiologic considerations in the determination of optimum interelectrode distance for the antidromic recording of compound sensory nerve action potentials. Commentary. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1993;72:99-100.
13. Oh SJ. Nerve conduction techniques. In: Oh SJ. Clinical Electromyography: Nerve Conduction Studies. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002;37-53.
14. Varghese G, Rogoff JB. Influence of inter-electrode distance on antidromic sensory potentials. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983;23: 297-301.
15. Evanoff V Jr, Buschbacher RM. Optimal interelectrode distance in sensory and mixed compound nerve action potentials: 3-versus 4-centimeter bar electrodes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:405-408.
16. Brashear A, Kincaid JC. The influence of the reference electrode on CMAP configuration: leg nerve observations and an alternative reference site. Muscle Nerve 1996;19:63-67.
17. Kincaid JC, Brashear A, Markand ON. The influence of the reference electrode on CMAP configuration. Muscle Nerve 1993;16:392-396.
18. Nandedkar SD, Barkhaus PE. Contribution of reference electrode to the compound muscle action potential. Muscle Nerve 2007;36:87-92.
19. Kim BJ, Date ES, Lee SH, Yoon JS, Hur SY, Kim SJ. Distance measure error induced by displacement of the ulnar nerve when the elbow is flexed. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:809-812.
20. Okamoto M, Abe M, Shirai H, Ueda N. Morphology and dynamics of the ulnar nerve in the cubital tunnel. Observation by ultrasonography. J Hand Surg Br 2000;25:85-89.
21. Childress HM. Recurrent ulnar-nerve dislocation at the elbow. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1975:168-173.
22. Grevsten S, Lindsjö U, Olerud S. Recurrent ulnar nerve dislocation at the elbow. Report of a non-traumatic case with ulnar entrapment neuropathy. Acta Orthop Scand 1978;49:151-153.
23. Jacobson JA, Jebson PJ, Jeffers AW, Fessell DP, Hayes CW. Ulnar nerve dislocation and snapping triceps syndrome: diagnosis with dynamic sonography--report of three cases. Radiology 2001;220:601-605.
24. Kim BJ, Koh SB, Park KW, Kim SJ, Yoon JS. Pearls & Oy-sters: false positives in short-segment nerve conduction studies due to ulnar nerve dislocation. Neurology 2008;70:e9-e13.
25. Kim BJ, Date ES, Park BK, Choi BY, Lee SH. Physiologic changes of compound muscle action potentials related to voluntary contraction and muscle length in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2005;15:275-281.
26. Mori I, Hasegawa O. [Effect of posture and postural fixation in repetitive nerve stimulation test]. No To Shinkei 1999;51:867-870.
27. Kornfield MJ, Cerra J, Simons DG. Stimulus artifact reduction in nerve conduction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985;66:232-235.
28. Tracey BH, Krishnamachari S. Automated removal of stimulus artifact in nerve conduction studies. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2006;1:6360-6363.
29. Dreyer SJ, Dumitru D, King JC. Anodal block V anodal stimulation. Fact or fiction. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1993;72:10-18.
30. Aprile I, Stålberg E, Tonali P, Padua L. Double peak sensory responses at submaximal stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2003;114:256-262.
31. Yasunami T, Miyawaki Y, Kitano K, Okuno H. Shortening of distal motor latency in anode distal stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2005; 116:1355-1361.
32. Aprile I, Tonali P, Stalberg E, Di Stasio E, Caliandro P, Foschini M, et al. Double peak sensory responses: effects of capsaicin. Neurol Sci 2007;28:264-269.
33. Dumitru D, Zwartz MJ. Special nerve conduction techniques. In: Dumitru D, Amato AA, Zwarts M. Electrodiagnostic Medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus, 2001;225-256.
34. Zehr EP. Considerations for use of the Hoffmann reflex in exercise studies. Eur J Appl Physiol 2002;86:455-468.
35. Knikou M. The H-reflex as a probe: pathways and pitfalls. J Neurosci Methods 2008;171:1-12.
36. Somjen G, Carpenter DO, Henneman E. Responses of motoneurons of different sizes to graded stimulation of supraspinal centers of the brain. J Neurophysiol 1965;28:958-965.
37. Henneman E, Somjen G, Carpenter DO. Excitability and inhibitability of motoneurons of different sizes. J Neurophysiol 1965;28:599-620.
38. Awiszus F, Feistner H. The relationship between estimates of Ia-EPSP amplitude and conduction velocity in human soleus motoneurons. Exp Brain Res 1993;95:365-370.
39. Hale BS, Raglin JS, Koceja DM. Effect of mental imagery of a motor task on the Hoffmann reflex. Behav Brain Res 2003;142:81-87.
40. Kiers L, Fernando B, Tomkins D. Facilitatory effect of thinking about movement on magnetic motor-evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997;105:262-268.
41. Takahashi N, Takahashi O, Ogawa S, Takahashi M. What is the origin of the premotor potential recorded from the second lumbrical? Muscle Nerve 2006;34:779-781.
42. Johnsen B, Fuglsang-Frederiksen A, de Carvalho M, Labarre-Vila A, Nix W, Schofield I. Amplitude, area and duration of the compound muscle action potential change in different ways over the length of the ulnar nerve. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117:2085-2092.
43. Colachis SC 3rd, Klejka JP, Shamir DY, Pease WS, Johnson EW. Amplitude of M responses. Side to side comparability. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1993;72:19-22.
44. Tong HC, Werner RA, Franzblau A. Effect of aging on sensory nerve conduction study parameters. Muscle Nerve 2004;29:716-720.
45. Shehab DK, Khuraibet AJ, Butinar D, Abraham MP, Jabre JF. Effect of gender on orthodromic sensory nerve action potential amplitude. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:718-720.
46. Fujimaki Y, Kuwabara S, Sato Y, Isose S, Shibuya K, Sekiguchi Y, et al. The effects of age, gender, and body mass index on amplitude of sensory nerve action potentials: multivariate analyses. Clin Neurophysiol 2009;120:1683-1686.
47. Lacomis D. Small-fiber neuropathy. Muscle Nerve 2002;26:173-188.
48. Vetrugno R, Liguori R, Cortelli P, Montagna P. Sympathetic skin response: basic mechanisms and clinical applications. Clin Auton Res 2003;13:256-270.
49. Tobin K, Giuliani MJ, Lacomis D. Comparison of different modalities for detection of small fiber neuropathy. Clin Neurophysiol 1999;110:1909-1912.
50. Rossi P, Serrao M, Amabile G, Parisi L, Pierelli F, Pozzessere G. A simple method for estimating conduction velocity of the spinothalamic tract in healthy humans. Clin Neurophysiol 2000;111:1907-1915.
51. Low PA. Testing the autonomic nervous system. Semin Neurol 2003; 23:407-421.
52. Floeter MK. Cutaneous silent periods. Muscle Nerve 2003;28:391-401.
53. Kim BJ, Kim NH, Kim SG, Roh H, Park HR, Park MH, et al. Utility of the cutaneous silent period in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Neurol Sci 2010;293:1-5.
54. Vroomen PC, de Krom MC, Knottnerus JA. Diagnostic value of history and physical examination in patients suspected of sciatica due to disc herniation: a systematic review. J Neurol 1999;246:899-906.
55. Vroomen PC, de Krom MC, Knottnerus JA. Consistency of history taking and physical examination in patients with suspected lumbar nerve root involvement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:91-96; discussion 97.
56. Coster S, de Bruijn SF, Tavy DL. Diagnostic value of history, physical examination and needle electromyography in diagnosing lumbosacral radiculopathy. Neurol 2010;257:332-337.
57. Suri P, Rainville J, Katz JN, Jouve C, Hartigan C, Limke J, et al. The accuracy of the physical examination for the diagnosis of midlumbar and low lumbar nerve root impingement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:63-73.
58. van der Windt DA, Simons E, Riphagen II, Ammendolia C, Verhagen AP, Laslett M, et al. Physical examination for lumbar radiculopathy due to disc herniation in patients with low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010:CD007431.
59. Tong HC, Haig AJ, Yamakawa KS, Miner JA. Specificity of needle electromyography for lumbar radiculopathy and plexopathy in 55-to 79-year-old asymptomatic subjects. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2006;85: 908-912; quiz 913-915, 934.
60. Daube JR, Rubin DI. Needle electromyography. Muscle Nerve 2009; 39:244-270.
61. Kim BJ, Date ES, Derby R, Lee SH, Seo KS, Oh KJ, et al. Electromyographic technique for lumbar multifidus examination: comparison of previous techniques used to localize the multifidus. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1325-1329.
62. Haig AJ, Moffroid M, Henry S, Haugh L, Pope M. A technique for needle localization in paraspinal muscles with cadaveric confirmation. Muscle Nerve 1991;14:521-526.
63. Stein J, Baker E, Pine ZM. Medial paraspinal muscle electromyography: techniques of examination. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74: 497-500.
64. Nardin RA, Raynor EM, Rutkove SB. Fibrillations in lumbosacral paraspinal muscles of normal subjects. Muscle Nerve 1998;21:1347-1349.
65. Date ES, Mar EY, Bugola MR, Teraoka JK. The prevalence of lumbar paraspinal spontaneous activity in asymptomatic subjects. Muscle Nerve 1996;19:350-354.
66. Date ES, Kim BJ, Yoon JS, Park BK. Cervical paraspinal spontaneous activity in asymptomatic subjects. Muscle Nerve 2006;34:361-364.
67. Dumitru D, Diaz CA, King JC. Prevalence of denervation in paraspinal and foot intrinsic musculature. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80: 482-490.
68. Dumitru D. Physiologic basis of potentials recorded in electromyography. Muscle Nerve 2000;23:1667-1685.
69. Haig AJ. Paraspinal denervation and the spinal degenerative cascade. Spine J 2002;2:372-380.
70. Date ES, Kim BJ. Cervical and thoracic radiculopathies. In: Kimura J. Peripheral Nerve Diseases: Handbook of Clinical Neurophysiology. 1st ed. Vol 7. New York: Elsevier, 2006;601-612.
71. Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, Lauder TD. Cervical paraspinal muscle abnormalities and symptom duration: a multivariate analysis. Muscle Nerve 1998;21:640-642.
72. Pezzin LE, Dillingham TR, Lauder TD, Andary M, Kumar S, Stephens RR, et al. Cervical radiculopathies: relationship between symptom duration and spontaneous EMG activity. Muscle Nerve 1999;22: 1412-1418.
73. Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, Lauder TD. Relationship between muscle abnormalities and symptom duration in lumbosacral radiculopathies. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1998;77:103-107.
74. Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, Lauder TD, Andary M, Kumar S, Stephens RT, et al. Symptom duration and spontaneous activity in lumbosacral radiculopathy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2000;79:124-132.
75. Srinivasan R, Rhodes J. The median-ulnar anastomosis (Martin-Gruber) in normal and congenitally abnormal fetuses. Arch Neurol 1981; 38:418-419.
76. Rodriguez-Niedenführ M, Vazquez T, Parkin I, Logan B, Sañudo JR. Martin-Gruber anastomosis revisited. Clin Anat 2002;15:129-134.
77. Rodriguez-Niedenführ M, Vazquez T, Ferreira B, Parkin I, Nearn L, Sañudo JR. Intramuscular Martin-Gruber anastomosis. Clin Anat 2002;15:135-138.
78. Lee KS, Oh CS, Chung IH, Sunwoo IN. An anatomic study of the Martin-Gruber anastomosis: electrodiagnostic implications. Muscle Nerve 2005;31:95-97.
79. Leibovic SJ, Hastings H 2nd. Martin-Gruber revisited. J Hand Surg Am 1992;17:47-53.
80. Amoiridis G, Vlachonikolis IG. Verification of the median-to-ulnar and ulnar-to-median nerve motor fiber anastomosis in the forearm: an electrophysiological study. Clin Neurophysiol 2003;114:94-98.
81. Lee SA, Kim KK, Lee MC, Sunwoo IN, Kim KW. The electrodiagnostic findings in Martin-Gruber anastomosis. J Korean Neurol Assoc 1994;12:87-91.
82. Amoiridis G. Median--ulnar nerve communications and anomalous innervation of the intrinsic hand muscles: an electrophysiological study. Muscle Nerve 1992;15:576-579.
83. Kimura J. Collision technique. Physiologic block of nerve impulses in studies of motor nerve conduction velocity. Neurology 1976;26:680-682.
84. Amoiridis G, Schöls L, Przuntek H, Wöhrle J. Collision technique in Martin-Gruber anastomosis. Muscle Nerve 1998;21:1354-1356.
85. Amoiridis G. Fact and fallacy in electrophysiological studies of anomalous innervation patterns of the intrinsic hand muscles. Muscle Nerve 1994;17:245-247.
86. Rubin DI, Dimberg EL. Martin-Gruber anastomosis and carpal tunnel syndrome: [corrected] morphologic clues to identification. Muscle Nerve 2010;42:457-458.
87. Marras C, Midroni G. Proximal Martin-Gruber anastomosis mimicking ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Muscle Nerve 1999;22:1132-1135.
88. Whitaker CH, Felice KJ. Apparent conduction block in patients with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow and proximal Martin-Gruber anastomosis. Muscle Nerve 2004;30:808-811.
89. Leis AA, Stetkarova I, Wells KJ. Martin-Gruber anastomosis with anomalous superficial radial innervation to ulnar dorsum of hand: a pitfall when common variants coexist. Muscle Nerve 2010;41:313-317.
90. Simonetti S. Electrophysiological study of forearm sensory fiber crossover in Martin-Gruber anastomosis. Muscle Nerve 2001;24: 380-386.
91. Meenakshi-Sundaram S, Sundar B, Arunkumar MJ. Marinacci communication: an electrophysiological study. Clin Neurophysiol 2003; 114:2334-2337.
92. Harness D, Sekeles E. The double anastomotic innervation of thenar muscles. J Anat 1971;109(Pt 3):461-466.
93. Boland RA, Krishnan AV, Kiernan MC. Riche-Cannieu anastomosis as an inherited trait. Clin Neurophysiol 2007;118:770-775.
94. Kim BJ, Date ES, Lee SH, Lau EW, Park MK. Unilateral all ulnar hand including sensory without forearm communication. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2004;83:569-573.
95. Kudoh H, Sakai T, Horiguchi M. The consistent presence of the human accessory deep peroneal nerve. J Anat 1999;194(Pt 1):101-108.
96. Lambert EH. The accessory deep peroneal nerve. A common variation in innervation of extensor digitorum brevis. Neurology 1969;19: 1169-1176.
97. Murad H, Neal P, Katirji B. Total innervation of the extensor digitorum brevis by the accessory deep peroneal nerve. Eur J Neurol 1999; 6:371-373.
98. Neundörfer B, Seiberth R. The accessory deep peroneal nerve. J Neurol 1975;209:125-129.
99. Owsiak S, Kostera-Pruszczyk A, Rowińska-Marcińska K. Accessory deep peroneal nerve-a clinically significant anomaly? Neurol Neurochir Pol 2008;42:112-115.
100. Crutchfield CA, Gutmann L. Hereditary aspects of accessory deep peroneal nerve. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1973;36:989-990.
101. Sander HW, Quinto C, Chokroverty S. Accessory deep peroneal neuropathy: collision technique diagnosis. Muscle Nerve 1998;21:121-123.
102. Kayal R, Katirji B. Atypical deep peroneal neuropathy in the setting of an accessory deep peroneal nerve. Muscle Nerve 2009;40:313-315.
103. Linden D, Berlit P. The intrinsic foot muscles are purely innervated by the tibial nerve ("all tibial foot")--an unusual innervation anomaly. Muscle Nerve 1994;17:560-561.
104. Lee SY, Yoon SR, Choi IS, Lee SG, Rowe SM. Extensor digitorum brevis innervated by the tibial nerve (all tibial foot): a case report. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 2000;24:1223-1228.
105. Amoiridis G, Schöls L, Meves S, Przuntek H. Fact and fallacy in clinical and electrophysiological studies of anomalous innervation of the intrinsic foot muscles. Muscle Nerve 1996;19:1227-1229.